Children with pediatric brain tumors (PBT) are at increased risk of psychosocial challenges (e.g., emotional distress, social difficulties), which in turn can result in functional impairment, or problems engaging appropriately across settings. These concerns have been shown to be especially pronounced in patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES), which tends to be overrepresented among ethnic minorities, such as Latino populations. On the other hand, resilience (the ability to utilize resources to alleviate stress and overcome adversity) can act as a protective factor against functional impairment. While resilience has been found to be lower among Latino survivors of pediatric cancer, little is known about the potential role of resilience in mitigating functional impairment among Latino patients with PBT. The authors hypothesized poorer resilience and increased functional impairment among Latino patients with PBT compared to normative expectations, in an attempt to explore need for additional support within this population.

42 Latino patients with PBT ages 2-20 (x=11.08 years, SD=5.24) completed neuropsychological evaluation between 2018 and 2022. The sample was split relatively equally in terms of sex (47.6% male, 52.4% female), tumor location (45.2% infratentorial, 54.8% supratentorial), and household language (47.6% predominantly English, 52.4% predominantly Spanish). Outcome variables included Resiliency and Functional Impairment content scales from the Behavior Assessment Scale for Children – Third Edition: Parent Rating Scales (BASC-3: PRS). Standardized T-scores (x=50; SD=10) were derived using age-appropriate normative data, with higher T-scores indicating better resiliency, yet poorer functional impairment. Median household income for specific neighborhoods was used as a proxy for SES.

The sample as a whole did not deviate from age expectations in terms of resiliency [t(41)=-.469, p=.642] or functional impairment [t(38)=.118, p=.907]. However, when separated by household language, participants from English speaking households demonstrated lower resiliency and increased functional impairment as compared to both normative expectations [t(19)=-2.748, p=.006; t(18)=1.882, p=.038, respectively] and participants from Spanish speaking households [t(40)=-3.327, p=.002; t(37)=2.717, p=.010, respectively]. In contrast, participants from Spanish speaking households performed similarly to same-aged peers in terms of both resiliency [t(21)=1.931, p=.067] and functional impairment [t(19)=-1.969, p=.064]. Furthermore, household language predicted both resiliency [F(2, 39)=8.639, p=.0008] and functional impairment [F(2, 36)=6.203, p=.005] above and beyond SES, explaining an additional 29.4% (p=.0002) and 24.3% (p=.002) of the variation in these variables, respectively.

Latino patients with PBT from Spanish speaking households had better reported resiliency and lower functional impairment than their counterparts from English speaking households. Given the subjective nature of parent reported outcomes and the importance of appropriately supporting patients and families from underserved populations, the roles of culturally-ingrained protective factors and cultural/linguistic differences in perceiving or articulating distress need further exploration. Future research, including comparison of parent report with objective measurement of impairment, is needed to better understand relationships between home language and these important variables. Additionally, examination of diagnostic and treatment-related factors will be beneficial to determine the best approaches to interventions and resources within this population.

Cognitive changes following adjuvant treatment for breast cancer (BC) are well documented particularly following chemotherapy. However, limited studies have examined cognitive and/or language functions in chemotherapy-naive women with BC taking tamoxifen (TAM). While there is some compelling evidence TAM affects cognitive and language domains, language has not been studied beyond semantics (i.e., content of language), which is just one aspect of language. Using ambulatory cognitive assessment, we investigated the trajectory of cognitive and language changes during early period of adjuvant endocrine treatment (tamoxifen) in women with BC at two time periods (pre-treatment and two months after treatment begins).

Four women with BC (mean age = 62.25 years, SD = 8.38) and 18 cognitively healthy age-matched controls (mean age = 59.77, SD = 7.45) completed 3 cognitive tasks using smartphones, during a short time period (5 days) and repeated at two time periods. Symbol search, dot memory and color dots tasks were used to measure the cognitive constructs - processing speed and working memory. Response times were recorded in milliseconds. To determine language ability, language samples were collected at two time periods, where the participants described two stories from two wordless picture books and samples were assessed using core lexicon analyses.

Wilcoxon-signed rank test was computed to identify cognitive and linguistic changes during early period of TAM administration in women with BC at two time periods. No significant within group or between group differences were seen on the cognitive and language tasks at the two time periods, however, a trend for decline in performance was seen in some BC participants across different tasks.

This is the first study to our knowledge to use ambulatory cognitive assessment method and study discourse-level language function during this early period (pre-treatment and 2 months post-TAM). Findings from the current study advance our understanding of trajectories of cognition and language changes during the initial course of adjuvant endocrine treatment for women with BC with ER+ tumors. Using a measurement-burst design and ambulatory cognitive assessment, we were able to apply better precision measurement to identify distinct cognitive constructs affected by adjuvant endocrine treatment. In addition, insight into changes in discourse ability are impactful for numerous reasons: (1) better understanding of how adjuvant endocrine therapy impacts communication and (2) discernment into language domains that may require early behavioral intervention.

Executive functioning (EF) and socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with functional outcomes (adaptive functioning and academic achievement) in healthy controls and pediatric populations with executive dysfunction. However, these relationships have yet to be investigated in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a population with EF impairment resulting from disease and treatment characteristics. The objective of this study was to examine the associations of functional outcomes with EF and SES (neighborhood-specific variables and academic support) in survivors of childhood ALL.

Forty-four participants (38.6% female, 72.7% non-Hispanic White, ages 6-17) previously diagnosed with low-risk or standard-risk pre-B cell ALL and treated with chemotherapy-only were included. Participants were evaluated on performance-based measures of EF (cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, working memory, and processing speed) and academic achievement (word reading and math calculation), and parent-ratings of EF and adaptive functioning. All measures were expressed as T-scores with lower scores indicating better performance. Neighborhood-specific variables were based on participants’ zip codes and census block group, and included area deprivation index (ADI) and child opportunity index (COI). Lower ADI and COI indicate lesser deprivation and greater opportunity. Individualized education plan (IEP) status was used as a proxy of academic support, coded dichotomously as with or without IEP. Percentages of participants showing impairments in functional outcomes were calculated using a cutoff of > 1 SD above the normative mean. Partial correlations were conducted while controlling for age at evaluation, age at diagnosis, sex, and verbal IQ, to examine whether participants with poorer performance-based and parent-rated EF would show reduced functional outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to evaluate whether neighborhood-specific variables and IEP status would predict functional outcomes while controlling for covariates.

