Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Understanding ‘water’
- Part II Water resources planning and management
- 8 Water law and the search for sustainability: a comparative analysis
- 9 Tackling the global water crisis: unlocking international law as fundamental to the peaceful management of the world's shared transboundary waters – introducing the H2O paradigm
- 10 Risk and uncertainty in water resources planning and management: a basic introduction
- 11 Collaboration and stakeholder engagement
- 12 Capacity building and knowledge sharing
- 13 Adaptive and integrated management of water resources
- 14 Gender and integrated water resource management
- 15 Environmental flows: achieving ecological outcomes in variable environments
- Part III Water resources planning and management: case studies
- Contributors
- Index
- References
15 - Environmental flows: achieving ecological outcomes in variable environments
from Part II - Water resources planning and management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Understanding ‘water’
- Part II Water resources planning and management
- 8 Water law and the search for sustainability: a comparative analysis
- 9 Tackling the global water crisis: unlocking international law as fundamental to the peaceful management of the world's shared transboundary waters – introducing the H2O paradigm
- 10 Risk and uncertainty in water resources planning and management: a basic introduction
- 11 Collaboration and stakeholder engagement
- 12 Capacity building and knowledge sharing
- 13 Adaptive and integrated management of water resources
- 14 Gender and integrated water resource management
- 15 Environmental flows: achieving ecological outcomes in variable environments
- Part III Water resources planning and management: case studies
- Contributors
- Index
- References
Summary
Environmental flows were implemented in the Cotter River in 1999 as a requirement of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Water Resources Act. A multi-disciplinary group composed of representatives from a water utility, ACT government, and research organisations was formed to manage the Cotter River environmental flows program, aiming to achieve specified ecological outcomes and increased water security through adaptive management. Based on scientific knowledge, changes were made to the delivery of environmental flows after drought in 2002 and bushfires in January 2003. Ongoing ecological assessment formed a major component of the adaptive management approach; it informed decisions regarding the achievement of desired ecological outcomes by using trial flow release strategies that involved smaller overall volumes of water. In this way, a feedback loop for the decision-making process was formed; it included a statement of the desired ecological outcomes, specified the flows needed to achieve them, how the effects would be assessed, and provided feedback to the decision makers. Another major component of the adaptive management approach was the formulation of a study design that was able to cope with changing questions and unforeseen events, such as drought and fire. The success of the environmental flows program has been demonstrated through attainment of desired changes to macroinvertebrate assemblage structure and periphyton, together with a significant reduction in the overall volume of water released as environmental flows.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Water Resources Planning and Management , pp. 331 - 350Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
(1999). ACT Environmental Flow Guidelines. Department of Environment, Climate Change, Energy and Water, Canberra, Australia.
(2006). Environmental Flow Guidelines 2006. Department of Environment, Climate Change, Energy and Water, Canberra Australia. http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/di/2006–13/current/pdf/2006–13.pdf, accessed 7 March 2010.
(2003). Annual Report 2003. http://www.actew.com.au/publications/annualReport/2003/default.aspx, accessed 7 March 2010.
and (1993). Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience, 43, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003). Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers. River Research and Applications, 19, 377–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 16, 1311–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2002). Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management, 30, 492–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2006). Dams and flow in the Cotter River, Australia: effects on instream trophic structure and benthic metabolism. Hydrobiologia, 572, 275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Finding Solutions for Environmental Conflicts: Power and Negotiation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2007). Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef and the Grand Canyon world heritage areas. Ambio, 36, 586–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , et al. (2010). Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment. Freshwater Biology, 55, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications, 19, 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Australian waterbirds: products of the continent's ecology. Emu, 102, 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). A prospectus for periphyton: recent and future ecological research. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29 (1), 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2003). Does Flow Modification Cause Geomorphological and Ecological Response in Rivers? A Literature Review From an Australian Perspective. Technical Report 1⁄2004, CRC for Freshwater Ecology. http://live.greeningaustralia.org.au/nativevegetation/pages/pdf/Authors%20L/13_Lloyd_et_al.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2010.
, , et al. (2002). Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: An overview. Environmental Management, 30, 455–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (2006). Ecological effects of serial impoundment on the Cotter River, Australia. Hydrobiologia, 572, 255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2005). Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science, 308, 405–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2004). Ecological Sustainability of Modified Environmental Flows in the Cotter River during Drought Conditions January 2003–April 2004, Final Report. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT, 2601.Google Scholar
(2005). Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). NSW Office of Water, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, Sydney. http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/Water-Management/Water-sharing/plans_commenced/default.aspx, accessed 7 March 2010.
, Davies P., , and (2004). Review of the 1999 ACT Environmental Flow Guidelines. A Report by the CRCFE to Environment ACT, November 2004. http://www.environment.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/156580/reviewofthe1999actenvironmentalflowguidelines1204pdf.pdf, accessed 30 March 2010.
, and (2005). River ecosystem response to bushfire disturbance: interaction with flow regulation. Australian Forestry, 68, 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and Norris, R. (2007). Adaptive management for determining environmental flows in the Australian Capital Territory. In Proceedings of the 5th Australian Stream Management Conference. Australian Rivers: Making a Difference, eds. , , et al. Charles Sturt University, Thurgoona, New South Wales. http://www.csu.edu.au/research/ilws/news/events/5asm/docs/proceedings/Peat_Michael_312.pdf, accessed 26 February 2010.Google Scholar
, , et al. (1997). The natural flow regime, a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience, 47, 769–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2003). River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2010). Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2009). Water Planning 2009. Review of Planning Variables for Water Supply and Demand Assessment: A Review of the Changes in Water Resources Modelling Assumptions. ACTEW Corporation, Infrastructure Development Branch, Water Division, Canberra. http://www.actew.com.au/publications/WaterPlanning2009Review_WaterSupplyandDemandAssessment.pdf, accessed 11 September 2009.
and (2000). Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques, eds. , and . Ambleside, Cumbria, UK: Freshwater Biological Association, pp. 125–42.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2008). Detecting biological responses to flow management: missed opportunities; future directions. River Research and Applications, 24, 506–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997). Valuation of experimental management options for ecological systems. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 987–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 71(6), 2060–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2000). Ecosystem modeling for evaluation of adaptive management policies in the Grand Canyon. Conservation Ecology, 4 (2), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by