Kraemer, H, Kazdin, A, Offord, D, et al. Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1997; 54: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Desmarais, S, Van Dorn, R, Johnson, K, et al. Community violence perpetration and victimization among adults with mental illness. Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print, February 13, 433 2014: e1–e8. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301680.Google Scholar

Monahan, J. The inclusion of biological risk factors in violence risk assessments. In: Singh, I, Sinnott-Armstrong, W, Savulescu, J, eds. BioPrediction, Biomarkers, and Bad Behavior: Scientific, Legal, and Ethical Implications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013: 57–76, 439CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, B, Bonnie, R, Monahan, J. Understanding and applying Virginia’s new statutory civil commitment criteria. Developments in Mental Health Law. 2009; 28(1): 127–139.Google Scholar

Meehl, P. Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota; 1954.Google Scholar

Ægisdóttir, S, White, M, Spengler, P, et al. The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist. 2006; 34(3): 341–382.Google Scholar

Skeem, J, Monahan, J. Current directions in violence risk assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011; 20: 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tardiff, K. Clinical risk assessment of violence. In: Simon, R, Tardiff, K, eds. Textbook of Violence Assessment and Management. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2008: 3–16.Google Scholar

Webster, C, Douglas, K, Eaves, D, Hart, S. HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence (Version 2). Vancouver: Simon Fraser University; 2007.Google Scholar

Douglas, K, Hart, Webster, C, Belfrage, H. HCR-20 (Version 3): Assessing Risk for Violence. Burnaby, BC, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.Google Scholar

Douglas, K, Hart, S, Groscup, J, Litwack, T. Assessing violence risk. In: Weiner, I, Otto, R, eds. The Handbook of Forensic Psychology, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2014: 385–442.Google Scholar

Monahan, J, Steadman, H, Silver, E, et al. Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar

Monahan, J. The classification of violence risk. In: R. Otto, R, Douglas, K, eds. Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment. New York:Routledge; 2010: 187–198.Google Scholar

Sturup, J, Kristiansson, M, Monahan, J. Gender and violent behavior in Swedish general psychiatric patients: a prospective clinical study. Psychiatr. Serv. 2013; 64(7): 688–693.Google Scholar

Quinsey, V, Harris, G, Rice, M, Cormier, C. Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rice, M, Harris, G, Lang, C. Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide—Revised (VRAG-R). Psychol. Assess. 2013; 25(3): 951–965.Google Scholar

Lidz, C, Mulvey, E, Gardner, W. The accuracy of predictions of violence to others. JAMA. 1993; 269(8): 1007–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yang, M, Wong, S, Coid, J. The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychol. Bull. 2010; 136(5): 740–767.Google Scholar

Kroner, D, Mills, J, Morgan, B. A coffee can, factor analysis, and prediction of antisocial behavior: the structure of criminal risk. Int. J. Law Psychiatry. 2005; 28(4): 360–374.Google Scholar

Skeem, J, Manchak, S, Peterson, J. Correctional policy for offenders with mental disorder: creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law Hum. Behav. 2011; 35(2): 110–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hart, S, Michie, C, Cooke, D. Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence. Br. J. Psychiatry Suppl. 2007; 49: s60–s65.Google Scholar

Cooke, D, Michie, C. Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: a challenge for forensic practice. Law Hum. Behav. 2010; 34(4): 259–274.Google Scholar

Hanson, R, Howard, P. Individual confidence intervals do not inform decision-makers about the accuracy of risk assessment evaluations. Law Hum. Behav. 2010; 34(4): 275–281.Google Scholar

Scurich, N, Monahan, J, John, R. Innumeracy and unpacking: bridging the nomothetic/idiographic divide in violence risk assessment. Law Hum. Behav. 2012; 36(6): 548–554.Google Scholar

Abraham, K. Distributing Risk: Insurance, Legal Theory, and Public Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1986.Google Scholar

National Research Council. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1989.Google Scholar

Faigman, D, Monahan, J, Slobogin, C. Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony. University of Chicago Law Review. 2014; 81(2).Google Scholar

Baird, C. A question of evidence: A critique of risk assessment models used in the justice system. National Council on Crime & Delinquency website. http://www.nccdglobal.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdf/special-report-evidence.pdf. Published February 2009. Accessed November 25, 2013.Google Scholar

Andrews, D. The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of correctional assessment and treatment. In: Dvoskin, J, Skeem, J, Novaco, R, Douglas, K, eds. Using Social Science to Reduce Violent Offending. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012: 127–156.Google Scholar

Monahan, J, Skeem, J. Risk redux: The resurgence of risk assessment in criminal sanctioning. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2014; 26(3).Google Scholar

Heilbrun, K. Prediction versus management models relevant to risk assessment: the importance of legal decision-making context. Law Hum. Behav. 1997; 21(4): 347–359.Google Scholar

Howard, P, Dixon, L. Identifying change in the likelihood of violent recidivism: causal dynamic risk factors in the OASys violence predictor. Law Hum. Behav. 2013; 37(3): 163–174.Google Scholar

Kroner, D, Yessine, A. Changing risk factors that impact recidivism: in search of mechanisms of change. Law Hum. Behav. 2013; 37(5): 321–336.Google Scholar

Menzies, R, Webster, C, Sepejak, D. Hitting the forensic sound barrier: predictions of dangerousness in a pre-trial psychiatric clinic. In: Webster, C, Ben-Aron, M, Hucker, S, eds. Dangerousness: Probability and Prediction, Psychiatry and Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1985: 115–143.Google Scholar

Appelbaum, P. Reference guide on mental health evidence. In: Federal Judicial Center. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011: 813–896.Google Scholar

Singh, J, Petrila, J. Measuring and interpreting the predictive validity of violence risk assessments. Behav. Sci. Law. 2013; 31(1): 1–7.Google Scholar

Sadeh, N, Binder, R, McNiel, D. Recent victimization increases risk for violence in justice-involved persons with mental illness. Law Hum. Behav. Advance online publication July 15, 2013. doi:10.1037/lhb0000043.Google Scholar

Knock, M, Park, J, Finn, C, et al. Measuring the suicidal mind: Implicit cognition predicts suicidal behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2010; 21(4): 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skeem, J, Manchak, S, Lidz, C, Mulvey, M. The utility of patients’ self-perceptions of violence risk: consider asking the person who may know best. Psychiatr. Serv. 2013; 64(5): 410–415.Google Scholar

Aharonia, E, Vincent, GM, Harenskia, CL, et al. Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U S A. 2013; 110(15): 6223–6228.Google Scholar