Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:54:51.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Exploring the Links between External and Internal Activity from a Cultural-Historical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Igor M. Arievitch
Affiliation:
College of Staten Island, City University of New York, United States
Bert van Oers
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Wim Wardekker
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Ed Elbers
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
René van der Veer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

After decades of being dominated by individualist (behaviorist, cognitivist, or physiology-driven) and reductionist notions, psychology has recently turned to contextual and cultural facets of human development. New attention to culture greatly contributes to, and necessitates, a substantial reconceptualization of the very nature of cognitive and other psychological processes as well as the ways to study them. Although the impact of culture, in one form or another, is acknowledged in almost all research branches that exist in psychology today, there is arguably one family of approaches that places this issue at the very center of its theory and methodology. This family of approaches encompasses studies in distributed cognition (e.g., Hutchins, 1996), situated learning (e.g., Lave & Wenger, 1991), cognitive evolution (e.g., Donald, 2001), sociocultural research (e.g., Cole, 1996; Wertsch, 1998), science and technology studies (e.g., Latour, 1999), and even history of psychology (e.g., Morawski, 2001). The principal assumption of this approach is that human cognition is a social collaborative activity that cannot be reduced either to physiological processes in the brain or to any individual information processing occurring “in the head.” Instead, cognition is viewed as stretching beyond the individual isolated mind – into the cultural systems of artifacts and activities that allow for the cognitive processes to be accomplished and into the social communities of which these processes are only a part.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Learning
Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
, pp. 38 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arievitch, I. M., & Veer, R. (1995). Furthering the internalization debate: Galperin's contribution. Human Development, 38 (2), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arievitch, I. M., & Veer, R. (2004). The role of non-automatic regulation of activity: From Lipps to Galperin. History of Psychology, 7 (2), 154–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearison, D. J., & Dorval, B. (2002). Collaborative cognition: Children negotiating ways of knowing. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chaiklin, S. (2002). A developmental teaching approach to schooling. In Wells, G. and Claxton, G. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia. (1976). Vvedenie v psikhologiju [Introduction to psychology]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia. (1989). The problem of attention. Soviet Psychology, 27 (3), 83–92. (Original work published 1976)Google Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia. (1992a). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30 (4), 60–80. (Original work published 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia. (1992b). The problem of activity in Soviet psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30 (4), 37–59. (Original work published 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia. (1997). Pismo k A. N. Leontievu, 1940 [Letter to A. N. Leontiev, 1940]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 14 (3), 3–7.Google Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia. (1998a). Razlichie v ispol'zovanii orudii u cheloveka i vspomogatel'nykh sredstv u zhivotnykh i ego psikhologicheskoe znachenie [The difference between human tool use and the use of auxiliary means in animals and its psychological significance]. In Galperin, P. Ia., Psikhologiia kak obyektivnaya nauka [Psychology as a rigorous science] (pp. 37–93). Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. (Original manuscript written 1935)Google Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia. (1998b). Metod, fakty i teorii v psikhologii formirovaniia umstvennykh deistvii i poniatii [The method, facts, and theories in the mental actions and concepts formation]. In Galperin, P. Ia., Psikhologiia kak obyektivnaya nauka [Psychology as a rigorous science] (pp. 389–398). Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. (Original manuscript written 1966)Google Scholar
Galperin, P. Ia., & Kabylnitskaia, S. L. (1974). Eksperimentalnoe formirovanie vnimaniia [Experimental formation of attention]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.Google Scholar
Glassmann, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30 (4), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haenen, J. (1996a). Piotr Galperin: Psychologist in Vygotsky's footsteps. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Haenen, J. (1996b). Piotr Galperin's criticism and extension of Lev Vygotsky's work. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 34 (2), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatano, G., & Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development, 44 (2), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. American Psychologist, 41 (3), 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., &. Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress. (Original work published 1959)Google Scholar
Minick, N. (1987). The development of Vygotsky's thought: An Introduction. In Rieber, R. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 17–36). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Minnis, M., & John-Steiner, V. P. (2001). Are we ready for a single, integrated theory?Human Development, 44 (5), 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawski, J. (2001). Gifts bestowed, gifts withheld: Assessing psychological theory with a Kochian attitude. American Psychologist, 56, 433–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obukhova, L. F. (1972). Etapy razvitiia detskogo myshleniia [Stages in the development of the child's thinking]. Moscow: MGU.Google Scholar
Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35 (4), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolskij, A. I. (1987). Stanovlenie poznavatelnogo deistviia: Nauchnaia abstraktsiia i realnost [The genesis of cognitive action: Scientific abstraction and reality]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. (1985). Vygotsky's use of history. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse-based versions of social constructivism. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4 (3), 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talyzina, N. F. (1975). Upravlenie protsessom usvoeniia znanii [Guiding the process of knowledge acquisition]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J., & Veer, R. (2000). The social mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In Rieber, R. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In Rieber, R. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 1–125). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zinchenko, P. I. (1983). The problem of involuntary memory. Soviet Psychology, 4, 9–33.Google Scholar
Zinchenko, V. P. (1985). Vygotsky's ideas about units for the analysis of mind. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×