Abi-Saab, Georges. ‘De l’Évolution de la Cour Internationale: Reflexions sur quelques tendances recentes' (1992) 2 Revue Générale De Droit International Public273–96
Alford, Neill H. ‘Fact finding by the World Court’ (1958) 4 Villanova Law Review37–91
Allison, J. W. F. ‘Fuller's analysis of polycentric disputes and the limits of adjudication’ (1994) Cambridge Law Journal367–83
Allison, J. W. F. ‘The procedural reason for judicial restraint’ (1994) Public Law452–73
Allison, J. W. F.A Continental Distinction in the Common Law: A historical and comparative perspective on English public law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)
Allison, Richard C. and Holtzmann, Howard M. ‘The Tribunal's use of experts’ in Caren, David D. and Crock, John R. (eds.), The Iran–United States Claims Tribunal and the Process of International Claims Resolution (New York: Transnational Publishers, 2000), p. 275
Alvarez, Jose E. ‘Burdens of proof’ (1993) 14 Michigan Journal of International Law399–427
Amerasinghe, C. F. ‘Presumptions and inferences in evidence in international litigation’ (2004) 3(3) Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals395–410
Amerasinghe, C. F.Evidence in International Litigation (Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005)
Anderson, Terrence, Schum, David and Twining, William. Analysis of Evidence, 2nd edn (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2005)
Balasko, A.Causes de nullité de la sentence arbitrale en droit international public (Paris: Pedone, 1938)
Barnett, Peter. Res Judicata, Estoppel, and Foreign Judgments (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2001)
Bartels, Lorand. ‘Commentary’, in Ortino, Federico and Ripinsky, Sergey (eds.), WTO Law and Process: The proceedings of the 2005 and 2006 Annual WTO Conferences (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2007), p. 220.
Bar-Yaacov, N.The Handling of International Disputes by Means of Inquiry (Oxford University Press, 1974)
Beardsley, James. ‘Proof of fact in French civil procedure’ (1986) 34 American Journal of Comparative Law459–86
Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a new modernity (London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1992)
Beck, Ulrich ‘Risk society revisited: Theory, politics and research programmes’ in Adam, Barbara, Beck, Ulrich and Loon, Joost, The Risk Society and Beyond (London; California; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2000)
Bedjaoui, Mohammed. ‘La “Descente sur les lieux” dans la pratique de la Cour International de Justice et de sa devancière’ in Hafner, Gerhard, Loibl, Gerhard and Seidlhohenveldern, Ignaz (eds.), Liber Amicorum: Professor Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern in honour of his 80th birthday (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), p. 1
Bell, J., Boyron, S. and Whittaker, S.Principles of French Law (Oxford University Press, 1998)
Bentham, J.Rationale of Judicial Evidence: Specially applied to English practice: From the manuscripts of Jeremy Bentham (London: Hunt and Clarke, 1827)
Bentham, J. ‘Principles of judicial procedure with the outlines of a procedural code’ in Bowring, John (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham 11 vols. (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843), II
Benzing, Markus. ‘Community interests in the procedure of international courts and tribunals’ (2006) 5 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals369–408
Berger, Adolf. Encylopedic Dictionary of Roman Law (1953) 43(2) Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
Bilder, Richard. ‘Some limitations of adjudication as an international dispute settlement technique’ (1983) 23 Virginia Journal of International Law1–12
Bilder, Richard ‘The fact/law distinction in international adjudication’ in Lillich, R. B. (ed.), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals: Eleventh Sokol Colloquium (Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1991), p. 95
Birnie, P., Boyle, A. and Redgwell, C.International Law and the Environment, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Bishop, R. D., Crawford, J., and Reisman, W. M.Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, materials and commentary (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005)
Bodansky, Daniel. ‘The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law?’ (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law596–623
Bohlander, Michael. ‘The German advantage revisited: An inside view of German civil procedure in the nineties’ (1998) 13 Tulane European and Civil Law Forum25–46
Bone, Robert G. ‘Lon Fuller's theory of adjudication and the false dichotomy between dispute resolution and public law models of litigation’ (1995) 75 Boston University Law Review1273–324
Bostian, Ida L. ‘Flushing the Danube: The World Court's decision concerning the Gabčíkovo Dam’ (1998) 9 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy401–27.
Bowett, D. ‘Res judicata and the limits of rectification of decisions by international tribunals’ (1996) 8 African Journal of International and Comparative Law577–91
Bowett, et al., The International Court of Justice: Process, practice and procedure (London: British Institute for International and Comparative Law, 1997)
Brealey, Mark. ‘The burden of proof before the European Court’ (1985) 10 European Law Review250–62
Brierly, J. L. ‘The Hague Conventions and the nullity of international arbitral awards’ (1928) 9 British Yearbook of International Law114–17
Broches, Aron. ‘Observations on the finality of ICSID awards’ (1991) 6 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal321–78
Broude, Tomer. ‘Genetically modified rules: The awkward rule-exception-right distinction in EC – Biotech’ (2007) 6(2) World Trade Review215–31
Brower, Charles N. ‘Evidence before international tribunals: The need for some standard rules’ (1994) 28 International Law47–58
Brower, Charles N. and Brueschke, Jason D.The Iran – United States Claims Tribunal (The Hague; Boston: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 1998)
Brown, Chester. A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)
Brown, David. ‘Oral evidence and experts in arbitration’, Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law: Arbitration and oral evidence (www.iccdrl.com: 2005), p. 77
Brown Weiss, Edith. In Fairness to Future Generations: International law, common patrimony and international equity (Hotei Publishing, 1989)
Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law, 7th edn (OxfordUniversity Press, 2008)
Bucci, Vittorio Di. ‘Revision’ in Plender, Richard (ed.), European Courts: Practice and Precedents (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1997), p. 699.
