Landscape Stewardship on the Ground

Part II - Landscape Stewardship on the Ground

Fields of Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017

Edited by

Claudia Bieling and

Tobias Plieninger

Show author details

Claudia Bieling: Affiliation:
Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart
Tobias Plieninger: Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship , pp. 101 - 308

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316499016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderies, J. M., Rodriguez, A. A., Janssen, M. A. & Cifdaloz, O. (2007). Panaceas, uncertainty, and the robust control framework in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 15194–15199.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Benayas, J. M. R., Martins, A., Nicolau, J. M. & Schulz, J. J. (2007). Abandonment of agricultural land: An over-view of drivers and consequences. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar

Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18, 621–630.Google Scholar

Constanza, R., Lowe, B. S., Ostrom, E. & Wilson, J. (2001). Institutions, Ecosystems, and Sustainability. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar

Cox, M., Arnold, G. & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15 (4), 38. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/).Google Scholar

DVL (2016). Website of the German Association for Land Care. (http://www.landschaftspflegeverband.de/).Google Scholar

EAA (2012). Protected Areas in Europe – an Overview. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency (EEA).Google Scholar

Enengel, B., Penker, M. & Muhar, A. (2014). Landscape co-management in Austria: The stakeholder's perspective on efforts, benefits and risks. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 223–234.Google Scholar

Estel, S., Kuemmerle, T., Alcantara, C., Levers, C., Prishchepov, A. V. & Hostert, P. (2015). Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 163, 312–325.Google Scholar

Eurostat (2016). Land Cover and Land Use (LUCAS) Statistics (Data 2012). Luxembourg: Eurostat. (http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Land_cover_and_land_use_ per cent28LUCAS per cent29_statistics).Google Scholar

FAO (2009). How to Feed the World in 2050. Proceedings of the Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome: FAO Headquarters.Google Scholar

Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S. & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31, 437–440.Google Scholar

Franks, J. R. & Emery, S. B. (2013). Incentivising collaborative conservation: Lessons from existing environmental Stewardship Scheme options. Land Use Policy, 30, 847–862.Google Scholar

Franks, J. R. & McGloin, A. (2007). Environmental co-operatives as instruments for delivering across-farm environmental and rural policy objectives: Lessons for the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 472–489.Google Scholar

Heuberger, R. (2010). Tourismus hilft Naturschutz. Kulturlandschaftserhaltung im Naturpark Weißensee. In Neue Modelle des Natur- und Kulturlandschaftsschutzes in den österreichischen Naturparke, VNÖ (ed.). Graz: VNÖ (Verband der Naturparke Österreichs), pp. 148–150.Google Scholar

Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.Google Scholar

Kieninger, P. & Penker, M. (2015). Threatened landscapes unite rural and urban communities. Farming Matters, 31.2, 28–31.Google Scholar

Kieninger, P. R., Penker, M. & Yamaji, E. (2013). Aesthetic and spiritual values motivating collective action for the conservation of cultural landscape – A case study of rice terraces in Japan. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 28, 364–379.Google Scholar

MacDonald, D., Crabtree, J. R., Wiesinger, G., Dax, T., Stamou, N., Fleury, P., Gutierrez Lazpita, J. & Gibon, A. (2000). Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 47–69.Google Scholar

McKenzie, A. J., Emery, S. B., Franks, J. R. & Whittingham, M. J. (2013). Landscape-scale conservation: Collaborative agri-environment schemes could benefit both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but will farmers be willing to participate? Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 1274–1280.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mühlmann, P. (2009). Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement in der Landschaft. Das Modell freiwilliger Arbeit in der Landschaftspflege. PhD thesis. Vienna: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences.Google Scholar

Navarro, L. M. & Pereira, H. M. (2012). Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems, 15, 900–912.Google Scholar

Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34, 75–90.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 15181–15187.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2008). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. 22nd edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Penker, M. (2009). Landscape governance for the local population? A property rights analysis in Austria. Land Use Policy, 26, 947–953.Google Scholar

Penker, M., Mühlmann, P. & Muhar, A. (2014). Volunteering for land care – A typology of civil-society organisations in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Ecomont, 6, 21–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A. & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Prager, K. (2015a). Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management. Journal of Environmental Management, 161, 375–384.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Prager, K. (2015b). Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 59–66.Google Scholar

Prager, K., Reed, M. & Scott, A. (2012). Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale – Rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy, 29, 244–249.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., Venter, M., Boedhihartono, A. K., Day, M., Garcia, C., van Oosten, C. & Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 8349–8356.Google Scholar

USDA (2011). Landscape Stewardship Guide. With collaboration of Northeastern Area Association of State Foresters. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North eastern Area State and Private Forestry. (http://na.fs.fed.us/pubs/stewardship/stewardship-guide/landscape_stewardship_guide_11_screen.pdf).Google Scholar

Van Vliet, J., de Groot, H. J. M., Rietveld, P. & Verburg, P. H. (2015). Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land change in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 24–36.Google Scholar

Wikimedia (2015): Weissensee in Austria. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Weissensee_Techendorf_Erholung_am_See_24072014_421.jpg).Google Scholar

References

Agnoletti, M. (ed.). (2006). The Conservation of Cultural Landscapes. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar

Andersson, K., Angelstam, P., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M. & Törnblom, J. (2013a). Connecting municipal and regional level planning: Analysis and visualization of sustainability indicators in Bergslagen, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 21, 1210–1234.Google Scholar

Andersson, K., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Axelsson, R. & Degerman, E. (2013b). Green infrastructures and intensive forestry: Need and opportunity for spatial planning in a Swedish rural-urban gradient. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 143–165.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P. & Kuuluvainen, T. (2004). Boreal forest disturbance regimes, successional dynamics and landscape structures – A European perspective. Ecological Bulletins, 51, 117–136.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Jonsson, B.-G. & Roberge, J.-M. (2011a). Protecting forest areas for biodiversity in Sweden 1991–2010: Policy implementation process and outcomes on the ground. Silva Fennica, 45, 1111–1133.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Laestadius, L., Lazdinis, M., Nordberg, M., Pătru-Stupariu, I. & Smith, M. (2011b). Knowledge production and learning for sustainable forest management: European regions as a time machine. Forestry, 84, 581–596.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Axelsson, R., Dixelius, M. & Törnblom, J. (2013a). Knowledge production and learning for sustainable landscapes: Seven steps using social-ecological systems as laboratories. Ambio, 42, 116–128.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P., Grodzynskyi, M., Andersson, K., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Khoroshev, A., Kruhlov, I. & Naumov, V. (2013b). Measurement, collaborative learning and research for sustainable use of ecosystem services: Landscape concepts and Europe as laboratory. Ambio, 42, 129–145.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., Annerstedt, M., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., Garrido, P., Grahn, P., Jönsson, K. I., Pedersen, S., Schlyter, P., Skärbäck, E., Smith, M. & Stjernquist, I. (2013c). Solving problems in social-ecological systems: Definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research. Ambio, 42, 254–265.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., Isacson, M., Gavrilov, D. V., Axelsson, R., Bäckström, M., Degerman, E., Elbakidze, M., Kazakova-Apkarimova, E. Y., Sartz, L., Sädbom, S. & Törnblom, J. (2013d). Learning about the history of landscape use for the future: Consequences for ecological and social systems in Swedish Bergslagen. Ambio, 42, 150–163.Google Scholar

Angelstam, P., Khaulyak, O., Yamelynets, T., Mozgeris, G., Naumov, V., Prots, B., Elbakidze, M., Manton, M., Valasiuk, S. & Chmielewski, T. J. (2017). Green infrastructure at the EU’s eastern border: Effects of road infrastructure development and forest habitat loss. Journal of Environmental Management, 193, 300–311.Google Scholar

Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224.Google Scholar

Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P. & Svensson, J. (2007). Natural forest and cultural woodland with continuous tree cover in Sweden: How much remains and how is it managed? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22, 545–558.Google Scholar

Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Stryamets, N. & Johansson, K.-E. (2011). Sustainable development and sustainability: Landscape approach as a practical interpretation of principles and implementation concepts. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4, 5–30.Google Scholar

Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Myhrman, L., Sädbom, S., Ivarsson, M., Elbakidze, M., Andersson, K., Cupa, P., Diry, C., Doyon, F., Drotz, M. K., Hjorth, A., Hermansson, J. O., Kullberg, T., Lickers, F. H., McTaggart, J., Olsson, A., Pautov, Y., Svensson, L. & Törnblom, J. (2013). Evaluation of multi-level social learning for sustainable landscapes: Perspective of a development initiative in Bergslagen, Sweden. Ambio, 42, 241–253.Google Scholar

Blicharska, M., Angelstam, P., Antonson, H., Elbakidze, M. & Axelsson, R. (2011). Road, forestry and regional planners’ work for biodiversity conservation and public participation: A case study in Poland's hotspots regions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 1373–1395.Google Scholar

Bollmann, K. & Braunisch, V. (2013). To integrate or to segregate: Balancing commodity production and biodiversity conservation in European forests. In Integrative Approaches as an Opportunity for the Conservation of Forest Biodiversity, Kraus, D. & Krumm, F. (eds.). Freiburg: European Forest Institute, pp. 18–31.Google Scholar

Cheng, A. S. & Fiero, J. D. (2005). Collaborative learning and the public's stewardship of its forests. In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century, Gastil, J. & Levine, P. (eds.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, pp. 164–173.Google Scholar

Chertow, M., Singh, S. J., Haberl, H., Mirtl, M. & Schmid, M. (eds.) (2013). Conclusions. In Long Term Socio-Ecological Research. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 555–561.Google Scholar

Claesson, S., Duvemo, K., Lundström, A. & Wikberg, P. -E. (2015). Skogliga konsekvensanalyser 2015. Skogsstyrelsen Rapport 2015:10. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.Google Scholar

Daniels, S. E. & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working Through Environmental Conflict – The Collaborative Learning Approach. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Dawson, L., Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P. & Gordon, J. (2017). Governance and management dynamics of landscape restoration at multiple scales: Learning from successful environmental managers in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Management, 197: 24–40.Google Scholar

Dubois, A. & Roto, J. (2013). Making the Best of Europe's Sparsely Populated Areas. Stockholm: Nordregio.Google Scholar

Edman, T., Angelstam, P., Mikusinski, G., Roberge, J.-M. & Sikora, A. (2011). Spatial planning for biodiversity conservation: Assessment of forest landscapes’ conservation value using umbrella species requirements in Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102, 16–23.Google Scholar

