(¹) Wundt, W., Eléments de psychologie physiologique, trad. Rouvier, E., Paris, 1886, Vol. 2, p. 231.Google Scholar

(²) Titchener, E.B., Manuel de Psychologie, Paris, 1922, p. 369.Google Scholar

(³) Watson, , d'après Pieron, H., Vocabulaire de la psychologie, Paris, 1951–1953, p. 34.Google Scholar

(⁴) Pieron, H., op. cit., p. 208.Google Scholar

(⁵) Bruner, J.S. and Postman, L., An Approach to Social Perception, in Current Trends in Social Psychology, Pittsburgh, 1948, p. 85:Google Scholar « Perception, then, is seen as a compromise between what the organism is given to see… and what the organism is set to see or wants to see or, even, what the organism wants to avoid seeing.»

(⁶) Bruner, J.S. and Goodman, C.C., Value and Need as Organizing Factors in Perception, in The Journ. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 42, 1947, pp. 33 et sv.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

(⁷) Krech, D. et Crutchfield, R.S., Théorie et problèmes de psychologie sociale, trad, par Lesage, H., Paris, 1952, p. 108 et sv.Google Scholar

(⁸) Luchins, A.S., On an Approach to Social Perception, Journ. of Personality, vol. 19, 1950–1951, pp. 64 et sv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luchins, A.S., An Evaluation of some Current Criticisms of Gestalt Psychological Work on Perception, Psychological Review, vol. 58, 1951, pp. 69 et sv.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

(⁹) Bruner, J.S., Personality Dynamics and the Process of Perceiving in Blake, R.R. and Ramsey, G. V., Perception, an Approach to Personality, New-York, 1951, pp. 121 et sv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(¹⁰) Fraisse, P., La perception comme processus d'adaptation : l'évolution et les recherches récentes, Année psychologique, 1953, n° 53, p. 457.Google Scholar

(¹¹) Fraisse, P., Op. cit., p. 455.Google Scholar

(¹²) Thurstone, L.L., A Factorial Study of Perception, Chicago, 1944, p. 3:Google Scholar « In these days when we insist so frequently on the interdependence of all aspects of personality, it would be difficult to maintain that any of these functions, such as perception, is isolated from the rest of the dynamical system that constitutes the person ».

(¹³) Fraisse, P., Op. cit., p. 458.Google Scholar

(¹⁴) Macleod, R., The Place of Phenomenological Analysis in Social Psychological Theory, in Social Psychology at the Crossroads, edited by Rohrer, J.H. and Sherif, M., New-York, 1951, p. 215 et sv.Google Scholar

(¹⁵) Bruner, J.S., One Kind of Perception: A Reply to Prof. Luchins, Psychological Review, vol. 58, 1951, pp. 306 et sv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(¹⁶) Klein, G.S. and Schlesinger, H., Where is the Perceiver in Perceptual Theory? Journal of Personality, vol. 18, 1949–1950, p. 32 et sv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(¹⁷) Krech, D. et Crutchfield, R.S., Op. cit., p. 113.Google Scholar

(¹⁸) Nbwcomb, T.M., Social Psychology, New-York, 1950, pp. 88 et sv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(¹⁹) Dennis, W., Cultural and Developmental Factors in Perception, Blake, R.R. and Ramsey, G.V., Perception, pp. 148 et sv.Google Scholar

(²⁰) Mcginnies, E. and Bowles, W., Personal Values as Determinants of Perceptual Fixation, Journ. of Personality, vol. 18, 1949–1950, pp. 224 et sv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(²¹) Piaget, J., Position du problème et hypotheses, La Perception, Symposium de l'Association de psychologie scientifique de langue française, Louvain, 1953, Paris, 1955, p. 18.Google Scholar

(²²) Pieron, H., Le maniement de la perception, in Traité de psychologie appliquée, Livre V, Le maniement humain, Paris, 1956, p. 962.Google Scholar

(²³) Benedict, R., Echantillons de civilisations, trad, de l'anglais par Weil, R., Paris, 5e éd., 1950, p. 63.Google Scholar

(²⁴) Murphy, G., Knowns and Unknowns in the Dynamics of Social Perception, in Group Relations at the Crossroads ed. by Sherif, M. and Wilson, M.O., New-York, 1953, p. 139 et sv.Google Scholar

(²⁵) Newcomb, T.M., Op. cit., p. 210 et sv.Google Scholar

(²⁶) Ibidem, p. 96 : « because many social situations may be variously perceived, particularly on the part of people who come from different cultural backgrounds.»