Button, Catherine. The Power to Protect: Trade, health and uncertainty in the WTO (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)
Cameron, James. ‘The precautionary principle: Core meaning, constitutional framework and procedures for implementation’ in Harding, Ronnie and Fisher, Elizabeth (eds.), Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle (Leichhardt, New South Wales: The Federation Press, 1999), p. 29
Cameron, James ‘The precautionary principle in international law’ in O'Riordan, Tim, Cameron, James and Jordan, Andrew (eds.), Re-Interpreting the Precautionary Principle (London: Cameron, 2001), p. 113
Cameron, James and Abouchar, Juli. ‘The precautionary principle: A fundamental principle of law and policy for the protection of the global environment’ (1991) 14 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review1–28
Cameron, James and Abouchar, Juli ‘The status of the precautionary principle in international law’ in Freestone, David and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The challenge of implementation (The Hague; London; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996) p. 29
Cameron, James and Orava, Stephen J. ‘GATT/WTO Panels between recording and finding facts: Issues of due process, evidence, burden of proof, and standard of review in GATT/WTO dispute settlement’ in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and lessons from the practice of other international courts and tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000), p. 195
Cappelletti, Mauro and Garth, Bryant G. ‘Introduction: Policies, trends and ideas in civil procedure’ in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, XVI: Civil Procedure (Tübingen, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1988)
Cappelletti, Mauro and Jolowicz, J. A.Public Interest Parties and the Active Role of the Judge in Civil Litigation (Milan: Dott. A. Giuffrè Editore; and New York: Oceana Publications, Inc., 1975)
Carlston, Kenneth S.The Process of International Arbitration (New York: Columbia University Press, 1946)
Castberg, F. ‘L'excès de pouvoir dans la justice internationale’ (1931) 35 Recueil des cours353–472
Charnovitz, S., Bartels, L., Howse, R., Bradley, J., Pauwelyn, J. and Regan, D. ‘Internet roundtable: The Appellate Body's GSP decision’ (2004) 3(2) World Trade Review239–65
Chayes, A. ‘The role of the judge in public law litigation’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Review1281–316
Cheng, BinGeneral Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Grotius Publications Ltd, 1987)
Christoforou, Theofanis. ‘WTO Panels in the face of scientific uncertainty’ in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and lessons from the practice of other international courts and tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000), p. 243
Churchill, Robin and Scott, Joanne. ‘The MOX Plant litigation: The first half-life’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly643–76
Corti Varela, Justo. ‘The EU “coexistence” policy under WTO law: Problems and solutions’, paper presented at Changing Futures? Science and International Law, ESIL-ASIL Research Forum, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2–3 October 2009
Crawford, James. The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, text and commentaries (Cambridge University Press, 2002)
Croley, Stephen P. and Jackson, John H. ‘WTO dispute procedures, standard of review, and deference to national governments’ (1996) 90 American Journal of International Law193–213
Damaška, Mirjan. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A comparative approach to the legal process (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1986)
Damaška, MirjanEvidence Law Adrift (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997)
Damaška, Mirjan ‘The uncertain fate of evidentiary transplants: Anglo-American and Continental experiments’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law839–52
Eijsvoogel, Peter V. (ed.), Evidence in International Arbitration Proceedings (London: Graham and Trotman / Martinus Nijhoff and Association Internationale de Jeunes Avocats, 1994)
Erichson, Howard M. ‘Mass tort litigation and inquisitorial justice’ (1999) 87 The Georgetown Law Journal1983–2024
Feldman, Mark B. ‘The annulment proceedings and the finality of ICSID arbitral awards’ (1987) 2 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal85–110
Fergusson, M. Carr. ‘A day in court in Justinian's Rome: Some problems of evidence, proof and justice in Roman law’ (1961) 46 Iowa Law Review732–72
Fiore, Pasquale. Nouveau droit international public, 2nd edn (Paris: Durand and Pedone, 1885), II
Fisher, Elizabeth. ‘Is the precautionary principle justiciable?’ (2001) 13(3) Journal of Environmental Law315–34
Fisher, ElizabethRisk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism (Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 2007)
Fisher, Elizabeth and Harding, Ronnie. ‘The precautionary principle: Towards a deliberative, trans-disciplinary problem-solving process’ in Harding, Ronnie and Fisher, Elizabeth (eds.), Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle (Leichhardt, New South Wales: The Federation Press, 1999), p. 290
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia. ‘Equipping the Court to deal with developing areas of international law: Environmental law’ in Peck, Connie and Lee, Roy S. (eds.), Increasing the Effectiveness of the International Court of Justice (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997), pp. 397–417.