Elands, B. H. M. & Wiersum, K. F. (2001). Forestry and rural development in Europe: An exploration of socio-political discourses. Forest Policy and Economics, 3, 5–16.Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M. & Angelstam, P. (2007). Implementing sustainable forest management in Ukraine's Carpathian Mountains: The role of traditional village systems. Forest Ecology and Management, 249, 28–38.Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M. & Angelstam, P. (2013). Sustainable forest management from policy to landscape, and back again: A case study in the Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains. In The Carpathians. Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability, Kozak, J., Ostapowicz, K., Bytnerowicz, A. & Wyżga, B. (eds.). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 309–329.Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., Sandström, C. & Axelsson, R. (2010). Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest initiatives: Adaptive governance towards sustainable forest management? Ecology and Society, 15, 14. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art14/).Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., Nordberg, M. & Pautov, Y. (2011). How does forest certification contribute to boreal biodiversity conservation? Standards and outcomes in Sweden and NW Russia. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 1983–1995.Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M., Andersson, K., Angelstam, P., Armstrong, G. W., Axelsson, R., Doyon, F., Hermansson, M., Jacobsson, J. & Pautov, Y. (2013a). Sustained yield forestry in Sweden and Russia: How does it correspond to sustainable forest management policy? Ambio, 42, 160–173.Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., Sandström, C., Stryamets, N., Crow, S., Axelsson, R., Stryamets, G. & Yamelynets, T. (2013b). The biosphere reserves for conservation and development in Ukraine? Legal recognition and establishment of the Roztochya initiative. Environmental Conservation, 40, 157–166.Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M., Hahn, T., Mauerhofer, V., Angelstam, P. & Axelsson, R. (2013c). Legal framework for biosphere reserves as learning sites for sustainable development: A comparative analysis of Ukraine and Sweden. Ambio, 42, 174–187.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Elbakidze, M., Dawson, L., Andersson, K., Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Stjernquist, I., Teitelbaum, S., Schlyter, P. & Thellbro, C. (2015). Is spatial planning a collaborative learning process? A case study from a rural–urban gradient in Sweden. Land Use Policy, 48, 270–285.Google Scholar

Elbakidze, M., Ražauskaite, R., Manton, M. Angelstam, P., Mozgeris, G., Brumelis, G., Brazaitis, G. & Vogt, P. (2016). The role of forest certification for biodiversity conservation: Lithuania as a case study. European Journal of Forest Research, 135, 361–376.Google Scholar

Erixon, S. (1960). Svenska byar utan systematisk reglering: En jämförande historisk undersökning. Stockholm: Nordiska museet.Google Scholar

European Commission (2013). Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe's Natural Capital. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 34, 487–515.Google Scholar

Fung, A. & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society, 29, 5–42.Google Scholar

Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., Żylicz, T. & Angelstam, P. (2015). Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecological Economics, 119, 8–23.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, L., Baker, S. C., Bauhus, J., Beese, W. J., Brodie, A., Kouki, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Löhmus, A., Pastur, G. M., Messier, C., Neyland, M., Palik, B., Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Volney, W. J. A., Wayne, A. & Franklin, J. F. (2012). Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: A world perspective. BioScience, 62, 633–645.Google Scholar

Hann, C. (2003). Property relations, historical justice and contemporary survival in the postsocialist countryside. In Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Report 2002–2003, Schlee, G. & Mann, B. (eds.). Halle-Queis: Druck-Medienverlag, pp. 207–223.Google Scholar

Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R. U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., Cunfer, G., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Freudenburg, W. R., Furman, E., Kaufmann, R., Krausmann, F., Langthaler, E., Lotze-Gampen, H., Mirtl, M., Redman, C. L., Reenberg, A., Wardell, A., Warr, B. & Zechmeister, H. (2006). From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecology and Society, 11, 13. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/).Google Scholar

Halme, P., Allen, K. A., Auniņš, A., Bradshaw, R. H., Brūmelis, G., Čada, V, Clear, J. L., Eriksson, A.-M., Hannon, G., Hyvärinen, E., Ikauniece, S., Iršėnaitė, R., Jonsson, B. G., Junninen, K., Kareksela, S., Komonen, A., Kotiaho, J. S., Kouki, J., Kuuluvainen, T., Mazziotta, A., Mönkkönen, M., Nyholm, K., Oldėn, A., Shorohova, E., Strange, N., Toivanen, T., Vanha-Majamaa, I., Wallenius, T., Ylisirniö, A.-L. & Zin, E. (2013). Challenges of ecological restoration: Lessons from forests in northern Europe. Biological Conservation, 167, 248–256.Google Scholar

Hartel, T. & Plieninger, T. (eds.) (2014). European Wood-Pastures in Transition. A Social-Ecological Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hartel, T., Dorresteijn, I., Klein, C., Máthé, O., Moga, C. I., Öllerer, K., Roellig, M., von Wehrden, H. & Fischer, J. (2013). Wood-pastures in a traditional rural region of Eastern Europe: Characteristics, management and status. Biological Conservation, 166, 267–275.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. (1997). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Gurgaon: Penguin Books India.Google Scholar

IMFN (International Model Forest Network) (2008). Model Forest Development Guide. Ottawa: International Model Forest Network Secretariat.Google Scholar

Kates, R. W. (2011). What kind of science is sustainability science? PNAS, 10, 19449–19450.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kirby, K. J. & Watkins, D. (eds.). (2015). Europe's Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Cultural Landscapes. Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar

LaPierre, L. (2003). Canada's model forest program. The Forestry Chronicle, 79, 794–798.Google Scholar

Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., Ostrom, E., Ouyang, Z., Provencher, W., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H. & Taylor, W. W. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317, 1513–1516.Google Scholar

Manton, M., Angelstam, P., Milberg, P. & Elbakidze, M. (2016). Wet grasslands as a green infrastructure for ecological sustainability: Wader bird conservation in southern Sweden as a case study. Sustainability, 8, 340.Google Scholar

Marples, D. R. (1984). The kulak in post-war USSR: The West Ukrainian example. Soviet Studies, 36, 560–570.Google Scholar

Mayer, A. L., Kauppi, P. E., Angelstam, P. K, Zhang, Y. & Tikka, P. M. (2005). Importing timber, exporting ecological impact. Science, 308, 59–60.Google Scholar

MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Current State and Trends. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Mirtl, M., Orenstein, D. E., Wildenberg, M., Peterseil, J. & Frenzel, M. (2013). Development of LTSER platforms in LTER-Europe: Challenges and experiences in implementing place-based long-term socio-ecological research in selected regions. In Long Term Socio-Ecological Research, Singh, S. J., Haberl, H., Chertow, M., Mirtl, M. & Schmid, M. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 409–442.Google Scholar

Myrdal, J. & Morell, M. (2011). The Agrarian History of Sweden: From 4000 BC to AD 2000. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar

Naumov, V., Angelstam, P. & Elbakidze, M. (2016). Barriers and bridges for intensified wood production in Russia: Insights from the environmental history of a regional logging frontier. Forest Policy and Economics, 66, 1–10.Google Scholar

Naumov, V. (2017). Barriers and bridges for intensified wood production and biodiversity conservation in NW Russia's boreal forest. PhD thesis. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, 2017, 9. (http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/13977/1/naumov_v_170112.pdf).Google Scholar

Newman, D. (1999). Geopolitics renaissant: Territory, sovereignty and the world political map. In Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity, Newman, D. (ed.). London: Frank Cass, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Nordberg, M., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M. & Axelsson, R. (2013). From logging frontier towards sustainable forest management: Experiences from boreal regions of North-West Russia and North Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 28, 797–810.Google Scholar

Pallot, J. (1990). Rural depopulation and the restoration of the Russian village under Gorbachev. Soviet Studies, 42, 655–674.Google Scholar

Popescu, V. D., Rozylowicz, L., Niculae, I. M., Cucu, A. L. & Hartel, T. (2014). Species, habitats, society: An evaluation of research supporting EU's Natura 2000 network. PLoS ONE, 9, e113648.Google Scholar

Potapov, P. V., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Krylov, A. M., McCarty, J. L., Radeloff, V. C. & Hansen, M. C. (2015). Eastern Europe's forest cover dynamics from 1985 to 2012 quantified from the full Landsat archive. Remote Sensing of Environment, 159, 28–43.Google Scholar

Prescott-Allen, R. (2001). The Wellbeing of Nations. A Country-by-Country Index of Quality of Life and the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35–42.Google Scholar

Redman, C., Grove, M. J. & Kuby, L. (2004). Integrating social science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems, 7, 161–117.Google Scholar

Roberge, J.-M., Angelstam, P. & Villard, M.-A. (2008). Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests-deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. Biological Conservation, 141, 997–1012.Google Scholar

Rothstein, B., Charron, N. & Lapuente, V. (2013). Quality of Government and Corruption from a European Perspective: A Comparative Study on the Quality of Government in EU Regions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Sabogal, C., Besacier, C. & McGuire, D. (2015). Forest and landscape restoration: concepts, approaches and challenges for implementation. Unasylva, 66, 3–10.Google Scholar

San Martín-Rodríguez, L., Beaulieu, M. D., D'Amour, D. & Ferrada-Videla, M. (2005). The determinants of successful collaboration: a review of theoretical and empirical studies. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, 132–147.Google Scholar

Stryamets, N., Elbakidze, M. & Angelstam, P. (2012). Role of non-wood forest products for local livelihoods in countries with transition or market economy: Case studies in Ukraine and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forestry, 27, 74–87.Google Scholar

Stryamets, N., Elbakidze, M., Ceuterick, M., Angelstam, P. & Axelsson, P. (2015). From economic survival to recreation: Contemporary uses of wild food and medicine in rural Sweden, Ukraine and NW Russia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11, 1.Google Scholar

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). World Network of Biosphere Reserves. (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/biosphere-reserves/world-network-wnbr/).Google Scholar

Wilson, G. (2012). Community Resilience and Environmental Transitions. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Agnoletti, M. (2014). Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: Some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (Southern) European perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126, 66–73.Google Scholar

Appadurai, A. (1986) The Social Life of Things. Commodities in a Social Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ashworth, G. & Larkham, P. J. (1996). Building a New Heritage. Tourism, Culture and Identity in the New Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Balée, W. (ed.). (1998). Advances in Historical Ecology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, G., Farrell, G. & Mattei, U. (eds.) (2014). Saving Future Generations through Commons. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar

Buizer, M., Elands, B. & Vierikko, K. (2016). Governing cities reflexively. The biocultural diversity concept as an alternative to ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 7–13.Google Scholar

Bürgi, M. (2011). Frontiers in historical ecology. IUFRO News 40, 9, 3.Google Scholar

Burny, J. (1999). Bijdrage tot de Historische Ecologie van de Kempen (1910–1950): Tweehonderd Gesprekken Samengevat. Brussels: Publicatie Instituut Bos- en Natuuronderzoek.Google Scholar

Calvo-Iglesias, M., Crecente-Maseda, R. & Fra-Paleo, U. (2006). Exploring farmer's knowledge as a source of information on past and present cultural landscapes: A case study from NW Spain. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 334–343.Google Scholar

Crumley, C. L. (ed.). (1994). Historical Ecology: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Google Scholar

De Moor, T. (2015). The Dilemma of the Commoners. Understanding the Use of Common-pool Resources in Long-term Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Egan, D. & Howell, E. (eds.). (2001). The Historical Ecology Handbook: A Restorationist's Guide to Reference Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Elerie, H. & Spek, T. (2010). The cultural biography of landscape as a tool for action research in the Drentsche Aa National Landscape (Northern Netherlands). In The Cultural Landscape Heritage Paradox Protection and Development of the Dutch Archaeological-historical Landscape and its European Dimension, Bloemers, J. H. F., Kars, H., van der Valk, A. & Wijnen, M. (eds.). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 83–113.Google Scholar

