Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:27:15.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Water law and the search for sustainability: a comparative analysis

from Part II - Water resources planning and management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

William L. Andreen
Affiliation:
University of Alabama School of Law
R. Quentin Grafton
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Karen Hussey
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Domestic water law regimes all around the globe face a common challenge: how to allocate freshwater resources in a fair, efficient, and sustainable manner. Agriculture, industry, and municipalities have traditionally competed for this increasingly limited resource. The legal structures that were devised to meet those critical economic and social uses, however, ignored another use, a non-consumptive use that until recently was not well understood and had relatively few champions in the political or legal arena. The environment – including adequate stream flows and healthy ecological processes – is the use that our domestic water law regimes have typically overlooked; the reason is that these legal systems were designed, in large measure, to regard water as a commodity for exclusive human use and consumption.

As a result of this myopic approach to the use of a natural resource, many rivers and streams bear little resemblance today to the waters they once were. Agricultural interests, industry, municipalities and other water managers have manipulated and degraded our freshwater resources in relentless fashion, all facilitated by domestic water law regimes. Meanwhile, little or no attention was paid to the adverse environmental effect of reduced stream flows or to the value of the ecological services that well-functioning freshwater systems provide.

After so many years and the creation of so many economic and social expectations predicated upon prior practice, change is difficult. Many waters are over-appropriated or otherwise impaired by excessive or unwise water uses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreen, W. L. (2004). Water quality today– has the Clean Water Act been a success?Alabama Law Review, 55 (3), 537–93.Google Scholar
Andreen, W. L. (2006). Developing a more holistic approach to water management in the United States. Environmental Law Reporter, 36 (4), 10277–89.Google Scholar
Andreen, W. L. (2008). Alabama. In Cumulative Supplement to Volume 6 of Waters and Water Rights, eds. Beck, R. E. and Kelley, A. K.. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Andreen, W. L. (2009). Delegated federalism versus devolution: some insights from the history of water pollution control. In Preemption Choice: The Theory, Law, and Reality of Federalism's Core Question, ed. Buzbee, W.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257–76.Google Scholar
Andreen, W. L. and Jones, S. (2008). The Clean Water Act: A Blueprint for Reform. Washington: Center for Progressive Reform. http://progressivereform.org/articles/CW_Blueprint_802.pdf.Google Scholar
,Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE), Australian Government (2007). Purchasing Water in the Murray Darling Basin: ABARE Report for the Department of Environment and Water Resources. Canberra: ABARE.Google Scholar
Bauer, C. J. (1998). Against the Current: Privatization, Water Markets, and the State in Chile. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, C. J. (2004). Siren Song: Chilean Water Law as a Model for International Reform. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Beck, R. E., ed. (2007). Vol. I of Waters and Water Rights. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
Boelens, R. (2008). From universal prescriptions to living rights: local and indigenous water rights confront public–private partnerships in the Andes. Journal of International Affairs, 61 (2), 127–44.Google Scholar
Bronstein, V. (2002). Drowning in the hole of the doughnut: regulatory overbreadth, discretionary licensing and the rule of law. South African Law Journal, 119 (3), 469–83.Google Scholar
Connell, D. (2007). Water Politics in the Murray–Darling Basin. Leichhardt, NSW: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
,Council of Australian Governments (COAG) (1994). Communique on Water Resource Policy, February, §4(a).
,Council of Australian Governments (COAG) (2004). Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative, June 2004.
Craig, R. K. (2008). Climate change, regulatory fragmentation, and water triage. University of Colorado Law Review, 79 (3), 825–927.Google Scholar
Dellapenna, J.W. (2002). The law of water allocation in the Southeastern States at the opening of the twenty-first century. University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review, 25(1), 9–88.Google Scholar
Dellapenna, J. W. (2009a). The market alternative. In The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water, eds. Dellapenna, J. W. and Gupta, J.. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 373–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellapenna, J. W. (2009b). United States: the allocation of surface waters. In The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water, eds. Dellapenna, J. W. and Gupta, J.. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA), Australian Government (DEWHA) (2009). Water for the Future, Water for the Environment. Canberra: DEWHA. http://www.environment.gov.au/water/environmental/management/index.html.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Australian Government (undated), Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder: 2008–09 Business Plan.
,Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (1997). White Paper on a National Water Policy. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
,Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (2004). National Water Resource Strategy, 1st edn. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Doremus, H. (2005). Crossing boundaries: commentary on ‘The law at the water's edge’. In Wet Growth: Should Water Law Control Land Use? ed. Arnold, C. A.. Washington: Environmental Law Institute, pp. 271–313.Google Scholar
Doremus, H. (2008). Data gaps in natural resource management: sniffing for leaks along the information pipeline. Indiana Law Journal, 83 (2), 407–63.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. E. (2006). Water law and policy in Australia– an overview. Environmental Law Reporter, 36 (4), 10264–276.Google Scholar
Foerster, A. (2009). Progress on environmental flows in southeastern Australia in light of climate change. Environmental Law Reporter, 39 (5), 10426–434.Google Scholar
Francis, R. (2005). Water justice in South Africa: natural resources policy at the intersection of human rights, economics, and political power. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 18 (1), 149–96.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. and Bowmer, K. H. (2008). Environmental water allocations and their governance. In Managing Water for Australia: The Social and Institutional Challenges, eds. Hussey, K. and Dovers, S.. Collingwood, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 43–57.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., Bartlett, R. and Gray, J. (2009). Water Resources Law. Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
Getches, D. H. (1997). Water Law, 3rd edn. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Getzler, J. (2006). A History of Water Rights at Common Law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghassemi, F. and White, I. (2007). Inter-Basin Water Transfer: Case studies from Australia, United States, Canada, China and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godden, L. (2005). Water law reform in Australia and South Africa: sustainability, efficiency and social justice. Journal of Environmental Law, 17 (2), 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. (2006). Legal approaches to the ownership, management and regulation of water from riparian rights to commodification. Transforming Cultures eJournal, 1 (2), 64–96. http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/TfC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, M. J. (1992). The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyder Consulting, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (2008). Review of the 2007–08 Water Entitlement Purchases: Final Report. Canberra: DEWHA.Google Scholar
Jungreis, J. N. (2005). ‘Permit’ me another drink: a proposal for safeguarding the water rights of federal lands in the regulated riparian east. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 29 (2), 369–419.Google Scholar
Katz, D. (2006). Going with the flow: preserving and restoring instream water allocations, In The World's Water: 2006–2007, ed. Gleick, P. H.. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Kidd, M. (2009). South Africa: the development of water law. In The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water, eds. Dellapenna, J. W. and Gupta, J.. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
McKay, J. and Marsden, S. (2009). Australia: the problem of sustainability in water. In The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water, eds. Dellapenna, J. W. and Gupta, J.. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 175–88.Google Scholar
Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency (2002). National Water Quality Inventory, 2000 Report to Congress, Washington D.C.: EPA.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2005). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Chile. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pena, H. (2005). Meaning and scope of water code reform in Chile. Circular No. 22. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
Postel, S. L. (2008). The forgotten infrastructure: safeguarding freshwater ecosystems. Journal of International Affairs, 61 (2), 75–90.Google Scholar
Reisner, M. (1986). Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
,Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979).
Salman, S. M. A. and Bradlow, D. D. (2006). Regulatory Frameworks for Water Resources Management: A Comparative Study. Washington: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. I. (1999). Water in Australia: Resources and Management. Melbourne : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, R. (2005). Water law in a democratic South Africa: a country case study examining the introduction of a public rights system. Texas Law Review, 83 (7), 2167–83.Google Scholar
Tarlock, A. D. (2005). We are all water lawyers now: water law's potential but limited impact on urban growth management. In Wet Growth: Should water law control land use? ed. Arnold, C. A.. Washington: Environmental Law Institute, pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
Vuuren, L. (May/June 2009). Government leaders slow to reserve water for environment. The Water Wheel, 8 (3), 14–17.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C. F. (1992). Crossing the Next Meridian: Land, Water, and the Future of the West. Washington, D. C.Island Press.Google Scholar
Williams, S. and Carriger, S. (2006). Water and sustainable development: lessons from Chile. Global Water Partnership, Policy Brief 2, http://www.gwpforum.org/grp/library/Policybrief2Chile.pdf.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×