Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:33:25.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to Section One: Exploring Vygotsky's Legacy: The Meaning of Mediation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

René Van Der Veer
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Bert van Oers
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Wim Wardekker
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Ed Elbers
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
René van der Veer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

When Vygotsky died in 1934, he left us with a set of general guidelines (e.g., true insight into a phenomenon can be gained only by studying its genesis, individual mind can be explained only by looking outside individual mind), methods of investigation (e.g., the method of double stimulation), and specific ideas (e.g., the systemic structure of mind and brain, the notion of scientific concepts, the zone of proximal development), but not with a fully coherent and systematically elaborated theory. With hindsight we can see that many of these guidelines, methods, and ideas were clearly historically or logically connected, but at the time Vygotsky did not always spell out their connection.

Take, for example, what Vygotsky called the genetic law of mental development and his concept of the zone of proximal development. The genetic law of mental development stated that “every function in the cultural development of the child appears on the stage twice, in two planes, first, the social, then the psychological, first between people as an interpsychological category, then within the child as an intrapsychological category” (Vygotsky, 1931/1983, p. 145; cf. Vygotsky, 1997, p. 106). The law clearly stated that private mental processes originate in the social interaction with other people and was present in Vygotsky's writings from at least 1931.

The concept of the zone of proximal development (the difference between joint and independent performance) was developed several years later.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Learning
Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
, pp. 15 - 19
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1929). L'évolution psychologique de la personnalité. Paris: Chahine.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, R., &. Moro, Ch. (1999). El mágico número tres: Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J., & Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veer, R. (1996a). The concept of culture in Vygotsky's thinking. Culture & Psychology, 2, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veer, R. (1996b). On some historical roots and present-day doubts: A reply to Nicolopoulou and Weintraub. Culture & Psychology, 2, 457–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veer, R. (2002). Vygotsky criticized. Journal of Russian and Eastern European Psychology, 38, 3–9. (dated November–December 2000, vol. 6)Google Scholar
Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/1983). Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii. In Matyushkin, A. M. (Ed.), Sobranie sochinenii. Tom tretii. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki (pp. 6–328). Moscow: Pedagogika.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 1–125). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×