Emanuelsson, U. (2009). The Rural Landscapes of Europe. How Man Has Shaped European Nature. Stockholm: Formas.Google Scholar

European Commission (2015). Getting Cultural Heritage to Work for Europe. Report of the Horizon 2020 Group on Cultural Heritage. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research and Innovation.Google Scholar

Fagerholm, N., Käyhko, N., Ndumbaro, F. & Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments: Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 18, 421–433.Google Scholar

Fazey, I., Evely, A. C., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Kruijsen, J. H. J., White, P. C. L., Newsham, A., Jin, L., Cortazzi, M., Phillipson, J., Blackstock, K. L., Entwistle, N., Sheate, W. R., Armstrong, F., Blackmore, C., Fazey, J. A., Ingram, J., Gregson, J., Lowe, P., Morton, S. & Trevitt, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation, 40, 19–36.Google Scholar

Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Gavin, M. C., McCarter, J., Mead, A., Berkes, F., Stepp, J. R., Peterson, D. & Tang, R. (2015). Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 140–145.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (2000). Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Grove, A. T. & Rackham, O. (2001). The Nature of Mediterranean Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 182, 1243–1248.Google Scholar

Hawkes, J. (2001). The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture's Essential Role in Public Planning. Melbourne: Cultural Development Network.Google Scholar

Hjelle, K. L., Kaland, S., Kvamme, M., Lødøen, T. K. & Natlandsmyr, B. (2012). Ecology and long-term land-use, palaeoecology and archaeology – the usefulness of interdisciplinary studies for knowledge-based conservation and management of cultural landscapes. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8, 321–337.Google Scholar

Jansen, J. (2011). Managing Natura 2000 in a Changing World: The Case of the Serra da Estrela. PhD thesis. Nijmegen: Radboud University.Google Scholar

Jones, M. (2003). The concept of cultural landscape: Discourse and narratives. In Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes, Palang, H. & Fry, G. (eds.). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer, pp. 21–51.Google Scholar

Holtorf, C. (1998). The life-histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeology, 30, 23–38.Google Scholar

Kolen, J. C. A. (2005). De Biografie van het Landschap. Drie Essays over Landschap, Geschiedenis en Erfgoed. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Kolen, J. C. A., Renes, J. & Hermans, R. (eds.) (2015). Landscape Biographies: Geographical, Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on the Production and Transmission of Landscapes. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Laven, D. N., Jewiss, J. L. & Mitchell, N. J. (2012). Toward landscape-scale stewardship and development: A theoretical framework of United States National Heritage Areas. Society and Natural Resources, 26, 762–777.Google Scholar

Licciardi, G. & Amirtahmasebi, R. (2012). The Economics of Uniqueness: Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Lowenthal, D. (1993) The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lowenthal, D. (2005). Natural and cultural heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11, 81–92.Google Scholar

Nurse, K. (2007). Culture as the fourth pillar of sustainable development. Economic Review and Basic Statistics, 11, 28–40.Google Scholar

Ode Sang, Å. & Tveit, M. S. (2013). Perceptions of stewardship in Norwegian agricultural landscapes. Land Use Policy, 31, 557–564.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (2012). Connecting cultural landscapes to resilience. In Resilience and the Cultural Landscape – Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments, Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar

Plieninger, T., Höchtl, F. & Spek, T. (2006). European rural landscapes: Land use, biodiversity and conservation. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 317–321.Google Scholar

Pötsch, E. M., Krautzer, B. & Hopkins, A. (eds.) (2012). Grassland Farming and Land Management Systems in Mountainous Regions. Proceedings of the 16th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation. Irdning: European Grassland Federation 2011/Agricultural Research and Education Centre (AREC).Google Scholar

Pott, R. & Hüppe, J. (1991). Die Hudelandschaften Nordwestdeutschlands. Münster: Westfäl-isches Museum für Naturkunde.Google Scholar

Prager, K. (2013). LandscapePartners – The Contribution of Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships to Sustainable Landscape Management. Aberdeen: The James Hutton Institute.Google Scholar

Reed, M. S. & Curzon, R. (2015) Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: A literature review. Journal of Integrative and Environmental Sciences, 12, 15–38.Google Scholar

Rackham, O. (1980). Ancient Woodland: Its History, Vegetation and Uses in England. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Rackham, O. (1990). Trees and Woodland in the British Landscape. The Complete History of Britain's Trees, Woods and Hedgerows. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M. & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1766–1777.Google Scholar

Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History. 3rd edn. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rodgers, C. P., Straughton, E. A., Winchester, A. J. L. & Pieraccini, M. (2011). Contested Common Land: Environmental Governance Past and Present. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Roe, M. (2012). Landscape and participation. In The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, Howard, P., Thompson, I. and Waterton, E. (eds.). London/New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 335–352.Google Scholar

Samuels, M. (1979). The biography of landscape. Cause and culpability. In The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes, Meinig, D. W. (ed.). New York, NY/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–88.Google Scholar

Speed, J. D. M., Austrheim, G., Birks, H. J. B., Johnson, S., Kvamme, M., Nagy, L., Sjögren, P., Skar, B., Stone, D., Svensson, E. & Thompson, D. B. A. (2012). Natural and cultural heritage in mountain landscapes: Towards an integrated valuation. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8, 313–320.Google Scholar

Spek, T., Elerie, H., Noordhoff, I. & Bakker, J. (eds.) (2015). Landschapsbiografie van de Drentsche Aa. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Strootman, B. & Zaragoza, A. (2009). Drentsche Aa: Revealing the landscape qualities. Topos, 66, 28–35.Google Scholar

Tengberg, A., Fredholm, S., Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Saltzman, K. & Wetterberg, O. (2012). Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2, 14–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thompson, P. (2000). The Voice of the Past. Oral History, 3rd edn. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vecco, M. (2010). A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible towards the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 321–324.Google Scholar

Vogiatzakis, I. N., Griffiths, G. H., Cassar, L. F. & Morse, S. (2005). Mediterranean Coastal Landscapes: Management Practices, Typology and Sustainability. Reading: The University of Reading.Google Scholar

References

Abromas, J. (2011). Some aspects of the assessment of visual impact of wind turbines on landscape of Western Lithuania. Rural Development, 5, 298–302.Google Scholar

Adelaja, S., Shaw, J., Beyea, W. & McKeown, C. (2010). Renewable energy potential on brownfield sites: A case study of Michigan. Energy Policy, 38, 7021–7030.Google Scholar

Aitken, M. (2008). Power and Wind Power: Exploring Experiences of Renewable Energy Planning Processes in Scotland. PhD thesis. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University.Google Scholar

Aitken, M. (2010). Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy, 38, 1834–1841.Google Scholar

Barry, J., Ellis, G. & Robinson, C. (2008). Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 67–98.Google Scholar

Brittan, G. G. (2001). Wind, energy, landscape: Reconciling nature and technology. Philosophy & Geography, 4, 169–184.Google Scholar

Cowell, R. (2010). Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning – The construction of ‘acceptable locations’ in Wales. Land Use Policy, 27, 222–232.Google Scholar

De Waal, R. & Stremke, S. (2014). Energy transition: Missed opportunities and emerging challenges for landscape planning and designing. Sustainability, 6, 4386–4415.Google Scholar

Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8, 125–139.Google Scholar

Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 426–441.Google Scholar

Devine-Wright, P. & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 271–280.Google Scholar

Dohmen, F. & Hornig, F. (2004). Die große Luftnummer. Der Spiegel, 14, 80–97.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65, 135.Google Scholar

Ek, K. & Persson, L. (2014). Wind farms – where and how to place them? A choice experiment approach to measure consumer preferences for characteristics of wind farm establishments in Sweden. Ecological Economics, 105, 193–203.Google Scholar

Ellis, G., Barry, J. & Robinson, C. (2006). Renewable Energy and Discourses of Objection: Towards Deliberative Policy-making. Summary of Main Research Findings. Belfast: Queen's University.Google Scholar

Fast, S. & Mabee, W. (2015). Place-making and trust-building: The influence of policy on host community responses to wind farms. Energy Policy, 81, 27–37.Google Scholar

Firestone, J., Bates, A. & Knapp, L. (2015). See me, feel me, touch me, heal me: Wind turbines, culture, landscapes, and sound impressions. Land Use Policy, 46, 241–249.Google Scholar

Gailing, L. & Leibenath, M. (2010). Diskurse, Institutionen und Governance: Sozialwissenschaftliche Zugänge zum Untersuchungsgegenstand Kulturlandschaft. Berichte zur Deutschen Landeskunde, 84, 9–25.Google Scholar

Gailing, L. & Leibenath, M. (2013). The social construction of landscapes: Two theoretical lenses and their empirical applications. Landscape Research, 40, 123–138.Google Scholar

Gee, K. (2010). Offshore wind power development as affected by seascape values on the German North Sea coast. Land Use Policy, 27, 185–194.Google Scholar

Graham, J. B., Stephenson, J. R. & Smith, I. J. (2009). Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand. Energy Policy, 37, 3348–3357.Google Scholar

Gross, C. (2007). Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy, 35, 2727–2736.Google Scholar

Hall, N., Ashworth, P. & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy, 58, 200–208.Google Scholar

Hill, P. B. (2002). Rational-Choice-Theorie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar

Hindmarsh, R. (2013). Hot air ablowin! ‘Media-speak’, social conflict, and the Australian ‘decoupled’ wind farm controversy. Social Studies of Science, 44, 194–217.Google Scholar

Hindmarsh, R. & Matthews, C. (2008). Deliberative speak at the turbine face: Community engagement, wind farms, and renewable energy transitions, in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10, 217–232.Google Scholar

Jobert, A., Laborgne, P. & Mimler, S. (2007). Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy, 35, 2751–2760.Google Scholar

Jones, C. R. & Eiser, R. J. (2010). Understanding ‘local’ opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? Energy Policy, 38, 3106–3117.Google Scholar

Kontogianni, A., Tourkolias, C., Skourtos, M. & Damigos, D. (2014). Planning globally, protesting locally: Patterns in community perceptions towards the installation of wind farms. Renewable Energy, 66, 170–177.Google Scholar

Krauss, W. (2010). The ‘Dingpolitik’ of wind energy in northern German landscapes: An ethnographic case study. Landscape Research, 35, 195–208.Google Scholar

Kunz, V. (2004). Rational Choice. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar

Leibenath, M. (2013a). Energiewende und Landschafts-Governance: Empirische Befunde und theoretische Perspektiven. In Neue Energielandschaften – Neue Perspektiven der Landschaftsforschung, Gailing, L. & Leibenath, M. (eds.). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, pp. 45–63.Google Scholar

Leibenath, M. (2013b). Konstruktivistische, interpretative Landschaftsforschung: Prämissen und Perspectiven. In Wie werden Landschaften gemacht? Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf die Konstituierung von Kulturlandschaften, Leibenath, M., Heiland, S., Kilper, H. & Tzschaschel, S. (eds.). Bielefeld: transkript Verlag, pp. 7–37.Google Scholar

Leibenath, M. (2014). Landschaft im Diskurs: Welche Landschaft? Welcher Diskurs? Naturschutz und Landschaftsplannung, 46, 124–129.Google Scholar

Leibenath, M. & Otto, A. (2012). Diskursive Konstituierung von Kulturlandschaft am Beispiel politischer Windenergiediskurse in Deutschland. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 70, 119–131.Google Scholar

Leibenath, M. & Otto, A. (2013). Local debates about ‘landscape’ as viewed by German regional planners: Results of a representative survey in a discourse-analytical framework. Land Use Policy, 32, 366–374.Google Scholar

Leibenath, M. & Otto, A. (2014). Competing wind energy discourses, contested landscapes. Landscape Online, 38, 1–18.Google Scholar

Mariel, P., Meyerhoff, J. & Hess, S. (2013). Heterogeneous preferences toward landscape externalities of wind turbines – combining choices and attitudes in a hybrid model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 647–657.Google Scholar

Mason, K. & Milbourne, P. (2014). Constructing a ‘landscape justice’ for windfarm development: The case of Nant Y Moch, Wales. Geoforum, 53, 104–115.Google Scholar

Nadaï, A. & van der Horst, D. (2010). Introduction: Landscapes of energies. Landscape Research, 35, 143–155.Google Scholar

Otto, A. & Leibenath, M. (2013). Windenergielandschaften als Konfliktfeld: Landschaftskonzepte, Argumentationsmuster und Diskurskoalitionen. In Neue Energielandschaften – Neue Perspektiven der Landschaftsforschung, Gailing, L. & Leibenath, M. (eds.). Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 65–75.Google Scholar

Pasqualetti, M. J. (2000). Morality, space and the power of wind-energy landscapes. The Geographical Review, 90, 381–394.Google Scholar

Pasqualetti, M. J. (2011). Opposing wind energy landscapes: A search for common cause. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101, 907–917.Google Scholar

Phadke, R. (2010). Steel forests or smoke stacks: The politics of visualisation in the Cape Wind controversy. Environmental Politics, 19, 1–20.Google Scholar

Phadke, R. (2011). Resisting and reconciling big wind: Middle landscape politics in the new American West. Antipode, 43, 754–776.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, M., Montanes, C. & Fueyo, N. (2010). A method for the assessment of the visual impact caused by the large-scale deployment of renewable-energy facilities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 240–246.Google Scholar

Rygg, B. J. (2012). Wind power – An assault on local landscapes or an opportunity for modernization? Energy Policy, 48, 167–175.Google Scholar

Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168.Google Scholar

Sabatier, P. A. & Weible, C. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In Theories of the Policy Process, Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp.189–220.Google Scholar

Selman, P. (2010). Learning to love the landscapes of carbon-neutrality. Landscape Research, 35, 157–171.Google Scholar

Solli, J. (2010). Where the eagles dare? Enacting resistance to wind farms through hybrid collectives. Environmental Politics, 19, 45–60.Google Scholar

Szarka, J. (2004). Wind power, discourse coalitions and climate change: Breaking the stalemate? European Environment, 14, 317–330.Google Scholar

Thayer, R. L. & Freeman, C. M. (1987). Altamont – public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 379–398.Google Scholar

Thompson, M., Ellis, R. & Wildavsky, A. B. (1990). Cultural Theory, 4th edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Toke, D., Breukers, S. & Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 1129–1147.Google Scholar

Torres Sibille, A. del C., Cloquell-Ballester, V.-A. & Darton, R. (2009). Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 40–66.Google Scholar

Van der Horst, D. (2007). NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy, 35, 2705–2714.Google Scholar

Van der Horst, D. (2014). Landscapes of lost energy: Counterfactual geographical imaginary for a more sustainable society. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22, 66–72.Google Scholar

Van der Horst, D. & Toke, D. (2010). Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England. Land Use Policy, 27, 214–221.Google Scholar

Warren, C. R. & McFadyen, M. (2010). Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy, 27, 204–213.Google Scholar

Winkel, G. & Sotirov, M. (2015). Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and a new spirit of integration. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 1–19.Google Scholar

Wolsink, M. (2000). Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy, 21, 49–64.Google Scholar

Wolsink, M. (2007). Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy, 35, 2692–2704.Google Scholar

Wolsink, M. (2010). Near-shore wind power – protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy, 27, 195–203.Google Scholar

Zografos, C. & Martinez-Alier, J. (2009). The politics of landscape value: A case study of wind farm conflict in rural Catalonia. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1726–1744.Google Scholar

References

BAFU (Bundesamt für Umwelt) (2009). Pärke von nationaler Bedeutung: Produktlabel. Richtlinie zur Verleihung und Verwendung des Produktelabels. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt.Google Scholar

Bardsley, D. K. & Bardsley, A. M. (2014). Organising for socio-ecological resilience: The roles of the mountain farmer cooperative Genossenschaft Gran Alpin in Graubünden, Switzerland. Ecological Economics, 98, 11–21.Google Scholar

Bastian, O., Stein, C., Lupp, G., Behrens, J., Renner, C. & Grunewald, K. (2015). The appreciation of nature and landscape by tourism service providers and visitors in the Ore Mountains (Germany). Landscape Online, 41, 1–23.Google Scholar

Boll, T., von Haaren, C. & von Ruschkowski, E. (2014). The preference and actual use of different types of rural recreation areas by urban dwellers – The Hamburg case study. PLoS ONE, 9, e108638.Google Scholar

Boman, M., Fredman, P., Lundmark, L. & Ericsson, G. (2013). Outdoor recreation – A necessity or a luxury? Estimation of Engel curves for Sweden. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 3, 49–56.Google Scholar

Buchecker, M., Gehring, K., Kianicka, S. & Hunziker, M. (2008). Zielvorstellungen der Bevölkerung hinsichtlich der alpinen Landschaftsentwicklung. In Gesellschaftliche Ansprüche an den Lebens- und Erholungsraum: Eine praxisorientierte Synthese der Erkenntnisse aus zwei Forschungsprogrammen, Buchecker, M., Frick, J. & Tobias, S. (eds.). Birmensdorf: Forschungsanstalt WSL, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar

Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft (2015). Grüner Bericht 2014. Wien: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft.Google Scholar

Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft (2015). Bericht über die Lage der Tourismus- und Freizeitwirtschaft in Österreich 2014. Wien: Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar

Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer, 24, 5–12.Google Scholar

Cousins, J. A., Evans, J. & Sadler, J. (2009). Selling conservation? Scientific legitimacy and the commodification of conservation tourism. Ecology and Society 14, 32. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art32/).Google Scholar

Eder, R. & Arnberger, A. (2007). Lehrpfade: Natur und Kultur auf dem Weg. Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Elmer, D. (2010). Switzerland's mountain forest project: Bringing volunteers to work in the forest. Unasylva, 61, 47–48.Google Scholar

EUROPARC Federation (2010). European Charter for Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas. Regensburg: EUROPARC Federation.Google Scholar

European Commission (2012). Europeans’ Attitudes towards Food Security, Food Quality and the Countryside: Special Eurobarometer 389. Brussels: EU Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. (http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/56963).Google Scholar

Hall, C. M. & Gössling, S. (eds.). (2013). Sustainable Culinary Systems: Local Foods, Innovation, Tourism and Hospitality. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hernández-Mogollón, J. M., Campón-Cerro, A. M. & Alves, H. (2013). Authenticity in environmental high-quality destinations: A relevant factor for green tourism demand. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 12, 1961–1970.Google Scholar

Heuberger, R. (2010). Kulturlandschaftserhaltungsprogramm im Naturpark Weissensee. Geographischer Jahresbericht aus Österreich, 66, 190–192.Google Scholar

Higuera, D., Martín-López, B. & Sánchez-Jabba, A. (2013). Social preferences towards ecosystem services provided by cloud forests in the neotropics: Implications for conservation strategies. Regional Environmental Change, 13, 861–872.Google Scholar

Hjalager, A.-M. (2010). A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management, 31, 1–12.Google Scholar

Hurd, A. R. & Anderson, D. M. (2011). The Park and Recreation Professional's Handbook. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar

Jeuring, J. H. G. (2016). Discursive contradictions in regional tourism marketing strategies: The case of Fryslân, the Netherlands. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 5, 65–75.Google Scholar

Jorgensen, K., Clemetsen, M., Thoren, A. H. & Richardson, T. (2016). Mainstreaming Landscape through the European Landscape Convention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jungk, R. (1980). Wieviel Touristen pro Hektar Strand? (How many tourists per hectare of beach?). GEO, 10, 154–156.Google Scholar

Kah, S. (2007). Preserving the man made environment: A case study of the Cinque Terre National Park, Italy. In Protected Areas and Regional Development in Europe: Towards a New Model for the 21st Century, Mose, I. (ed.). Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 129–140.Google Scholar

Ketterer Bonnelame, L. & Siegrist, D. (2014). Biodiversität und Tourismus. Finanzierungsinstrumente im Tourismus zur Förderung der Biodiversität und Landschaft. Rapperswil: HSR Hochschule für Technik Rapperswil.Google Scholar

Krippendorf, J. (1975). Die Landschaftsfresser, Tourismus und Erholungslandschaft – Verderben oder Segen? Bern: Hallwag.Google Scholar

Liesen, J. & Coch, T. (2015). Finanzielle Unterstützung des Landschaftserhalts durch die Kurtaxe: Erfahrungen aus der Ferienregion Münstertal-Staufen (Naturpark Südschwarzwald). Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 47, 69–76.Google Scholar

Mathieson, A. & Wall, G. (1982). Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts. London/New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

Penker, M., Mühlmann, P. & Muhar, A. (2014). Volunteering for land care – A typology of civil society organizations in Austria, Germany and Switzerland as the basis for establishing new initiatives. Eco.mont – Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management, 6, 21–28.Google Scholar

Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (2013). Resilience-based perspectives to guiding high-nature-value farmland through socioeconomic change. Ecology and Society, 18, 20. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art20/).Google Scholar

Powell, R. B. & Ham, S. H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16, 467–489.Google Scholar

Rudigier, A. (2012). Museum und Kulturlandschaft. Eine Beziehung mit Zukunft? Zoll+, 21, 4–8.Google Scholar

Scheuermann, M. (1999). DAV-Projekt ‚Skibergsteigen umweltfreundlich‘. Beitrag des Deutschen Alpenvereins für naturverträgliches Tourenskifahren in den Alpen. In Laufener Seminarbeiträge 6/99. Laufen/Salzach: Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, pp. 79–84.Google Scholar

Scolozzi, R., Schirpke, U., Detassis, C., Abdullah, S. & Gretter, A. (2015). Mapping alpine landscape values and related threats as perceived by tourists. Landscape Research, 40, 451–465.Google Scholar

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2004). Guidelines on Biodiversity and Tourism Development. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar

Siegrist, D., Gessner, S. & Ketterer Bonnelame, L. (2015). Naturnaher Tourismus. Qualitätsstandards für sanftes Reisen in den Alpen. Bern: Haupt Verlag.Google Scholar

Singh, T. (2012). Critical Debates in Tourism. Buffalo: Channel View Publications.Google Scholar

Stenseke, M. (2006). Biodiversity and the local context: Linking semi-natural grasslands and their future use to social aspects. Environmental Science & Policy, 9, 350–359.Google Scholar

Stremlow, M., Pütsch, M., & Vogtmann, H. (2006). Neue Wege der Sensibilisierung – von der Konfrontation zur Kooperation: Eine Synthese in 12 Kernaussagen Natursport und Kommunikation. Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.Google Scholar

Tschofen, B. (2008). On the taste of the regions: Culinary praxis, European politics and spatial culture – A research outline. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 17, 24–53.Google Scholar

Tschofen, B. (2010). Things, Senses, Practices: Experiencing Cultural Crossroads through Hospitality and the Culinary System. Oslo: 17th Conference of the International Commission for Ethnological Food Research Oslo 2008.Google Scholar

Tveit, M., Ode, Å. & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31, 229–255.Google Scholar

Tyrväinen, L., Uusitalo, M., Silvennoinen, H. & Hasu, E. (2014). Towards sustainable growth in nature-based tourism destinations: Clients’ views of land use options in Finnish Lapland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 1–15.Google Scholar

UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2005). Making Tourism More Sustainable: A Guide for Policy Makers. Paris: UNEP & Madrid: World Tourism Organization.Google Scholar

UNWTO (United Nations World Tourism Organization) (2010). Tourism and Biodiversity – Achieving Common Goals Towards Sustainability. Madrid: World Tourism Organization.Google Scholar

UNWTO (United Nations World Tourism Organization) (2014). Glossary of Tourism Terms. Madrid: World Tourism Organization.Google Scholar

Vergunst, J. (2013). Scottish land reform and the idea of ‘outdoors’. Ethnos, 78, 121–146.Google Scholar

Wearing, S. & McGehee, N. G. (2013). Volunteer tourism: A review. Tourism Management, 38, 120–130.Google Scholar

Yadav, L. P., O'Neill, S. & Van Rensburg, T. (2013). Supporting the conservation of farm landscapes via the tourism sector. Economic and Social Review, 44, 221–245.Google Scholar

Yuan, M. & Fredman, P. (2008). A call for a broad spatial understanding of outdoor recreation use. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas, Terme, M. & delle Ricerche, C. N. (eds.). pp. 169–173.Google Scholar

References

Acreman, M. C. & Ferguson, A. J. D. (2010). Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Biology, 55, 32–48.Google Scholar

Askew, A. P., Fridley, J. D. & Grime, J. P. (2011). Predicting biodiversity dynamics of grasslands under global change: The role of long-term manipulations of climate. In Grassland Productivity and Ecosystem Services, Lemaire, G., Hodgson, J. & Chabbi, A. (eds.). Wallingford: CABI, pp. 123–128.Google Scholar

BenDor, T. K., Livengood, A., Lester, T. W., Davis, A. & Yonavjak, L. (2015). Defining and evaluating the ecological restoration economy. Restoration Ecology, 23, 209–219.Google Scholar

Besseau, P., Dansou, K. & Johnson, F. (2002). The International Model Forest Network (IMFN): Elements of success. The Forestry Chronicle, 78, 648–654.Google Scholar

Bilton, M. C, Whitlock, R., Grime, J. P., Marion, G. & Pakeman, R. J. (2010). Intraspecific trait variation in grassland plant species reveals fine-scale strategy trade-offs and size differentiation that underpins performance in ecological communities. Botany, 88, 939–952.Google Scholar

Bridgewater, P. & Walton, D. W. (1995). The species triage: Are we trying to revive the man overboard while the ship sinks? In Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna, Serena, M (ed.). Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty, pp. ix–xi.Google Scholar

Bridgewater, P., Russell-Smith, J. & Cresswell, I. (1998). Vegetation science in a cultural landscape. The case of Kakadu National Park. Phytocoenologia, 28, 1–17.Google Scholar

Brockington, D. & Wilkie, D. (2015). Protected areas and poverty. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 370, 1–6.Google Scholar

Brown, J. & Mitchell, B. (2000). The stewardship approach and its relevance for protected landscapes. The George Wright Forum, 17, 70–79.Google Scholar

Catchpole, R. (2012). Ecological Coherence Definitions in Policy and Practice. Final Report to Scottish Natural Heritage. Leeds: Aspen International.Google Scholar

Ceccon, E., Barrera-Cataño, J. I., Aronson, J. & Martínez-Garza, C. (2015). The socioecological complexity of ecological restoration in Mexico. Restoration Ecology, 23, 331–336.Google Scholar

CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2004). The Ecosystem Approach. Decision VII/11. (www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=7748).Google Scholar

Ceauşu, S., Hofmann, M., Navarro, L. M., Carver, S., Verburg, P. H. & Pereira, H. M. (2015). Mapping opportunities and challenges for rewilding in Europe. Conservation Biology, 29, 1017–1027.Google Scholar

Defra (2011). The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature. London: TSO.Google Scholar

Ellis, E. C., Fuller, D. Q., Kaplan, J. O. & Lutters, W. G. (2013). Dating the Anthropocene: Towards an empirical global history of human transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Elementa: Science of Anthropocene, 1, 18.Google Scholar

Elphick, C. S., Meiman, S. & Rubega, M. A. (2015). Tidal-flow restoration provides little nesting habitat for a globally vulnerable saltmarsh bird. Restoration Ecology, 23, 439–446.Google Scholar

Ervin, J. K., Mulongoy, J., Lawrence, K., Game, E., Sheppard, D., Bridgewater, P., Bennett, G., Gidda, S. B. & Bos, P. (2010). Making protected areas relevant: A guide to integrating protected areas into wider landscapes, seascapes and sectoral plans and strategies. Convention on Biological Diversity Technical Series, 44, 5.Google Scholar

Eustice, G. (2015). New Environmental Scheme for Farmers to Prioritise Biodiversity. (www.gov.uk/government/news/new-environmental-scheme-for-farmers-to-prioritise-biodiversity).Google Scholar

Folke, C., Jansson, Å., Rockström, J., Olsson, P., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., III, Crépín, A. S., Daily, G., Danell, K., Ebbesson, J., Elmqvist, T., Galaz, V., Moberg, F., Nilsson, M., Österblom, H., Ostrom, E., Persson, Å., Peterson, G., Polasky, S., Steffen, W., Walker, B. & Westley, F. (2011). Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio, 40,719–738.Google Scholar

Gaywood, M. (ed.) (2015). Beavers in Scotland: A Report to the Scottish Government. Inverness: Scottish National Heritage.Google Scholar

Good, R. B. (1981). The role of fire in conservation reserves. In Fire and the Australian Biota, Gill, A. M, Groves, R. H & Noble, I. R (eds.). Canberra: Australian Academy of Science, pp. 529–550.Google Scholar

Grime, J. P. & Pierce, S. (2012). The Evolutionary Strategies that Shape Ecosystems. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hewins, E., Pinches, C., Lush, M., Plant, B., Frith, R. & Toogood, S. (2008). Baseline Evaluation of Higher Level Stewardship Grassland Options. Report to Natural England. Gloucestershire: Just Ecology.Google Scholar

Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E. S. & Hall, C. A. (eds.). (2013). Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E. S., Hall, C. A., Bridgewater, P., Chapin, F. C., III, Ellis, E. C., Ewel, J. J., Hallett, L. M., Harris, J., Hulvey, K. B., Jackson, S. T., Kennedy, P. L., Kueffer, C., Lach, L., Lantz, T. C., Lugo, A. E., Mascaro, J., Murphy, S. D., Nelson, C. R., Perring, M. P., Richardson, D. M., Seastedt, T. R., Standish, R. J., Starzomski, B. M., Suding, K. N., Tognetti, P. M., Yakob, L. & Yung, L. (2014). Managing the whole landscape: Historical, hybrid, and novel ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 557–564.Google Scholar

JNCC (2015). European Legislation. (http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1372).Google Scholar

Jongman, R. H. G., Külvik, M. & Kristiansen, I. (2004). European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 305–319.Google Scholar

Keith, D. A., Williams, J. E. & Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2002). Fire management and biodiversity conservation: Key approaches and principles. In Flammable Australia. The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent, Bradstock, R. A, Williams, J. E & Gill, A. M (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–428.Google Scholar

Laven, D. N., Jewiss, J. L. & Mitchell, N. J. (2012). Toward landscape-scale stewardship and development: A theoretical framework of United States national heritage areas. Society & Natural Resources, 26, 762–777.Google Scholar

Lawton, J. H., Brotherton, P. N. M., Brown, V. K., Elphick, C., Fitter, A. H., Forshaw, J., Haddow, R. W., Hilborne, S., Leafe, R. N., Mace, G. M., Southgate, M. P., Sutherland, W. J., Tew, T. E., Varley, J. & Wynne, G. R. (2010). Making Space for Nature: A Review of England's Wildlife Sites and Ecological Network. Report to DEFRA.Google Scholar

Marshall, K. N., Hobbs, N. T. & Cooper, D. J. (2013). Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B, 280, 20122977.Google Scholar

Metcalf, E. C., Mohr, J. J., Yung, L., Metcalf, P. & Craig, D. (2015). The role of trust in restoration success: Public engagement and temporal and spatial scale in a complex social-ecological system. Restoration Ecology, 23, 315–324.Google Scholar

Milder, J. C., Hart, A. K., Dobie, P., Minai, J. & Zaleski, C. (2014). Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: A region-wide assessment. World Development, 54, 68–80.Google Scholar

Natural England (2014). Nature Improvement Areas: Improved Ecological Networks. (www.gov.uk/government/publications/nature-improvement-areas-improved-ecological-networks).Google Scholar

Natural England (2015a). Nature England Statement on the Possible Introduction of Lynx. (www.gov.uk/government/news/natural-england-statement-on-the-possible-reintroduction-of-lynx).Google Scholar

Natural England (2015b). Countryside Stewardship. (www.gov.uk/government/collections/countryside-stewardship-get-paid-for-environmental-land-management).Google Scholar

Peach, W., Lovett, L., Wotton, S. & Jeffs, C. (2001). Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK. Biological Conservation, 101, 361–373.Google Scholar

Posey, D. A. (ed.) (1999). Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. Nairobi: UNEP (United Nation Environmental Programme).Google Scholar

Prach, K., Karešová, P., Jírová, A., Dvořáková, H., Konvalinková, P. & Řehounková, K. (2015). Do not neglect surroundings in restoration of disturbed sites. Restoration Ecology, 23, 310–314.Google Scholar

Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, M. P., Schmitz, O. J., Smith, D. W., Wallach, A. D. & Wirsing, A. J. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science, 343, 1241484.Google Scholar

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapi, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A. Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, D., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.Google Scholar

Sayre, N. F., Kelty, R., Simmons, M., Clayton, S., Kassam, K.-A., Pickett, S. T. A., Chapin, F. S., III (2013). Invitation to earth stewardship. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 339.Google Scholar

Sells, A. (2014). Nature Improvement Areas Partnership. (www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nature-improvement-areas-partnerships).Google Scholar

SER (Society for Ecological Restoration) (2004). SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International.Google Scholar

TNC (The Nature Conservancy) (2015). Environmental Flows. (www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPractices/Freshwater/EnvironmentalFlows/Pages/environmental-flows.aspx).Google Scholar

