Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T19:08:36.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - How custom becomes law in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Peter Orebech
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School
Fred Bosselman
Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Jes Bjarup
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
David Callies
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa
Martin Chanock
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Hanne Petersen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

This court will upon a writ of error take judicial notice of all private customs in private places; for they below are as much bound to proceed upon their customs as the Judges here upon the common law. Case 104. Anonymous 11 Mod 68

How that which may be claimed by all the inhabitants of England can be the subject of a custom, I cannot conceive. Customs must in their nature be confined to individuals of a particular description, and what is common to all mankind, can never be claimed as a custom.

Fitch v. Rawling, 2 H.Bl. 393 (1795) at 398;[1775–1802 All ER 571, 574; 126 ER 614, 616

[A]ll customs which are against the common law of England, ought to be taken strictly, nay very strictly, even stricter than any Act of Parliament that alters the common law. It is a general rule, that customs are not to be enlarged beyond the usage; because it is the usage and practice that makes the law in such cases, and not the reason of the thing, for it cannot be said that a custom is founded on reason, though an unreasonable custom is void; for no reason, even the highest whatsoever, would make a custom or law; so it is no particular reason that makes any custom law, but the usage and practice itself, without regard had to any reason of such usage; and therefore you cannot enlarge such custom by any parity of reason, since reason has no part in the making of such custom … but the law allows usage in particular places to supersede the common law, and is the local law, which is never to be extended further than the usage and practice, which is the only thing that makes it law.

Arthur v. Bockenham, 11 Mod. 148 (1707) at 160–161
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×