Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T05:09:56.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Ultrasound-guided epidural anesthesia

from Section 5 - Neuraxial blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Chrystelle Sola
Affiliation:
University Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
Christophe Dadure
Affiliation:
Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France
Stephen Mannion
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Gabrielle Iohom
Affiliation:
University College Cork
Christophe Dadure
Affiliation:
Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier
Mark D. Reisbig
Affiliation:
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
Arjunan Ganesh
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Clinical use

In infants and children, epidural analgesia has been proven to be a major component of the multimodal approach to perioperative pain management. Most commonly used in combination with general anesthe-sia, the benefits of epidural anesthesia/analgesia include a reduction of the surgical stress response, decreases in the consumption of intraoperative hypnotic agents and opioids, and the clinical impact of these reductions on post-operative ventilatory function. After surgery, the potential advantages of epidural analgesia include improved comfort with excellent pain control. This facilitates earlier extuba-tion, improved gut function, and more rapid recovery (Walker and Yaksh, 2012; Goeller et al., 2014). Additionally, the reduction in the dose of general anes-thetic agents may be desirable, particularly in infants and neonates, given the concerns regarding their potential neurotoxicity recently raised in the pediatric literature (Sinner et al., 2014). The main perioperative indications of epidural anesthesia/analgesia are major thoracic, abdominal and urologic procedures, spinal surgeries, and complex or bilateral lower limb surgeries. Outside of the operative room, the use of epidural blockade is now also well reported for chronic pain relief, such as pain associated with burns, sickle cell crisis, malignancies, or complex regional pain syndrome (Dadure et al., 2013). As with any other regional anesthesia technique, side effects may be related to placement of the needle and catheter, to the infused drugs, or to the physiologic effects of the medication. The potential list of complications of epidural anesthesia in children is the same as those in adults. However, the incidence of serious (<1:10 000) or major (<1:100 000) incidents appears rarer and less frequent than in adults. Most adverse events reported are minor technical incidents, such as catheter-related problems (dislodgement, leakage, occlusion, or disconnection), or predictable effects, such as urinary retention and other effects associated with opioid adjuvants. Fortunately major neurologic complications are extremely rare, but infections associated with epidural catheters should always be monitored for, particularly in children at risk. Overall the infection rate is low, but prolonged use of a continuous catheter technique (>5 days) is likely to increase this risk (Sethna et al., 2010). Regarding orthopedic surgery, a recent editorial suggested that post-operative epidural analgesia does not delay the diagnosis of compartment syndrome (Johnson and Chalkiadis, 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antok, E, Bordet, F., Duflo, F., et al. (2003) Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous epidural infusion with ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children. Anesth Analg. 97,1608–11.Google Scholar
Dadure, C, Marec, P, Veyckemans, F, Beloeil, H. (2013) Chronic pain and regional anesthesia in children. Arch Pediatr. 20,1149–57.Google Scholar
Goeller, JK, Bhalla, T, Tobias, JD. (2014) Combined use of neuraxial and general anesthesia during major abdominal procedures in neonates and infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 24,553–60.Google Scholar
Grau, T, Leipold, RW, Conradi, R, Martin, E. (2001) Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 45,766–71.Google Scholar
Johnson, DJ, Chalkiadis, GA. (2009) Does epidural analgesia delay the diagnosis of lower limb compartment syndrome in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 19,83–91.Google Scholar
Kil, HK, Cho, JE, Kim, WO, et al. (2007) Prepuncture ultrasound-measured distance: an accurate reflection of epidural depth in infants and small children. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 32,102–6.Google Scholar
Perlas, A. (2010) Evidence for the use of ultrasound in neuraxial blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 35,S43–6.Google Scholar
Provenzano, DA, Narouze, S. (2013) Sonographically guided lumbar spine procedures. J Ultrasound Med. 32,1109–16.Google Scholar
Rapp, HJ, Folger, A, Grau, T. (2005) Ultrasound-guided epidural catheter insertion in children. Anesth Analg. 101,333–9.Google Scholar
Rubin, K, Sullivan, D, Sadhasivam, S. (2009) Are peripheral and neuraxial blocks with ultrasound guidance more effective and safe in children? Paediatr Anaesth. 19,92–6.Google Scholar
Sethna, NF, Clendenin, D, Athiraman, U, et al. (2010) Incidence of epidural catheter-associated infections after continuous epidural analgesia in children. Anesthesiology. 113,224–32.Google Scholar
Sinner, B, Becke, K, Engelhard, K. (2014) General anaesthetics and the developing brain: an overview. Anaesthesia. 69,1009–22.Google Scholar
Tsui, BC, Pillay, JJ. (2010) Evidence-based medicine: assessment of ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants, children, and adolescents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 35,S47–54.Google Scholar
Tsui, BC, Suresh, S. (2010) Ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants, children, and adolescents: a review of current literature and its application in the practice of neuraxial blocks. Anesthesiology. 112,719–28.Google Scholar
Walker, SM, Yaksh, TL. (2012) Neuraxial analgesia in neonates and infants: a review of clinical and preclinical strategies for the development of safety and efficacy data. Anesth Analg. 115,638–62.Google Scholar
Willschke, H, Bosenberg, A, Marhofer, P, et al. (2007) Epidural catheter placement in neonates: sonoanatomy and feasibility of ultrasonographic guidance in term and preterm neonates. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 32,34–40.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×