Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T22:08:06.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Ultrasound-guided caudal block

from Section 5 - Neuraxial blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Anca Grigoras
Affiliation:
Victoria University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
Jawad Mustafa
Affiliation:
Victoria University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
Stephen Mannion
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Gabrielle Iohom
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Christophe Dadure
Affiliation:
Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier
Mark D. Reisbig
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Arjunan Ganesh
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Clinical use

Caudal epidural blockade is the most frequently used regional anesthesia technique in pediatric patients. Caudal block in children provides intra- and postoperative pain control in surgical procedures below the umbilicus (perineal, genitourinary, ilioinguinal, lower extremity surgery), and it is almost always performed under general anesthesia. The technique can occasionally be used as the sole anesthetic in high-risk patients (newborn and premature infants, neuromuscular disease, malignant hyperthermia susceptibility) in order to reduce the risks associated with general anesthesia. Caudal analgesia is produced by injection of local anesthetic (LA) into the caudal canal through the sacral hiatus. The success rate depends upon accurate identification of the hiatus and an adequate needle insertion angle.

The incidence of serious complications that can result in patient harm or sequelae is very low, particularly with single shot caudal blocks. The most common adverse event associated with caudal block in children is the inability to place the block or block failure followed by urinary retention (Polaner et al., 2012).

In children, the size and position of the spinal cord is different from adults: at birth the cord ends at L3/L4 and the dura mater at S3. That may increase the risk of spine injury during advancement of the caudal needle. The distance between dural sac and hiatus varies, but it is less than 10 mm in newborns. As the child grows, the cord and the dural sac rise to reach their adult level L1/L2 and S2, respectively, by the end of the first year of life. In newborns and infants, the sacral bone is composed mostly of cartilage and soft bony tissue that increases the risk of bone penetration and rectal puncture.

Ultrasonography allows for easy identification of sacral anatomy (specifically the relation of the sacral hiatus to the dural sac and the search of occult spinal dysraphism) before attempting the block. This is particularly important in children with an anatomy that is difficult to define by palpation alone. By using ultrasound, the anesthetist can visualize the cranial spread of LA in the caudal–epidural space, or the placement of an epidural catheter. Ultrasound guidance offers a reliable caudal block for pediatric patients with the advantages of easier performance and fewer complications compared with traditional sacral canal injection (Wang et al., 2013).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brenner, L, Marhofer, P, Kettner, SC, et al. (2011) Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: the effect of different volumes of local anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 107,229–35.Google Scholar
Dadure, C, Raux, O, Rochette, A, Capdevila, X. (2009) Interest of ultrasonographic guidance in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 28 (10),878–84.Google Scholar
Ecoffey, C, Lacroix, F, Giaufré, E, Orliaguet, G, Courrèges, P; Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF). (2010) Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth. 20,1061–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galante, D. (2005) Preoperative apnea in a preterm infant after caudal block with ropivacaine and clonidine. Paediatr Anaesth. 15,708–9.Google Scholar
Galante, D. (2008) Ultrasound needle guidance in neonatal and infant caudal anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 18,1233–4.Google Scholar
Ghai, B., Bala, I., Bhardwaj, N. (2005) Caudal block. Paediatr Anaesth. 15,900–6.Google Scholar
Ivani, G. (2005) Caudal block: the ‘no turn technique’. Paediatr Anaesth. 15,83–4.Google Scholar
Ivani, G, Mosseti, V. (2009) Pediatric regional anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 75 (10),577–83.Google Scholar
Johr, M, Berger, TM. Caudal blocks. (2012) Paediatr Anaesth. 22,44–50.Google Scholar
Kim, J, Shin, S, Lee, H, Kil, HK. (2013) Tethered spinal cord syndrome detected during ultrasound for caudal block in a child with single urological anomaly. Korean J Anesthesiol. 64 (6),552–3.Google Scholar
Krane, EJ. (1988) Delayed respiratory depression in a child after caudal epidural morphine. Anesth Analg. 67,79–82.Google Scholar
Krane, EJ, Tyler, DC, Jacobson, LE. (1989) The dose response of caudal morphine in children. Anesthesiology. 71,48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JJ, Rubin, AP. (1994). Comparison of a bupivacaine-clonidine mixture with plain bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in children. Br J Anaesth. 72,258–62.Google Scholar
Park, JH, Koo, BN, Kim, JY, et al. (2006) Determination of the optimal angle for needle insertion during caudal block in children using ultrasound imaging. Anaesthesia. 61,946–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polaner, DM, Taenzer, AH, Walker, BJ, et al. (2012) Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN): a multi-institutional study of the use and incidence of complications of pediatric regional anesthesia. Anest Analg. 115 (6),1353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghunathan, K, Schwartz, D, Connelly, NR. (2008) Determining the accuracy of caudal needle placement in children: a comparison of the swoosh test and ultrasonography. Paediatr Anaesth. 18,606–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S, Galvez, I. (2005) Ultrasound assessment of caudal catheter position in infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 15,429–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S, Guruswamy, V, Galvez, I. (2005) Caudal injectate can be reliably imaged using portable ultrasound – a preliminary study. Paediatr Anaesth. 15,948–52.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D, Dunn, SM, Connelly, NR. (2006) Ultrasound and caudal blocks in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 16,900–1.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D, Raghunathan, K, Dunn, S et al. (2008) Ultrasonography and pediatric caudals. Anesth Analg. 106,97–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semple, D, Findlow, D, Aldridge, LM, Doyle, E. (1996) The optimal dose of ketamine for caudal epidural blockade in children. Anaesthesia. 51 (12),1170–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, SK, Hong, JY, Kim, WO et al. (2009) Ultrasound evaluation of the sacral area and comparison of sacral interspinous and hiatal approach for caudal block in children. Anesthesiology. 111,1135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvani, P, Camporesi, A, Agostino, MR, Salvo, I. (2006) Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: an update. Minerva Anestesiol. 72 (6),453–9.Google Scholar
Vranken, JH, Troost, D, de Haan, P et al. (2006) Severe toxic damage to the rabbit spinal cord after intrathecal administration of preservative-free S+-ketamine. Anesthesiology. 105,813–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Hu, X., Zhang, Y, Chang, X. (2013) A randomized comparison of caudal block by sacral hiatus injection under ultrasound guidance with traditional sacral canal injection in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 23,395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×