Tolunay, A., Türkoglu, T., Elbakidze, M. & Angelstam, P. (2014). Determination of the support level of local organizations in a model forest initiative: Do local stakeholders have willingness to be involved in the model forest development? Sustainability, 6, 7181–7196.Google Scholar

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2000). Solving the Puzzle: The Ecosystem Approach and Biosphere Reserves. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Verschuuren, B., Wild, R., McMeely, J. A. & Oviedo, G. (eds.) (2010). Sacred Natural Sites: Conserving Nature and Culture. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Watling, J. I., Brandt, L. A., Mazzotti, F. J. & Romañach, S. S. (2013). Use and Interpretation of Climate Envelope Models: A Practical Guide. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar

Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 67–743.Google Scholar

Wu, J. G. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28, 999–1023.Google Scholar

References

Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28, 168–192.Google Scholar

Andersson, E. (2006). Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecology and Society, 11, 34. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art34/).Google Scholar

Andersson, E., Barthel, S. & Ahrné, K. (2007). Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications, 17, 1267–1278.Google Scholar

Andersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., Colding, J., Elmqvist, T., Folke, C. & Gren, Å. (2014). Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio, 43, 445–453.Google Scholar

Andersson, E. & Colding, J. (2014). Understanding how built urban form influences biodiversity. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13, 221–226.Google Scholar

Barthel, S., Colding, J., Elmqvist, T. & Folke, C. (2005). History and local management of a biodiversity-rich, urban, cultural landscape. Ecology and Society, 10, 10. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art10/).Google Scholar

Barthel, S., Folke, C. & Colding, J. (2010). Social-ecological memory in urban gardens – Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 20, 255–265.Google Scholar

Baviskar, A. (2003). Between violence and desire: Space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Delhi. International Social Science Journal, 55, 89–98.Google Scholar

Bendt, P., Barthel, S. & Colding, J. (2013). Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109, 18–30.Google Scholar

Berkes, F. & Folke, C. (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Borgström, S. T., Elmqvist, T., Angelstam, P. & Alfsen-Norodom, C. (2006). Scale mismatches in management of urban landscapes. Ecology and Society, 11, 16. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art16/).Google Scholar

Cadenasso, M. L., Pickett, S. T. A. & Grove, J. M. (2006). Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: Heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecological Complexity, 3, 1–12.Google Scholar

Carlsson, L. & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 65–76.Google Scholar

Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 11–21.Google Scholar

Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 15–26.Google Scholar

Colding, J. (2007). ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 46–55.Google Scholar

Colding, J., Barthel, S., Bendt, P., Snep, R., van der Knaap, W. & Ernstson, H. (2013). Urban green commons: Insights on urban common property systems. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1039–1051.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. J., Svendsen, E. S., Fisher, D. R. & Campbell, L. K. (2013). Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109, 76–84.Google Scholar

D'Souza, R. & Nagendra, H. (2011). Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: The Agara lake in Bangalore, India. Environmental Management, 47, 840–850.Google Scholar

Dunning, J. B., Danielson, B. J. & Pulliman, H. R. (1992). Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65, 169–175.Google Scholar

Enqvist, J., Tengö, M. & Boonstra, W. J. (2016). Against the current: Rewiring rigidity trap dynamics in urban water governance through civic engagement. Sustainability Science 11, 919–933.Google Scholar

Enqvist, J., Tengö, M. & Bodin, Ö. (2014). Citizen networks in the Garden City: Protecting urban ecosystems in rapid urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 130, 24–35.Google Scholar

Ernstson, H., Barthel, S., Andersson, E. & Borgström, S. T. (2010). Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm, Sweden. Ecology and Society, 15, 28. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art28/).Google Scholar

Ernstson, H. & Sörlin, S. (2009). Weaving protective stories: Connective practices to articulate holistic values in the Stockholm National Urban Park. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1460–1479.Google Scholar

Ernstson, H., Sörlin, S. & Elmqvist, T. (2008). Social movements and ecosystem services – The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 13, 39. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/).Google Scholar

Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.Google Scholar

Grönwall, J., Mulenga, M. & McGranahan, G. (2010). Groundwater, Self-Supply and Poor Urban Dwellers – A Review with Case Studies of Bangalore and Lusaka. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar

Hedblom, M., Andersson, E. & Borgström, S. (2017). Flexible land-use and undefined governance: From threats to potentials in peri-urban landscape planning. Land Use Policy, 63, 523–527.Google Scholar

Krasny, M. E., Crestol, S. R., Tidball, K. G. & Stedman, R. C. (2014). New York City's oyster gardeners: Memories and meanings as motivations for volunteer environmental stewardship. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 16–25.Google Scholar

Krasny, M. & Tidball, K. (2009). Community gardens as contexts for science, stewardship, and civic action learning. Cities and the Environment (CATE), 2, 8.Google Scholar

Krasny, M. E. & Tidball, K. G. (2012). Civic ecology: A pathway for earth stewardship in cities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 267–273.Google Scholar

Kudryavtsev, A., Krasny, M. E. & Stedman, R. C. (2012). The impact of environmental education on sense of place among urban youth. Ecosphere, 3, 29.Google Scholar

Luna, F. (2014). Transformation of Urban Lake Governance in Bangalore, India. Master thesis. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Lundberg, J., Andersson, E., Cleary, G. & Elmqvist, T. (2008). Linkages beyond borders: Targeting spatial processes in fragmented urban landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 23, 717–726.Google Scholar

Nagendra, H. (2010). Maps, lakes and citizens. Seminar India, 613, 19–23.Google Scholar

Nagendra, H. (2016). Nature in the City: Bengaluru in the Past, Present, and Future. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagendra, H. & Ostrom, E. (2014). Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecology and Society, 19, 67. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art67/).Google Scholar

Nagendra, H., Sudhira, H. S., Katti, M., Tengö, M. & Schewenius, M. (2012). Urbanization, Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Assessments of India and Bangalore. Stockholm: Stockholm Resilience Centre.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. L., Kaplan, R. & Grese, R. E. (2001). Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44, 629–648.Google Scholar

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD). (2012). Cities and Biodiversity Outlook. Montreal: SCBD.Google Scholar

Srinivas, S. (2001). Landscapes of Urban Memory: The Sacred and the Civic in India's High-Tech City. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Stedman, R. C. & Ingalls, M. (2014). Topophilia, Biophilia and Greening in the Red Zone. In Greening in the Red Zone: Disaster, Resilience, and Community Greening, Tidball, K. G & Krasny, M. E (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 129–143.Google Scholar

Handelskammare, Stockholms (2013). Stockholm Attraherar Arbetskraften: Västeuropas Snabbast Växande Storstadsregion till 2030 (in Swedish). Stockholm: Stockholm Handelskammare.Google Scholar

Sudhira, H. S., Ramachandra, T. V. & Subrahmanya, M. H. B. (2007). Bangalore. Cities, 24, 379–390.Google Scholar

Svendsen, E. S. & Campbell, L. K. (2010). Living memorials: Understanding the social meanings of community-based memorials to September 11, 2001. Environment and Behavior, 42, 318–334.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Power, nature and the city. The conquest of water and the political ecology of urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880–1990. Environment and Planning A, 29, 311–332.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 601–620.Google Scholar

Tidball, K. & Stedman, R. (2013). Positive dependency and virtuous cycles: From resource dependence to resilience in urban social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics, 86, 292–299.Google Scholar

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9, 2–3.Google Scholar

Zipperer, W. C., Wu, J. G., Pouyat, R. V. & Pickett, S. T. A. (2000). The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecological Applications, 10, 685–688.Google Scholar

References

Arlinghaus, R. & Mehner, T. (2003). Socio-economic characterisation of specialised common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) anglers in Germany, and implications for inland fisheries management and eutrophication control. Fisheries Research, 61, 19–33.Google Scholar

Arlinghaus, R., Mehner, T. & Cowx, I. G. (2002). Reconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialized countries, with emphasis on Europe. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 261–316.Google Scholar

Arlinghaus, R., Tillner, R. & Bork, M. (2015). Explaining participation rates in recreational fishing across industrialised countries. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 22, 45–55.Google Scholar

Bauer, J., Kniivilä, M. & Schmithüsen, F. (2004). Forest Legislation in Europe. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe / Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar

Bell, S., Hampshire, K. & Topalidou, S. (2007). The political culture of poaching: A case study from northern Greece. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 399–418.Google Scholar

DEFRA (2006). FEP Guidance 001: Hedgerow Woody Species. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar

di Tizio, A., Łuczaj, Ł. J., Quave, C. L., Redžić, S., Pieroni, A. & Rzeszów, W. (2012). Traditional food and herbal uses of wild plants in the ancient South-Slavic diaspora of Mundimitar/Montemitro (Southern Italy). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 8, 21.Google Scholar

Dominé, A., Römer, J. & Ditter, M. (2000). Culinaria Europese specialiteiten. Köln: Könemann Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH.Google Scholar

Emery, M., Martin, S. & Dyke, A. (2006). Wild Harvests from Scottish Woodlands. Social, Cultural and Economic Values of Contemporary Non-timber Forest Products. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.Google Scholar

FACE (2012). European Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation. (www.face.eu).Google Scholar

FAO (2012). FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries 13: Recreational Fisheries. Rome: FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations).Google Scholar

Fischer, A., Sandström, C., Delibes-Mateos, M., Arroyo, B., Tadie, D., Randall, D., Hailu, F., Lowassa, A., Msuha, M., Kereži, V., Reljić, S., Linnell, J. & Majić, A. (2012). On the multifunctionality of hunting – an institutional analysis of eight cases from Europe and Africa. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 531–522.Google Scholar

Fresco, L. O. (2012). Hamburgers in het Paradijs. Voedsel in tijden van Schaarste en Overvloed (Hamburgers in Paradise. Food in Times of Scarcity and Abundance). Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

González, J. A., García-Barriuso, M. & Amich, F. (2011). The consumption of wild and semi-domesticated edible plants in the Arribes del Duero (Salamanca-Zamora, Spain): An analysis of traditional knowledge. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 58, 991–1006.Google Scholar

Grasser, S., Schunko, C., Vogl, C. R., Ocho, D. L., Struik, P., Price, L., Kelbessa, E., Kolo, K., Quiroga, R. & Meneses, L. (2012). Gathering ‘tea’ – from necessity to connectedness with nature. Local knowledge about wild plant gathering in the Biosphere Reserve Grosses Walsertal (Austria). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 8, 31.Google Scholar

Hadjichambis, A. C. H., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Della, A., Giusti, M. E., De Pasquale, C., Lenzarini, C., Censorii, E., Gonzales-Tejero, M. R., Sanchez-Rojas, C. P. & Ramiro-Gutierrez, J. M. (2008). Wild and semi-domesticated food plant consumption in seven circum-Mediterranean areas. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 59, 383–414.Google Scholar

Hoving, I. (2011). Opacity and openness: Creating new senses of Dutchness. Thamyris/Intersecting: Place, Sex and Race, 23, 297–312.Google Scholar

Kangur, A., Ginter, K., Kangur, P., Kangur, K. & Orru, K. (2014). Recreational ice fishing on the large Lake Peipsi: Socioeconomic importance, variability of ice-cover period, and possible implications for fish stocks. Estonian Journal of Ecology, 63, 282.Google Scholar

Keuper, D. D. J. & Guldemond, J. A. (2014). Waarde van de jacht. Tijd en geld besteed door jagers aan maatschappelijke diensten (The value of hunting to Dutch society). Culemborg, Netherlands: CLM Research and Advice.Google Scholar

Larousse, (ed.). (2011). De grote Larousse gastronomique. Utrecht: Kosmos Uitgevers.Google Scholar

Ljung, P. E., Riley, S. J., Heberlein, T. A. & Ericsson, G. (2012). Eat prey and love: Game-meat consumption and attitudes toward hunting. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 36, 669–675.Google Scholar

Louette, G., Maes, D., Alkemade, J. R. M., Boitani, L., de Knegt, B., Eggers, J., Falcucci, A., Framstad, E., Hagemeijer, W., Hennekens, S. M., Maiorano, L., Nagy, S., Serradilla, A. N., Ozinga, W. A., Schaminée, J. H. J., Tsiaousi, V., van Tol, S. & Delbaere, B. (2010). BioScore – Cost-effective assessment of policy impact on biodiversity using species sensitivity scores. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18, 142–148.Google Scholar

Łuczaj, Ł. J. & Nieroda, Z. (2011). Collecting and learning to identify edible fungi in Southeastern Poland: Age and gender differences. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 50, 319–336.Google Scholar

Martínez de Aragón, J., Riera, P., Giergiczny, M. & Colinas, C. (2011). Value of wild mushroom picking as an environmental service. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 419–424.Google Scholar

McLain, R. J., Hurley, P. T., Emery, M. R. & Poe, M. R. (2013). Gathering ‘wild’ food in the city: Rethinking the role of foraging in urban ecosystem planning and management. Local Environment, 19, 220–240.Google Scholar

MCPFE (2007). State of Europe's Forests 2007. The MCPFE Report on Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. Warsaw: Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe.Google Scholar

Menendez-Baceta, G., Aceituno-Mata, L., Tardío, J., Reyes-García, V. & Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2012). Wild edible plants traditionally gathered in Gorbeialdea (Biscay, Basque Country). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 59, 1329–1347.Google Scholar

Murray, M. & Simcox, H. (2003). Use of Wild Living Resources in the United Kingdom – A Review. Petersborough: UK Committee for IUCN.Google Scholar

Natural England (2014). Countryside Hedgerows: Regulation and Management. (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/countryside-hedgerows-regulation-and-management).Google Scholar

Nebel, S., Pieroni, A. & Heinrich, M. (2009). Ta Chòrta: A comparative ethnobotanical-linguistic study of wild food plants in a Graecanic area in Calabria, Southern Italy. Economic Botany, 63, 78–92.Google Scholar

Nguyen, M. H. (2015). Visies op het Wildplukken – Een Verkennend Onderzoek naar de Ervaringen, Visies en Kennisbehoeften van Wildplukkers en Natuurbeheerders. Bachelor's thesis. JZ Dronten: CAH Vilentum University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar

Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Tardío, J., Blanco, E., Carvalho, A. M., Lastra, J. J., Miguel, E. S. & Morales, R. (2007). Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): A comparative study. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 3, 27.Google Scholar

Pawson, M., Glenn, H. & Padda, G. (2008). The definition of marine recreational fishing in Europe. Marine Policy, 32, 339–350.Google Scholar

Pieroni, A. & Gray, C. (2008). Herbal and food folk medicines of the Russlanddeutschen living in Künzelsau/Taläcker, South-Western Germany. Phytotherapy Research, 22, 889–901.Google Scholar

Poe, M. R., McLain, R. J., Emery, M. & Hurley, P. T. (2013). Urban forest justice and the rights to wild foods, medicines, and materials in the city. Human Ecology, 41, 409–422.Google Scholar

Pouta, E., Sievänen, M. T. & Neuvonen, M. (2006). Recreational wild berry picking in Finland – Reflection of a rural lifestyle. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 285–304.Google Scholar

Rangel, M. O. & Erzini, K. (2007). An assessment of catches and harvest of recreational shore angling in the north of Portugal. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 14, 343–352.Google Scholar

Redzic, S. (2010). Use of wild and semi-wild edible plants in nutrition and survival of people in 1430 days of siege of Sarajevo during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–1995). Collegium Antropologicum, 34, 551–570.Google Scholar

Schulp, C. J. E., Thuiller, W. & Verburg, P. H. (2014a). Wild food in Europe: A synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service. Ecological Economics, 105, 292–305.Google Scholar

Schulp, J. A., Pettinga, F. & Meester, P. (2014b). Game consumption and attitudes to hunting in the Netherlands. Research in Hospitality Management, 4, 91–95.Google Scholar

Schunko, C. & Vogl, C. R. (2010). Organic farmers use of wild food plants and fungi in a hilly area in Styria (Austria). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 6, 17.Google Scholar

Sievänen, M. T. (2005). Participation in mushroom picking in Finland. In Social Roles of Forests for Urban Population. Forest Recreation, Landscape, Nature Conservation, Economics Evaluation and Urban Forest, Ito, T & Tanaka, N (eds.). Tokyo: Japan Society of Forest Planning Press, pp. 122–137.Google Scholar

Tsachalidis, E. P. & Hadjisterkotis, E. (2008). Wild boar hunting and socioeconomic trends in Northern Greece, 1993–2002. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54, 643–649.Google Scholar

Turner, N. J., Łuczaj, Ł. J., Migliorini, P., Pieroni, A., Dreon, A. L., Sacchetti, L. E. & Paoletti, M. G. (2011). Edible and tended wild plants, traditional ecological knowledge and agroecology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30, 198–225.Google Scholar

Wilde, G. R. & Pope, K. L. (2013). Worldwide trends in fishing interest indicated by internet search volume. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 20, 211–222.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, K. A., Janssen, R., Arciniegas, G., O'Higgins, T. G., Eikelboom, T. & Wilding, T. A. (2012). Interactive marine spatial planning: Siting tidal energy arrays around the Mull of Kintyre. PLoS ONE, 7, e30031.Google Scholar

Brennan, R. (2015). What Lies Beneath: Probing the Cultural Depths of a Nature Conservation Conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland. PhD thesis. Inverness/Aberdeen: University of the Highlands and Islands/University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar

Cumming, G. & Norwood, C. (2012). The community voice method: Using participatory research and filmmaking to foster dialog about changing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105, 434–444.Google Scholar

Davies, G. E. (2004). Maintaining unimpaired ocean resources and experiences: A national park service ocean stewardship strategy. The George Wright Forum, 21, 22–41.Google Scholar

Gray, T. S. & Hatchard, J. (2007). Environmental stewardship as a new form of fisheries governance. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 64, 786–792.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (1916). The Freedom of the Seas, or the Right Which Belongs to the Dutch to Take Part in the East Indian Trade. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jentoft, S. & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.Google Scholar

Laffoley, D. (2002). Stewardship of the seas. Biologist, 49, 243.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, I. & Brennan, R. (2012). Dùthchas na mara/Belonging to the sea. Exploring the cultural roots of maritime conflict on Gaelic speaking islands in Ireland and Scotland. (http://www.sams.ac.uk/ruth-brennan/belonging-to-the-sea).Google Scholar

Österblom, H. & Folke, C. (2013). Emergence of global adaptive governance for stewardship of regional marine resources. Ecology and Society, 18, 4. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss2/art4/).Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50, 8–21.Google Scholar

Prives, L. (2012). Discovering the ocean: Integrating education, research and environmental stewardship. IEEE Women in Engineering Magazine, 6, 14–15.Google Scholar

Scyphers, S. B., Picou, J. S., Brumbaugh, R. D. & Powers, S. P. (2014). Integrating societal perspectives and values for improved stewardship of a coastal ecosystem engineer. Ecology and Society, 19, 38. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art38/).Google Scholar

Silbernagel, J., Host, G., Hagley, C., Hart, D., Axler, R., Fortner, R., Axler, M., Smith, V., Drewes, A., Bartsch, W., Danz, N., Mathews, J. & Wagler, M. (2015). Linking place-based science to people through spatial narratives of coastal stewardship. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19, 181–198.Google Scholar

St. Martin, K. (2006). The impact of ‘communities’ on fisheries management in the US Northeast. Geoforum, 37, 169–184.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly (1982). Convention on the Law of the Sea. (http://www.refworld.org/docid/3dd8fd1b4.html).Google Scholar

UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) & GPA (Global Programme of Action) (2006). The State of the Marine Environment: Trends and Processes. The Hague: UNEP/GPA.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (2009). The Digest of Justinian. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

References

Allen, M. S. & Palmer, M. W. (2011). Fire history of a prairie/forest boundary: more than 250 years of frequent fire in a North American tallgrass prairie. Journal of Vegetation Science, 22, 436–444.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. C. (1990). The historic role of fire in the North American grassland. In: Fire in North American Tallgrass Prairies, Collins, S. L. and Wallace, L. L. (eds.). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 8–18.Google Scholar

Behnke, R. (2008). The drivers of fragmentation in arid and semi-arid landscapes. In Fragmentation in Semi-arid and Arid Landscapes: Consequences for Human and Natural Systems, Galvin, K., Reid, R., Behnke, R. & Hobbs, N. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 305–340.Google Scholar

Behnke, R. H., Scoones, I. & Kerven, C. (eds.) (1993). Range Ecology at Disequilibrium: New Models of Natural Variability and Pastoral Adaptation of African Savannas. London: Overseas Development Institute/International Institute for Environment and Development/Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. W. (1968). Reciprocal economic exchanges among North American agricultural operators. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24, 276–309.Google Scholar

Bollig, M. & Schwieger, D. A. M. (2014). Fragmentation, cooperation and power: institutional dynamics in natural resource governance in north-western Namibia. Human Ecology, 42, 167–181.Google Scholar

Booker, K., Huntsinger, L., Bartolome, J. W., Sayre, N. F. & Stewart, W. (2013). What can ecological science tell us about opportunities for carbon sequestration on arid rangelands in the United States? Global Environmental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions, 23, 240–251.Google Scholar

Bunce, R. G. H., Pérez-Soba, M., Jongman, R. H. G., Gómez Sal, A., Herzog, F. & Austad, I. (eds.) (2001). Transhumance and Biodiversity in European Mountains, Report of the EU-FP5 Project Transhumount. Wageningen: ALTERRA, Wageningen University and Research Center.Google Scholar

California Rangeland Conservation Coalition (2016). (http://carangeland.org/).Google Scholar

Campos, P., Huntsinger, L., Oviedo, J. L., Starrs, P. F., Díaz, M., Standiford, R. B. & Montero, G. (eds.). (2013). Mediterranean Oak Woodland Working Landscapes: Dehesas of Spain and Ranchlands of California. Dordrecht: Springer Landscape Series, pp. 353–388.Google Scholar

