Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:59:51.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hymenolepis diminuta: the role of the tail in determining the position of the worm in the intestine of the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. A. Hopkins  and
L. M. Allen
C. A. Hopkins
Affiliation:
Welcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH
L. M. Allen
Affiliation:
Welcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

One-worm infections of Hymenolepis diminuta in rats had their strobila severed surgically, in the neck region, on day 14 of an infection. The scolex and remaining strobila survived but were recovered from a more posterior region of the intestine where small worms are attached during development. The movement to the new region was usually not complete in 24 h, but was complete by 72 h, and probably by 48 h. The operation, involving laparotomy and an incision in the duodenal wall which avoided severing the strobila, had no effect on the position of the worm but did depress the growth of the worm during the ensuing 24 h. It is suggested that (1) the preferred site for H. diminuta is 30–50 % down the small intestine, (2) the worm monitors information about its position from all over its strobila and (3) as the worm grows, its position is determined by balancing the input of adverse information from its tail and head ends. The slowness with which surgically shortened worms return to the preferred site may be due either to delay in the worm ‘realising’ it has no tail, or to the location stimuli in the intestine being disturbed for 24 h by the operation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 401 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. N. A. (1971). Hymenolepis diminuta: circadian rhythm in movement and body length in the rat. Experimental Parasitology 29, 285–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bråten, T. & Hopkins, C. A. (1969). The migration of Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat's intestine during normal development and following surgical transplantation. Parasitology 59, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, C. E. & Mettrick, D. F. (1970). Changes in the distribution of Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea) within the rat intestine during prepatent development. Canadian Journal of Zoology 48, 761–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, A. C. (1939). The effects of number and age of worms on development of primary and secondary infections with Hymenolepis diminuta in rats, and an investigation into the true nature of ‘premunition’ in tapeworm infections. American Journal of Hygiene 29, 105–14.Google Scholar
Chappell, L. H., Arai, H. P., Dike, S. C. & Read, C. P. (1970). Circadian migration of Hymenolepis (Cestoda) in the intestine – I. Observations on H. diminuta in the rat. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 34, 31–46.Google Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. (1973). The sites occupied by some parasitic helminths in the alimentary tract of vertebrates. Biological Reviews 48, 27–83.Google Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. & Whitfield, P. J. (1968). A hypothesis to account for the anterior migrations of adult Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) and Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala) in the intestine of rats. Parasitology 58, 227–9.Google Scholar
Goodchild, C. G. (1958). Transfaunation and repair of damage in the rat tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 44, 345–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A. (1969). The influence of dietary methionine on the amino acid pool of Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat's intestine. Parasitology 59, 407–27.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. A. (1970 a). Diurnal movement of Hymenolepis diminuta in the rat. Parasitology 60, 255–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A. (1970 b). Location-specificity in adult tapeworms with special reference to Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 56 (Suppl.), 561–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, C. A. & Zajac, A. (1976). Transplantation of Hymenolepis diminuta into naive, immune and irradiated mice. Parasitology 73, 73–81.Google Scholar
Lumsden, R. D. (1975). Surface ultrastructure and cytochemistry of parasitic helminths. Experimental Parasitology 37, 267–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mettrick, D. F. & Podesta, R. B. (1974). Ecological and physiological aspects of helminth– host interactions in mammalian gastrointestinal canal. Advances in Parasitology 12, 183–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. & Kilejian, A. Z. (1969). Circadian migratory behaviour of a cestode symbiote in the rat host. Journal of Parasitology 55, 574–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed