Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Predictors of moving on from mental health supported accommodation in England: national cohort study

  • Helen Killaspy (a1), Stefan Priebe (a2), Peter McPherson (a3), Zohra Zenasni (a4), Lauren Greenberg (a4), Paul McCrone (a5), Sarah Dowling (a6), Isobel Harrison (a3), Joanna Krotofil (a3), Christian Dalton-Locke (a7), Rose McGranahan (a8), Maurice Arbuthnott (a9), Sarah Curtis (a10), Gerard Leavey (a11), Geoff Shepherd (a12), Sandra Eldridge (a13) and Michael King (a14)...

Abstract

Background

Around 60 000 people in England live in mental health supported accommodation. There are three main types: residential care, supported housing and floating outreach. Supported housing and floating outreach aim to support service users in moving on to more independent accommodation within 2 years, but there has been little research investigating their effectiveness.

Aims

A 30-month prospective cohort study investigating outcomes for users of mental health supported accommodation.

Method

We used random sampling, accounting for relevant geographical variation factors, to recruit 87 services (22 residential care, 35 supported housing and 30 floating outreach) and 619 service users (residential care 159, supported housing 251, floating outreach 209) across England. We contacted services every 3 months to investigate the proportion of service users who successfully moved on to more independent accommodation. Multilevel modelling was used to estimate how much of the outcome and cost variations were due to service type and quality, after accounting for service-user characteristics.

Results

Overall 243/586 participants successfully moved on (residential care 15/146, supported housing 96/244, floating outreach 132/196). This was most likely for floating outreach service users (versus residential care: odds ratio 7.96, 95% CI 2.92–21.69, P < 0.001; versus supported housing: odds ratio 2.74, 95% CI 1.01–7.41, P < 0.001) and was associated with reduced costs of care and two aspects of service quality: promotion of human rights and recovery-based practice.

Conclusions

Most people do not move on from supported accommodation within the expected time frame. Greater focus on human rights and recovery-based practice may increase service effectiveness.

Declaration of interest

H.K., S.P., M.K., S.E., P. McCrone, M.A., S.C., G.L. and G.S. report a grant from National Institute of Health Research during the conduct of the study. All other authors report having no conflicts to disclose.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Predictors of moving on from mental health supported accommodation in England: national cohort study
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Predictors of moving on from mental health supported accommodation in England: national cohort study
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Predictors of moving on from mental health supported accommodation in England: national cohort study
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Professor Helen Killaspy, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7NF, UK. Email: h.killaspy@ucl.ac.uk

References

Hide All
1National Statistics. Community Care Statistics, Supported Residents (Adults). National Statistics, 2006.
2Department of Community and Local Government. Research Into the Effectiveness of Floating Support Services for the Supporting People Programme. Final Report. Department of Community and Local Government, 2006.
3Mcpherson, P, Krotofil, J, Killaspy, H. Mental health supported accommodation services: a systematic review of mental health and psychosocial outcomes. BMC Psychiatry 2018; 18: 128.
4Krotofil, J, Mcpherson, P, Killaspy, H. Service user experiences of specialist mental health supported accommodation: a systematic review of qualitative studies and narrative synthesis. Heal Soc Care Commun 2018; 26: 787800.
5Chilvers, R, Macdonald, GM, Hayes, A. Supportive housing for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 4: CD000453.
6Stergiopoulos, V, Gozdzik, A, Misir, V, Skosireva, A, Connelly, J, Sarang, A, et al. Effectiveness of using first with intensive case management in an ethnically diverse sample of homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0130281.
7Killaspy, H, White, S, Dowling, S, Krotofil, J, McPherson, P, Sandhu, S, et al. Adaptation of the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) for use in mental health supported accommodation services (QuIRC-SA). BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16: 101.
8Killaspy, H, Priebe, S, Bremner, S, McCrone, P, Dowling, S, Harrison, I, et al. Quality of life, autonomy, satisfaction, and costs associated with mental health supported accommodation services in England: a national survey. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3: 1129–37.
9Sandhu, S, Priebe, S, Leavey, G, Krotofil, J, Harrison, I, McPherson, P, et al. Intentions and Experiences of Effective Practice in Mental Health Specific Supported Accommodation Services: A Qualitative Interview Study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 471.
10Priebe, S, Saidi, M, Kennedy, J, Glover, G. How to select representative geographical areas in mental health service research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2008; 43: 1004–7.
11Leff, J, Szmidla, A. Evaluation of a special rehabilitation programme for patients who are difficult to place. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002; 37: 532–6.
12Slade, M, Phelan, M, Thornicroft, G, Parkman, S. The Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN): comparison of assessments by staff and patients of the needs of the severely mentally ill. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1996; 31: 109–13.
13Drake, RE, Mueser, KT, McHugo, GJ. Clinician rating scales: Alcohol Use Scale (AUS), Drug Use Scale, (DUS) and Substance Abuse Treatment Scale (SATS). In Outcomes Assess. Clin. Pract. (eds Sederer, LI, Dickey, B). Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
14Parker, G, Rosen, A, Emdur, N, Hadzi-Pavlov, D. The Life Skills Profile: psychometric properties of a measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991; 83: 145–52.
15Priebe, S, Huxley, P, Knight, S, Evans, S. Application and results of the Manchester short assessment of quality of life (Mansa). Int J Soc Psychiatry 1999; 45: 712.
16Hatton, C, Emerson, E, Robertson, J, Gregory, N, Kessissoglou, S, Walsh, PN. The Resident Choice Scale: a measure to assess opportunities for self-determination in residential settings. J Intellect Disabil Res 2004; 48: 103–13.
17Sandhu, S, Killaspy, H, Krotofil, J, McPherson, P, Harrison, I, Dowling, S, et al. Development and psychometric properties of the client's assessment of treatment scale for supported accommodation (CAT-SA). BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16: 43.
18Beecham, J, Knapp, M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In Measuring Mental Health Needs (2nd edn, ed Thornicroft, G): 524. Gaskell, 2001.
19StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. StataCorp LP, 2011.
20Killaspy, H, Marston, L, Green, N, Harrison, I, Lean, M, Holloway, F, et al. Clinical outcomes and costs for people with complex psychosis; a naturalistic prospective cohort study of mental health rehabilitation service-users in England. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16: 95.
21Austin, P. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46: 399424.
22Tanzman, B. An overview of surveys of mental health consumers’ preferences for housing and support services. Psychiatr Serv 1993; 44: 450–5.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Predictors of moving on from mental health supported accommodation in England: national cohort study

  • Helen Killaspy (a1), Stefan Priebe (a2), Peter McPherson (a3), Zohra Zenasni (a4), Lauren Greenberg (a4), Paul McCrone (a5), Sarah Dowling (a6), Isobel Harrison (a3), Joanna Krotofil (a3), Christian Dalton-Locke (a7), Rose McGranahan (a8), Maurice Arbuthnott (a9), Sarah Curtis (a10), Gerard Leavey (a11), Geoff Shepherd (a12), Sandra Eldridge (a13) and Michael King (a14)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *