Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T11:05:32.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and analysis of planar four-port UWB-MIMO antenna with band-rejection capability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2023

Harleen Kaur
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India
Hari Shankar Singh*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India TIET-VT Center of Excellence for Emerging Materials, TIET, Patiala, India
Rahul Upadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India
*
Corresponding author: Hari Shankar Singh; Email: harishankar1990@gmail.com

Abstract

This manuscript presents a 50 Ω microstrip-fed quad-element high isolated ultra-wideband (UWB) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna with band-notched characteristics. The overall area of the proposed structure is 0.33λo × 0.33λo mm2 (where λo depicts the free space wavelength corresponding to the lower cutoff frequency, i.e. 2.54 GHz), etched on an FR-4 substrate of thickness 0.8 mm. The top layer has four semicircular disc-shaped radiating elements that are identical and orthogonal to obtain better inter-element isolation and compactness. A reverse two-shaped slot is etched onto the radiating patches to attain a band-rejection capability. Moreover, a decoupling structure is also placed at the top layer to suppress the unwanted surface waves. The bottom layer consists of a ground plane, which is further modified with quasi-self complementary and meandered line slots. A rectangular slot is also etched below the feed line to better match the impedance near the lower cutoff frequencies. The simulated reflection coefficients (S11) of the proposed antenna are less than −10 dB over 2.54 to 10.74 GHz frequencies except at 3.37 to 4.15 GHz (WiMAX/C band), and the simulated inter-port isolation (S21) is greater than −15 dB over the entire UWB range of frequencies (3.1 to 10.6 GHz). Also, the measured S-parameter results well agreed with the simulated ones. Furthermore, the simulation study of the 20-element UWB-MIMO antenna is also investigated using the proposed quad-element structure.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Federal Communication Commission (FCC) (2002) First report and order on ultra-wideband technology. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Li, X, Bond, EJ, Van Veen, BD and Hagness, SC (2005) An overview of ultra-wideband microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early-stage breast-cancer detection. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 47(1), 1934.Google Scholar
Liu, L, Cheung, SW and Yuk, TI (2013) Compact MIMO antenna for portable devices in UWB applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61(8), 42574264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekasiewicz, A and Koziel, S (2016) Compact UWB monopole antenna for internet of things applications. Electronics Letters 52(7), 492494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H, Zhang, F, Wang, C and Zhang, X (2014) A universal methodology for designing a UWB diversity antenna. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 28(10), 12211235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malviya, L, Panigrahi, RK and Kartikeyan, MV (2017) MIMO antennas with diversity and mutual coupling reduction techniques: A review. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9(8), 17631780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, X and Chen, ZN (2015) Simplification and implementation of decoupling and matching network with port pattern-shaping capability for two closely spaced antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63(8), 36953699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayabasi, A, Toktas, A, Yigit, E and Sabanci, K (2018) Triangular quad-port multi-polarized UWB MIMO antenna with enhanced isolation using neutralization ring. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications 85, 4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A, Bashir, S, Ghafoor, S and Qureshi, KK (2021) Mutual coupling reduction using ground stub and EBG in a compact wideband MIMO-Antenna. IEEE Access 9, 4097240979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, MN, Chu, S and Bashir, S (2019) A DGS monopole antenna loaded with U-shape stub for UWB MIMO applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 61(9), 21412149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, F, Saleem, R, Shabbir, T, Rehman, SU, Bilal, M and Shafique, MF (2019) A compact quad-element UWB-MIMO antenna system with parasitic decoupling mechanism. Applied Sciences 9(11), .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, HS, Kalraiya, S, Meshram, MK and Shubair, RM (2019) Metamaterial inspired CPW-fed compact antenna for ultrawide band applications. International Journal RF Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 29(8), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakli, H, Abdelhamid, C, Essid, C and Sakli, N (2021) Metamaterial-based antenna performance enhancement for MIMO system applications. IEEE Access 9, 3854638556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, A, Saraereh, OA, Ahmad, AW and Bashir, S (2017) Mutual coupling reduction using F-shaped stubs in UWB-MIMO antenna. IEEE Access 6, 27552759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L, Du, Z, Yang, H, Ma, R, Zhao, Y, Cui, X and Xi, X (2019) Compact UWB MIMO antenna with high isolation using fence-type decoupling structure IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 18(8), 16411645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, G and Mohan, A (2016) Compact MIMO slot antenna for UWB applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 10571060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B, Chen, M and Li, L (2018) Design of a four-element WLAN/LTE/UWB MIMO antenna using half-slot structure. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications 93(May), 354359.Google Scholar
Modak, S, Khan, T and Antar, YMM (2022) Miniaturized self-isolated UWB MIMO planar/cuboidal antenna with dual X-band interference rejection. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications 143, .Google Scholar
Quddus, A, Saleem, R, and Bilal, M (2016) Reconfigurable band-notched UWB-MIMO antenna, 2016 16th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium (MMS),Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 1, 25.Google Scholar
Thakur, E, Jaglan, N, Gupta, SD and Kanaujia, BK (2019) A compact notched UWB MIMO antenna with enhanced performance. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C 91(February), 3953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautam, AK, Yadav, S and Rambabu, K (2018) Design of ultra-compact UWB antenna with band-notched characteristics for MIMO applications. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 12(12), 18951900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, D, Abegaonkar, MP, Koul, SK, Tiwari, V and Bhatnagar, D (2018) A compact dual band-notched UWB circular monopole antenna with parasitic resonators. AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications 84, 313320.Google Scholar
Elshirkasi, AM, Al-Hadi, AA, Mansor, MF, Khan, R and Soh, PJ (2019) Envelope correlation coefficient of a two-port MIMO terminal antenna under uniform and Gaussian angular power spectrum with user’s hand effect. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C 92(April), 123136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, HS, Agarwal, M, Pandey, GK and Meshram, MK (2014) A quad-band compact diversity antenna for GPS L1/Wi-Fi/LTE2500/WiMAX/ HIPERLAN1 applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 13, 249252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar