Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Ulmer, S. Sidney
1985.
Governmental Litigants, Underdogs, and Civil Liberties in the Supreme Court: 1903-1968 Terms.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 3,
p.
899.
Segal, Jeffrey A.
1988.
Amicus Curiae Briefs By the Solicitor General During the Warren and Burger Courts: a Research Note.
Western Political Quarterly,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Segal, Jeffrey A.
and
Reedy, Cheryl D.
1988.
The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination: the Role of the Solicitor General.
Western Political Quarterly,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 3,
p.
553.
Caldeira, Gregory A.
and
Wright, John R.
1988.
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 4,
p.
1109.
Pacelle, Richard L.
1989.
Simulating Supreme Court Decision Making.
Political Science Teacher,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 2,
p.
8.
Jucewicz, Joseph
and
Baum, Lawrence
1990.
Workload Influences on Supreme Court Case Acceptance Rates, 1975-1984.
Western Political Quarterly,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
123.
McGuire, Kevin T.
1990.
Obscenity, Libertarian Values, and Decision Making in the Supreme Court.
American Politics Quarterly,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
p.
47.
Segal, Jeffrey A.
1990.
Supreme Court Support for the Solicitor General: the Effect of Presidential Appointments.
Western Political Quarterly,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
137.
Spiller, Pablo T.
1992.
Agency discretion under judicial review.
Mathematical and Computer Modelling,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 8-9,
p.
185.
McGuire, Kevin T.
and
Caldeira, Gregory A.
1993.
Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 3,
p.
717.
Ignagni, Joseph A.
1993.
U.S. Supreme Court Decision-Making and the Free Exercise Clause.
The Review of Politics,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
511.
Simester, Duncan I.
and
Brodie, Roderick J.
1993.
Forecasting criminal sentencing decisions.
International Journal of Forecasting,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
49.
McGuire, Kevin T.
and
Palmer, Barbara
1995.
Issue Fluidity on the U.S. Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 3,
p.
691.
Songer, Donald R.
Cameron, Charles M.
and
Segal, Jeffrey A.
1995.
An Empirical Test of the Rational-Actor Theory of Litigation.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
1119.
Maltzman, Forrest
and
Wahlbeck, Paul J.
1996.
Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 3,
p.
581.
Palmer, Barbara
1999.
Issue Definition and Policy Making on the United States Supreme Court.
Southeastern Political Review,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
699.
Palmer, Barbara
1999.
Issue Fluidity and Agenda Setting on the Warren Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Cameron, Charles M.
Segal, Jeffrey A.
and
Songer, Donald
2000.
Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 1,
p.
101.
O'Connor, Karen
2001.
Presidential Address: The Supreme Court and the South.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 3,
p.
701.
Zorn, Christopher J. W.
2002.
U.S. Government Litigation Strategies in the Federal Appellate Courts.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 1,
p.
145.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.