Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:51:44.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Update on the Vanuatu Megapode Megapodius layardi on Ambrym, Vanuatu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Tanya Foster
Affiliation:
5B Winterwell Road, Brixton, London SW2 5JB, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A group of villagers in Vanuatu are concerned that continuing development pressures are contributing to the over-exploitation of eggs of the Vanuatu Megapode Megapodius layardi. The Vanuatu Megapode or “namalau” as it is known locally, is endemic to the country and classified as Vulnerable. Repeating a previous survey carried out in 1995, the Vanuatu Protected Areas Initiative mapped and classified the burrows at three communal nesting grounds on north-west Ambrym in November 1996. The number of active and probably active burrows on the beach was low compared with 1995, whereas it was higher on both the raised promontories. The beach nesting site had recently been affected by a cyclone, and storm waves had inundated the area with the highest concentration of burrows. There is concern over the high percentage of megapode burrows checked by villagers at Buwoma, as well as the localized impact visitors could be having. Discussions with villagers raised useful points to be included in the proposed protection plan, particularly the support for a protected area.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1999

References

Argeloo, M. and Dekker, R. W. R. J. (1996) Exploitation of megapode eggs in Indonesia: the role of traditional methods in the conservation of megapodes. Oryx 30:5964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, J. (1996) Notes on the Vanuatu Megapode Megapodius layardi on Ambrym, Vanuatu. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 6: 401408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregulla, H. L. (1992) Birds of Vanuatu. Shropshire: Anthony Nelson.Google Scholar
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J., and Stattersfield, A. J. (1994) Birds to watch 2: the world list of threatened birds. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series no. 4)Google Scholar
Dekker, R. W. R. J. (1988) Notes on ground temperatures at nesting sites of the Maleo Macrocephalon maleo (Megapodiidae). Emu 88: 124127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, R. W. R. J. (1989) Predation and the western limits of megapode distribution (Megapodiidae; Aves). J. Biogeogr. 16: 317321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, R. W. R. J. and McGowan, P. J. K. (1995) Megapodes—an action plan for their conservation 1995–1999. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
IUCN (1996) The 1996 Red List of threatened animals. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N., Dekker, R. W. R. J. and Roselaar, C. S. (1995) The megapodes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ntlamoa-Baidu, Y. (1995) Conservation education in threatened species management in Africa. Bird Conserv. Internatn 5: 455462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankaran, R. (1995). The Nicobar Megapode and other avifauna of the Nicobar Islands. Status and Conservation. SACON-Technical Report 2. Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, India.Google Scholar
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. and Wege, D.C. (1998) Endemic bird areas of the World. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International.Google Scholar
Tacconi, L. (1995) Participatory conservation in Malakula Island. Research Report 10, Vanuatu Forest Conservation Reports. University of New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar