Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:22:25.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Conceptual and Methodological Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2018

Ulrich Witt
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute, Jena
Andreas Chai
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Economic Change
Advances in Evolutionary Economics
, pp. 41 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andrews, P. W. S. 1949. Manufacturing Business. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. W. S. 1964. On Competition in Economic Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Casson, M. 1982. The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, E. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: A Re-orientation of the Theory of Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, N. S. 4, 386405.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1988. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1991. The Nature of the Firm: Meaning. In: Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. G. (eds.) The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Downie, J. 1958. The Competitive Process. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. 1984[1974]. On the Notion of Equilibrium in Economics. Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. 1991. The Next Hundred Years. The Economic Journal, 101, 4750.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H. 1993. Incomplete Market Economies. Keynes Lecture in Economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1937. Economics and Knowledge. Economica, N. S. 4, 3354.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1952. The Sensory Order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1982. Money, Interest and Wages: Collected Essays on Economic Theory Volume II. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1896[1739–40]. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford, NY: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. 1963. A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York; London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainity and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Langlois, R. N. 1988. Economic Change and the Boundaries of the Firm. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 144, 635–57.Google Scholar
Langlois, R. N. 1992. Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 99127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazonick, W. 1992. Strategy, Structure, and Managment Development in the Britain. In: Kobayashi, K. and Morikawa, H. (eds.) Organisation and Technology in Capitalist Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Loasby, B. J. 1973. The Swindon Project. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
Loasby, B. J. 1990. Firms, Markets and the Principles of Continuity. In: Whitaker, J. K. (ed.) Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loasby, B. J. 2006. The Early Philosophical Papers. In: Raffaelli, T., Becattini, G., and Dardi, M. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Alfred Marshall. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1919. Industry and Trade. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1961. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. and Marshall, M. 1879. The Economics of Industry. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. 1982. Pluto’s Republic. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menger, K. 1981[1871]. Principles of Economics. New York and London: New York University Press. (First published in German, 1871).Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. P. 1983. Research Programmes in Competitive Structure. Journal of Economic Studies, 10, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1995. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1963. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson. (First published in German, 1934).Google Scholar
Raffaelli, T. 2003. Marshall’s Evolutionary Economics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, T. 2006. Ye Machine. In: Raffaelli, T., Becattini, G., and Dardi, M. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Alfred Marshall. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, T. 2008. The General Pattern of Marshallian Evolution. In: Shionoya, Y. and Nishizawa, T. (eds.) Marshall and Schumpeter on Evolution: Economic Sociology of Capitalist Development. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. and Skinner, A. S. 1980. General Introduction. In: Wightman, W. P. D. and Bryce, J. C. (eds.) Vol. 3 of the Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith: Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. B. 1960. Information and Investment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. B. 1972. The Organisation of Industry. Economic Journal, 82, 883–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G. B. 1998[1975]. Adam Smith on Competition and Increasing Returns. In: Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T. S. (eds.) Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1932. The Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. A. G. 1931. The Structure of Competitive Industry. London, Nisbet and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. V. 1969. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. 1971. Edward H Chamberlin. New York and London: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1967. The Monopolistic Competition Revolution. In: Kuenne, R. E. (ed.) Monopolistic Competition Theory: Studies in Impact. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1998. Report Card on Sraffa at 100. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 5, 458–67.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1949. Expectation in Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1965. A Scheme of Economic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1969. Decision, Order and Time in Economic Affairs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1970. Expectation, Enterprise and Profit. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. 1972. Epistemics and Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1969. The Architecture of Complexity. In: The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1982[1959]. Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. American Economic Review, 49, 253–83.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976[1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976[1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1980[1795]. The Principles Which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries: Illustrated by the History of Astronomy. In: Wightman, W. P. D. (ed.) Essays on Philosophical Subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1983. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streit, M. E. 1992. Wissen, Wettbewerb und Wirtschaftsordnung – Zum Gedenken an Friedrich August von Hayek. ORDO, 43, 130.Google Scholar
Streit, M. E. 1993. Cognition, Competition and Catallaxy – In Memory of Friedrich August von Hayek. Constitutional Political Economy, 4, 223–62.Google Scholar
