Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:43:59.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Advances in Explaining and Assessing Institutional Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2018

Ulrich Witt
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute, Jena
Andreas Chai
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Economic Change
Advances in Evolutionary Economics
, pp. 213 - 340
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 1982. Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. 1986. Liberty Market and State. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Catania, A. C. and Harnad, S. 1988. The Selection of Behavior: The Operant Behaviorism of B.F. Skinner: Comments and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Commager, H. S. 1978. The Empire of Reason: How Europe Imagined and America Realized the Enlightenment. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 2006. Breaking the Spell. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, A. [1840] 1945. Democracy in America, Vol. 2. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Economist. 2006. Islam, America and Europe. Economist [Online]. Available: www.economist.com/node/7081343Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, V. 1969. The Greek State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. B., Hébert, Robert F., Tollison, R. D., Anderson, G. M., and Davidson, A. B. 1997. Sacred Trust: The Medieval Church as an Economic Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ensminger, Jeseses. 1997. Transaction Costs and Islam: Explaining Conversion in Africa. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 429.Google Scholar
Farrar, C. 1992. Ancient Greek Political Theory as a Response to Democracy. In: Dunn, J. (ed.) Democracy: The Unfinished Journey 508 BC to 1993 AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernández-Armesto, F. 2004. So You Think You’re Human? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finer, S. E. 1997. The History of Government, vols. I, II, and III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, F. 1968. The Venetian Constitution in Florentine Political Thought. In: Rubinstein, N. (ed.) Florentine Studies: Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Gleeson-White, J. 2011. Double Entry: How the Merchants of Venice Created Modern Finance. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Harris, M. 1989. Our Kind. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. 1995. Passions and Constraint. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Horton, R. 1982. Tradition and Modernity Revisited. In: Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.) Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1742] 1987. Essays, Moral, Political and Literary. Indiannapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Isocrates, 1929. Isocrates. New York: W. Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1795. Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf (Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch), Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar
Kitto, H. D. F. T. 1957. The Greeks. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Klosko, G. 2000. Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. 1995. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In: Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. 1975. On the Origins of Language: An Introduction to the Evolution of Human Speech. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macdowell, D. M. 1978. The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Martines, L. 1988. Power and Imagination: City-States in Renaissance Italy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, J. 2002. The Gifts of Athena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. C. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., et al. 2014. The Cultural Evolution of Prosocial Religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 165.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2000. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 137158.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Pugla, D. and Trefler, D. 2014. International Trade and Institutional Change: Medieval Venice’s Response to Globalization. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 753821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. and Campbell, D. E. 2010. American Grace. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Quigley, C. 1979. The Evolution of Civilizations. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. 1990. Visual Perception in People and Machines. In: Blake, A. and Troscianko, T. (eds.) AI and the Eye. Chichister, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Roux, G. 1980. Ancient Iraq. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Staddon, J. E. R. 1983. Adaptive Behavior and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Thucydides, 1943. The History of the Peloponnesian War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1971. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 3557.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1985. Social Evolution. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. [1896] 1967. A New Principle of Just Taxation, Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen. Jena: Fischer, English translation. In Musgrave, R. A. and Peacock, A. T. eds. Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 72118.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Young, H. P. 1997. Group Choice and Individual Judgments. In: Mueller, D. C. (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zakaria, F. 2003. The Future of Freedom. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

References

Bailey, M. J. 1992. Approximate Optimality of Aboriginal Property Rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 183198.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. 1984. Committees and Rent-Seeking Effort. Journal of Public Economics, 25, 197209.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. 1989. Efficient Status Seeking: Externalities, and the Evolution of Status Games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11, 175190.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. 1991. The Economic Role of a Work Ethic. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 15, 365385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congleton, R. D. 2007a. From Royal to Parliamentary Rule without Revolution: The Economics of Constitutional Exchange within Divided Governments. European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 261284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congleton, R. D. 2007b. Informational Limits to Democratic Public Policy: The Jury Theorem, Yardstick Competition, and Ignorance. Public Choice, 132, 333352.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. 2011. Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Reform, Liberalism, and the Rise of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. 2013. On the Inevitability of Divided Government and Improbability of a Complete Separation of Powers. Constitutional Political Economy, 24, 177198.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. and Vanberg, V. J. 2001. Help, Harm or Avoid? On the Personal Advantage of Dispositions to Cooperate and Punish in Multilateral PD Games with Exit. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44, 145167.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Jegen, R. 2001. Motivation Crowding Theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 589611.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. L. and Katz, E. 1987. Hierarchical Structure and the Social Costs of Bribes and Transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 34, 129142.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1978. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Leech, D. 2002. An Empirical Comparison of the Performance of Classical Power Indices. Political Studies, 50, 122.Google Scholar
Manne, H. G. 1965. Merges and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 73, 110120.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. J. 1992. Organizations as Constitutional Systems. Constitutional Political Economy, 3, 223253.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. J. and Congleton, R. D. 1992. Rationality, Morality, and Exit. The American Political Science Review, 86, 418431.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. 1967. Hierarchical Control and Optimal Firm Size. Journal of Political Economy 75, 123138.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 2002. The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 171195.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, R. 2000. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 1998. Imagination and Leadership – The Neglected Dimension of an Evolutionary Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35, 161177.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 2006. The Evolving Economy: Essays on the Evolutionary Approach to Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, M. 2002. Evolutionary Approaches to Politics. Kyklos, 55, 223246.Google Scholar

References

Aumann, R. 2008. Game Engineering. In: Neogy, S., Bapat, R., Das, A., and Parthasarathy, T. (eds.) Mathematical Programming and Game Theory for Decision Making. Singapore: World Scientific. 279285.Google Scholar
Billingsley, P. 1986. Probability and Measure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bjørndal, T. and Gordon, D. V. 1993. The Opportunity Cost of Capital and Optimal Vessel Size in the Norwegian Fishing Fleet. Land Economics, 69, 98107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boncoeur, J., Coglan, L., Le Gallic, B., and Pascoe, S. 2000. On the (Ir)relevance of Rates of Return Measures of Economic Performance to Small Boats. Fisheries Research, 49, 105115.Google Scholar
Brann, P. and Foddy, M. 1987. Trust and the Consumption of a Deteriorating Common Resource. The Journal of Conflict Resolution (1986–1998), 31, 615630.Google Scholar
Brenner, T. and Witt, U. 2003. Melioration Learning in Games with Constant and Frequency-Dependent Pay-offs. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 50, 429448.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Ludwig, D., and Brock, W. A. 1999. Management of Eutrophication for Lakes Subject to Potentially Irreversible Change. Ecological Applications, 9, 751771.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. 1980. Social Dilemmas. The Annual Review of Psychology 31, 169–92.Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. and Messick, D. M. 2000. Social Dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. D. 1978. The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Döring, R. 2006. Investing in Natural Capital the Case of Fisheries. In: Sumaila, U. R. and Marsden, A. D. (eds.) North American Association of Fisheries Economists Forum Proceedings, 2006 Fisheries Centre, Univ BC, Vancouver, 4964.Google Scholar
Döring, R. and Egelkraut, T. M. 2008. Investing in Natural Capital as Management Strategy in Fisheries: The Case of the Baltic Sea Cod Fishery. Ecological Economics, 64, 634642.Google Scholar
Edney, J. J. 1980. The Commons Problem: Alternative Perspectives. American Psychologist, 35, 131150.Google Scholar
Edney, J. J. 1981. Paradoxes on the Commons: Scarcity and the Problem of Equality. Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 334.Google Scholar
Edney, J. J. and Harper, C. S. 1978. The Effects of Information in a Resource Management Problem: A Social Trap Analysis. Human Ecology, 6, 387395.Google Scholar
Forges, F. 1986. An Approach to Communication Equilibria. Econometrica, 54, 13751385.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. 2000. Game Theory Evolving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamburger, H. 1973. N-person Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 2748.Google Scholar
Hannesson, R. 1997. Fishing as a Supergame. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 309322.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., and Williams, M. B. 2002. Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment. The American Economic Review, 92, 16061617.Google Scholar
Hart, S. 1985. Nonzero-Sum Two-Person Repeated Games with Incomplete Information. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10, 117153.Google Scholar
Haurie, A., Krawczyk, J. B., and Zaccour, G. 2012. Games and Dynamic Games. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. 1997. The Matching Law: Papers in Psychology and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hillis, J. F. and Wheelan, B. J. 1994. Fisherman’s Time Discounting Rates and Other Actors to Be Taken into Account in Planning Rehabilitation of Depleted Fisheries. In: Antona, M., Catanzano, J., and Sutinen, J. G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade, 1994 IIFET-Secretariat Paris. 657670.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 1996. Dynamics, Equilibria, and Values. PhD thesis, Maastricht University.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 2005. A Note on Repeated Games with Vanishing Actions. International Game Theory Review, 7, 107115.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 2007a. Small Fish Wars and an Authority. In: Prinz, A., Steenge, A. E., and Schmidt, J. (eds.) The Rules of the Game: Institutions, Law, and Economics. Berlin: LiT Verlag. 131162.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 2007b. Small Fish Wars: A New Class of Dynamic Fishery Management Games. ICFAI Journal of Managerial Economics, 5, 1730.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 2009. Strategic Advertisement with Externalities: A New Dynamic Approach. In: Neogy, S. K., Das, A. K., and Bapat, R. B. (eds.) Modeling, Computation and Optimization. Singapore: World Scientific. 2143.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 2014. Social Dilemmas, Time Preferences and Technology Adoption in a Commons Problem. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16, 239258.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 2015. Long-run Strategic Advertisement and Short-run Bertrand Competition. International Game Theory Review, 17.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. 2016. Strong and Weak Rarity Value: Resource Games with Complex Price–Scarcity Relationships. Dynamic Games and Applications, 6, 97111.Google Scholar
Joosten, R., Brenner, T., and Witt, U. 2003. Games with Frequency-Dependent Stage Payoffs. International Journal of Game Theory, 31, 609620.Google Scholar
Joosten, R. and Meijboom, R. 2010. Stochastic Games with Endogenous Transitions. In: Economics, M. P. I. o. (ed.) Papers on Economics and Evolution. Jena.Google Scholar
Komorita, S. S. and Parks, C. D. 1994. Social Dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
Liebrand, W. B. G. 1983. A Classification of Social Dilemma Games. Simulation and Games, 14, 123138.Google Scholar
Long, N. V. 2010. A Survey of Dynamic Games in Economics. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Mäler, K. G., Xepapadeas, A., and De Zeeuw, A. J. 2003. The Economics of Shallow Lakes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26, 603624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, D. M. and Brewer, M. B. 1983. Solving Social Dilemmas: A Review. Annual Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 1143.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, P. M., Zemke, P. E., and Lui, L. 1983. Individual Adaptations and Structural Change as Solutions to Social Dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294309.Google Scholar
Osborne, M. J. and Rubinstein, A. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Platt, J. 1973. Social Traps. American Psychologist, 28, 641651.Google Scholar
Scheffer, M. 1998. The Ecology of Shallow Lakes. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., and Walker, B. 2001. Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591596.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Schoenmakers, G., Flesch, J., and Thuijsman, F. 2002. Coordination Games with Vanishing Actions. International Game Theory Review, 4, 119126.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. 1953. Stochastic Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 39, 10951100.Google Scholar
Steg, L. 2003. Motives and Behavior in Social Dilemmas Relevant to the Environment. In: Hendrickx, L., Jager, W., and Steg, L. (eds.) Human Decision Making and Environmental Perception. Understanding and Assisting Human Decision Making in Real-Life Settings. Liber Amicorum for Charles Vlek. Groningen: Groningen University.Google Scholar
Van Damme, E. E. C. 1991. Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Warner, J. T. and Pleeter, S. 2001. The Personal Discount Rate: Evidence from Military Downsizing Programs. The American Economic Review, 91, 3353.Google Scholar

References

Aranson, P. H. 1986. Economic Efficiency and the Common Law: A Critical Survey. In: Schulenburg, J. M. v. d. and Skogh, G. (eds.) Law and Economics and the Economics of Legal Regulation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. and Loewenstein, G. 1997. Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 109126.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. and Bradford, D. F. 1972. Detrimental Externalities and Non-Convexity of the Production Set. Economica, 39, 160176.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2005. Natural Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2006. The Origins of Fair Play. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Inst. of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group.Google Scholar
Blume, L., Rubinfeld, D. L., and Shapiro, P. 1984. The Taking of Land: When Should Compensation Be Paid? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 7192.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. W. 1997. Constitutional Political Economy: Property Claims in a Dynamic World. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15, 4354.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A. D. 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85, 10891128.Google Scholar
Canaris, C.-W. 1993. Funktion, Struktur und Falsifikation juristischer Theorien. Juristenzeitung 48, 377391.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 144.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1988. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. L. and Murphy, J. G. 1990. Philosophy of Law. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. 1982. The Cost of Coase. The Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 133.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. D. 2000. Law from Order: Economic Development and the Jurisprudence of Social Norms. In: Olson, M. and Kähkönen, S. (eds.) A Not-So-Dismal Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooter, R. and Ulen, T. 2011. Law and Economics. Reading, MA: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Cordes, C. and Schubert, C. 2007. Toward a Naturalistic Foundation of the Social Contract. Constitutional Political Economy, 18, 3562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, N. 1979. Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. The Journal of Philosophy, 76, 256282.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. 1972. When Does the Rule of Liability Matter? The Journal of Legal Studies, 1, 1328.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, I. and Posner, R. A. 1974. An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking. The Journal of Legal Studies, 3, 257286.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. 1995. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. A. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. 2002. Why Social Preferences Matter – The Impact of Non-Selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives. The Economic Journal, 112, C1C33.Google Scholar
Fischel, W. A. 1985. The Economics of Zoning Laws. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fischel, W. A. 1995. Regulatory Takings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fischel, W. A. and Shapiro, P. 1989. A Constitutional Choice Model of Compensation for Takings. International Review of Law and Economics, 9, 115128.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S., Oberholzer-Gee, F., and Eichenberger, R. 1996. The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 12971313.Google Scholar
Grigoleit, K. J. 2000. Normative Steuerung und kooperative Planung. Die Verwaltung, 33, 79109.Google Scholar
Güth, W. 1995. On Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments – A Personal Review. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 329344.Google Scholar
Hahn, S. 2000. Überlegungsgleichgewicht(e) – Prüfung einer Rechtfertigungsmetapher. Alber: Freiburg.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1975. Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’ Theory. American Political Science Review, 69, 594606.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. 1982. Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior. In: Sen, A. K. and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayden, G. M. and Ellis, S. E. 2007. Law and Economics after Behavioral Economics. University of Kansas Law Review, 55, 629675.Google Scholar
Healey, P., Purdue, M., and Ennis, F. 1995. Negotiating Development: Rationales and Practice for Development Obligations and Planning Gain. London: E & FN Spon.Google Scholar
Heider, L. and Mukerji, N. 2015. Rawls, Order Ethics, and Rawlsian Order Ethics. In: Lütge, C. and Mukerji, N. (eds.) Order Ethics – A Compendium. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., Mcelreath, R., et al. 2010a. Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment. Science, 327, 14801484.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., and Norenzayan, A. 2010b. The Weirdest People in the World? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 6183.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M. L. 1986. Experimental Tests of the Coase Theorem with Large Bargaining Groups. Journal of Legal Studies, 15, 149171.Google Scholar
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., and Thaler, R. 1998. A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics. Stanford Law Review, 50, 14711450.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1996. Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis. Harvard Law Review, 109, 713790.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 2002. Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, I. and Kim, J. 2004. Efficiency of Posner’s Nuisance Rule: A Reconsideration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 160, 327333.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. 1996. The Self-organizing Economy. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Medema, S. G. 1999. Symposium on the Coase Theorem: Legal Fiction: The Place of the Coase Theorem in Law and Economics. Economics and Philosophy, 15, 209233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, T. J. 1991. Compensation for the Taking of Land under Eminent Domain. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 147, 354363.Google Scholar
Miceli, T. J. and Segerson, K. 2000. Takings. In: Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. D. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Law & Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. I. 1967. Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law. Harvard Law Review, 80, 11651258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1971. The Postwar Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 9, 128.Google Scholar
Mumey, G. A. 1971. The “Coase Theorem”: A Reexamination. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85, 718723.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1998. The Method of A Theory of Justice. In: Höffe, O. (ed.) John Rawls. Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ott, C. and Schäfer, H. B. 1994. Entwicklung und Konstruktion effizienter Normen im Rechtssystem des deutschen Zivilrechts. Homo Oeconomicus, 11, 293329.Google Scholar
Papandreou, A. A. 2003. Externality, Convexity and Institutions. Economics and Philosophy, 19, 281309.Google Scholar
Papier, H. J. 1994. Art. In: Maunz, T. and Dürig, G. (eds.) Grundgesetz-Kommentar. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. 1979. Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory. The Journal of Legal Studies, 8, 103140.Google Scholar
Posner, R. A. 2010. Economic Analysis of Law. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1958. Justice as Fairness. Philosophical Review, 67, 164194.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schlicht, E. 1996. Exploiting the Coase Mechanism: The Extortion Problem. Kyklos, 49, 319330.Google Scholar
Schubert, C. 2006. Die rechtliche Steuerung urbanen Wandels: eine konstitutionenökonomische Untersuchung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Schubert, C. 2012. Is Novelty Always a Good Thing? Towards an Evolutionary Welfare Economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22, 585619.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1966. The Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Swanson, T. and Kontoleon, A. 2000. Nuisance. In: Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. D. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
von Wangenheim, G. V. 2011. Evolutionary Theories in Law and Economics and Their Use for Comparative Legal Theory. Review of Law & Economics, 7, 737765.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 1989. The Evolution of Economic Institutions as a Propagation Process. Public Choice, 62, 155172.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 1996. Innovations, Externalities and the Problem of Economic Progress. Public Choice, 89, 113130.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. 2005. Sachenrecht. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×