Book contents
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Landscape Stewardship in Practice, Policy and Research
- Part I Foundations of Landscape Stewardship
- Part II Landscape Stewardship on the Ground
- Part III Visions Towards Landscape Stewardship
- 16 Bridging New Sustainable Development Goals, Global Agendas and Landscape Stewardship
- Case 15 Terre de Liens – Facilitating Access to Land for Farmers Into the Long-Term
- 17 How Landscape Stewardship Emerges Out of Landscape Planning
- Case 16 The Dartmoor Vision – A Long-Term, Participatory Management Process on the Landscape Scale
- 18 Art and Responsible Landscape Development
- Case 17 One Hut Full – A Multi-Sensory Journey Turning Threatened Heritage into Opportunity
- 19 Leveraging Landscape Stewardship
- Index
- References
18 - Art and Responsible Landscape Development
A Plea for Landscape Art
from Part III - Visions Towards Landscape Stewardship
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017
Book contents
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Emergence of Landscape Stewardship in Practice, Policy and Research
- Part I Foundations of Landscape Stewardship
- Part II Landscape Stewardship on the Ground
- Part III Visions Towards Landscape Stewardship
- 16 Bridging New Sustainable Development Goals, Global Agendas and Landscape Stewardship
- Case 15 Terre de Liens – Facilitating Access to Land for Farmers Into the Long-Term
- 17 How Landscape Stewardship Emerges Out of Landscape Planning
- Case 16 The Dartmoor Vision – A Long-Term, Participatory Management Process on the Landscape Scale
- 18 Art and Responsible Landscape Development
- Case 17 One Hut Full – A Multi-Sensory Journey Turning Threatened Heritage into Opportunity
- 19 Leveraging Landscape Stewardship
- Index
- References
Summary
Landscapes are spaces that have been appropriated, imprinted and divided through the efforts of humans. Whether farmer, forester, fisher, conservationist, local politician, tourism manager or simply a resident, such people put value on and use the natural and culturally created potential of landscapes in very different ways that seem to inevitably lead to conflict. Thus, it would appear that a responsible approach to landscape development can only be successfully brought into existence through a process of collective debate, discussion and even argument between various kinds of people. Landscape art offers myriad possibilities for providing potent impulses that can enable people with their own specific ideas, experiences, and knowledge to take part in the debates and discourse on how to shape the landscapes they are involved in. This chapter outlines landscape art as an appropriate instrument for supporting a responsible landscape development on a regional or local level.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship , pp. 350 - 367Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.) (2014). Landschaftswerkstatt Wasser. Wissenstransfer für einen zukünftigen Landschaftswasserhaushalt in der Region Uckermark-Barnim. Croustillier: Aufland Verlag.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2012a). Zehn Thesen zur Landschaftskommunikation. In Landschafts-kommunikation. Thesen und Texte, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2012b). Was ist eine Landschaftswerkstatt? Ein Definitionsversuch. In Landschaftskommunikation. Thesen und Texte, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 138–142.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2015a). Thesen über Landwirtschaft im Diskurs. In Auf der Suche nach einer neuen Sesshaftigkeit, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 40–63.Google Scholar
Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (2015b). Viele offene Fragen für Pfeils Erben. In Auf der Suche nach einer neuen Sesshaftigkeit, Anders, K. & Fischer, L. (eds.). Croustillier: Aufland Verlag, pp. 64–77.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area, 36, 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. & Mitchell, B. (2000). Landscape stewardship. New directions in conservation of nature and culture. The George Wright Forum, 17, 70–79.Google Scholar
Burckhard, L. (2006). Warum ist Landschaft schön? Die Spaziergangswissenschaft. Berlin: Martin Schmitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2000). European Landscape Convention. European Treaty Series, 176, 3.Google Scholar
Galerie für Landschaftskunst (2015). Text zur Kartierungsabteilung. (www.gflk.de/index.php?title=Kartierungsabteilung).Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, A. (2000). Andy Goldsworthy. 10th edn. Frankfurt am Main: Zweitausendeins.Google Scholar
Howoldt, J., E. & Schneede, U. M. (eds.) (2003). Die Entdeckung der Natur von C. D. Friedrich bis Humboldt. Hamburg/München: Dölling und Galitz.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. (2014). The Practice of Ecological Art. (http://art-science.univ-paris1.fr/plastik/document.php?id=866).Google Scholar
Krause, T. (2004). Zwischenbericht zur Hamburg-Kartierung und Anmerkungen zur Kartografie. In Mapping a City, Möntmann, N, Dziewio, Y & Landschaftskunst, Galerie für (eds.). Hamburg: Hantje Cantz, pp. 172–189.Google Scholar
Krause, T. (2012). Freie Flusszone Süderelbe. Hypothetische Schließung für die Binnenschifffahrt. In Aus Hamburg – Lokale Positionen urbaner Landschaftsgestaltung, Schreiner, S (ed.). Hamburg: Gudberg Verlag, pp. 8–15.Google Scholar
Lemke, H. (2013). Dem Schilf zuhören. Von den bedrohten Klängen der Parthenaue. Croustillier: Aufland Verlag.Google Scholar
Lemke, H. (2014). Cànan – Sreathan – Tuinn. Über Den Hörwert – Luach Eile Fhuaimean – The Surplus Value of Sound. Todmorden: HK Publishing.Google Scholar
Lippard, L. R. (1997). The Lure of the Local. Senses of Place in a Multicentered Society. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Lippard, L. R. (2004). Alles auf einen Blick. In Mapping a City, Möntmann, N, Dziewio, Y & Landschaftskunst, Galerie für (eds.). Hamburg: Hantje Cantz.Google Scholar
Makowski, H. & Buderath, B. (1983). Die Natur dem Menschen Untertan. Ökologie im Spiegel der Landschaftsmalerei. München: Kindler Verlag.Google Scholar
Ott, K. & Döring, R. (2004). Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Runte, A. (1997). National Parks. The American Experience. 3rd edn. Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Schiffers, A. & Sprenger, T. (2010). Ich bin gerne Bauer und möchte es auch gerne bleiben. Berlin: Agrobooks.Google Scholar
Seel, M. (1997). Die Kunst der Entzweiung. Zum Begriff der ästhetischen Rationalität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Sieferle, R. P. (1984). Fortschrittsfeinde? Opposition gegen Technik und Industrie von der Romantik bis zur Gegenwart. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Spaid, S. (2002). Ecovention. Current Art to Transform Ecologies. Cincinnati, OH: The Contemporary Arts Center.Google Scholar
Trnek, R. (1977). Der Wandel des Sehens und Empfindens von Landschaft durch die Kunst. In Die Ware Landschaft. Eine kritische Analyse des Landschaftsbegriffs, Achleitner, F (eds). Salzburg: Residenz Verlag, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Werkner, P. (1992). Land Art USA. Von den Ursprüngen zu den Großraumprojekten in der Wüste. München: Prestel VerlagGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia (2016). Environmental Art. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_art).Google Scholar
Wollmeiner, S. (2002). Naturkunst. Künstlersymposien in Deutschland. Petersberg: Imhof Verlag.Google Scholar