Streit, M. E. 2000. The Institutional Economics Unit 1993–2000. Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems: Annual Report 2000. Munich: Max Planck Institute.Google Scholar
Voigt, S. 2000. The Foundations Had Been Laid – Describing and Evaluating the Development of the First Unit. Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems: Annual Report 2000. Munich: Max Planck Institute.Google Scholar
Walker, D. A. 1987. Walras’s Theories of Tatonnement. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 758–74.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, A. A. 1928. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress. The Economic Journal, 38, 527–42.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. 2000. Real Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Alder, K. 2007. The Lie Detectors: The History of an American Obsession. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J., and Vanberg, V. J. 2008. In Defence of Generalized Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18, 577596.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. 2016. Culture and Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 53, 898944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, P. M. 1988. Evolution, Innovation and Economics. In: Dosi, G. (ed.) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, 95119.Google Scholar
Allen, R. C. 2009. The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. 2009. The Nature of Technology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. 1995. Resistance to New Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benabou, R., Ticchi, D., and Vindigni, A. 2013. Forbidden Fruits: The Political Economy of Science, Religion and Growth. Unpublished working paper. Princeton University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisin, A. and Verdier, T. 2011. The Economics of Cultural Transmission and Socialization. In: Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., and Jackson, M. O. (eds.) Handbook of Social Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 339416.Google Scholar
Blackmore, S. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. 2004. Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. 2011. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. 2005. The Origins and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., and Henrich, J. 2013. The Cultural Evolution of Technology. In: Richerson, P. J. and Christiansen, M. H. (eds.) Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 119142.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. 1987. Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes. In: Radnitzky, G. and Bartley, W. W. III (eds.) Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 91114.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and Feldman, M. W. 1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. 1985. English Society 1688–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, G. 2007. A Farewell to Alms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. F. 2012. How Modern Science Came into the World. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Stewart, I. 1994. The Collapse of Chaos: Discovering Simplicity in a Complex World. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Constant, E. W. 1980. The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. 1994. Toward a New Economics of Science. Research Policy, 23, 487521.Google Scholar
David, P. A. 1997. Path Dependence and the Quest for Historical Economics. University of Oxford Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, No. 20 (November), Oxford. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
David, P. A. 2008. The Historical Origins of “Open Science”: An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution. Capitalism and Society, 3, 1103.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
de la Croix, D., Doepke, M., and Mokyr, J. 2018. Clans, Guilds, and Markets: Apprenticeship Institutions and Growth in the Pre-Industrial Economy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 170.Google Scholar
Doepke, M. and Zilibotti, F. 2008. Occupational Choice and the Spirit of Capitalism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 747793.Google Scholar
Donald, M. 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duran-Reynals, M. L. 1946. The Fever Bark Tree: The Pageant of Quinine. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Dyson, G. B. 1997. Darwin among the Machines: The Evolution of Global Intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D. 2007. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, E. 1979. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. D. 1985. The Evolutionary Tradition in Jurisprudence. Columbia Law Review, 85, 3894.Google Scholar
Fernández, R. 2011. Does Culture Matter? In: Benhabib, J., Jackson, M. O., and Bisin, A. (eds.) Handbook of Social Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 481510.Google Scholar
Galor, O. 2011. Unified Growth Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Galor, O. and Moav, O. 2002. Natural Selection and the Origin of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 11331191.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, R. B. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. 1982. Exaptation: A Missing Term in the Science of Form. Paleobiology, 8, 415.Google Scholar
Helpman, E. 2004. The Mystery of Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. 2009. The Evolution of Innovation-Enhancing Institutions. In: Shennan, S. and O’Brien, M. (eds.) Innovation in Cultural Systems: Contributions from Evolutionary Anthropology. Altenberg Workshops in Theoretical Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. and Knudsen, T. 2010. Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1988. Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. J. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, E. 2002. The Record of Global Economic Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Jones, E. 2006. Cultures Merging: A Historical and Economic Critique of Culture. Princeton, NJ: University Press.Google Scholar
Juma, C. 2016. Innovations and its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. A. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, M., Mokyr, J., and Ó Gráda, C. 2014. Precocious Albion: A New Interpretation of the British Industrial Revolution. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 363391.Google Scholar
Knapp, V. J. 1989. Disease and Its Impact on Modern European History. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
LeCoq, A.-M. 2001. La Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, S. J. and Margolis, S. E. 1995. Path Dependency, Lock-In, and History. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11, 205226.Google Scholar
Loasby, B. J. 1996. The Organization of Industry and the Growth of Knowledge. Lectiones Jenensis, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