(²⁷) Schonbar, R.A., The Interaction of Observer-Pairs in Judging Visual Extent and Movement, Archives of Psychology, n° 299, 1945, p. 7:Google Scholar « Thus the frame of reference against which the individual forms his judgments is composed of the norms he develops merely as a result of the combined social heritage passed on to him by his family, his church, his school, his tribe, his country, or any of the subgroups with which he identifies… These norms influence the closely related processes of perception, memory and judgment.»

(²⁸) Schonbar, R.A., Op. cit., p. 7.Google Scholar

(²⁹) Sherif, M. and Cantril, H., The Psychology of Ego-Involvements, New-York, 1947, p. 52 et sv.Google Scholar

(³⁰) Newcomb, T.M., Op. cit., p. 273:Google Scholar «The total pattern of activities which go to make up an institution, together with the sanctions by which they are enforced, is perceived in a shared frame of reference. And the institution as a whole comes to serve as a norm by which behaviors relevant to it are perceived and judged.»

(³¹) Krech, D. et Crutchfield, R.S., Op. cit., p. 133.Google Scholar

(³²) Sherif, M. and Cantril, H., Op. cit., p. 34 et sv.Google Scholar

(³³) Frank, L.K., cité par Blake, R.R. and Ramsey, G.V., Perception, p. 15:Google Scholar «In every culture the individual is of necessity ‘cribbed, cabinned, and confined’ within the limitations of what his culture tells him to see, to believe, to do, and to feel…» ( Frank, L.K., Society as the Patient, New Brunswick, 1949).Google Scholar

(³⁴) Blondel, Ch., Introduction à la psychologie collective, Paris, 1928, p. 117.Google Scholar

(³⁵) Mead, M., Coming of Age in Samoa, New-York, 1949.Google Scholar

(³⁶) Gibson, J.J., Social Perception, and the Psychology of Perceptual Learning, in Group Relations at the Crossroads ed. by Sherif, M. and Wilson, M.O., New-York, 1953, p. 120 et sv.Google Scholar

(³⁷) Pieron, H., Le maniement de la perception, in Traité de psychologie appliquée, Livre V, Le maniement humain, Paris, 1956, p. 959 et sv.Google Scholar

(³⁸) Krech, D. et Crutchfield, R.S., Op. cit., chap. IV, p. 144.Google Scholar

(³⁹) Hallowell, A.I., Cultural Factors in the Structuralization of Perception, in Social Psychology at the Crossroads ed. by Rohrer, J.H. and Sherif, M., New-York, 1951, pp. 164 et sv.Google Scholar

(⁴⁰) Seligman, C.G., The Vision of the Natives of British Guinea. In Report of the Cambridge anthropological expedition to Torres straits, Cambridge, 1901, vol. 2,Google Scholar cité par Dennis, W., Cultural and Developmental Factors in Perception in Blake, R.R. and Ramsey, G.V., Perception, New-York, 1951, p. 151.Google Scholar

(⁴¹) Krech, D. et Crutchfield, R.S., Op. cit., p. 122.Google Scholar

(⁴²) Strauss, A., cité par Sherif, M., A Glance at Group Relations at the Crossroads: Introduction in Group Relations at the Crossroads, New-York, 1953, p. 9.Google Scholar

(⁴³) Montpellier, G.de, Conduites intelligentes et psychiques, Louvain, 1946, p. 318.Google Scholar

(⁴⁴) Chocholle, R. Discussion in La Perception, Symposium, op. cit., Paris, 1955, p. 73.Google Scholar

(⁴⁵) Merleau-PONTY, M., Phénoménologie de la perception, Paris, 3e éd., 1945, p. 207.Google Scholar

(⁴⁶) Montpellier, G. de, Op. cit., p. 318.Google Scholar

(⁴⁷) Gibson, J.J., Social Perception and the Psychology of Perceptual Learning, in Group Relations at the Crossroads, New-York, 1953, pp. 120 et sv.Google Scholar

(⁴⁸) Berck, A.MICHOTTE van den, Perception et Cognition, XIVe Congrès international de Psychologie in Acta Psychologica, vol. 11, 1955, p. 72.Google Scholar

(⁴⁹) Merleau-PONTY, M., Op. cit., p. 218.Google Scholar

(⁵⁰) Blondel, Ch., Op. cit., p. 117.Google Scholar

(⁵¹) Halbwachs, M., Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire, Paris, 1935, p. 371.Google Scholar

(⁵²) Chocholle, R., Op. cit., p. 74.Google Scholar

(⁵³) Kohler, W. cité par Α. Hallowell, I., Cultural Factors in the Structuralization of Perception in Social Psychology at the Crossroads, p. 172:Google Scholar «… Gradually they have become aspects of the world as we perceive it; the world looks today what our forefathers learned to say about it ; » (Amer. J. Psych., vol. 50, 1937, p. 274).

(⁵⁴) Newcomb, T.M., Op. cit., p. 414.Google Scholar

(⁵⁵) Sapir, E., cité par Hallowell, A.I., Cultural Factors in the Struc-turalization of Perception, in Social Psychology at the Crossroads, p. 171:Google Scholar «… Even comparatively simple acts of perception are very much more at the mercy of the social patterns called words than we might suppose…» (The Status of Linguistics as a Science, Language, Vol. 5 (1929), pp. 209-210, Reprinted in Selected Writings… 1949.)

(⁵⁶) Hallowell, A.I., Cultural Factors in the Structuralization of Perception, in Social Psychology at the Crossroads, p. 171.Google Scholar

(⁵⁷) Krech, D. et Crutchfield, R.S., Op. cit., pp. 113 à 116.Google Scholar

(⁵⁸) Bruner, J.S. and Postman, L., An Approach to Social Perception, in Current Trends in Social Psychology, Pittsburgh, 1948, p. 98.Google Scholar

(⁵⁹) Bruner, J.S. and Postman, L., Perception, Cognition, and Behavior, Journal of Personality, vol. 18, 1949–1950, p. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(⁶⁰) Preron, H., Vocabulaire de psychologie, Paris, 1951–1953.Google Scholar

(⁶¹) Lalande, A., Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie, Paris, 1938, vol. 2, p. 937.Google Scholar

(⁶²) Bruner, J.S. and Postman, L., Symbolic Value as Organizing Factors in Perception, Journ. of Social Psychology, 1948, n 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(⁶³) Cantril, H., The Psychology of Social Movements, New-York, 1944, chapitre I, p. 3 et sv.Google Scholar

(⁶⁴) Ansbacher, H., Perception of Number as Affected by the Monetary Value of the Objects, Archives of Psychology, no. 215, 1937, p. 36 et sv.Google Scholar

(⁶⁵) Bruner, J.S. and Goodman, C.C., Value and Need as Organizing Factors in Perception, The Journ. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 42, 1947, pp. 33 et sv.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

(⁶⁶) Bruner, J.S. and Postman, L., An Approach to Social Perception in Current Trends in Social Psychology, Pittsburgh, 1948, p. 71 et sv.Google Scholar

(⁶⁷) Klein, G.S. and Schlesinger, H., Op. cit., pp. 32-47.Google Scholar

(⁶⁸) Luchins, A.S., On an Approach to Social Perception, Journ. of Personality, vol. 19, 1950–1951, p. 64 et sv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(⁶⁹) Carter, L.F. and Schooler, K., Value, Need, and other Factors in Perception, Psychological Review, vol. 56, 1949, pp. 200 et sv.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

(⁷⁰) Rosenthal, B.G., Attitude towards Money, Need, and Methods of Presentation as Determinants of Perception of Coins from six to ten Years of Age, Am. Psychologist, 1951, Vol. 6, n° 7, p. 317.Google Scholar

(⁷¹) Bruner, J.S. and Rodrigues, J.S., Some Determinants of Apparent Size, Journ. of Abnormal and Soc. Psychology, vol. 48, 1953, pp. 17 et sv.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

(⁷²) Dennis, W., Cultural and Developmental Factors in Perception, Blake, R.R. and Ramsey, G.V., Perception, p. 152:Google Scholar «We assume that the general citizen's perception of the world is affected by his church, his vocation, his party, his lodge, and his newspaper, but we have not taken the trouble to study these influences.»

(⁷³) Bruner, J.S. and Postman, L., An Approach to Social Perception, in Current Trends in Social Psychology, Pittsburgh, 1948, pp. 114:Google Scholar « There is a danger of repeating the error in pointing, on the one hand, to perception and, on the other, to social perception. Man cannot persist long in any of his activities without being influenced by society, without looking at his social world. All perception has a social component.°