Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international
  4. Volume 26
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all volumes

Volume 26 - 1989

Contents

Page 1 of 2

Articles

Notes and Comments/Notes et commentaires

  • Liability for Damage Caused by Space Debris: The Cosmos 954 Claim

  • Edward G. Lee, D. W. Sproule
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    09 March 2016, pp. 273-279

  • Canada's claim against the Soviet Union for compensation for damages caused by the re-entry and crash in 1978 of the Soviet satellite, Cosmos 954, was based primarily on the 1972 Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (hereinafter referred to as the Liability Convention) and also on the Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects (hereinafter referred to as the Rescue and Return Agreement). It gave rise to several legal issues concerning the interpretation of these conventions. They are of relevance to states seeking compensation for damage caused by space debris.

  • Contemporary U.S. Theory of International Law*

  • Edward McWhinney
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    09 March 2016, pp. 281-295

  • My retrospective study, published in the twenty-fifth anniversary volume of this Yearbook, attempted a critical survey of post-war Soviet general theory of international law, and noted the signs of an intellectual changing of the guard and the emergence of a new generation of Soviet international legal theorists. Is it possible today to speak of a post-war U.S. general theory of international law, and, if so, can we speak of a generational change, in the late 1980's, similar to that in the Soviet Union?

Canadian Practice in International Law / La pratique canadienne en matière de droit international public

Practice / La pratique

Practice / La pratique

Cases / La jurisprudence

Book Reviews / Recensions de livres

Page 1 of 2