Loch, C. H. and Huberman, B. A. 1999. A Punctuated-Equilibrium Model of Technology Diffusion. Management Science, 45, 160177.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1920[1890]. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1989. Speciational Evolution or Punctuated Equilibria. In: Somit, A. and Peterson, S. A. (eds.) The Dynamics of Evolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2153.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1991. One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. 2010. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McElreath, R. and Henrich, J. 2007. Modeling Cultural Evolution. In: Barrett, L. and Dunbar, R. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 555570.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A. 2011. Cultural Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Laland, K. N., Boyd, R., Buchanan, B., Flynn, E., Mccauley, R. N., Renn, J., Reyes-García, V., Shennan, S., Stout, D., and Tennie, C. 2013. Cultural Evolution. In: Richerson, P. J. and Christiansen, M. H. (eds.) Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 193216.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 1990a. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 1990b. Punctuated Equilibria and Technological Progress. The American Economic Review, 80, 350354.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 1992. Is Economic Change Optimal? Australian Economic History Review, XXXII, 323.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 1994. Progress and Inertia in Technological Change. In: James, J. and Thomas, M. (eds.) Capitalism in Context: Essays in Honor of R. M. Hartwell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 230253.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 1998. The Political Economy of Technological Change: Resistance and Innovation in Economic History. In: Berg, M. and Bruland, K. (eds.) Technological Revolutions in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 3964.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 2002. The Gifts of Athena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 2016. A Culture of Growth: Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Monod, J. 1971. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Needham, J. 1969. The Grand Titration. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 1995. Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIII 4890.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Puffert, D. J. 2009. Tracks across Continents, Paths through History: The Economic Dynamics of Standardization in Railway Gauge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, T. 2003. Marshall’s Evolutionary Economics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rankine, W. J. M. 1873[1859]. A Manual of the Steam Engine and Other Prime Movers. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J. 1987. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. and Boyd, R. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. and Christiansen, M. H. 2013. Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sale, K. 1995. Rebels against the Future: The Luddites and Their War on the Industrial Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Saviotti, P. P. 1996. Technological Evolution, Variety, and the Economy Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 2013. Long-Term Trajectories of Technological Change. In: Richerson, P. J. and Christiansen, M. H. (eds.) Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 143155.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell’s.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L. 1969. The Basis of Progressive Evolution. Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J., Winter, S., Rumelt, R., and Dosi, G. 1994. Understanding Corporate Coherence: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 130.Google Scholar
Tenner, E. 1997. Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P., Lebow, N., and Parker, G. 2006. Unmaking the West: “What-If?” Scenarios That Rewrite World History. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Usher, A. P. 1929. A History of Mechanical Inventions. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1995. Economics, Volcanoes, and Phanerozoic Revolutions. Paleobiology, 21, 125152.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. 2004. Nature: An Economic History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vincenti, W. 1990. What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Vries, P. 2013. The Escape from Poverty. Vienna: Vienna University Press.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. 1996. Hybridizing Growth Theory. The American Economic Review, 86, 207213.Google Scholar
Wesson, R. 1991. Beyond Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 1997a. Economics and Darwinism. In: Aruka, Y. (ed.) Evolutionary Controversies in Economics: A New Transdisciplinary Approach. Tokyo: Springer Verlag, 4155.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 1997b. “Lock-in” vs. “Critical Masses” – Industrial Change under Network Externalities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 753773.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 2009. Propositions about Novelty. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70, 311320.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. 2000. Selectionism and Complexity. In: Ziman, J. (ed.) Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4151.Google Scholar

References

Aldrich, H. E., Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J., and Vanberg, V. J. 2008. In Defence of Generalized Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18, 577596.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 2000. A Well-Disposed Social Anthropologist’s Problem with Memes. In: Aunger, R. (ed.) Darwinizing Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. 1987. The Evolution of Ethnic Markers. Cultural Anthropology, 2, 6579.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. T. 2005. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breslin, D. 2011. Reviewing a Generalized Darwinist Approach to Studying Socio-economic Change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 218235.Google Scholar
Buenstorf, G. 2006. How Useful Is Generalized Darwinism as a Framework to Study Competition and Industrial Evolution? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 511527.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. 1974. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. In: Schilp, P. A. (ed.) The Library of Living Philosophers. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Claidière, N. and Sperber, D. 2007. The Role of Attraction in Cultural Evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 7, 89111.Google Scholar
Cordes, C. 2006. Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Continuity. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 529541.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. 2007. A Soulful Science: What Economists Really Do and Why It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cziko, G. 1995. Without Miracles. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
D’arms, J., Batterman, R., and Gorny, K. 1998. Game Theoretic Explanations and the Evolution of Justice. Philosophy of Science, 65, 76102.Google Scholar
