No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ancient Indian Contacts With Western Lands
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2024
Extract
In the last century and in the first decades of the present century the historians of India laid stress on the isolation of the subcontinent by the mountains and seas surrounding her on all sides and cutting her off as a separate universe. The progress of modern research has shown how mistaken this view was. We now see the true facts much more clearly than ever. The mountain barriers, though formidable at many points, are broken by gaps which have always allowed a considerable intercourse across the frontiers on the northwest as well as the northeast and at some points due north as well. By her position in the center of the littoral of the Indian Ocean, India enjoyed ample facilities for communication by sea with the countries lying to her west and east, and we now know that she and her neighbors availed themselves of these facilities from time immemorial. The Indian Ocean was navigated freely from very early, even prehistoric, times, and there was a series of lively maritime exchanges—migratory, commercial, and cultural—among the peoples of Africa, India, and Indonesia, or more generally Southeast Asia. Western Asia and the lands adjoining the Levant also took, from the beginning, a prominent part in this commerce of goods and ideas between India and the world. It is the aim of this paper to trace briefly the ancient contacts between India and the Western countries to the time when the rise and spread of Islam and the Islamic impact on India ushered in a new epoch.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1959 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)
References
1. New Light on the Most Ancient East (I934), p. 220.
2. Man Makes Himself ("Watts, Thinkers' Library," No. 47 [I94I]), pp. I49-50. Stuart Piggott seems grossly to underestimate the role of Indus civilization by extending to the whole of its history the traits that marked its decadence about I500 B.C. (Some Ancient Cities of India [O.U.P., I945], pp. I6-I7). Toynbee (Study of History, I, I07-8) and Langdon (JRAS, I94I, p. 593) have stressed the extraordinary affinity between the Sumerian and Indus Valley civilizations and postulated a close connection or even identity between the two.
3. I Kings, chaps. I0-22.
4. Intercourse between India and the Western World (Cambridge: Cambridge Univer sity Press, I926), p. 2.
5. Cambridge Ancient History, I, I3.
6. The Aryan Gods of the Mitani People (Kristina), p. 39.
7. "The Early Commerce of Babylon with India," JRAS, I898.
8. "Les Échanges de l'Inde et de l'Émpire romain aux premiers siècles de l'ère chré tienne," Revue historique, janvier-mars, I949; translated into English by Sourindranath Roy M.A., Journal of Indian History, Vol. XVIII.
9. Eastern Religions and Western Thought (Oxford, I939), p. I33.
10. The Philosophy of Ancient India (Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co., I897), pp. 32-33.
11. Ibid., p. 38.
12. Mysticism and Catholicism (London: T. F. Unwin, I925), p. 3I, cited by Radha krishnan.
13. See Garbe, op. cit., pp. 33-37, 53-55.
14. op. cit., p. I38.
15. Early Greek Philosophy (London: A. & C. Black, I908), p. 88.
16. Greek Thinkers, I, II7, cited by Radhakrishnan.
17. Legacy of India (I937), p. 5.
18. JRAS, I909, pp. 569 ff.
19. Indian Art and Letters, X (I936), 57-58. Aristoxenus is confirmed by a fragment of Aristotle (Radhakrishnan, op. cit., p. I5I and n.).
20. Both cited by Radhakrishnan, op. cit., pp. I48-49, n. I.
21. S. J. Warren, "Het Slang en Truw-Voorbeeld big ‘Sextus Empiricus en in Inde,'" Versl. en. Med, der Kon. Akad. van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, IV, ix, pp. 230-44.
22. "Stones with Buddhist Symbols," JRAS, I898, p. 875; W. M. Flinders Petrie on Indian colony at Memphis, Man, Vol. VIII, No. 7I (I908); Memphis (I908), chap. vii. Also Egypt and Israel (New York: E. S. Gorham, I9II, I923), p. I34, cited by Rada krishnan, op. cit., p. I50.
23. Millar Burrows, The Dead Sea Scrolls (New York: Viking Press, I955). Also Kingsley Martin, "New Light on Old Testament," Hindu, December II, I955.
24. Radhakrishnan, op. cit., pp. I60-6I.
25. Ibid., p. I76. The whole section from which the citation is taken seeks to demon strate this conclusion in detail and must be read.
26. Hinduism and Buddhism (I92I), III, 443.
27. JRAS, I909, p. I092; Radhakrishnan, op. cit., p. I56.
28. Smith, Early History of India (I924), p. 255, n. I.
29. The Greeks in Bactria and India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, I938), PP.375-76.
30. Ibid., p. 67.
31. See M. Rostovtzeff, Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World (Oxford: Clarendon Press, I94I), pp. 550-5I.
32. E. H. Warmington, The Commerce between the Roman Empire and India (Cam bridge : Cambridge University Press, I928), p. 302. This book and Rawlinson's Intercourse are the best studies of the whole subject.
33. John Watson McCrindle, Ancient India (Westminster: A. Constable & Co., I90I), PP. II9-74.
34. Rawlinson, Intercourse, p. I42.
35. "Buddhist Gnosticism," JRAS, I902, p. 383.
36. For Hippolytus see Filliozat, op. cit., pp. 27-28; for the other writers, Radha krishnan, op. cit., p. 2I9.
37. Smith, The Oxford History of India (3d ed., I958), pp. I54-55.
38. Marshall, in JRAS, I909, pp. I060 ff.
39. Smith, op. cit., p. I59.
40. See K. A. N. Sastri, History of South India (I957), for details.
41. Vogel in Annual Bibliography of Indian Archaeology, I938, pp. I-5.
42. Ancient India, July, I946, pp. I7-I24.
43. JRAS, I904, p. 369.
44. D. E. Smith, History of Mathematics (Boston and New York: Ginn & Co., I923), I, I66-67.