The COVID-19 pandemic substantially impacted care of patients with schizophrenia treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs). This study examined how clinics adapted operations to maintain a standard of care for these patients after pandemic onset.

Online surveys were completed in October-November 2020 by one principal investigator (PI) or PI-appointed designee at 35 clinics participating in OASIS (NCT03919994). Items concerned pandemic impacts on clinic operations, particularly telepsychiatry, and on the care of patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs.

All 35 clinics reported using telepsychiatry; 20 (57%) implemented telepsychiatry after pandemic onset. Telepsychiatry visits increased from 12%-15% to 45%-69% across outpatient visit types after pandemic onset; frequency of no-show and/or canceled telepsychiatry visits decreased by approximately one-third. Nearly half of clinics increased the frequency of telepsychiatry visits for patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs. Approximately one-third of participants each reported switching patients treated with LAIs to longer injection interval LAIs or to oral antipsychotics. The most common system/clinic- and patient-related barrier for telepsychiatry visits was lower reimbursement rate and access to technology/reliable internet, respectively. Almost all participants (94%) were satisfied with telepsychiatry for maintaining care of patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs; most predicted a hybrid of telepsychiatry and office visits post-pandemic.

Changes made by clinics after pandemic onset were viewed by almost all participants as satisfactory for maintaining a standard of care for patients with schizophrenia treated with LAIs. Most participants predicted continuing telepsychiatry to support patient care post-pandemic; equitable access to telepsychiatry will be important in this regard.

Alkermes, Inc.

Amphetamines are a first-line treatment for ADHD. The dextroamphetamine transdermal system (d-ATS) was developed as an alternative to oral amphetamine formulations. A randomized controlled trial of d-ATS in children and adolescents with ADHD was conducted, and its primary and key secondary endpoints were met. Here, we report secondary endpoints of the study, further assessing the efficacy and safety of d-ATS.

This study comprised a 5-week, open-label dose optimization period (DOP) followed by a 2-week, randomized, cross-over double-blind treatment period (DBP). All eligible patients received d-ATS 5 mg/9 h and were evaluated weekly for a possible dose increase to 10 mg/9 h, 15 mg/9 h, and 20 mg/9 h. Once reached, the optimal dose was maintained for the DOP and utilized during the DBP. Secondary objectives for this study included assessment of efficacy via Permanent Product Measure of Performance-Attempted and -Correct (PERMP-A, PERMP-C), ADHD-RS-IV, Conners Parent Rating Scale Revised Short Form (CPRS-R:S), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores in a laboratory classroom setting. Efficacy was analyzed using a mixed-model repeated-measures (MMRM) approach. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dermal safety.

In total, 110 patients were enrolled in the DOP, and 106 patients were randomized in the DBP. Patients receiving d-ATS demonstrated significant improvement vs placebo in PERMP-A and -C scores in the DBP consistently from 2 to 12 hours post-dose (P < .001 for all timepoints). ADHD-RS-IV total scores improved during the DOP and improved further during the DBP, with a least-squares mean (95% CI) difference for d-ATS vs placebo of −13.1 (−16.2, −10.0; P < .001). Significant differences between placebo and d-ATS in the DBP were also observed for the CPRS-R:S and CGI scales (P < .001). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate, with 3 TEAEs (abdominal pain, irritated mood, and appetite loss) leading to study discontinuation in the DOP and none in the DBP. No patients were discontinued due to dermal reactions in either phase.

d-ATS was effective in the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents, meeting its primary endpoint (reported elsewhere) and all secondary endpoints. d-ATS was safe and well-tolerated, with minimal dermal reactions.

Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is often challenging to treat and resistant to psychological interventions and prescribed medications. The adjunctive use of nutraceuticals with potential neuromodulatory effects on underpinning pathways such as the glutamatergic and serotonergic systems is one novel approach.

To assess the effectiveness and safety of a purpose-formulated combination of nutraceuticals in treating OCD: N-acetyl cysteine, L-theanine, zinc, magnesium, pyridoxal-5′ phosphate, and selenium.

A 20-week open label proof-of-concept study was undertaken involving 28 participants with treatment-resistant DSM-5-diagnosed OCD, during 2017 to 2020. The primary outcome measure was the Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), administered every 4 weeks.

An intention-to-treat analysis revealed an estimated mean reduction across time (baseline to week-20) on the YBOCS total score of −7.13 (95% confidence interval = −9.24, −5.01), with a mean reduction of −1.21 points per post-baseline visit (P ≤ .001). At 20-weeks, 23% of the participants were considered “responders” (YBOCS ≥35% reduction and “very much” or “much improved” on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale). Statistically significant improvements were also revealed on all secondary outcomes (eg, mood, anxiety, and quality of life). Notably, treatment response on OCD outcome scales (eg, YBOCS) was greatest in those with lower baseline symptom levels, while response was limited in those with relatively more severe OCD.

While this pilot study lacks placebo-control, the significant time effect in this treatment-resistant OCD population is encouraging and suggests potential utility especially for those with lower symptom levels. Our findings need to be confirmed or refuted via a follow-up placebo-controlled study.

Differences in psychiatric background and dose–response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia were examined based on efficacy and safety, using data obtained in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Patients with schizophrenia were classified into three clusters by a cluster analysis based on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) subscores at baseline, using the data from a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PANSS Marder factor scores were calculated for each cluster. The efficacy of 10 or 20 mg/day of asenapine on PANSS score was used as the primary endpoint, with the incidence of adverse events evaluated as the secondary endpoint.

A total of 529 asenapine-treated patients were classified into 3 clusters: Cluster-P with the higher scores in positive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and hostility/excitement, Cluster-N with higher scores in negative symptoms, and Cluster-L with overall lower scores. In Cluster-N and Cluster-L, both 10 and 20 mg/day groups showed significant improvement in PANSS scores, while only the 20 mg/day group showed a significant difference in Cluster-P. Cluster-N and Cluster-L had differences in the incidence of adverse events, but this was not seen in Cluster-P.

The efficacy and safety of asenapine 10 and 20 mg/day differed between the 3 clusters of patients. This suggests that background information regarding baseline psychiatric symptoms may affect the therapeutic response in patients with schizophrenia.

Olfactory reference syndrome (ORS) is a delusion in which a person believes that he or she exudes a displeasing body aroma that others perceive negatively. The axilla has been reported as a single primary source in only one patient. Furthermore, ORS is rarely reported to be associated with food odor. In these instances, the food is not edible. Delusions of ORS presenting as alliaceous edible food aromas have not heretofore been described.

One week after undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, this 42-year-old right-handed male experienced a sudden onset of loss of smell and taste. This has persisted on presentation and he described a complete lack of smell, only being able to smell different spices and herbs. Over time, his sense of smell selectively improved such that he was able to smell alliaceous substances, including onion and garlic, as well as a few other aromas. At the same time his smell returned, he noted that his own body exuded a smell of garlic. This occurred especially while weightlifting at the gym. He noticed that the shirts he had worn working out, in the axillary regions, were encumbered with a garlic/onion miasma. He was fearful that this mephitic aroma was being secreted through his armpits, and that others would recognize his tragomaschalia. As a result, he restricted his activities. Over a few months, his smell ability gradually worsened back to the condition he was in after the ablation. Coincident with this, his perception that he was exuding an alliaceous aroma resolved.

Motor examination: Drift testing: mild left pronator drift. Left abductor digiti minimal sign. Olfactory testing prior to the development of ORS: Alcohol Sniff Test (AST): 0 (anosmia). Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT): 3 (anosmia). Olfactory testing during ORS: AST: 16 (hyposmia). B-SIT: 9 (hyposmia). Olfactory testing after resolution of ORS: AST: 0 (anosmia).

This could be explained by a physiologic axillary odor or malodor, which he could not detect before or after the ORS. During the ORS, the odor may have been misperceived in a dysosmic manner due to his underlying olfactory deficit. Such dysosmia may have then been interpreted as the aroma of an alliaceous vegetable. The intensity of the aroma may have been greatest at the axillary area if compared to the other sources, but due to his underlying hyposmia, he was able to perceive only the axilla as a sole source of the aroma. Besides, psychodynamic preoccupation with bodily physique may have explained his hypersensitivity to minor flaws and his excessive preoccupation with possible harassment from others. He may have consequently misinterpreted individuals’ benign observations and attitudes to presume the presence of aroma. In individuals with olfactory deficit, this investigation for the presence of ORS with traditionally unpleasant food aromas or the presence of ORS in those with chemosensory dysfunction is warranted.