Compared to population norms, survivors of childhood ALL showed worse functional outcomes. Within adaptive functioning, 45.5% of participants showed impairment in activities of daily living and leadership. Adaptive functioning was significantly positively correlated with parent-rated, but not performance-based, EF (r=0.694, p<0.001). Compared to female survivors, male survivors were at increased risk for adaptive functioning difficulties (r=-0.401, p<0.05). Impairments for word reading and math calculation were 25% and 41.7%, respectively. Greater math calculation was associated with better verbal fluency (r=0.378, p<0.05) and processing speed (r=0.439, p<0.05). Older participants at evaluation (/3=-0.580, p<0.001) and those without IEP support (ß=0.465, p<0.05) showed better word reading. Lower ADI predicted better verbal fluency (ß=0.282, p=0.041), however, neighborhood-specific variables were not associated with functional outcomes.

Prior findings indicate that performance-based measures and parent-ratings assess different constructs of EF. Thus, adaptive functioning may relate more to the behavioral construct of EF than its cognitive construct. Current findings also suggest that male survivors are at increased risk for reduced adaptive functioning, consistent with recent reports that male survivors of ALL are at greater risk for specific neurocognitive outcomes. Overall, functional outcomes may be more strongly related to EF than neighborhood-specific variables. Long-term goals include early screening of adaptive and academic difficulties, targeted intervention, and neuropsychological monitoring to support pediatric survivors’ neurocognitive and psychosocial development.

Hippocampal pathology is a consistent feature in persons with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and a strong biomarker of memory impairment. Histopathological studies have identified selective patterns of cell loss across hippocampal subfields in TLE, the most common being cellular loss in the cornu ammonis 1 (CA1) and dentage gyrus (DG). Structural neuroimaging provides a non-invasive method to understand hippocampal pathology, but traditionally only at a whole-hippocampal level. However, recent methodological advances have enabled the non-invasive quantification of subfield pathology in patients, enabling potential integration into clinical workflow. In this study, we characterize patterns of hippocampal subfield atrophy in patients with TLE and examine the associations between subfield atrophy and clinical characteristics.

High-resolution T2 and T1-weighted MRI were collected from 31 participants (14 left TLE; 6 right TLE; 11 healthy controls [HC], aged 18-61 years). Reconstructions of hippocampal subfields and estimates of their volumes were derived using the Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) pipeline. Total hippocampal volume was calculated by combining estimates of the subfields CA1-3, DG, and subiculum. To control for variations in head size, all volume estimates were divided by estimates of total brain volume. To assess disease effects on hippocampal atrophy, hippocampi were recoded as either ipsilateral or contralateral to the side of seizure focus. Two sample t-tests at a whole-hippocampus level were used to test for ipsilateral and contralateral volume loss in patients relative to HC. To assess whether we replicated the selective histopathological patterns of subfield atrophy, we carried out mixed-effects ANOVA, coding for an interaction between diagnostic group and hippocampal subfield. Finally, to assess effects of disease load, non-parametric correlations were performed between subfield volume and age of first seizure and duration of illness.

Patients had significantly smaller total ipsilateral hippocampal volume compared with HC (d=1.23, p<.005). Contralateral hippocampus did not significantly differ between TLE and HC. Examining individual subfields for the ipsilateral hemisphere revealed significant main-effects for group (F(1, 29)=8.2, p<0.01), subfields (F(4, 115)=550.5, p<0.005), and their interaction (F(4, 115)=8.1, p<0.001). Post-hoc tests revealed that TLE had significantly smaller volume in the ipsilateral CA1 (d=-2.0, p<0.001) and DG (d = -1.4, p<0.005). Longer duration of illness was associated with smaller volume of ipsilateral CA2 (p=-0.492, p<0.05) and larger volume of contralateral whole-hippocampus (p=0.689, p<0.001), CA1 (p=0.614, p < 0.005), and DG (p=0.450, p<0.05).

Histopathological characterization after surgery has revealed important associations between hippocampal subfield cell loss and memory impairments in patients with TLE. Here we demonstrate that non-invasive neuroimaging can detect a pattern of subfield atrophy in TLE (i.e., CA1/DG) that matches the most common form of histopathologically-observed hippocampal sclerosis in TLE (HS Type 1) and has been linked directly to both verbal and visuospatial memory impairment. Finally, we found evidence that longer disease duration is associated with larger contralateral hippocampal volume, driven by increases in CA1 and DG. This may reflect subfield-specific functional reorganization to the unaffected brain tissue, a compensatory effect which may have important implications for patient function and successful treatment outcomes.

Children with epilepsy are at greater risk of lower academic achievement than their typically developing peers (Reilly and Neville, 2015). Demographic, social, and neuropsychological factors, such as executive functioning (EF), mediate this relation. While research emphasizes the importance of EF skills for academic achievement among typically developing children (e.g., Best et al., 2011; Spiegel et al., 2021) less is known among children with epilepsy (Ng et al., 2020). The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of EF skills on academic achievement in a nationwide sample of children with epilepsy.

Participants included 427 children with epilepsy (52% male; MAge= 10.71), enrolled in the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Epilepsy Surgery Database who had been referred for surgery and underwent neuropsychological testing. Academic achievement was assessed by performance measures (word reading, reading comprehension, spelling, and calculation and word-based mathematics) and parent-rating measures (Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) Functional Academics and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) School Performance). EF was assessed by verbal fluency measures, sequencing, and planning measures from the Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS), NEPSY, and Tower of London test. Rating-based measures of EF included the 'Attention Problems’ subscale from the CBCL and 'Cognitive Regulation’ index from the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-2). Partial correlations assessed associations between EF predictors and academic achievement, controlling for fullscale IQ (FSIQ; A composite across intelligence tests). Significant predictors of each academic skill or rating were entered into a two-step regression that included FSIQ, demographics, and seizure variables (age of onset, current medications) in the first step with EF predictors in the second step.

Although zero-order correlations were significant between EF predictors and academic achievement (.29 < r’s < .63 for performance; -.63 < r’s < -.50 for rating measures), partial correlations controlling for FSIQ showed fewer significant relations. For performance-based EF, only letter fluency (DKEFS Letter Fluency) and cognitive flexibility (DKEFS Trails Condition 4) demonstrated significant associations with performance-based academic achievement (r’s > .29). Regression models for performance-based academic achievement indicated that letter fluency (ß = .22, p = .017) and CBCL attention problems (ß = -.21, p =.002) were significant predictors of sight-word reading. Only letter fluency (ß = .23, p =.006) was significant for math calculation. CBCL Attention Problems were a significant predictor of spelling performance (ß = -.21, p = .009) and reading comprehension (ß = -.18, p =.039). CBCL Attention Problems (ß = -.38, p <.001 for ABAS; ß = -.34, p =.002 for CBCL School) and BRIEF-2 Cognitive Regulation difficulties (ß = -.46, p < .001 for ABAS; ß = -.46, p =.013 for CBCL School) were significant predictors of parent-rated ABAS Functional Academics and CBCL School Performance.