Foster, Caroline E. ‘The “real dispute” in the Southern Bluefin Tuna case: A scientific dispute?’ (2001) 16(4) International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law571–601
Foster, Caroline E. ‘Social science experts and amicus curiae briefs in international courts and tribunals: The WTO Biotech Case’ (2005) 52 Netherlands International Law Review433–59
Foster, Caroline E. ‘Necessity and precaution in international law: Responding to oblique forms of urgency’ (2008) 32(2) New Zealand Universities Law Review265–83
Foster, Caroline E. ‘Prior approval systems and the substance–procedure dichotomy under the WTO SPS Agreement’ (2008) 42(6) Journal of World Trade1203–17
Foster, Caroline ‘Public opinion and the interpretation of the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures’ (2008) 11(2) Journal of International Economic Law427–58
Foster, Caroline ‘Precaution, scientific development and scientific uncertainty under the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures’ (2009) 18(1) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law50–8
Foster, Caroline ‘The consultation of independent experts by international courts and tribunals’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, Volume 20, 2009 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)
Foster, Caroline ‘Burden of proof in international courts and tribunals’ (2010) 29 Australian Yearbook of International Law (forthcoming)
Foster, Kenneth R. and Huber, Peter W.Judging Science: Scientific knowledge and the Federal Courts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997)
Fraiberg, Jeremy D. and Trebilcock, Michael J. ‘Risk regulation: Technocratic and democratic tools for regulatory reform’ (1998) 43 McGill Law Journal835–87
Franck, Thomas M.Fairness in International Law and Institutions (New York: Clarendon Press, 1995)
Freestone, David. ‘Caution or precaution: “A rose by any other name”?’ (1999) 10 Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 25–32
Freestone, David and Hey, Ellen. ‘Origins and development of the precautionary principle’ in Freestone, David and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The challenge of implementation (The Hague; London; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996), p. 3
Freyer, Dana. ‘Assessing expert evidence’ in Newman, Lawrence W. and Hill, Richard D. (eds.), The Leading Arbitrators' Guide to International Arbitration, 2nd edn (New York: Juris Publishing Inc., 2008), p. 429
Frowein, Jochen A. ‘Fact-finding by the European Commission of Human Rights’ in Lillich, Richard B. (ed.), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals: Eleventh Sokol Colloquium (Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1991), p. 237
Fuller, Lon L. ‘The forms and limits of adjudication’ (1978) 292 Harvard Law Review353–409
Gaeta, Paola. ‘Inherent powers of international courts and tribunals’ in Vohrah, Lal Chand, Yvonne Featherstone, Fausto Pocaret al. (eds.), Man's Inhumanity to Man: Essays on international law in honour of Antonio Cassese (The Hague; New York: Kluwer Law International, 2003), p. 353
Gaillard, Emmanuel. ‘Centre International pour le Réglement des Différends Relatifs aux Investissements’ (1987) 114 Journal du Droit International135–91
Garapon, Antoine. ‘Incertitude et expertise: l'expertise française sous le regard international’ in Séminaire risques, assurances, responsabilités 2004–2005: le traitement juridique et judiciaire de l'incertitude, Cour de Cassation, colloques et activités de formation, www.courdecassation.fr
Ghestin, J., Goubeaux, G. and Fabre-Magnan, M.Traité de Droit Civil (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, Editions Juridiques Associées, 1994)
Gordon, Edward. ‘The World Court and the interpretation of constitutive treaties: Some observations on the development of an international constitutional law’ (1965) 59 American Journal of Interational Law794–833
Grando, Michelle T. ‘Allocating the burden of proof in WTO disputes: A critical analysis (2006) 9(3) Journal of International Economic Law615–56
Grando, Michelle T.Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Green, James A. ‘Fluctuating evidentiary standards for self-defence in the International Court of Justice’ (2009) 58(1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly163–79
Griffith, J. A. G. ‘Judicial decision-making in public law’ (1985) Public Law564–82
Grisel, Étienne. ‘Res judicata: l'autorité de la chose jugée en droit international’ in Dutoit, Bernard and Grisel, Étienne (eds.), Melanges Georges Perrin: recueil de travaux offerts à M. Georges Perrin (Lausanne: Payot, 1984) p. 136
Gündling, Lothar. ‘The status in international law of the principle of precautionary action’ (1990) 5 International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law23–30
Hand, Learned. ‘Historical and practical considerations regarding expert testimony’ (1901) 15 Harvard Law Review40–58
Handl, Günter. ‘Environmental security and global change: The challenge to international law’ in Lang, W., Neuhold, H. and Zemanek, K. (eds), Environmental Protection and International Law (London; Dordrecht; Boston: Graham and Trotman / Martinus Nijhoff, 1991)
Hanotiau, Bernard. ‘Satisfying the burden of proof: The viewpoint of a “civil law” lawyer’ (1994) 10(3) Arbitration International341–53
Harremoës, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M.et al. ‘Twelve late lessons’ in Harremoës, Poul, Gee, D., MacGarvin, M.et al. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late lessons from early warnings (London; Sterling, VA: Earthscan Pub. Ltd, 2002), p. 185