Cao, J., Yeh, E. T., Holden, N. M., Yang, Y. & Du, G. (2013). The effects of enclosures and land-use contracts on rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Journal of Arid Environments, 97, 3–8.Google Scholar

Caparrós, A., Huntsinger, L., Oviedo, J. L., Plieninger, T. & Campos, P. (2013). Economics of ecosystem services, Chapter 12. In Mediterranean Oak Woodland Working Landscapes: Dehesas of Spain and Ranchlands of California, Campos, P., Huntsinger, L., Oviedo, J. L., Starrs, P. F., Díaz, M., Standiford, R. B. & Montero, G. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer Landscape Series, pp. 353–388.Google Scholar

Chaplin-Kramer, R., Tuxen-Bettman, K. & Kremen, C. (2011). Value of wildland habitat for supplying pollination services to Californian agriculture. Rangelands, 33, 33–41.Google Scholar

Charnley, S., Sheridan, T. E. & Nabhan, G. P. (eds.) (2014). Stitching the West Back Together: Conservation of Working Landscapes. Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, J. (1989). The Walking Larder: Patterns of Domestication, Pastoralism, and Predation. London/Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar

Commerford, J. L., Leys, B., Mueller, J. R. & McLauchlan, K. K. (2016). Great Plains vegetation dynamics in response to fire and climatic fluctuations during the Holocene at Fox Lake, Minnesota (USA). Holocene, 26, 302–313.Google Scholar

Cumming, D. H. M., Osofsky, S. A., Atkinson, S. J. & Atkinson, M. W. (2015). Beyond fences: Wildlife, livestock and land use in Southern Africa. In One Health: The Theory and Practice of Integrated Health Approaches, Zinsstag, J, Schelling, E., Waltner-Toews, D., Whittaker, M. & Tanner, M.. Wallingford: CABI, pp. 243–257.Google Scholar

Ellickson, R. C. (1986). Of coase and cattle: Dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review, 38, 623–687.Google Scholar

Fan, M. M., Li, W. J., Zhang, C. C. & Li, L. H. (2014). Impacts of nomad sedentarization on social and ecological systems at multiple scales in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China. Ambio, 43, 673–686.Google Scholar

Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2002). Spatial and social boundaries and the paradox of pastoral land tenure: Case study from postsocialist Mongolia. Human Ecology, 30, 49–78.Google Scholar

Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. & Le Febre, S. (2006). Mobility in pastoral systems: dynamic flux or downward trend? International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 13, 341–362.Google Scholar

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.Google Scholar

Fortmann, L. (2005). What we need is a community Bambi: The perils and possibilities of powerful symbols. In Communities and Conservation: Histories and Politics of Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Brosius, J. P., Lowehaupt Tsing, A. & Zerner, C. (eds.). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, pp. 195–205.Google Scholar

Gongbuzeren, Li, Y. & Li, W. (2015). China's rangeland management policy debates: What have we learned? Rangeland Ecology & Management, 68, 305–314.Google Scholar

Gripne, S. L. (2005). Grassbanks: Bartering for conservation. Rangelands, 27, 24–28.Google Scholar

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.Google Scholar

Havstad, K. M. & Peters, D. P. C. (1999). People and rangeland biodiversity – North America. Proceedings of the Sixth International Rangeland Congress, 2, 634–638.Google Scholar

Hobbs, N. T., Galvin, K. A., Stokes, C. J., Lackett, J. M., Ash, A. J., Boone, R. B., Reid, R. S. & Thornton, P. K. (2008). Fragmentation of rangelands: Implications for humans, animals, and landscapes. Global Environmental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions, 18, 776–785.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L. (2009). Into the wild: Vegetation, alien plants, and familiar fire at the exurban frontier. In The Planner's Guide to Natural Resource Conservation, Esparza, A. X. & McPherson, G. (eds.). New York, NY: Springer, pp. 133–156.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L., Forero, L. & Sulak, A. (2010a). Transhumance and pastoralist resilience in the western United States. Pastoralism: Research, Policy, and Practice, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L., Johnson, M., Stafford, M. & Fried, J. (2010b). Hardwood rangeland landowners in California from 1985 to 2004: Production, ecosystem services, and permanence. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 63, 324–334.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L. & Oviedo, J. L. (2014). Ecosystem services are social-ecological services in a traditional pastoral system: The case of California's Mediterranean rangelands. Ecology and Society, 19, 8. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss1/art8/).Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L. & Sayre, N. E. (2007). Introduction: The working landscapes special issue. Rangelands, 23, 9–13.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L., Sayre, N. E. & Macauley, L. (2014). Ranchers, land tenure, and grass-roots governance: maintaining pastoralist use of rangelands in the U.S. in three different settings. In The Governance of Rangelands: Collective Action for Sustainable Pastoralism, Davies, J. (ed.). New York, NY: Routledge, p. 298.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L., Sayre, N. F. & Wulfhorst, J. D. (2012). Birds, beasts and bovines: Three cases of U.S. pastoralism and wildlife. Pastoralism: Research, Policy, and Practice, 2, 1–28.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, L., & Starrs, P. F. (2006). Grazing in arid North America: A biogeographical approach. Secheresse, 17, 219–233.Google Scholar

Kremen, C. & Miles, A. (2012). Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 17, 40. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art40/).Google Scholar

Kremen, C., Iles, A. & Bacon, C. (2012). Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 17, 44. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art44/).Google Scholar

Li, W. J. & Huntsinger, L. (2011). China's grassland contract policy and its impacts on herder ability to benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic feedbacks. Ecology and Society, 16, 1. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art1/main.html).Google Scholar

Li, W. J. & Li, Y. (2012). Managing rangeland as a complex system: How government interventions decouple social systems from ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 17, 9. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss1/art9/).Google Scholar

Li, W. J., Ali, S. H. & Zhang, Q. (2007). Property rights and grassland degradation: A study of the Xilingol Pasture, Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 85, 461–470.Google Scholar

Li, Y., Fan, M. & Li, W. J. (2015). Application of payment for ecosystem services in China's rangeland conservation initiatives: A social-ecological system perspective. Rangeland Journal, 37, 285–296.Google Scholar

Liffmann, R. H., Huntsinger, L. & Forero, L. C. (2000). To ranch or not to ranch: Home on the urban range? Journal of Range Management, 53, 362–370.Google Scholar

Maestas, J. D., Knight, R. L. & Gilgert, W. C. (2003). Biodiversity across a rural land-use gradient. Conservation Biology, 17, 1425–1434.Google Scholar

Malpai Borderlands Group (2016). (http://www.malpaiborderlandsgroup.org/).Google Scholar

McAllister, R. R. J., Gordon, I. J., Janssen, M. A. & Abel, N. (2006). Pastoralists’ responses to variation of rangeland resources in time and space. Ecological Applications, 16, 572–583.Google Scholar

Naudts, K., Chen, Y., McGrath, M. J., Ryder, J., Valade, A., Otto, J. & Luyssaert, S. (2016). Europe's forest management did not mitigate climate warming. Science, 351, 597–600.Google Scholar

Netting, R. M. (1981). Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Niamir-Fuller, M., Kerven, C., Reid, R. & Milner-Gulland, E. (2012). Co-existence of wildlife and pastoralism on extensive rangelands: Competition or compatibility? Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar

Oba, G., Stenseth, N. C. & Lusigi, W. J. (2000). New perspectives on sustainable grazing management in arid zones of sub-Saharan Africa. BioScience, 50, 35–51.Google Scholar

Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34, 75–90.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. A. & Anderies, J. M. (2007). Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 15176–15178.Google Scholar

Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., López, C. A., González, J. A., Plieninger, T. & Montes, C. (2014). Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 1269–1289.Google Scholar

Oviedo, J. L., Huntsinger, L., Campos, P. & Caparros, A. (2012). Income value of private amenities assessed in California oak woodlands. California Agriculture, 66, 91–96.Google Scholar

Porensky, L. M. & Veblen, K. E. (2015). Generation of ecosystem hotspots using short-term cattle corrals in an African savanna. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 68, 131–141.Google Scholar

Reid, R. S., Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. & Galvin, K. A. (2014). Dynamics and resilience of rangelands and pastoral peoples around the globe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 217–242.Google Scholar

Sayre, N. F. (2005). Working Wilderness: The Malpai Borderlands Group and the Future of the Western Range. Tucson, AZ: Rio Nuevo Publishers.Google Scholar

Sayre, N. F. (2008). The genesis, history, and limits of carrying capacity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98, 120–134.Google Scholar

Sayre, N. F., Carlisle, L., Huntsinger, L., Fisher, G. & Shattuck, A. (2012). The role of rangelands in diversified farming systems: Innovations, obstacles, and opportunities in the USA. Ecology and Society, 17, 43. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art43/).Google Scholar

Sayre, N. F., McAllister, R. R. J., Bestelmeyer, B. T., Moritz, M., & Turner, M. D. (2013). Earth stewardship of rangelands: Coping with ecological, economic, and political marginality. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 348–354.Google Scholar

Seeger, R. & Vecchi, G. A. (2010). Greenhouse warming and the 21^st century hydroclimate of southwestern North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 21277–21282.Google Scholar

Shannon, G., Thaker, M., Vanak, A. T., Page, B. R., Grant, R. & Slotow, R. (2011). Relative impacts of elephant and fire on large trees in a savanna ecosystem. Ecosystems, 14, 1372–1381.Google Scholar

Smith, A. H. & Martin, W. E. (1972). Socioeconomic behavior of cattle ranchers, with implications for rural community development in the west. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 217–225.Google Scholar

Starrs, P. F. (1998). Let the Cowboy Ride: Cattle Ranching in the American West. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Stokes, C. J., McAllister, R. R. J. & Ash, A. J. (2006). Fragmentation of Australian rangelands: Processes, benefits and risks of changing patterns of land use. Rangeland Journal, 28, 83–96.Google Scholar

Talbert, C. B., Knight, R. L. & Mitchell, J. E. (2007). Private ranchlands and public land grazing in the southern Rocky Mountains. Rangelands, 29, 5–8.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. (2002). When elephants stand for competing philosophies of nature: Amboseli National Park, Kenya. In Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices, Law, J. & Mol, A. (eds.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 166–190.Google Scholar

Utrilla, V., Brizuela, M. & Cibils, A. (2005). Riparian habitats (mallines) of Patagonia – A key grazing resource for sustainable sheep-farming operations. Outlook on Agriculture, 34, 55–59.Google Scholar

Veldman, J. W., Overbeck, G. E., Negreiros, D., Mahy, G., Le Stradic, S., Fernandes, G. W., Durigan, G., Buisson, E., Putz, F. E., & Bond, W. J. (2015). Where tree planting and forest expansion are bad for biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience, 65, 1011–1018.Google Scholar

Vetter, S. (2005). Rangelands at equilibrium and non-equilibrium: Recent developments in the debate. Journal of Arid Environments, 62, 321–341.Google Scholar

Williams, D. M. (1996). Grassland enclosures: Catalyst of land degradation in Inner Mongolia. Human Organization, 55, 307–313.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part II - Landscape Stewardship on the Ground

Summary

Access options

References

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

Book contents

Part II - Landscape Stewardship on the Ground

Summary

Access options

References

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive