Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:22:41.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Reflections on Points of Departure in the Development of Sociocultural and Activity Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Harry Daniels
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Bath, United Kingdom
Bert van Oers
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Wim Wardekker
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Ed Elbers
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
René van der Veer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

In this chapter I attempt to clarify, elaborate, compare, and contrast sociocultural approaches to learning. After addressing the tension between accounts of mediated action and activity (or semiotic and activity-based accounts), I reflect on the notion of tool or artefact as mediator between individual and social and suggest that this requires further clarification. My next step is to address the issue of the production of tools or artefacts in contexts, asking how we understand the production of tools or artefacts in terms of the social relations that obtain in the circumstances in which they were produced. Lastly, I discuss the need to extend the analysis beyond words and ask how we can develop methodologies that enable us to explore effects of activity that is mediated by and through nonverbal means. I illustrate this section through reference to empirical work.

THE TENSION BETWEEN ACCOUNTS OF SEMIOTIC AND ACTIVITY-BASED MEDIATION

The concept of “mediation” opens the way for the development of a nondeterministic account in which mediators serve as the means by which the individual acts upon and is acted upon by social, cultural, and historical factors. There is considerable tension and debate as to the nature of such factors. Some approaches have tended to focus on semiotic means of mediation (Wertsch, 1991), whereas others have tended to focus more on activity itself (Engeström, 1993). Engeström argues that the positioning of Leontiev, one of the progenitors of activity theory, as someone who took no account of semiotic mediation was and is erroneous.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Learning
Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
, pp. 58 - 75
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakhurst, D. (1995). Lessons from Ilyenkov. Communication Review 1 (2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: BBC Publications/Penguin.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1977). Class codes and control: Vol. 3. Towards a theory of educational transmissions (2nd rev. ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1993). Foreword. In Daniels, H. (Ed.), Charting the agenda: Educational activity after Vygotsky (pp. xiii–xxiv). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1994). A conception of culture for a communication theory of mind. In Vocate, D. (Ed.), Intrapersonal communication: Different voices, different minds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Christie, F. (Ed). (1999). Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1990). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Open address at the Second International Congress for Research on Activity Theory, Lahti, Finland, May 21–25.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In Chaiklin, S. & Lave, J. (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and practice (pp. 64–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearhart, M., & Newman, D. (1980). Learning to draw a picture: The social context of an individual activity. Discourse Processes, 3, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, D., & Cole, M. (1995). Between discourse and schema: Reformulating a cultural-historical approach to culture and mind. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26 (4), 475–490.Google Scholar
Ivic, I. (1989). Profiles of educators: Lev S. Vygotsky (1896–1934). Prospects, 9 (3), 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In Chaiklin, S. & Lave, J. (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and contest (pp. 3–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lektorsky, V. A. (1999). Activity theory in a new era. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 65–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Salomon, G. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ratner, C. (1997). Cultural psychology and qualitative methodology: Theoretical and empirical considerations. London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudge, J. R. H., & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tul'viste, P. (1989). Education and the development of concepts: Interpreting results of experiments with adults with and without schooling. S-4, 27 (1), 5–21.Google Scholar
Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The development of higher forms of attention. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 189–140). New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V., Rio, Del P., & Alvarez, A. (Eds.). (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×