Among a national pediatric epilepsy dataset, performance-based and ratings-based measures of EF predicted performance academic achievement, whereas only ratings-based EF predicted parent-rated academic achievement, due at least in part to shared method variance. These findings suggest that interventions that increase cognitive regulation, reduce symptoms of attention dysfunction, and promote self-generative, flexible thinking, may promote academic achievement among children with epilepsy.

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted schools and learning formats. Children with epilepsy are at-risk for generalized academic difficulties. We investigated the potential impact of COVID-19 on learning in those with epilepsy by comparing achievement on well-established academic measures among school-age children with epilepsy referred prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and those referred during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This study included 466 children [52% male, predominately White (76%), MAge=10.75 years] enrolled in the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Epilepsy (PERC) Surgery database project who were referred for surgery and seen for neuropsychological testing. Patients were divided into two groups based on a proxy measure of pandemic timing completed by PERC research staff at each site (i.e., “were there any changes to typical in-person administration [of the evaluation] due to COVID?”). 31% of the sample (N = 144) were identified as having testing during the pandemic (i.e., “yes” response), while 69% were identified as having testing done pre-pandemic (i.e., “no” response). Of the 31% who answered yes, 99% of administration changes pertained to in-person testing or other changes, with 1% indicating remote testing. Academic achievement was assessed by performance measures (i.e., word reading, reading comprehension, spelling, math calculations, and math word problems) across several different tests. T-tests compared the two groups on each academic domain. Subsequent analyses examined potential differences in academic achievement among age cohorts that approximately matched grade level [i.e., grade school (ages 5-10), middle school (ages 11-14), and high school (ages 15-18)].

No significant differences were found between children who underwent an evaluation before the pandemic compared to those assessed during the pandemic based on age norms across academic achievement subtests (all p’s > .34). Similarly, there were no significant differences among age cohorts. The average performance for each age cohort generally fell in the low average range across academic skills. Performance inconsistently varied between age cohorts. The youngest cohort (ages 5-10) scored lower than the other cohorts for sight-word reading, whereas this cohort scored higher than the middle cohort (ages 11-14) for math word problems and reading comprehension. There were no significant differences between the two pandemic groups on demographic variables, intellectual functioning, or epilepsy variables (i.e., age of onset, number of seizure medications, seizure frequency).

Academic functioning was generally equivalent between children with epilepsy who underwent academic testing as part of a pre-surgical evaluation prior to the pandemic compared to those who received testing during the pandemic. Additionally, academic functioning did not significantly differ between age cohorts. Children with epilepsy may have entered the pandemic with effective academic supports and/or were accustomed to school disruptions given their seizure history. Replication is needed as findings are based on a proxy measure of pandemic timing and the extent to which children experienced in-person, remote, and hybrid learning is unknown. Children tested a year into the pandemic, after receiving instruction through varying educational methods, may score differently than those tested earlier. Future research can address these gaps. Although it is encouraging that academic functioning was not disproportionately impacted during the pandemic in this sample, children with epilepsy are at-risk for generalized academic difficulties and continued monitoring of academic functioning is necessary.

Neuropsychological assessment is an essential part of presurgical evaluation for epilepsy patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Evaluations assist in localizing and lateralizing epileptogenic focal points and identifying possible risks for cognitive decline following surgery. Researchers and clinicians consistently find that verbal memory dysfunction is an accurate indicator of left temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) through verbal measures such as the CVLT-II. Although visual memory structures are assumed to be in the right (nondominant) hemisphere, visual memory assessments have not been reliable in identifying right TLE. It is hypothesized that assessments to test visual memory are confounded by verbal cueing to assist in visual learning. To account for this, researchers have identified that comparing verbal and visual score asymmetries does accurately differentiate left and right TLE patients. This study aimed to determine if verbalvisual asymmetry using the CVLT-II and BVMT-R accurately identifies left and right TLE relative weaknesses potentially associated with epileptogenic regions.

As part of a pre-surgical neuropsychological evaluation, 37 well-characterized medically refractory TLE patients (18 right TLE; 19 left TLE) were administered the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised to evaluate visuospatial memory and the CVLT-II to evaluate verbal memory. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare RTLE and LTLE group performances on BVMT-R delay recall subscales, using T-scores. Then memory asymmetry scores were calculated by converting CVLT-II verbal delay memory scores to T-scores and subtracting BVMT-R delayed recall T-score from the verbal memory T-score. An independent samples t-test was used to compare asymmetry scores between the groups.

There were no significant differences between patients with RTLE and LTLE for BVMT-R Delay [F(2,34) = 0.11, p = .895]. There was not a significant difference when accounting for verbal-visual asymmetry (t (35) = 0.422, p = 0.675, d = 12.566) between left (M = -2.42, SD = 13.82) and right side (M = -4.17, SD = 11.09).

The BVMT-R did not identify nondominant hemisphere dysfunction in this sample of 18 right TLE patients. Because visual memory performance did not inform lateralization, we investigated the usefulness of memory asymmetry. Inconsistent with our hypothesis, verbal-visual memory asymmetry scores did not differentiate RTLE from LTLE in this sample. These findings add to existing findings that the BVMT-R may not be able to identify visuospatial memory dysfunction in epilepsy. Additionally, these data indicate the inability to assess for visuospatial memory even when accounting for verbal abilities in epilepsy patients. Future research should consider alternate visuospatial measures for the evaluation of epilepsy patients.

Epilepsy is the third most common neurological disorder among older adults, and as adults are living longer, the incidence of epilepsy is increasing (Kun Lee, 2019). The purpose of this study is to examine 1. differences in quality of life (QOL) between older and younger adults with medically intractable epilepsy and 2. the impact of seizure frequency, seizure duration, depression, sex, and marital status on QOL. Given differences in the prevalence rates of depression between men and women and importance of depression in QOL, we predicted that sex and marital status would moderate the effect of depression on total QOL (TQOL).

Hypothesis I: Compared to younger adults, older adults with epilepsy will report lower TQOL scores and lower scores on subscales measuring energy/fatigue, cognition, and medication effects. Hypothesis II: Seizure variables and depression will significantly account for TQOL scores in both groups (younger and older) above demographic variables (sex, marital status, and education). Hypothesis III: Sex will moderate the effect of depression in both groups and marital status will moderate the effect of depression only in the older adults.

Participants were 607 adults (> 18 years old) who were prospective candidates for epilepsy surgery and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation including QOL assessment using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Scale-31 (QOLIE-31). Individuals were grouped by older (> 50 years old; N = 122) and younger adults (< 50 years old; N = 485). Hierarchical regression was used to examine the proposed associations.

Hypothesis I: In contrast to our hypothesis, a one-way ANOVA did not reveal significant differences between the older and younger groups on the QOL subscales, TQOL, or depression.

Hypothesis II: For older adults, longer seizure duration was associated with better TQOL; bivariate correlations showed no evidence of statistical suppression. Higher depression scores were associated with worse TQOL. Overall, the model accounted for 39.6% of variance among older adults. For younger adults, only depression was a significant predictor of TQOL wherein higher depression scores were associated with worse TQOL. Overall, the model accounted for 36.1% of the variance among younger adults. Hypothesis III: There was no moderation between depression and marital status in older or younger adults (b = -.009, p > .05). There was multicollinearity evidenced by VIF (variance inflation factor) greater than 10, so the associations between depression and sex could not be examined.

Overall, there were no significant differences between QOL in younger versus older adults. Greater depression symptoms were associated with lower TQOL in both groups. Longer seizure duration was a significant predictor of better TQOL in older adults only, perhaps indicating better adjustment to having a seizure disorder with longer duration of epilepsy. Lastly, marital status did not moderate the effects of depression on TQOL and the moderating effects of sex on TQOL could not be assessed due to multicollinearity. Study limitations include dichotomizing the sample into these particular age groups and the heterogeneity of seizure types.

Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) commonly show memory deficits on neuropsychological tests. The BVMT-R is a widely used test of visual learning and memory that involves accurately reproducing an array of figures in the correct special location. The present study examined performance processes of visual memory in presurgical patients with TLE, including item (i.e., accuracy) and associative memory (i.e., location), which have been shown to be dissociable in studies of visual memory in other neurologic populations.

Participants included nine patients with left TLE (67% female; 67% left-handed; mean age = 46.15 years, range = 24-55; mean education = 14.8 years, range = 9-18) and six patients with right TLE (17% female; 33% left-handed; mean age = 57.64 years, range = 22-62; mean education = 15.52 years, range 11-18). Mean duration of epilepsy was 19 years. Participants had an average of two failed anti-seizure medications prior to surgery. TLE groups were compared to 22 healthy controls (36% female; 14% left-handed; mean age = 33.68 years, range = 2253; mean education = 17.66 years, range = 1620). All participants completed comprehensive neuropsychological testing at a large Northeastern medical center. The BVMT-R was scored using standard and novel scoring paradigms. All data were retrospectively reviewed from archival datasets.

MANCOVA results indicated a significant multivariate main effect for group membership and standard BVMT-R scoring after controlling for level of education, Wilks’ A = 0.59, F(4, 64) = 4.91, p = .002. The multivariate partial eta squared (np2) of .58 indicated a strong relationship between group membership and both immediate and delayed recall, with the control group performing better overall. The TLE groups did not perform significantly different from each other. A significant multivariate main effect for group and novel BVMT-R scoring was found (also controlling for education), Wilks’ A = 0.42, F(8, 58) = 3.97, p = .001. Overall, the control group demonstrated better item learning with no significant difference between TLE groups observed. Both the control (M = (16.5, SD = 2.04) and left TLE (M = 12.33, SD = 4.03) showed stronger associative learning compared to the right TLE group (M = 10.2, SD = 4.27). For item and location delayed recall, controls (M = 4.82, SD = 1.62) had more accurate recall compared to left TLE (M = 1.56, SD = 2.04) with a trend toward better performance compared to the right TLE patients (M = 2.6, SD = 1.82); the TLE groups performed similarly. No difference was observed for associative delayed recall between the three groups.

Patients with right TLE showed worse associative learning compared to left TLE, while performance was generally comparable to their right TLE counterparts on other novel BVMT-R scoring paradigms. Unsurprisingly, patients with TLE performed worse on BVMT-R using standard scoring procedures, though no lateralizing effect was observed. While these findings suggest that associative visual learning weakness may be characteristic of right TLE, findings should be interpreted cautiously the given small sample size and demographic considerations (i.e., uneven gender distribution, lack of data on ethnicity/race).

Anterior temporal lobectomy is a common surgical approach for medication-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Prior studies have shown inconsistent findings regarding the utility of presurgical intracarotid sodium amobarbital testing (IAT; also known as Wada test) and neuroimaging in predicting postoperative seizure control. In the present study, we evaluated the predictive utility of IAT, as well as structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), on long-term (3-years) seizure outcome following surgery for TLE.

Patients consisted of 107 adults (mean age=38.6, SD=12.2; mean education=13.3 years, SD=2.0; female=47.7%; White=100%) with TLE (mean epilepsy duration =23.0 years, SD=15.7; left TLE surgery=50.5%). We examined whether demographic, clinical (side of resection, resection type [selective vs. non-selective], hemisphere of language dominance, epilepsy duration), and presurgical studies (normal vs. abnormal MRI, normal vs. abnormal PET, correctly lateralizing vs. incorrectly lateralizing IAT) were associated with absolute (cross-sectional) seizure outcome (i.e., freedom vs. recurrence) with a series of chi-squared and t-tests. Additionally, we determined whether presurgical evaluations predicted time to seizure recurrence (longitudinal outcome) over a three-year period with univariate Cox regression models, and we compared survival curves with Mantel-Cox (log rank) tests.

Demographic and clinical variables (including type [selective vs. whole lobectomy] and side of resection) were not associated with seizure outcome. No associations were found among the presurgical variables. Presurgical MRI was not associated with cross-sectional (OR=1.5, p=.557, 95% CI=0.4-5.7) or longitudinal (HR=1.2, p=.641, 95% CI=0.4-3.9) seizure outcome. Normal PET scan (OR= 4.8, p=.045, 95% CI=1.0-24.3) and IAT incorrectly lateralizing to seizure focus (OR=3.9, p=.018, 95% CI=1.2-12.9) were associated with higher odds of seizure recurrence. Furthermore, normal PET scan (HR=3.6, p=.028, 95% CI =1.0-13.5) and incorrectly lateralized IAT (HR= 2.8, p=.012, 95% CI=1.2-7.0) were presurgical predictors of earlier seizure recurrence within three years of TLE surgery. Log rank tests indicated that survival functions were significantly different between patients with normal vs. abnormal PET and incorrectly vs. correctly lateralizing IAT such that these had seizure relapse five and seven months earlier on average (respectively).

Presurgical normal PET scan and incorrectly lateralizing IAT were associated with increased risk of post-surgical seizure recurrence and shorter time-to-seizure relapse.

In the US, >20% of individuals aged 5 years and older speak a language other than English at home, with rates of bi- and multilingualism increasing. Providing linguistically- and culturally- competent care to increasingly diverse populations is a necessary task for neuropsychologists. The need for close attention to bilingualism is even more glaring in the context of neurosurgical interventions, such as in intractable epilepsy. Pre-surgical epilepsy evaluations serve as a baseline for post-surgical change, inform lateralization and localization, and help determine cognitive risks associated with surgery. The importance of evaluating bilingual status and assessing cognitive abilities in both languages, if needed, in presurgical epilepsy evaluations is examined. We present the neuropsychological profile of a 10-year-old bilingual male with intractable epilepsy participating in a pre-surgical epilepsy evaluation.

This right-handed male is a sequential language learner, exposed to Spanish at birth and English when he began kindergarten. His parent reported he was primarily English speaking. Developmental milestones were met within expected timeframes. Seizures began at age 5. He is prescribed Vimpat and Lamictal. vEEG during admission revealed right temporal-onset seizures. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted in English based on parent report; however, expressive language testing revealed significantly higher performance in Spanish (average) compared to English (exceptionally low). Subsequently, a bilingual provider was consulted, and supplemental Spanish verbal reasoning and verbal memory measures were administered.

The patient’s neuropsychological profile captured a significant difference between English and Spanish verbal abilities. WISC-V Similarities scaled scores (ss) were 5 and 11 in English and Spanish, respectively. Vocabulary scaled scores were 8 and 15 in English and Spanish, respectively. Regarding verbal memory, list learning was below average in English (ss = 5), but low average in Spanish (ss = 6). Contextual verbal memory was only administered in Spanish; scores were average (ss = 10). Verbal Fluency administered in English was low (phonemic fluency ss = 5, categorical fluency ss = 6). fMRI verbal tasks were performed in English and revealed left-sided language lateralization.

In pre-surgical epilepsy evaluations of bilingual children, consideration of language is essential. Assessment of language dominance is a minimum requirement in bilingual families, followed by full bilingual evaluation if necessary. In this case, starkly different conclusions regarding lateralization and localization may have been made if the child had not been evaluated in both languages. In English, a significant split between verbal and non-verbal cognition was apparent, possibly suggesting involvement of the dominant left hemisphere. With Spanish testing, this split disappeared, with high average verbal skills. While a growing proportion of children in the US are bilingual, bilingual assessments are not commonly conducted in pre-surgical epilepsy evaluations. In fact, very little work has been done examining language functioning in bilingual epilepsy patients, particularly in children. With both epilepsy-and language-related factors at play in a developing brain, we encourage closer attention to these issues, particularly in the context of neurosurgical procedures.

Many epilepsy syndromes are medically refractory, leading patients to be referred for surgical work-up to control their seizures and improve their quality of life (QOL). Although surgical treatments may reduce or stop seizures, many patients continue to present with declines in mood and/or cognition post-operatively. In addition, pre-operative QOL of patients with medically refractory epilepsy is impacted by executive function (EF). The present study aims to investigate the relationship between post-operative mood/QOL and pre-operative EF in adults with epilepsy. It was hypothesized that mood would remain stable or decline post-operatively; pre-operative EF would be a protective factor for mood decline and QOL.

The sample consisted of 47 adult patients (57.4% female; Age, M= 34.02(11.59)) with medically refractory epilepsy at the UCSF Epilepsy Center. Participants were included if they received surgical treatment for their epilepsy (42.6% right anterior temporal lobectomy [ATL], 46.8% left ATL, 2.1% laser ablation, 6.4% responsive neurostimulation, 2.1% multiple surgical interventions) and received both a pre- and post-surgical neuropsychological evaluation. Most patients were right-handed (95.7% right). Mood and QOL were assessed from pre- and post-operative evaluations using the Beck Depression Inventory- Second Edition (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Quality of Life in Epilepsy- 31 (QOLIE-31). Executive function was assessed using the Trail Making Test, and the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function Scale (D-KEFS) subtests Color-Word Interference (CW-I) and Verbal Fluency. Descriptive statistics were obtained for each of the measures listed. A paired sample t-test was conducted between time A and B to determine whether mood and QOL were significantly different. Two multiple regressions were conducted. One analysis for post-operative depression and QOL respectively with pre-operative EF.

At time A, both anxiety and depression were minimal (BDI M= 17.8, SD= 10.34; BAI M= 13; SD= 8.94). QOL was borderline clinically significant (QOLIE M= 37.46, SD= 9.74). Depression at time B was positively correlated with depression at time A (r[45]= 0.316, p=0.035). A paired sample t-test indicated that depression and QOL were significantly different at time A and time B (t[44]= 2.04, p= 0.047; t[31]= -3.34, p= 0.002), with improved scores post-operatively. Anxiety was not significantly different across time points (t[39]= 1.20, p=0.238). Multiple regression analyses indicated that pre-operative depression and EF did not predict post-operative depression (F(5,27)= 1.62, p= 0.189). Pre-operative EF (CW-I Inhibition-Switching), but not pre-operative depression, predicted post-operative QOL (F(4(24)= 3.13, p=.03, R2= .343).

Results were somewhat discrepant from prior research in that depression and QOL improved post-surgically. Notably, while the observed change in depression was statistically significant it was not clinically significant according to literature (Doherty et al., 2021). Pre-surgical inhibitory control predicted QOL, illustrating that EF may serve as a protective factor post-surgically. The present study did not include a measure of seizure freedom classification post-operatively, therefore, future studies should investigate how seizure freedom classification impacts the relationship between mood, QOL, and cognitive outcomes.