Hautecloque, Jean. ‘French judicial expertise procedure and international arbitration’ (1987) 4 Journal of International Arbitration77–101
Helfer, Lawrence R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. ‘Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication’ (1997) 107 Yale Law Journal273–392
Herzog, Peter E. and Karlen, Delmar. ‘Attacks on judicial decisions’ in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, XVI: Civil Procedure (Tübingen, The Hague: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982)
Hey, Ellen. ‘The precautionary concept in environmental policy and law: Institutionalizing caution’ (1991–1992) 4 Georgetown International Environmental Law Review303–18
Hickey, James E. and Walker, Vern R. ‘Refining the precautionary principle in international environmental law’ (1995) 14 Virginia Environmental Law Journal Spring, 423–54
Higgins, Rosalyn. ‘Respecting sovereign states and running a tight courtroom’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly121–32
Highet, Keith. ‘Evidence and proof of facts’ in Damrosch, Lori F. (ed.), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers Inc., 1987), pp. 355–75
Hodgkinson, Tristram and James, Mark. Expert Evidence: Law and practice, 3rd edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2010)
Hof, Jacomijn J. van. Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: The application by the Iran–U.S. Claims Tribunal (Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1991)
Hohmann, Harold. Precautionary Legal Duties and Principles of Modern International Environmental Law: The precautionary principle: International environmental law between exploitation and protection (London; Boston: Graham and Trotman / Martinus Nijhoff, 1994)
Holtzmann, Howard M. ‘Fact-finding by the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ in Lillich, Richard B. (ed.), Fact-Finding Before International Tribunals: Eleventh Sokol Colloquium (Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1991), p. 101
Holtzmann, Howard, ,Judge of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal, ‘Streamlining arbitral proceedings: Some techniques of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal’ (1995) 11 Arbitration International39–50.
Hooper, Laural L., Cecil, Joe S. and Willging, Thomas E. ‘Assessing causation in breast implant litigation: The role of science panels’ (2001) 64(4) Law and Contemporary Problems139–89
Howse, Robert. ‘Democracy, science, and free trade: Risk regulation on trial at the World Trade Organization’ (2000) 98 Michigan Law Review2329–57
Huber, Peter. Galileo's Revenge: Junk science in the courtroom (New York: Basic Books, 1991)
Hudson, Manley O.The Permanent Court of International Justice: A treatise (New York: Macmillan, 1934)
Hudson, Manley O. ‘Visits by international tribunals to places concerned in proceedings’ (1937) 31 American Journal of International Law696–7
Hunter, Martin. ‘Expert conferencing and new methods’ in Berg, Albert Jan (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2006), pp. 820–5
Hunter, William A.Introduction to Roman Law (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1908)
Hwang, M. ‘Witness conferencing,’ in McKay, Jamie (ed.), Guide to the World's Leading Experts in Commercial Arbitration (Legal Media Group, www.legalmediagroup.com, 2008), pp. 3–5
Hwang, M. ‘Witness conferencing and party autonomy’ Transnational Dispute Management (October 2009 provisional issue) 19–27
Iynedjian, Marc. ‘The case for incorporating scientists and technicians into WTO Panels’ (2008) 42(2) Journal of World Trade279–97
Jasanoff, Sheila. ‘What judges should know about the sociology of science’ (1992) 32 Jurimetrics Journal345–60
Jenks, Wilfred. The Prospects of International Adjudication (London: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1964)
Jolowicz, J. A. ‘The active role of the court in civil litigation’ in Cappelletti, Mauro and Jolowicz, J. A. (eds.), Public Interest Parties and the Active Role of the Judge in Civil Litigation (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications Inc., 1975), pp. 157–278
Jolowicz, J. A.On Civil Procedure (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
Jones, Doug. ‘Party appointed expert witnesses in international arbitration: A protocol at last’ (2008) 24(1) Arbitration International137–55
Kazazi, Mojtaba. Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A study on evidence before international tribunals (The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996)
Kokott, Juliane. The Burden of Proof in Comparative and International Human Rights Law: Civil and common law approaches with special reference to the American and German legal systems (The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998)
Kolb, Robert. ‘General principles of procedural law’ in Zimmerman, Andreas, Tomuschat, Christian and Oellers-Frahm, Karin (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A commentary (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 793–835
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Peaceful settlement of environmental disputes’ (1991) 60 Nordic Journal of International Law73–92
Kuhn, Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996)
Kwast, Patricia Jimenez. ‘Cooperating on the law of UNCLOS Article 76 and the science of the outer limits: The normativity of the institutional dimension’, paper presented at Changing Futures? Science and International Law, ESIL-ASIL Research Forum, University of Helsinki, Finland, 2–3 October 2009
Lachs, Manfred. ‘Evidence in the procedure of the International Court of Justice: Role of the Court’ in Bello, Emmanuel G. and Ajibola, Bola A. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Judge Taslim Olawale Elias, 2 vols., I: Contemporary International Law and Human Rights (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992), p. 265
Lalive, J. F. ‘Quelques remarques sur la preuve devant la Cour Permanente et La Cour Internationale de Justice’ (1950) 7 Annuaire Suisse de Droit International77–103
Langbein, John H. ‘The German advantage in civil procedure’ (1985) 52 The University of Chicago Law Review823–66
Larroumet, Christian. Droit Civil I (Paris: Economica, 1998)
Lasok, K. P. E.The European Court of Justice: Practice and procedure, 2nd edn (London: Butterworths, 1994)
Lasok, K. P. E.Law and Institutions of the European Union, 7th edn (London: Butterworths, 2001)
Lauterpacht, Elihu. ‘Partial judgments and the inherent jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice’ in Lowe, Vaughan and Fitzmaurice, Malgosia (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press 1996), pp. 465–86
Lauterpacht, HerschPrivate Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1927)
Lauterpacht, Hersch. The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens and Sons Limited, 1958)
Lester, Simonet al. World Trade Law: Text, materials and cases (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2008)
Lévesque, Céline. ‘Science in the hands of international investment tribunals: A case for “scientific due process”’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, Volume 20, 2009 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)
Lind, E. Allan and Tyler, Tom R.The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (New York: Plenum Press, 1988)
Loughlin, Paula and Gerlis, Stephen. Civil Procedure, 2nd edn (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2004)
Lowe, Vaughan. ‘Res judicata and the rule of law in international arbitration’ (1996) 8 African Journal of International and Comparative Law38–50
MacDonald, John M. ‘Appreciating the precautionary principle as an ethical evolution in ocean management’ (1995) 26 Ocean Development and International Law255–86
MacLennan, Jacquelyn. ‘Evidence, standard and burden of proof in the use of experts in procedure before the Luxembourg Courts’ in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and lessons from the practice of other international courts and tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000), p. 265
Malaurie, Philippe and Morvan, Patrick. Droit civil: introduction générale (Paris: Editions Juridiques Associés, 2005)
Mani, V. S.International Adjudication: Procedural aspects (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1980)
Mansfield, Bill. ‘The Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration: Comments on Professor Barbara Kwiatkowska's article’ (2001) 16 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law361–6.
Mansfield, Bill. ‘Compulsory dispute settlement after the Southern Bluefin Tuna Award’ in Oude Elferink, Alex G. and Rothwell, Donald R. (eds.), Oceans Management in the 21st Century: Institutional frameworks and responses (Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2004), p. 255.
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J. ‘Presumptions and burden of proof in world trade law’ (1997) 14 Journal of International Arbitration67–98
Matet, Patrick. ‘Propositions du groupe de travail’, in Séminaire risques, assurances, responsabilités 2004–2005: le traitement juridique et judiciaire de l'incertitude Cour de Cassation colloques et activités de formation (www.courdecassation.fr)
McDonell, Gavan. ‘Risk management, reality and the precautionary principle: Coping with decisions’ in Harding, Ronnie and Fisher, Elizabeth (eds.), Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle (Leichhardt, New South Wales: The Federation Press, 1999), p. 190
Mueller, Christopher B. and Kirkpatrick, Laird C.Evidence, 4th edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2003)
Nance, Dale A. ‘Civility and the burden of proof’ (1994) 17 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy647–90
Ngwasiri, C. N. ‘Some problems of expertise in French civil proceedings’ (1989) 10 Civil Justice Quarterly168–83
Ngwasiri, C. N. ‘The role of the judge in French civil proceedings’ (1990) 9 Civil Justice Quarterly167–85
Nollkaemper, André. ‘“What you risk reveals what you value” and other dilemmas encountered in the legal assaults on risks’ in Freestone, David and Hey, Ellen (eds.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The challenge of implementation (The Hague; London; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996), p. 73
North, Sir Peter and Fawcett, J. J.Cheshire and North's Private International Law, 14th edn (Oxford University Press, 2008)
O'Connell, D. P.International Law, 2nd edn (London: Stevens and Sons, 1970)
Oesch, Matthias. Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution (Oxford University Press, 2003)
Okowa, Phoebe N. ‘Procedural obligations in international environmental agreements’ (1996) 67 British Yearbook of International Law275–336
Okowa, Phoebe N. ‘Case concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia)’ 47 (1998) International and Comparative Law Quarterly688–98.
Okowa, Phoebe ‘Environmental dispute settlement: Some reflections on recent developments’ in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), Remedies in International Law: The institutional dilemma (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998), p. 157
Olson, James M. ‘Shifting the burden of proof: How the common law can safeguard nature and promote an earth ethic’ (1990) 20 Environmental Law891–915
Orellana, Marcos A. ‘The role of science in investment arbitrations concerning public health and the environment’ (2006) 17 Yearbook of International Environmental Law48–72
O'Riordan, Tim. ‘The politics of the precautionary principle’ in Harding, Ronnie and Fisher, Elizabeth (eds.), Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle (Leichhardt, N.S.W.: The Federation Press, 1999), p. 283
Orrego Vicuña, Francisco. The Changing International Law of High Seas Fisheries (Cambridge University Press, 1999)
Pasqualucci, Jo M.The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Paulsson, Jan. ‘ICSID's achievements and prospects’ (1991) 6 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal380–99
Pauwelyn, Joost. ‘Evidence, proof and persuasion in WTO dispute settlement: Who bears the burden?’ (1998) 1 Journal of International Economic Law227–58
Pauwelyn, Joost ‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as applied in the first three SPS disputes: EC – Hormones, Australia – Salmon and Japan – Varietals’ (1999) 2(4) Journal of International Economic Law641–64
Pauwelyn, Joost ‘The use of experts in WTO dispute settlement’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly325–64
Pauwelyn, Joost ‘Expert advice in WTO dispute settlement’ in Bermann, George A. and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Trade and Human Health and Safety (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 235
Peel, Jacqueline. ‘Risk regulation under the WTO SPS agreement: Science as an international normative yardstick?’ Jean Monnet Working Papers, 2004
Peel, JacquelineThe Precautionary Principle in Practice: Environmental decision-making, and scientific uncertainty (Annandale, N.S.W.: Federation Press, 2005)
Peel, Jacqueline ‘International law and the legitimate determination of risk: Is democratising expertise the answer?’ (2007) 38 Victoria University Law Review363–80
Peter, Wolfgang. ‘Witness conferencing revisited’ in Arbitral Procedure at the Dawn of the New Millennium: Reports of the International Colloquium of CEPANI (Brussels: Bruylant, 2005), pp. 155–71
Plender, Richard. ‘Procedure in the European Courts: Comparisons and proposals’ (1997) 267 Receuil des Cours
Poli, Sara. ‘Continuity and change in the EU Regulatory Framework on Genetically Modified Organisms, after the WTO dispute on “Biotech Products”’ (2010) Legal issues of Economic Integration (forthcoming)
Popper, K.The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 4th edn (London: Hutchinson, 1959)
Popper, K.The Myth of the Framework: In defence of science and rationality (London; New York: Routledge, 1994)
Postema, Gerald J. ‘The principle of utility and the law of procedure: Bentham's theory of adjudication’ (1977) 11 Georgia Law Review1393–424
Prager, Dietmar W. ‘Procedural developments at the International Court of Justice’ (2004) 3 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals125–42
Prieto-Castro y Ferrandiz, Leonardo. Derecho Procesal Civil, 5th edn (Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, S.A., 1989)
Raeschke-Kessler, H. ‘Witness conferencing’ in L. W. Newman and Hill, R. D. (eds.), The Leading Arbitrators Guide to International Arbitration, 2nd edn (New York: Juris Publishing Inc., 2008), pp. 415–28
Ralston, Jackson H.The Law and Procedure of International Tribunals: Being a resumé of the views of arbitrators upon questions arising under the law of nations and of the procedure and practice of international courts (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1926)
Rambaud, Patrick. ‘L'Annulation des sentences Klöckner et AMCO’ (1986) 32 Annuaire Français de Droit International259–74
Rao, P. Chandrasekhara and Gautier, Ph. (eds). The Rules of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: A commentary (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006)
Redfern, A.et al. Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2004)
Michael, Reisman, W.. Nullity and Revision: The review and enforcement of international judgments and awards (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971)
Reisman, W. Michael ‘The breakdown of the control mechanism in ICSID arbitration’ 1989 (4) Duke Law Journal739–807
Reisman, W. M. ‘The supervisory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: International arbitration and international adjudication (1996) 258 Recueil des Cours
Reitz, John C. ‘Why we probably cannot adopt the German advantage in civil procedure’ (1990) 75 Iowa Law Review975–1009
Ress, Georg. ‘Fact-finding at the European Court of Justice’ in Lillich, R. B. (ed.), Fact-Finding before International Tribunals: Eleventh Sokol Colloquium (Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1991), pp. 177–203
Riddell, Anna and Plant, Brendan. Evidence Before the International Court of Justice (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009)
Ripert, G. ‘Les Règles du droit civil applicables aux rapports internationaux’ (1933) 44 Receuil des Cours, 569–660
Risinger, D. Michael. ‘“Substance” and “procedure” revisited with some afterthoughts on the constitutional problems of “irrebuttable presumptions”’ (1982–83) 30 University of California at Los Angeles Law Review156–88
Rosenne, Shabtai. Procedure in the International Court: A commentary on the 1978 Rules of the International Court of Justice (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1983)
Rosenne, Shabtai ‘The International Court of Justice and international arbitration’ in Muller, Sam and Mijs, Wim (eds.), The Flame Rekindled: New hopes for international arbitration: Leiden Journal of International Law, Special issue on International Arbitration (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994), p. 297
Rosenne, Shabtai ‘Visit to the site by the International Court’ in Yakpo, Emile and Boumedra, Tahar (eds.), Liber Amicorum – Mohammed Bedjaoui (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), pp. 461–73
Rosenne, ShabtaiThe Law and Practice of the International Court, 1920–2005, 4th edn (Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006)
Rosenne, ShabtaiInterpretation, Revision and Other Recourse from International Judgments and Awards (Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007)
Rosenne, S. ‘Fact-finding before the International Court of Justice’ in Rosenne, S., Essays on International Law and Practice (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007), p. 235.
Rosenthal, Lloyd L. ‘The development of the use of expert testimony’ (1935) 2 Law and Contemporary Problems403–18
Sadeleer, Nicolas. Environmental Principles: From political slogans to legal rules (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)
Salmon, Jean J. A. ‘Le Fait dans l'application du droit international’ (1982) 175 (II) Recueil des Cours257–414
Sanders, Pieter. ‘Commentary on UNCITRAL arbitration rules’ (1997) II Yearbook: Commercial Arbitration172– 219
Sandifer, Durward V.Evidence before International Tribunals (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1975)
Sands, Philippe. Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Schomberg, René. ‘The precautionary principle and its normative challenges’ in Fisher, Elizabeth, Jones, Judith and Schomberg, René (eds.), Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and prospects (Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006), p. 19
Schreuer, Christoph H.The ICSID Convention: A commentary, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Schwarzenberger, Georg. International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens and Sons Ltd, 1986)
Schwebel, S. M. ‘The creation and operation of an International Court of Arbitral Awards’ in Hunter, M., Marriott, A and Veeder, V. V. (eds.), The Internationalisation of International Arbitration (London; Dordrecht; Boston: Graham and Trotman / Martinus Nijhoff, 1995)
Scobbie, Iain. ‘Res judicata, precedent and the International Court: A preliminary sketch’ (1999) 20 Australian Yearbook of International Law299–317
Scott, Joanne. The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A commentary (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Shahabuddeen, Mohamed. ‘The International Court of Justice: The integrity of an idea’ in Pathak, R. S. and Dhokalia, R. P. (eds.), International Law in Transition, Essays in Honour of Judge Nagendra Singh (Dordrecht; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 1992) p. 341
Shahabuddeen, MohamedPrecedent in the World Court (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press 1996)
Shany, Yuval. The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2003)
Shaw, Malcolm N.International Law, 6th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2008)
Simpson, J. L. and Fox, Hazel. International Arbitration: Law and practice (London: Stevens and Sons Ltd, 1959)
Sivakumaran, Sandesh. ‘Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzogovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)’ (2007) 56(3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly695–708
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. ‘A global community of courts’ (2003) 44 Harvard International Law Journal191–220
Smith, Roger and Wynne, Brian. ‘Introduction’ in Smith, Roger, and Wynne, Brian (eds.), Expert Evidence (London; New York: Routledge, 1989)
Spencer Bower, G., Turner, A. K. and Handley, K. R.The Doctrine of Res Judicata, 2nd edn (London; Edinburgh; Dublin: Butterworths, 1996)
Stein, Alex. Foundations of Evidence Law (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)
Stein, P. A. ‘Civil procedure’ in Fokkema, D. C., Chorus, J. M. J., Hondius, E. H. and Lisser, E. C. (eds.) Introduction to Dutch Law for Foreign Lawyers (Deventer: Kluwer, 1978), p. 231
Stephens, Tim. ‘The limits of international adjudication in international environmental law: Another perspective on the Southern Bluefin Tuna case’ (2004) 19 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law173–97
Stephens, Tim. International Courts and Environmental Protection (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2009)
Stirling, Andy. ‘The precautionary principle in science and technology’ in O'Riordan, Tim, Cameron, James and Jordan, Andrew (eds.), Re-Interpreting the Precautionary Principle (London: Cameron May, 2001), p. 61
Sward, Ellen E. ‘Values, ideology and the evolution of the adversary system’ (1989) 64 Indiana Law Journal301–56
Szabó, Marcel. ‘The implementation of the judgment of the ICJ in the Gabčíkovo–Nagymaros dispute’ (2009) 39 Environmental Policy and Law97–102
Tams, C. J. ‘Article 50’ in Zimmerman, A., Tomuschat, C. and Oellers-Frahm, K. (eds.) The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A commentary (Oxford University Press, 2006), p. 1109
Tapper, Colin. Cross and Tapper on Evidence, 11th edn (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Taruffo, Michele. ‘Rethinking the standards of proof’ (2003) 51 American Journal of Comparative Law569–678
Taylor, Robert F. ‘A comparative study of expert testimony in France and the United States: Philosophical underpinnings, history, practice and procedure’ (1996) 31 Texas International Law Journal181–213
Thayer, James B. ‘The burden of proof’ (1890–1) 4(2) Harvard Law Review45–70
Thibaut, John and Walker, Laurens. ‘A theory of procedure’ (1978) 66 California Law Review541–66
Thirlway, Hugh. ‘Dilemma or chimera? Admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in international adjudication’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law622–41
Thirlway, H. W. A. ‘Procedural law and the International Court of Justice’ in Lowe, Vaughan and Fitzmaurice, Malgosia (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 389
Thirlway, H. W. A. ‘Procedure of international courts and tribunals’ in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, 12 vols. (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 1997), III, pp. 1128–31