Darden, L. and Cain, J. A. 1989. Selection Type Theories. Philosophy of Science, 56, 106129.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Revised Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. 2008. The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foster, J. 1997. The Analytical Foundations of Evolutionary Economics: From Biological Analogy to Economic Self-organization. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8, 427451.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2000. The Replicator in Retrospect. Biology and Philosophy, 15, 403423.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2007. Population Thinking, Darwinism, and Cultural Change [Online]. Available: www.interdisciplines.org/adaptation/papers/14Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2014. Philosophy of Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. and Boyd, R. 2002. On Modeling Cognition and Culture: Why Replicators Are Not Necessary for Cultural Evolution. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 87112.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 2002. Darwinism in Economics: From Analogy to Ontology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 259281.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 2006. Economics in the Shadows of Darwin and Marx: Essays on Institutional and Evolutionary Themes. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. 2004. The Complex Evolution of a Simple Traffic Convention: The Functions and Implications of Habit. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54, 1947.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. 2006a. Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-economic Evolution as Lamarckian Are Misleading. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 343366.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. 2006b. Why We Need a Generalized Darwinism, and Why Generalized Darwinism Is Not Enough. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61, 119.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. 2008. Information, Complexity and Generative Replication. Biology and Philosophy, 23, 4765.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. 2010. Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. 2012. Underqualified – Maximal Generality in Darwinian Explanation: A Response to Matt Gers. Biology and Philosophy, 27, 607614.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1981. Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay. In: Jensen, U. J. and Harré, R. (eds.) The Philosophy of Evolution. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2344.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., and Glenn, S. S. 2001. A General Account of Selection: Biology, Immunology, and Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 511528.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1985. Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klaes, M. 2004. Ontological Issues in Evolutionary Economics: Introduction. Journal of Economic Methodology, 11, 121163.Google Scholar
Levit, G. S., Hossfeld, U., and Witt, U. 2011. Can Darwinism Be “Generalized” and of What Use Would This Be? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21, 545562.Google Scholar
Mameli, M. 2004. Nongenetic Selection and Nongenetic Inheritance. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 3571.Google Scholar
Mameli, M. 2008. Understanding Culture: A Commentary on Richerson and Boyd’s Not By Genes Alone. Biology and Philosophy, 23, 269281.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., and Laland, K. N. 2004. Perspective: Is Human Cultural Evolution Darwinian? Evidence from the Perspective of the Origin of Species. Evolution, 58, 111.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., and Laland, K. N. 2006. Towards a Unified Science of Cultural Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 329347.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 2007. Universal Darwinism and Evolutionary Social Science. Biology and Philosophy, 22, 7394.Google Scholar
Pelikan, P. 2011. Evolutionary Developmental Economics: How to Generalize Darwinism Fruitfully to Help Comprehend Economic Change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21, 341366.Google Scholar
Plotkin, H. 1994. Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Schubert, C. 2014. “Generalized Darwinism” and the Quest for an Evolutionary Theory of Policy-making. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, 479513.Google Scholar
Skipper, R. A. Jr. 1999. Selection and the Extent of Explanatory Unification. Philosophy of Science, 66, S196S209.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1991. Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. 2000. An Objection to the Memetic Approach to Culture. In: Aunger, R. (ed.) Darwinizing Culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 1996. Explanatory Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology. Biology and Philosophy, 11, 193214.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2006. Memes Revisited. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 145165.Google Scholar
Stoelhorst, J. W. 2008. The Explanatory Logic and Ontological Commitments of Generalized Darwinism. Journal of Economic Methodology, 15, 343363.Google Scholar
Stoelhorst, J. W. and Hensgens, R. 2006. On Applying Darwinism in Economics: From Meta-theory to Middle-range Theories, (paper presented at European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy Conference, Istanbul, November 2007).Google Scholar
Stoelhorst, J. W. 2009. The Naturalist View of Universal Darwinism: An Application to the Evolutionary Theory of the Firm. In: Hodgson, G. M. (ed.) Darwinism and Economics. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Stoelhorst, J. W. and Hensgens, R. 2007. On the Application of Darwinism to Economics: From Generalization to Middle-range Theories In: Amsterdam, U. o. (ed.) Working Paper. Amsterdam Business School, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vromen, J. 2004. Conjectural Revisionary Economic Ontology: Outline of an Ambitious Research Agenda for Evolutionary Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 11, 213264.Google Scholar
Vromen, J. J. 2006. Routines, Genes and Program-based Behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 543560.Google Scholar
Vromen, J. J. 2011. Heterogeneous Economic Evolution: A Different View on Darwinizing Evolutionary Economics. In: Davis, J. B. and Hands, D. W. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Vromen, J. J. 2012. How to Make a Convincing Case for Darwinizing the Social Sciences. (Review of Hodgson and Knudsen 2010). Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, 7788.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 1999. Genes, Memes, and Cultural Heredity. Biology and Philosophy, 14, 279310.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 1999. Bioeconomics as Economics from a Darwinian Perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1, 1934.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 2003. The Evolving Economy: Essays on the Evolutionary Approach to Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 2006. Evolutionary Concepts in Economics and Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 473476.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×