Researchers are increasingly finding that the presence of neuronal surface antibodies (NSAb) may account for a larger percentage of outpatient epilepsy cases than previously thought (Elisak et al., 2018; Brenner et al., 2013). However, systematic NSAb screening is not included in standard epilepsy care (Kambadja et al., 2022). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine, 2005) is one of the most commonly used screening tools among physicians (Judge et al., 2019) across various neurological conditions, and has previously been validated in populations with autoimmune encephalitis (Hebert et al., 2018). Because patients with NSAb associated epilepsy often present with cognitive dysfunction (Greco et al., 2006), a MoCA is often administered as part of standard clinical care. The present analysis compared MoCA performance profiles in epilepsy patients with and without the presence of serum NSAbs. We explored what specific cognitive profile, as defined by the MoCA, may predict NSAb positivity.

Forty-eight epilepsy patients were enrolled through an outpatient epilepsy clinic or during non-intensive or elective hospital stays. Participants were eligible if they met one of three diagnostic categories: focal epilepsy of unknown cause (n = 33), lesional focal epilepsy (n = 5), or generalized epilepsy (n = 4). All participants signed consent, underwent a comprehensive interview, which included MoCA testing, and serum NSAb testing paralleling standard clinical practice. Mann-U Whitney tests were run to compare overall MoCA and subgroup domain performance between groups.

Six patients (13%), all with focal epilepsy of unknown cause, had positive NSAb panels (LGI1: n = 3; GAD65: n = 2; CASPR2: n = 1). There was no significant difference in overall MoCA scores between participants with focal epilepsy of unknown cause who were antibody positive versus negative, and antibody positive versus antibody negative lesional or generalized epilepsy. However, when analyzing by MoCA subgroup, we found that antibody positive patients performed significantly worse on delayed recall than antibody negative patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause (Mdn = 1.5 vs 3), U(Nantibodynegative=27, Nantibodypositive=6) = 69.00, p = .02. There was no significant difference in other MoCA cognitive domain tests, and delayed recall scores did not significantly differ between antibody positive patients and those with lesional focal and generalized epilepsy.

These preliminary findings suggest that episodic memory impairment, as measured by delayed recall on the MoCA, may predict NSAb antibody positivity among patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause. This may relate to specific predilection of the hippocampal regions in antibody-mediated epileptogenesis and pathology.

Word finding or “naming” difficulty is a symptom of multiple neurological disorders; therefore, naming assessment is an integral component of neuropsychological evaluation. Prior work has found weaker second-language naming in healthy proficient bilingual youth than monolingual youth, and similar findings have been shown in adults with epilepsy. Considering the potential influences of both early onset epilepsy and bilingualism on brain development, we compared naming in English second language (ESL) and monolingual youth with epilepsy. To assess the impact of bilingualism independent of the known effects of seizure laterality (i.e., poor naming in those with left, dominant-hemisphere seizures), we excluded patients with left language dominance and unilateral seizures. We hypothesized that like other groups, naming would be weaker in ESL than in monolingual youth with epilepsy.

Participants included 84 children with seizures that could not be lateralized clinically (n=36), bilateral seizures (n=20), centrotemporal spikes (n=3), and those with unilateral seizures and atypical language dominance (n=25), ages 6-15 years old: 66 monolingual, English (mean age: 10.87 ± 2.70 years) and 18 ESL (mean age: 10.78 ± 2.88 years). Those with FSIQ < 70 and vocabulary SS < 6 were excluded to ensure English proficiency. Independent samples t-tests, multivariate ANOVA, and chi-square tests compared groups on demographic factors and test performance. All measures (FSIQ, WISC/WASI Vocabulary, letter and category fluency, Children’s Auditory (AN) and Visual Naming (VN) Tests) were administered in English.

Monolingual and ESL groups did not differ in: age, sex, SES, seizure type (i.e., non-lateralized, bilateral, centrotemporal spikes, or atypical language dominance), epilepsy onset age, or number of AEDs. Comparisons also showed no differences in FSIQ, vocabulary, letter fluency, or category fluency (all ps > 0.05). By contrast, auditory and visual naming performances were weaker among ESL patients than monolingual patients: AN accuracy, F(1,81) = 10.89, p = 0.001; AN tip-of-the-tongues (TOTs), F(1,81) = 6.35, p = 0.014; AN Summary Scores (SS), F(1,81) = 6.17, p = 0.015; VN accuracy, F(1,81) = 4.66, p = 0.034; VN SS, F(1,81) = 4.87, p = 0.030, with the exception of VN TOTs, which approached significance, F(1,81) = 3.55, p = 0.063.

Consistent with findings in bilingual healthy youth and ESL adults with epilepsy, naming in ESL youth with epilepsy was weaker than in monolingual children. The groups did not differ on other aspects of language. Thus, unlike other expressive verbal functions, naming is adversely affected in the second language of bilingual people with epilepsy across the age span. These results suggest that poor naming in ESL patients cannot be used to infer a naming deficit, and/or left (dominant) temporal lobe dysfunction.

Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; previously known as “sluggish cognitive tempo” or SCT) refers to a set of behavioral symptoms characterized by slowed thinking/behavior, daydreaming, and mental fogginess or confusion. It has been described as related to, yet separate from, symptoms associated with Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) inattention. There is a paucity of research on CDS within pediatric epilepsy populations despite substantial risk factors inherent to the disorder and a large proportion of patients with comorbid ADHD. This study therefore describes CDS as reported by parents for a large sample of children with epilepsy. Relationship between epilepsy variables (e.g., number of antiepileptic drugs [AEDs], seizure frequency, seizure type) and CDS symptoms was explored. Additionally, considering the negative association between CDS and academic performance in other populations, the relationship between parentrated CDS and academic risk factors was examined.

Participants included 151 children with epilepsy (mean age = 11y, range 6-18y; 55% male; IQ>70), referred for outpatient neuropsychological assessment. As part of routine clinical care, parents completed the Penny Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Scale (SCT) and the Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire (CLDQ). Scores and basic demographic information were extracted from an IRB approved clinical database; the IRB granted approval for retrospective chart review to extract additional medical variables. Parent report of CDS included total CDS score and three subdomains: Sleepy/Sluggish, Low Initiation, and Daydreamy. Higher scores represent greater parent-reported difficulties. Independent samples t-tests compared the participants’ means on total CDS and each subdomain to the normative sample. Analysis of variance was conducted to determine differential impact of seizure type (Generalized, Focal, or Multifocal) on total CDS and each subdomain. Correlations between other medical variables, scores on the CLDQ, and parent ratings on the SCT were examined.