No funding

High prevalence of insulin resistance (IR) has been reported in bipolar disorder (BD) patients. Importantly, impaired insulin sensitivity could modulate the course and treatment outcome in BD. Here, we hypothesized that insulin sensitivity could be potentially associated with the neurocognitive trajectory in euthymic BD. We aimed to examine differences in insulin sensitivity and executive function between BD patients and controls.

Sixty-two patients with BD receiving mood stabilizer treatment and 62 controls, matching age, sex, and body mass index, were recruited in this study. Insulin sensitivity was estimated using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The Wisconsin card-sorting test (WCST) was applied to test participants’ ability to shift cognitive set. Group differences were measured and multivariate regression analysis was performed to examine relationships among factors.

The results indicated that the HOMA-IR (P = .048) value in the patients with BD were significantly higher than those in controls. With regards to executive function, the BD patients performed significantly poorer than the control subjects (P < .05). Moreover, the interaction effect between BD diagnosis and HOMA-IR value on the WCST-preservation errors was significant (P = .01), and post-hoc analyses showed that the cognitive abilities were worse in the BD patients with a higher IR than in the others groups.

Insulin sensitivity is associated with the neurocognitive performance in euthymic BD patients. Although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, interventions to improve insulin sensitivity could potentially improve the functional outcome of BD.

Benzodiazepine (BZD) prescription rates have increased over the past decade in the United States. Available literature indicates that sociodemographic factors may influence diagnostic patterns and/or prescription behaviour. Herein, the aim of this study is to determine whether the gender of the prescriber and/or patient influences BZD prescription.

Cross-sectional study using data from the Florida Medicaid Managed Medical Assistance Program from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Eligible recipients ages 18 to 64, inclusive, enrolled in the Florida Medicaid plan for at least 1 day, and were dually eligible. Recipients either had a serious mental illness (SMI), or non-SMI and anxiety.

Total 125 463 cases were identified (i.e., received BZD or non-BZD prescription). Main effect of patient and prescriber gender was significant F(1, 125 459) = 0.105, P = 0 .745, partial η2 < 0.001. Relative risk (RR) of male prescribers prescribing a BZD compared to female prescribers was 1.540, 95% confidence intervals (CI) [1.513, 1.567], whereas the RR of male patients being prescribed a BZD compared to female patients was 1.16, 95% CI [1.14, 1.18]. Main effects of patient and prescriber gender were statistically significant F(1, 125 459) = 188.232, P < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.001 and F(1, 125 459) = 349.704, P < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.013, respectively.

Male prescribers are more likely to prescribe BZDs, and male patients are more likely to receive BZDs. Further studies are required to characterize factors that influence this gender-by-gender interaction.

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is prevalent among adolescents and research is needed to clarify the mechanisms which contribute to the behavior. Here, the authors relate behavioral neurocognitive measures of impulsivity and compulsivity to repetitive and sporadic NSSI in a community sample of adolescents.

Computerized laboratory tasks (Affective Go/No-Go, Cambridge Gambling Task, and Probabilistic Reversal Task) were used to evaluate cognitive performance. Participants were adolescents aged 15 to 17 with (n = 50) and without (n = 190) NSSI history, sampled from the ROOTS project which recruited adolescents from secondary schools in Cambridgeshire, UK. NSSI was categorized as sporadic (1-3 instances per year) or repetitive (4 or more instances per year). Analyses were carried out in a series of linear and negative binomial regressions, controlling for age, gender, intelligence, and recent depressive symptoms.

Adolescents with lifetime NSSI, and repetitive NSSI specifically, made significantly more perseverative errors on the Probabilistic Reversal Task and exhibited significantly lower quality of decision making on the Cambridge Gambling Task compared to no-NSSI controls. Those with sporadic NSSI did not significantly differ from no-NSSI controls on task performance. NSSI was not associated with behavioral measures of impulsivity.

Repetitive NSSI is associated with increased behavioral compulsivity and disadvantageous decision making, but not with behavioral impulsivity. Future research should continue to investigate how neurocognitive phenotypes contribute to the onset and maintenance of NSSI, and determine whether compulsivity and addictive features of NSSI are potential targets for treatment.

Meningitis causes inflammation of the meninges and when bacteria are not the cause may be considered aseptic. Drug-induced aseptic meningitis (DIAM) can arise from the use of certain medications. The pathophysiology of DIAM is not well understood. Within the antiepileptic medication class, only lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and levetiracetam have been associated with DIAM via documented cases. Common presentation of DIAM involves fever, headache, meningismus, and mental status changes (abnormal consciousness and focal neurological deficits). Other clinical features may include neck stiffness, photophobia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bone pain, hypotension, edema (facial and optic nerve), rash, and seizures. Case reports of DIAM with varying or limited symptomology exist. Therefore, the presentation alone will not allow for a DIAM diagnosis, prompting further analysis and diagnostic exclusion.

A middle-aged male presented with a 48-hour history of confusion, disorientation, unresponsiveness, and hypersomnolence. Past medical history included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type-2 diabetes, and seizures. Home medication included chlorthalidone, levetiracetam, lisinopril, metformin, potassium chloride, rosuvastatin with no medication allergies reported. Upon admission, the patient denied fever, headache, nausea, neck pain, vomiting, and rash. Somnolence, dysarthria, and obtundation were noted during the physical evaluation. Hospital medications included home medications along with enoxaparin, correctional dose insulin lispro, and IV lactated ringers. Vitals and labs were unremarkable. On hospital day (HD) 1 the MRI scan was unremarkable, ruling out a demyelinating process. Serology tests (ie, ANA and dsANA) were negative. Neurology was consulted, and a lumbar puncture was performed. On HD-2 AEIM was suspected, prompting levetiracetam discontinuation and lacosamide initiation (50 mg by mouth twice daily). The CSF analysis was notable for pleocytosis (lymphocytic predominance at 96%), elevated protein (100 mg/dL), and slightly elevated glucose (79 mg/dL). The CSF VDRL was negative, ruling out neurosyphilis. Bacterial meningitis was ruled out based on the CSF analysis (WBC 144 × 103 and glucose) and the lack of bacterial growth on gram stain. Inasmuch, antibiotic therapy was not initiated. Empiric acyclovir 1000 mg IV every 8 hours was initiated as viral meningitis had not been eliminated, due to the lack of viral meningeal PCR testing. By HD-3, the CSF culture resulted without growth and the patient was alert and oriented. By HD-4 the patient was discharged, having received 6 doses of IV acyclovir, with 7 more days of oral therapy.

In 2018, McDonald et al documented the first case of probable levetiracetam-related antiepileptic induced meningitis (AEIM). The mainstay of treatment is discontinuing the offending agent. Resolution of symptoms is typically 2 to 3 days after drug discontinuation as seen in this patient case report. Symptomatic resolution within days of stopping the suspected offending drug has been observed in all reported cases of AEIM where 1 to 2 weeks is generally seen with viral meningitis. Applying the Naranjo Scale yields a score of 4, which indicates possible levetiracetam-induced meningitis in this adult patient. Providers should be cognizant when prescribing antiepileptics to assess and monitor for aseptic meningitis that may appear with atypical symptoms.

No funding

Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is an emerging condition featuring restrictive eating behaviors on the basis of subjective beliefs about food healthiness. Many authors have stressed the similarities between ON and anorexia nervosa (AN) in both cognitive and behavioral patterns. Despite that, while the link between AN and female autism presentations is well known in the literature, no study has yet investigated the relationship between ON and autism spectrum. This work aims to investigate the relationship between ON and autistic traits in a university population.

An e-mail invitation was sent to all the students and University workers of University of Pisa. Subjects were asked to fulfill the ORTO-15 and the Adult Autism Subthreshold spectrum (AdAS spectrum) questionnaires.

A total of 2426 subjects joined the survey: 623 subjects (26.3%) reported a score associated with significant orthorexic symptoms according to ORTO-15 (ON group), while 1789 subjects (73.7%) did not report ON symptomatology and were considered as healthy controls (HC). The ON group scored significantly higher on almost all AdAS spectrum domains. Moreover, being female and scoring higher on AdAS spectrum were statistically predictive factors for the presence of ON symptomatology. Among AdAS spectrum domains, higher scores on AdAS spectrum inflexibility and adherence to routine and restricted interests and rumination domains, as well as lower scores on verbal communication domain, were statistically predictive of orthorexic symptoms.

Our findings highlight an overlap between ON and autism spectrum psychopathology. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between restrictive eating disorders and female autism phenotypes.

Ketamine, an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, has been “repurposed” as a rapid-acting antidepressant for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The s-enantiomer of ketamine, “esketamine,” was FDA approved for TRD and depressive symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder with suicidal ideations/behaviors. Intravenous (IV) ketamine, although financially less expensive, is often not covered by insurance and intranasal (IN) esketamine, although covered by insurance can be expensive. There is a paucity of literature on efficacy data comparing subanesthetic IV ketamine and IN esketamine for TRD in a real-world scenario. Thus, we conducted this study comparing the efficacy and the number of treatments required to achieve remission/response with repeated use of subanesthetic IV ketamine/IN esketamine among TRD patients.

This was an observational study where we included adults (≥18 years) with TRD who provided consent and had received up to 6 IV ketamine infusions (0.5 mg/kg, infused over 40 minutes) or up to 8 intranasal (IN) esketamine (56/84 mg) treatments for TRD at the Mayo Clinic Depression Center. Depression symptoms were measured utilizing the self-report 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) scale before and 24 hours after ketamine/esketamine treatment. Remission and response were defined as QIDS-SR 16 score ≤5 and ≥50% change in QIDS-SR 16, respectively. Continuous variables are reported as means ± SD and categorical variables as counts and percentages. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare continuous variables. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. The number of treatments to remission/response was calculated.

Sixty-three adults with TRD, middle-aged (47.0 ± 12.1 years), predominantly female (65%), of which 76% (n = 48) and 24% (n = 15) received IV ketamine and IN esketamine, respectively. Mean (SE) change in QIDS-SR 16 score was −8.7 ± 0.7 (P < .001), a significant reduction (improvement) from baseline (mean ± SD = 17.6 ± 3.7). Overall remission and response rates were 36.5% and 55.6%, respectively in the acute phase. Response (56.3% vs 53.3%) and remission rates (39.6% vs 26.7%) were similar among patients who received IV ketamine or IN esketamine, respectively (P > .05). The mean number of treatments received to achieve response (2.5 ± 1.6 vs 4.6 ± 2.1) and remission (2.4 ± 1.3 vs 6.3 ± 2.4) were significantly lower among patients who received IV ketamine compared to IN esketamine (P < .005). Most patients tolerated both treatments well.

Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine showed similar response/remission in TRD patients but the number of treatments required to achieve response/remission was significantly lower with IV ketamine compared to IN esketamine. These findings need to be investigated in a randomized control trial comparing these two treatment interventions.

No funding

Skin picking disorder and trichotillomania, also characterized as body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), often lead to functional impairment. Some people with BFRBs, however, report little if any psychosocial dysfunction. There has been limited research as to which clinical aspects of BFRBs are associated with varying degrees of functional impairment.

Adults (n = 98), ages 18 to 65 with a current diagnosis of trichotillomania (n = 37), skin picking disorder (n = 32), trichotillomania plus skin picking disorder (n = 10), and controls (n = 19) were enrolled. Partial least squares regression (PLS) was used to identify variables associated with impairment on the Sheehan Disability Scale.

PLS identified an optimal model accounting for 45.8% of variation in disability. Disability was significantly related to (in order of descending coefficient size): severity of picking, perceived stress, comorbid disorders (specifically, anxiety disorders / obsessive–compulsive disorder), trait impulsivity, family history of alcohol use disorder, atypical pulling/picking sites, and older age.

At present mental disorders are viewed as unitary entities; however, the extent of impairment varies markedly across patients with BFRBs. These data suggest that whereas symptom nature/severity is important in determining impairment, so too are other variables commonly unmeasured in clinical practice. Outcomes for patients may thus be maximized by rigorously addressing comorbid disorders; as well as integrating components designed to enhance top-down control and stress management. Interestingly, focused picking and emotional pulling were linked to worse disability, hinting at some differences between the two types of BFRBs, in terms of determinants of impairment.

Prescription opioid dispensing patterns over time were assessed for individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) vs matched controls.

Health insurance claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database and Multi-State Medicaid Database were analyzed. Individuals aged 18 to 64 with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims for BD during the year preceding the analysis year (2015-2019) were included, with age- and sex-matched controls. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Opioid dispensing during each analysis year was defined as either chronic (coverage for ≥70 days in any 90-day period, or ≥6 prescriptions dispensed during analysis year) or nonchronic (≥1 prescription dispensed, not meeting chronic definition).

BD patients had a higher prevalence of medical and psychiatric comorbidities, including pain diagnoses, vs controls. Among patients with BD in the Commercial database, chronic opioid dispensing decreased from 11% (controls: 3%) in 2015 to 6% (controls: 2%) in 2019, and in the Medicaid database, from 27% (controls: 12%) to 12% (controls: 5%). Among patients with BD in the Commercial database, nonchronic dispensing decreased from 26% (controls: 17%) in 2015 to 20% (controls: 12%) in 2019, and from 32% (controls: 26%) to 25% (controls: 14%) in the Medicaid database.

Between 2015 and 2019, there was a significant decrease in chronic and nonchronic prescription opioid dispensing among BD patients and controls across both the Commercial and Medicaid databases. Despite this finding, it is important to note that both chronic and nonchronic opioid dispensing was consistently higher for BD patients vs controls over time, across both databases.

Alkermes, Inc.

A combination of olanzapine and samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) that provides the efficacy of olanzapine while mitigating weight gain was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. To improve communication of the OLZ/SAM benefit-risk profile, a structured framework was utilized.

The Benefit-Risk Action Team framework was used to evaluate OLZ/SAM, with analyses completed for each pivotal study. ENLIGHTEN-1 evaluated antipsychotic efficacy and safety. ENLIGHTEN-2 evaluated the weight profile of OLZ/SAM vs olanzapine. Benefit-risk outcomes were selected based on study outcome parameters, known risks of olanzapine and samidorphan, and public health importance. A subset of opioid antagonist risks was not assessed due to clinical trial exclusions; however, they were factored into the overall evaluation. Risk differences and confidence intervals were analyzed.

In ENLIGHTEN-1, OLZ/SAM had a lower risk of psychiatric discontinuation and nonresponse to treatment compared with placebo; higher risks of hyperprolactinemia, weight gain (≥7%), sedation, and worsening of fasting triglycerides and glucose, and no difference for fasting total and LDL cholesterol, neutropenia, orthostatic hypotension, and movement disorders. In ENLIGHTEN-2, OLZ/SAM had reduced risks of weight gain and waist circumference increase compared to olanzapine along with similar risks of relapse and psychiatric discontinuation and no difference in metabolic worsening, neutropenia, hyperprolactinemia, orthostatic hypotension, sedation, and movement disorders.

Based on this assessment, OLZ/SAM has comparable efficacy and a safety profile consistent with olanzapine, with reduced weight gain. A structured approach to assessing the benefit-risk profile of a product facilitates transparent evaluation and communication.

Alkermes, Inc.

To evaluate the effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-a) in reducing the 90-day and annual readmission rates in schizophrenia inpatients.

We conducted a cross-sectional study and included 180 adult patients with psychotic disorders discharged from 2018 to 2019 at a state psychiatric hospital. Descriptive statistics were used to measure the differences between the readmit and nonreadmit cohorts. Logistic regression model was used to measure the odds ratio (OR) for 90-day and annual readmission and was controlled for potential readmission risk factors.

A lower proportion of patients receiving LAI-a were readmitted within 90-day (28.6%) and 1-year (32.4%) periods. Patients receiving LAI-a had lower odds of association for 90-day (OR 0.36, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.139-0.921) and annual (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.131-0.954) readmissions compared to those discharged on oral antipsychotics. A higher proportion of inpatients who received fluphenazine LAI had 90-day (25%) and annual (18.2%) readmissions compared to other LAI-a.

Utilization of LAI-a in patients with psychotic disorders can decrease both 90-day and annual psychiatric readmissions by 64% to 65%. Physicians should prefer LAI-a to reduce the readmission rate and improve the quality of life, and decrease the healthcare-related financial burden.

MIND-TD is a collaboration of healthcare professionals (HCPs) who are committed to raising awareness of tardive dyskinesia (TD), a persistent and potentially disabling movement disorder associated with prolonged exposure to antipsychotics and other dopamine receptor blocking agents. The MIND-TD questionnaire was developed to help HCPs screen for TD and facilitate discussion with patients.

In August 2020, an expert panel of 13 HCPs (4 psychiatrists, 6 neurologists/movement disorder specialists [MDSs], and 3 advanced practice providers [APPs]) met virtually to discuss potential screening questions for TD. This work was continued by 4 panelists (1 psychiatrist, 2 neurologists/MDSs, and 1 APP) who tested the questions in clinical practice for revision and refinement. The same group also worked with the sponsor to develop 2 additional sections that could be used to elicit more information from patients. The panel recognized the need for a tool that could facilitate telehealth screening for TD, including audio-only interactions. Therefore, practices from speech-language pathologists (eg, diadochokinetics) were used to refine the questionnaire.

Part 1 of the MIND-TD questionnaire includes a yes-or-no question for each of the 4 following topics: presence of extra or unwanted movements (Movement); feelings of embarrassment or self-consciousness (Impact); if anyone else has noticed the movements (Notice); and if movements interfere with everyday routines (Daily Activities). Part 1 can be administered by any trained medical staff, either in person or via telehealth (with video or audio-only). Routine administration is suggested in all patients who meet any of the following criteria: current or prior use of any first- or second-generation antipsychotic; use of an anticholinergic medication in conjunction with a current or past antipsychotic; or current diagnosis of TD. Part 2 of the MIND-TD questionnaire has 2 sections. The first (Thorough Interview) includes 9 items related to physical/functional difficulties (eg, eating, speaking, walking, and gripping objects) and 3 simple instructions for speech difficulties. The second section (Differentiate) includes checklists of characteristic movements for TD and drug-induced parkinsonism, along with an item related to akathisia and suggestions for observing abnormal or involuntary movements. Part 2 should be administered by the treating HCP in patients who have abnormal movements that may be related to TD. Part 2 requires visual observation of the patient, whether in-person or via video.

MIND-TD is a screening questionnaire that can facilitate a dialogue between HCPs and patients about the risks, symptoms, and impact of TD. The MIND questions can stand alone and be administered during in-person visits or telehealth visits (video or audio-only). The TD section can be used to gather more information about a patient’s abnormal movements.

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

The aim of this study is to examine the effects of quetiapine as an adjuvant treatment for obsessive–compulsive (OC) symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) type I.

In this 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, 47 patients with BD in euthymic phase that had OC symptoms were randomly allocated to receive either quetiapine or placebo plus their routine medications (lithium + clonazepam). Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) was used to assess the outcomes. Adverse effects were also recorded.

Of 47 BD patients with OC symptoms that were randomly allocated in two groups of quetiapine (n = 24) and placebo group (n = 23), 40 patients (20 in quetiapine group and 20 in placebo group) completed the trial. Throughout the trial, the mean score of YBOCS in the quetiapine group dropped from 24.37 ± 1.51 to 15.26 ± 1.16 (P < .001) and in the placebo group decreased from 24.21 ± 1.33 to 23.94 ± 1.66 (P = 1.97). At the end of the study, 12 (60%) patients in the quetiapine group and 1 (5%) patient in the placebo group had more than 34% decline in YBOCS score (P < .001). No serious adverse effects were reported in two groups.

Our double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial showed that quetiapine may be an effective adjuvant agent for reducing OC symptoms in BD patients.

Altered peripheral immune/inflammatory system and brain volumetric changes have been implicated in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). This study aimed to evaluate how peripheral levels of cytokines are related to volumetric brain changes in euthymic patients with BD.

Euthymic patients with BD (n = 21) and healthy controls (n = 22) were enrolled in this exploratory study. Blood samples were collected on the same day of clinical assessment and neuroimaging. Cytokines were measured through cytometric bead array method. Neuroimaging data were acquired using a sagittal three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging T1-weighted fast field echo sequence and was processed using FreeSurfer.

Compared to controls, BD patients had significantly lower volumes in the cingulate, medial-orbitofrontal (MOF) and parahippocampal regions. We found a negative correlation between right MOF volume and interferon-gamma levels (β = −0.431, P = .049) and a positive correlation between interleukin-10 levels and left posterior cingulate volume (β = 0.457, P = .048).

Our results support the involvement of inflammatory pathways in structural brain changes in BD.