Thirlway, Hugh ‘The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Part Nine’ (1999) 69 British Yearbook of International Law1–84
Thirlway, Hugh ‘The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Part Ten’ (2000) 70 British Yearbook of International Law1–63
Thouvenin, Jean-Marc. ‘La Descente de la cour sur les lieux dans l'affaire relative au projet Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros’ (1997) XLIII Annuaire Français de Droit International333–40
Tochilovsky, Vladimir. Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Courts and the European Court of Human Rights: Procedure and evidence (Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008)
Tomka, Peter and Wordsworth, Samuel S. ‘The first site visit of the International Court of Justice in fulfilment of its judicial function’ (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law133–40
Trouwborst, Arie. Evolution and Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law (The Hague; New York: Kluwer Law International, 2002)
Tsagourias, N. ‘Application for revision of the judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina), Judgment of 3 February 2003’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly731–8
Twining, William. Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore (London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, Handon, 1985)
Twining, WilliamRethinking Evidence: Exploratory essays, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Usher, John A.European Court Practice (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1983)
Vattel, Emmerich. ‘The law of nations or the principles of natural law’ (trans. Fenwick, Charles G.) in Scott, James Brown (ed.), The Classics of International Law (Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1916), III, pp. 1–398
Verhoosel, Gaetan. ‘Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros: The evidentiary regime on environmental degradation and the World Court’ (1997) 6 European Environmental Law Review, 247–53
Victor, David G. ‘The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An assessment after five years’ (1999–2000) 32 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics865–937
Visscher, Charles. Aspects récents de droit procédural (Paris: Pedone, 1966)
Wagner, Martin J. ‘International investment, expropriation and environmental protection’ (1999) 29 Golden Gate University Law Review465–538
Waincymer, Jeff. WTO Litigation: Procedural aspects of formal dispute settlement (London: Cameron May, 2002)
Walid, Ben Hamida. ‘Two nebulous ICSID features: The notion of investment and the scope of annulment control: Ad hoc Committee's decision in Patrick Mitchell v. Democratic Republic of Congo’ (2007) 24 (3) Journal of International Arbitration287–306
Walker, Vern R. ‘Keeping the WTO from becoming the “World Trans-Science Organization”: Scientific uncertainty, science policy, and factfinding in the growth hormones dispute’ (1998) 31 Cornell International Law Journal251–322
Walker, Vern R. ‘Transforming science into law: Default reasoning in international trade disputes’ in Wagner, Wendy and Steinzor, Rena (eds.), Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the distortion of scientific research (Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 165
Watts, Sir Arthur. New Zealand at the International Court of Justice: French nuclear testing in the Pacific: Nuclear Tests Case New Zealand v. France, 1995 (Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 1996)
Watts, Sir Arthur ‘Burden of proof, and evidence before the ICJ’ in Weiss, Friedl (ed.), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and lessons from the practice of other international courts and tribunals (London: Cameron May, 2000), pp. 289–301
Watts, Sir Arthur ‘New practice directions of the International Court of Justice’ (2002) 1(2) Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals247–56
Watts, Sir Arthur and Jennings, Sir Robert. Oppenheim's International Law, 9th edn (London: Longman, 1992)
Wesley, John W. ‘Scientific evidence and the question of judicial capacity’ (1984) 25 William and Mary Law Review675–703
Wetter, J. Gillis. The International Arbitral Process: Public and private, 5 vols. (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1979), II
White, Gillian M.The Use of Experts by International Tribunals (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1965)
Winickoff, D., Jasanoff, S., Busch, L., Grove-White, R. and Wynne, B. ‘Adjudicating the GM food wars: Science, risk, and democracy in world trade law’ (2005) 30 Yale Journal of International Law81–123
Wirth, David. ‘The role of science in the Uruguay round and NAFTA trade disciplines’ (1994) 27 Cornell International Law Journal817–59
Witenberg, J. C. ‘Onus probandi devant les juridictions arbitrales’ (1951) 55 Revue Generale de Droit International Public321–42
Woolf, Right Hon. Lord. Access to Justice: Final report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice system in England and Wales (London: HMSO, 1996)
,World Trade Organization, The Legal Texts: The results of the Uruguay round of multilateral trade negotiations (Cambridge University Press, 1999)
Wynne, Brian. ‘Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm’ (1992) 2(2) Global Environmental Change111–27
Wynne, Brian ‘Risk and environmental issues as STS themes: Reflexivity on the rocks?’ (July 2002) Special Issue Current Sociology
Zuckerman, A. A. S.Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of practice (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2006)