Parents of children with epilepsy rated overall CDS total and subdomain scores as significantly higher compared to the normative means with highest elevation in symptoms of Low Initiation (p = <.001). Total CDS was associated with increased parent-reported academic difficulties; however, of the three subdomains, only Low Initiation was significantly associated with concerns for academic functioning. Number of AEDs was associated with increased symptoms on the Sleepy/Sluggish subdomain only. Seizure frequency was associated with total CDS and Sleepy/Sluggish symptoms, though this finding is likely mediated by increased number of AEDs for those with more frequent seizures. Seizure type was not associated with significant differences in Total CDS or CDS subdomains.

Children with epilepsy are at increased risk for experiencing slowed thinking and cognitive disengagement. Low initiation is particularly elevated in pediatric epilepsy populations, which may lead to increased academic difficulties. Potential interventions targeting low initiation may therefore have benefit in the academic setting for children with epilepsy, regardless of epilepsy type.

Pediatric patients with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) have higher rates of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), as well as executive functioning (EF) and fine motor (FM) challenges. Relations between these constructs have been established in youth with ADHD and are supported by FM and EF skill involvement in frontal-subcortical systems. Still, they are not well understood in pediatric FLE. We hypothesized that poorer FM performance would be related to greater executive dysfunction and ADHD symptomatology in this group.

47 children and adolescents with FLE (AgeM=12.47, SD=5.18; IQM=84.07; SD=17.56; Age of Seizure OnsetM=6.85, SD=4.64; right-handed: n=34; left-handed: n=10; Unclear: n=3) were enrolled in the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium dataset as part of their phase I epilepsy surgical evaluation. Participants were selected if they had unifocal FLE and completed the Lafayette Grooved Pegboard (GP). Seizure lateralization (left-sided: n=19; right-sided: n=26; bilateral: n=2) and localization were established via data (e.g., EEG, MRI) presented at a multidisciplinary team case conference. Patients completed neuropsychological measures of FM, attention, and EF. Parents also completed questionnaires inquiring about their child’s everyday EF and ADHD symptomatology. Correlational analyses were conducted to examine FM, EF, and ADHD relations.

Dominant hand (DH) manual dexterity (GP) was related to parent-reported EF (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition [BRIEF-2]-Global Executive Composite [GEC]: r(15) =-.70, p<.01, d=1.96). While not statistically significant, medium to large effect sizes were found for GP DH and parent-reported inattention (Behavior Assessment System for Children, Third Edition [BASC-3]-Attention Problems: r(12)=-.39, p=.17, d=.85) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (BASC-3-Hyperactivity: r(11)= -.44, p=.13, d=.98), as well as performance-based attention (Conners Continuous Performance Test, Third Edition -Omission Errors: r(12)=-.35, p=.22, d=.41), working memory (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fifth Edition [WISC-V]-Digit Span [DS]: r(19)=.38, p=.09, d=.82) and cognitive flexibility (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Verbal Fluency Category Switching: r(13)=.46, p=.08, d=1.04); this suggests that these relations may exist but that our study was underpowered to detect them. Non-dominant hand (NDH) manual dexterity was related to performance-based working memory (WISC-V-DS: r(19)=.50, p<.01, d=1.12) and cognitive flexibility (D-KEFS-Trails Making Test Number-Letter Switching: r(17)=.64, p<.01, d=1.67). Again, while underpowered, medium to large effect sizes were found for GP NDH and parent-reported EF (BRIEF-2 GEC: r(15) =-.45, p=.07, d=1.01) and performance-based phonemic fluency (D-KEFS-Letter Fluency: r(13)=.31, p=.20, d=.65).

Our findings suggest that FM, EF, and ADHD are related in youth with FLE; however, these relations appear to vary by skill and hand. We posit that our findings are due in part to the frontal-cerebellar networks given their anatomic proximity between frontal motor areas and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex - as well as their shared functional involvement in these networks. Future studies should evaluate the predictive validity of initial FM skills for later executive dysfunction and ADHD symptomatology in FLE. If such relations emerge, contributions of early FM interventions on EF development should be examined. Further replication of these findings with a larger sample is warranted.

A rich literature exists on cognitive changes related to focal injury in the adult brain. In contrast, the developing brains of children are less understood. In contrast to adult cases, 20% to 25% of perinatal strokes result in language disorder regardless of lesion lateralization. Existing literature suggests children with perinatal stroke may present with a range of executive functioning and visuospatial processing difficulties. Gross and fine motor challenges are also likely to occur. Furthermore, these children have an increased prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and carry the highest risk for epilepsy. Despite growing research on neurodevelopmental profiles in patients with perinatal stroke, published literature is limited.

Our study examines neurodevelopment of a 2-year-old, right-handed male with a history of perinatal ischemic right middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke, infantile spasms, and left hemiparesis following right hemispherectomy for seizure management who underwent two neurodevelopmental evaluations at our medical center over approximately 3 years.

Findings from the patient’s evaluation with the Mullen Scales of Early Learning revealed overall cognitive ability in the low average range (SS = 89, 23rd percentile); however, notable variability was seen in his performance. His receptive language was average (SS = 98, 45th %tile) and consistent with previous evaluation results, and he has made gains in visual reception (from SS = 75, 5th %tile to SS = 91, 27th %tile) and expressive language (from SS = 55, 0.1st %tile to SS = 70, 2nd %tile). In addition, his gross motor was exceptionally low (SS = 55, 0.1st %tile) and consistent with previous evaluation results. Fine motor was low average (SS = 84, 14th %tile).

Our patient showed cognitive gains in language and visual reception since his prior evaluation despite history of right MCA stroke and right hemispherectomy. Improvements are likely due to a combination of early brain plasticity and intensive therapies he has received. Consistent with published findings in this population, he experienced seizures associated with his stroke. Our results add to the limited literature on neurodevelopmental challenges associated with perinatal stroke and progress that can be made when appropriate supports are provided early and consistently.

To examine whether suboptimal performance as determined by formal validity testing would predict neurocognitive scores in a sample of 83 pre-surgical, non-litigating epilepsy patients.

Participants were 83 patients who underwent comprehensive outpatient neuropsychological testing as part as their evaluation as epilepsy surgery candidates. The sample consisted of 41 females and 42 males, with 72 patients identifying as White, 5 as Black, 2 as Hispanic, 1 as Asian, and 2 as other. Mean age was 36 (SD=12.4) mean FSIQ was 87 (SD=12.7), mean years of education of 12.9 (SD=2.1). Each patient’s assessment included a stand-alone performance validity test (PVTs)— Word Memory Test (WMT), the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), or the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT)—as well as two embedded measures of validity—the California Verbal Learning Test Forced Choice (CVLT FC) and WAIS-IV Reliable Digit Span (RDS). Pass/fail rates were analyzed, with valid performance being defined as pass score on at least two of the completed PVTs (N=73 Pass Effort group 86.9%; N=10 Failed Effort group 11.9%). Point-biserial Pearson correlations were conducted to determine the relationship between validity pass/fail status and WAIS-IV FSIQ, VCI, and PRI scores, CVLT-II Trials 1-5 Total T scores, CVLT-II Long Delay Free Recall z scores, WMS-III Logical Memory II T scores, BVMT Total Recall T scores, BVMT Delayed Recall T scores, and Trail Making Test (TMT) B T scores.

Significant relationships were found between Failed Effort group and all neurocognitive scores except BVMT Total Recall. On average, the Failed Effort group obtained significantly lower FSIQ (M=76.57, SD=10.94), VCI (M=80.89, SD=16.03), PRI (M=81.00, SD=14.91), CVLT-II Trials 1-5 Total (M =34, SD=6.89), CVLT-II Long Delay Free Recall (M =-2.44, SD=1.43), WMS-IV Logical Memory II (M =4.83, SD=2.79), BVMT Delayed Recall (M=26.38, SD=6.41), and TMT B (M=29.70, SD=11.46) standard scores compared to the Pass Effort group (FSIQ M=88.09, SD=12.52; VCI M=92.13, SD=13.61; PRI M=91.14, SD=12.06; CVLT-II Trials 1-5 Total M=47.86, SD=12.02; CVLT- II Long Delay Free Recall M=-.44, SD=1.11; WMS-III Logical Memory II M=8.41, SD=3.17; BVMT Delayed Recall M=39.19, SD=12.66; TMT B M=39.34, SD=13.18). Correlation coefficients were r=-.266* (FSIQ), r=-.255* (VCI), r=-.271* (PRI), r=.361**(CVLT-II Total), r=-.474** (CVLT-II LDFR), r=-.298** (WMS-IV LM II), r=-.308** (BVMT DR), and r=-.240* (TMTB). All coefficients were significant at the .05 (*) or .01 (**) level.

Results suggest that pass/fail status on formal validity testing predicts depressed performance on a variety of neurocognitive measures. Therefore, predicting surgical outcome of resection/ablation (e.g., compensation of contralateral hemisphere) should not be based upon neuropsychological memory performance alone when there are failures on tests of engagement as memory scores have strong correlations to pass/fail status on formal validity testing. Overall, this emphasizes the importance of routinely integrating PVTs as part of pre-epilepsy surgery neuropsychological evaluations.

Little research exists characterizing the neuropsychological profile of pediatric insular epilepsy. Accurate diagnosis of insular epilepsy is challenging due to difficulties localizing deep brain structures with current non-invasive neurodiagnostic tools, as well as seizure semiology that may mimic temporal, frontal, and parietal seizures for this patient population [1]. Therefore, we investigated trends across neuropsychological data to help characterize the cognitive profile of pediatric insular epilepsy. This is important because studies that could accurately characterize insular epilepsy into cognitive phenotypes could potentially provide supporting evidence for insular localization during epilepsy surgery work-up. The insula is situated underneath the temporal, parietal, and frontal opercula, and has a number of diffuse projections to key brain structures involved in language, executive functioning, motor coordination, and sensory function [2]. Therefore, we hypothesized that children with insular epilepsy will demonstrate particular weaknesses in language and executive functioning skills.

Retrospective medical records review identified 19 children with insular epilepsy who completed neuropsychological assessment (Age: M=8.2 years, SD=3.4) at Boston Children’s Hospital. Insular epilepsy was defined by ictal insular localization on long-term monitoring EEG. The current sample includes 59% males and 41% females. The majority of participants (69%) had left sided lateralization and more than one seizure type (63%). MRI findings were widely distributed across frontal, temporal, and multiple lobes as well as insular and perisylvian brain regions. A lesion was identified on MRI findings for most participants (63%).

Descriptive analyses showed that overall IQ (FSIQ: M=84, SD=12, range=68-102) fell in the Low Average range. Verbal and visual reasoning skills were equally developed in the Low Average range (VIQ: M=88, SD=12, range=70-104; PIQ: M=88, SD=16, range=53-117). Participants exhibited lower performance on speeded expressive language measures, including measures of phonemic fluency (M=5.5, SD=1.5, range=2-8) and semantic fluency (M=6.7, SD=2.5, range=3-11). With regard to executive functioning, reduced cognitive flexibility was observed on D-KEFS Trail Making Test (Trial 4, Number-Letter Switching: M=5.9, SD=4.9, range=1-12). Additionally, working memory skills fell in the Below Average range (WMIQ: M=77, SD=8.5, range=67-88).

Our results indicate that pediatric patients with insular epilepsy present with reduced scores across aspects of speeded expressive language and executive functioning, including working memory and cognitive flexibility. Additional research is needed to replicate these preliminary findings with a larger sample size and determine whether these trends in cognitive profile would help with seizure localization. Future research should investigate whether insular epilepsy has a clearly identifiable and distinct cognitive phenotype that could be helpful in differential diagnostic workup.

Previous studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of social and emotional problems in young adults with a history of childhood epilepsy, with social skill impairment hypothesized to play a significant role in these outcomes. Few studies have examined social skills within children with epilepsy and very few have examined this within the context of other neuropsychological and neurological variables. This study aims to examine the association between social problems and other relevant neuropsychological variables (IQ, adaptive functioning, social skills) within the pediatric epilepsy population.

Participants were 86 epilepsy patients between the ages 5 and 18 years of age who were referred for neuropsychological assessment as a part of their surgical candidacy work-up. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to examine the correlations between performance on objective measures of full-scale IQ, and parent ratings on questionnaires assessing parent perception of the patients’ overall adaptive functioning, social skills, and social problems.

As expected, earlier age of onset was associated with lower IQ, which itself was associated with weaker overall daily living skills and social skills. Later age of seizure onset was associated greater social problems. Social skills were not correlated with social problems.

The results of this study suggest that children with later age of onset of seizures, are at increased risk of social problems and that these problems may not related to social skill impairment. Implications for clinical practice and future directions are discussed.