Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effect of water trough type on the drinking behaviour of pasture-based beef heifers

  • P. A. D. Coimbra (a1), L. C. P. Machado Filho (a1), P. A. Nunes (a1), M. J. Hötzel (a1), A. G. L. de Oliveira (a2) and U. Cecato (a2)...

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different trough types on the water consumption and drinking behaviour of pasture-based beef heifers. Two trials were implemented with 32 beef heifers to test two different types of water troughs, namely a rectangular concrete trough (RC) and a round polyvinyl chloride water tank (PVC). In Trial 1, both troughs were simultaneously available to groups of four animals within eight paddocks. In Trial 2, the animals were distributed in pairs throughout 16 paddocks and, in a crossover design, were exposed to one type of trough at a time. In both trials, estimated water intake was per four animals. Number of drinking bouts, time spent drinking and amount of water intake from the RC and PVC trough were recorded in both trials. Data were statistically analysed by analysis of variance. In Trial 1, group and trough effect were in the model. In Trial 2, stage, pair and trough were tested. In Trial 1, where both types of troughs were available, animals had a higher number of drinking bouts (3.32 v. 0.57 ± 0.09; P < 0.01), longer drinking periods (144.21 v. 22.81 ± 7.3 s; P < 0.01) and greater intake (160.21 v. 23.76 ± 13.06 l; P < 0.01) from the PVC water tank, compared to the RC trough. In Trial 2, all groups drank more often (5.10 v. 3.28 ± 0.32; P < 0.001), for longer periods (167.23 v. 115.23 ± 15.61 s; P < 0.02) and with higher intake (141.36 v. 118.47 ± 5.01 l; P < 0.02) from the PVC than from the RC trough. Thus, heifers not only prefer, but also drink more from a PVC water tank in comparison to a RC trough.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Albright, JL 1993. Feeding behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 485498.
Andersson, M 1985. Effects of drinking water temperatures on water intake and milk yield of tied-up dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 12, 329338.
Bica, GS 2005. Animal welfare and environmental protection in supplying water for beef cattle. MSc, Federal University of Santa Catarina.
Bica, GS, Machado Filho, LCP, Teixeira, DL, Souza, GPP, Probst, R 2006. Behaviour and performance of beef cattle supplied with pond or trough. In Proceedings of the 43th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Zootechny. João Pessoa, Brazil, 6 pp.
FAO 2008. FAOSTAT Agriculture Data. Retrieved July 12, 2008, from http://apps.fao.org
Hötzel, MJ, Machado Filho, LCP, Teixeira, DL, Wolf, FM, Coimbra, PAD, Yunes, MC, Dinon, PSL, Lopes, EJC 2003. Effects of physiological state on water consumption of water-restricted dairy cows. In Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Animal Production, Porto Alegre, Brazil, pp. 232–234.
IAPAR (Instituto Agronômico do Paraná) 2005. Boletim Meteorológico Diário, Estação Meteorológica de Paranavaí.
Lardner, HA, Kirychuk, BD, Braul, L, Willms, WD, Yarotski, J 2005. The effect of water quality on cattle performance on pasture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 97104.
Lardy, G, Stoltenow, C 1999. Extension Veterinarian Livestock and Water, AS-954. Retrieved January 17, 2007, from http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/ansci/livestoc/as954w.htm
Loneragan, GH, Wagner, JJ, Gould, DH, Garry, FB, Thoren, MA 2001. Effects of water sulfate concentration on performance, water intake and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. Journal of Animal Science 79, 29412948.
Machado Filho, LCP, Teixeira, DL, Weary, DM, Von Keyserlingk, MAG, Hötzel, MJ 2004. Designing better water troughs: dairy cows prefer and drink more from larger troughs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89, 185193.
Meyer, U, Everinghoff, M, Gadeken, D, Flachowsky, G 2004. Investigations on the water intake of lactating dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 90, 117121.
Meyer, RU, Stahl, W, Flachowsky, G 2006. Investigations on the water intake of growing bulls. Livestock Science 103, 186191.
Murphy, M 1992. Nutritional factors affecting animal water and waste quality – water metabolism of diary cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 326333.
Murphy, M, Davis, CL, Mccoy, GC 1983. Factors affecting water consumption by Holstein cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 3538.
National Research Council 2000. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th edition. NRC, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
National Research Council 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th edition. NRC, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Nyman, S, Dahlborn, K 2001. Effect of water supply method and flow rate on drinking behaviour and fluid balance in horses. Physiology and Behavior 73, 18.
Osborne, VR, Hacker, RR, McBride, BW 2002. Effects of heated drinking water on the production responses of lactating Holstein and Jersey cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 267273.
Phillips, PA, Fraser, D 1990. Water bowl size for newborn pigs. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 6, 7981.
Phillips, PA, Fraser, D, Pawluczuk, B 2001. Determining the optimum mounting of water nipples for sows. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 17, 845847.
Pinheiro Machado, LC 2004. Pastoreio Racional Voisin: tecnologia agroecológica para o terceiro milênio. Ed. Cinco Continentes, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Rouda, R, Andersson, D, Wallace, J, Murray, L 1994. Free-ranging cattle water-consumption in south-central New-Mexico. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39, 2938.
SAS 2002. Proprietary software, version 9.00. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Sheffield, RE, Mostaghimi, S, Vaughan, DH, Collins, ER Jr, Allen, VG 1997. Off-stream water sources for grazing cattle as a stream bank stabilization and water quality BMP. Transactions of the ASAE 40, 595604.
Snedecor, GW, Cochran, WG 1989. Statistical methods, 8th edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.
Teixeira, D 2005. Efficiency and ethics in transforming pasture on milk: ethological aspects of water supply. MSc, Federal University of Santa Catarina.
Teixeira, DL, Hotzel, MJ, Machado Filho, LCP 2006. Designing better water troughs: 2. surface area and height, but not depth, influence dairy cows’ preference. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96, 169175.
Wheeler, JL, Burns, JC, Mochrie, RD, Gross, HD 1973. The choice of fixed or variable stocking rates in grazing experiments. Experimental Agriculture 9, 289302.
Wright, T 2003. Water Quality for Dairy Cattle. Dairy Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Retrieved August 21, 2005, from http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/livestock/dairy/facts/03-085.htm

Keywords

Effect of water trough type on the drinking behaviour of pasture-based beef heifers

  • P. A. D. Coimbra (a1), L. C. P. Machado Filho (a1), P. A. Nunes (a1), M. J. Hötzel (a1), A. G. L. de Oliveira (a2) and U. Cecato (a2)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed