Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  4. Volume 13
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all volumes

Volume 13 - December 1990

Contents

Page 14 of 21

Open Peer Commentary

Continuing Commentary

Open Peer Commentary

Author's Response

Open Peer Commentary

Author's Response

Open Peer Commentary

Continuing Commentary

Open Peer Commentary

Author's Response

Open Peer Commentary

Target Article

  • Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction

  • Douglas Wahlsten
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    19 May 2011, pp. 109-120

  • It makes sense to attribute a definite percentage of variation in some measure of behavior to variation in heredity only if the effects of heredity and environment are truly additive. Additivity is often tested by examining the interaction effect in a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or its equivalent multiple regression model. If this effect is not statistically significant at the α = 0.05 level, it is common practice in certain fields (e.g., human behavior genetics) to conclude that the two factors really are additive and then to use linear models, which assume additivity. Comparing several simple models of nonadditive, interactive relationships between heredity and environment, however, reveals that ANOVA often fails to detect nonadditivity because it has much less power in tests of interaction than in tests of main effects. Likewise, the sample sizes needed to detect real interactions are substantially greater than those needed to detect main effects. Data transformations that reduce interaction effects also change drastically the properties ofthe causal model and may conceal theoretically interesting and practically useful relationships. If the goal ofpartitioning variance among mutually exclusive causes and calculating “heritability” coefficients is abandoned, interactive relationships can be examined more seriously and can enhance our understanding of the ways living things develop.

Open Peer Commentary

Front matter

  • BBS volume 13 issue 3 Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    19 May 2011, pp. f1-f4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Open Peer Commentary

Page 14 of 21