Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:24:12.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters for bone strength, osteochondrosis and meat percentage in Finnish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2010

A. Storskrubb ,
M.-L. Sevón-Aimonen  and
P. Uimari
A. Storskrubb
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Biotechnology and Food Research, Biometrical Genetics, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
M.-L. Sevón-Aimonen
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Biotechnology and Food Research, Biometrical Genetics, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
P. Uimari*
Affiliation:
MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Biotechnology and Food Research, Biometrical Genetics, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland
*
†E-mail: pekka.uimari@mtt.fi
Get access

Abstract

Osteochondrosis (OC) is a major factor causing joint problems that affect animal welfare and pork production profitability. Strong bones are also important in the slaughtering process, especially as broken bones can lead to rejections of parts of the carcass. In this study, 326 Finnish Yorkshire and 464 Finnish Landrace test station pigs were examined post mortem for bone strength and osteochondral lesions. The objective was to estimate genetic parameters for OC and bone strength and their genetic and phenotypic correlations with carcass meat percentage. Two formulas were used for lean meat percentage, the first one (Hennessy meat-%) comprising two fat thickness measurements and one muscle depth measurement, and the second one (test station meat-%) also including the weight of lean meat in ham. Finnish Yorkshire had stronger bones than Finnish Landrace on average, but also more OC in the proximal end of the humerus (36%) and the distal end of the femur (51%) than Finnish Landrace (29% and 31% OC in the humerus and femur, respectively). By using the data on both breeds, the OC heritability estimated was 0.05 in the humerus and 0.26 in the femur. The estimated heritability of bone strength was also moderate (0.26). Test station meat-% showed higher heritability (0.40) than meat-% based on the Hennessy formula (0.29). Genetic correlations between meat percentage and the other studied traits were weak and associated with high standard errors. The results show that a mild form of OC is common in both Finnish pig breeds; bone strength and OC in the distal end of the femur are moderately heritable and can be improved through selection; and selection for high meat percentage does not seem to affect bone strength or OC.

Keywords

heritabilitypigosteochondrosisbone
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 8 , August 2010 , pp. 1319 - 1324
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ekman, S, Carlson, CS 1998. The pathophysiology of osteochondrosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice 28, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honkavaara, M, Sevón-Aimonen, M.-L, Mäki-Tanila, A, Puolanne, E, Ruusunen, M, Siljander-Rasi, H, Partanen, K 2007. Improvement of carcass quality of Finnish pigs: measurements and genetics (in Finnish). Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: Report no: 4982/502/2003.Google Scholar
Jensen, J, Madsen, P 2000. A user guide to DMU. A package for analysing multivariate mixed models. National Institute of Animal Science, Tjele, Denmark.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, B 2000. Osteochondrosis/osteoarthrosis and claw disorders in sows, associated with leg weakness. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 41, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorgensen, B, Andersen, S 2000. Genetic parameters for osteochondrosis in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire boars and correlation with leg weakness and production traits. Animal Science 71, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, B, Nielsen, B 2005. Genetic parameters for osteochondrosis traits in elbow joints of crossbred pigs and relationship with production traits. Animal Science 81, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadarmideen, HN, Schwörer, D, Ilahi, H, Malek, M, Hofer, A 2004. Genetics of osteochondral disease and its relationship with meat quality and quantity, growth, and feed conversion traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3118–3127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X, Mohan, S, Gu, W, Wergedal, J, Baylink, DJ 2001. Quantitative assessment of forearm muscle size, forelimb grip strength, forearm bone mineral density, and forearm bone size in determining humerus breaking strength in 10 inbred strains of mice. Calcified Tissue International 68, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundeheim, N 1987. Genetic analysis of osteochondrosis and leg weakness in the Swedish pig progeny testing scheme. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 37, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, H, Schwörer, D, Hofer, A 2007. Heritabilities of osteochondral lesions and genetic correlations with production and exterior traits in station-tested pigs. Animal 1, 1105–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mälkiä, P 2002. The young pig is vulnerable to joint problems (in Finnish). Käytännön Maamies.Google Scholar
Olsson, SE, Reiland, S 1978. The nature of osteochondrosis in animals. Summary and conclusions with comparative aspects on osteochondritis dissecans in man. Acta Radiologica 358 (suppl.), 299–306.Google ScholarPubMed
Serenius, T, Sevón-Aimonen, M-L, Kause, A, Mäntysaari, EA, Mäki-Tanila, A 2004. Genetic association of prolificacy with performance, carcass, meat quality, and leg conformation traits in the Finnish Landrace and Large White pig populations. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2301–2306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serenius, T, Sevón-Aimonen, M-L, Mäntysaari, EA 2001. The genetics of leg weakness in Finnish Large White and Landrace populations. Livestock Production Science 69, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serenius, T, Stalder, KJ 2006. Selection for sow longevity. Journal of Animal Science 84 (suppl.), E166–E171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wijk, HJ, Arts, DJG, Matthews, JO, Webster, M, Ducro, BJ, Knol, EF 2005. Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain. Journal of Animal Science 83, 324–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazdi, MH, Lundeheim, L, Rydhmer, L, Ringmar-Cederberg, E, Johansson, K 2000. Survival of Swedish Landrace and Yorkshire sows in relation to osteochondrosis: a genetic study. Animal Science 71, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ytrehus, B, Carlson, CS, Ekman, S 2007. Etiology and pathogenesis of osteochondrosis. Veterinary Pathology 44, 429–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed