Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:09:59.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Humanization of Recombinant Antibodies

from PART I - HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Melvyn Little
Affiliation:
Affimed Therapeutics AG
Get access

Summary

Since 1890, when von Behring and Kitasato reported that animal antitoxin serum could protect against lethal doses of toxins in humans, antisera have been used to neutralize pathogens in acute disease as well as in prophylaxis. Antisera are also used in vitro as diagnostic tools to establish and monitor disease. However, antisera invariably induce an immune response resulting in joint pains, fevers, and sometimes life-threatening anaphylactic shock. Various proteins contribute to the immunogenicity, as the serum is a crude extract containing not only the antibodies against the disease-causing antigen (often at low concentration), but also other antibodies and proteins.

FULLY MOUSE TO FULLY HUMAN

In 1975, Köhler and Milstein (1975) at the Medical Research Council's (MRC) Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge (UK) reported their discovery of a way to produce custom-built antibodies in vitro with relative ease. They fused rodent antibody-producing cells with immortal tumor cells (myelomas) from the bone marrow of mice to produce hybridomas. A hybridoma combines the cancer cell's ability to reproduce almost indefinitely with the immune cell's ability to produce antibodies. Once screened to isolate the hybridomas yielding antibodies of the required antigen specificity and affinity – and given the right nutrients – a hybridoma will grow and divide, mass-producing antibodies of a single type (monoclonals). Nearly a century before, the German scientist Paul Ehrlich envisaged that such entities could be used as magic bullets to target and destroy human diseases, and hybridomas seemed like a production line of batch consistency for these magic bullets.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Lazikani, B, Lesk, AM, Chothia, C. (1997) Standard conformations for the canonical structure of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 927–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baca, M, Presta, LG, O'Connor, SJ, Wells, JA. (1997) Antibody humanization using monovalent phage display. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10678–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulianne, GL, Hozumi, N, Shulman, MJ. (1984) Production of functional chimaeric mouse/human antibody. Nature. 312, 643–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourne, PC, Terzyan, SS, Cloud, G, Landolfi, NF, Vasquez, M, Edmundson, AB. (2004) Three-dimensional structures of a humanized anti-IFN-gamma Fab (HuZAF) in two crystal forms. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol Crystallogr. 60, 1761–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüggemann, M, Spicer, C, Buluwela, L, Rosewell, I, Barton, S, Surani, MA, Rabbitts, TH. (1991) Human antibody production in transgenic mice: expression from 100kb of the human IgH locus. Eur. J. Immunol. 21, 1323–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüggemann, M, Winter, G, Waldmann, H, Neuberger, MS. (1989) The immunogenicity of chimeric antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 170, 2153–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chothia, C, Lesk, AM, Tramontano, A, Levitt, M, Smith-Gill, SJ, Air, G, Sheriff, S, Padlan, EA, Davies, D, Tulip, WR, Colman, PM, Spinelli, S, Alzari, PM, Poljak, RJ. (1989) Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature 342, 877–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chothia, C, Lesk, AM. (1987) Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 196, 901–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chothia, C, Novotny, J, Bruccoleri, R, Karplus, M. (1985) Domain association in immunoglobulin molecules. The packing of variable domains. J. Mol. Biol. 186, 651–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Co, MS, Deschamps, M, Whitley, RJ, Queen, C. (1991) Humanized antibodies for antiviral therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 2869–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Co, MS, Scheinberg, DA, Avdalovic, NM, McGraw, K, Vasquez, M, Caron, PC, Queen, C. (1993) Genetically engineered deglycosylation of the variable domain increases the affinity of an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody. Mol. Immunol. 30, 1361–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Dall'Acqua, WF, Damschroder, MM, Zhang, J, Woods, RM, Widjaja, L, Yu, J, Wu, H. (2005) Antibody humanization by framework shuffling. Methods 36, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damschroder, MM, Widjaja, L, Gill, PS, Krasnoperov, V, Jiang, W, Dall'Acqua, WF, Wu, H. (2007) Framework shuffling of antibodies to reduce immunogenicity and manipulate functional and biophysical properties. Mol. Immunol. 44, 3049–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daugherty, BL, DeMartino, JA, Law, MF, Kawka, DW, Singer, II, Mark, GE. (1991) Polymerase chain reaction facilitates the cloning, CDR-grafting, and rapid expression of a murine monoclonal antibody directed against the CD18 component of leukocyte integrins. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2471–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, JH, Barber, KA, Tutt, A, Hale, C, Lewis, AP, Glennie, MJ, Stevenson, GT, Crowe, JS. (1995) Engineered anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies for immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. J. Immunol. 155, 925–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Fontayne, A, Vanhoorelbeke, K, Pareyn, I, Rompaey, I, Meiring, M, Lamprecht, S, Roodt, J, Desmet, J, Deckmyn, H. (2006) Rational humanization of the powerful antithrombotic anti-GPIbα antibody: 6B4. Thromb. Haemost. 96, 671–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzales, NR, Padlan, EA, Pascalis, R, Schuck, P, Schlom, J, Kashmiri, SV. (2004) SDR grafting of a murine antibody using multiple human germline templates to minimize its immunogenicity. Mol. Immunol. 41, 863–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorman, SD, Clark, MR, Routledge, EG, Cobbold, SP, Waldmann, H. (1991) Reshaping a therapeutic CD4 antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 4181–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graziano, RF, Tempest, PR, White, P, Keler, T, Deo, Y, Ghebremariam, H, Coleman, K, Pfefferkorn, LC, Fanger, MW, Guyre, PM. (1995) Construction and characterization of a humanized anti-gamma-Ig receptor type I (Fc gamma RI) monoclonal antibody. J. Immunol. 155, 4996–5002.Google ScholarPubMed
Hakimi, J, Ha, VC, Lin, P, Campbell, E, Gately, MK, Tsudo, M, Payne, PW, Waldmann, TA, Grant, AJ, Tsien, WH, Schneider, WP. (1993) Humanized Mik beta 1, a humanized antibody to the IL-2 receptor beta-chain that acts synergistically with humanized anti-TAC. J. Immunol. 151, 1075–85.Google Scholar
Hamilton, AA, Manuel, DM, Grundy, JE, Turner, AJ, King, SI, Adair, JR, White, P, Carr, FJ, Harris, WJ. (1997) A humanized antibody against human cytomegalovirus (CMV) gpUL75 (gH) for prophylaxis or treatment of CMV infections. J. Infect. Dis. 176, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellendoorn, K, Jones, T, Watkins, J, Baker, M, Hamilton, A, Carr, F. (2004) Limiting the risk of immunogenicity by identification and removal of T-cell epitopes (DeImmunisation™). Cancer Cell Intl. 4, S20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, WY, Foote, J. (2005) Immunogenicity of engineered antibodies. Methods 36, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffers, GJ, Fuller, TC, Cosimi, AB, Russell, PS, Winn, HJ, Colvin, RB. (1986) Monoclonal antibody therapy. Anti-idiotypic and non-anti-idiotypic antibodies to OKT3 arising despite intense immunosuppression. Transplantation 41, 572–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, M, Klehr, M, Bogel, A, Schmitz, S, Tawadros, S, Mühlenhoff, M, Plück, A, Fischer, T, Schomäcker, K, Schultze, JL, Berthold, F. (2007) One step generation of fully chimeric antibodies using Cγ1- and Cκ mutant mice. J. Immunother. 30, 338–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jespers, LS, Roberts, A, Mahler, SM, Winter, G, Hoogenboom, HR. (1994) Guiding the selection of human antibodies from phage display repertoires to a single epitope of an antigen. Biotechnology 12, 899–903.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, PT, Dear, PH, Foote, J, Neuberger, MS, Winter, G. (1986) Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse. Nature 321, 522–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junghans, RP, Waldmann, TA, Landolfi, NF, Avdalovic, NM, Schneider, WP, Queen, C. (1990) Anti-Tac-H, a humanized antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor with new features for immunotherapy in malignant and immune disorders. Cancer Res. 50, 1495–502.Google ScholarPubMed
Kabat, EA, Wu, TT, Perry, H, Gottesman, K, Foeller, C. (1991) Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th ed. NIH Publication No. 91–3242.
Kabat, EA, Wu, TT, Reid-Miller, M, Perry, H, Gottesman, K. (1987) Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 4th ed. US Govt. Printing Office No. 165–492.
Kettleborough, CA, Saldanha, J, Heath, VJ, Morrison, CJ, Bendig, MM. (1991) Humanization of a mouse monoclonal antibody by CDR-grafting: the importance of framework residues on loop conformation. Protein Eng. 4, 773–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köhler, G, Milstein, C. (1975) Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256, 495–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbinger, F, Saldanha, J, Hardman, N, Bendig, MM. (1993) Humanization of a mouse anti-human IgE antibody: a potential therapeutic for IgE-mediated allergies. Protein Eng. 6, 971–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazar, GA, Desjarlais, JR, Jacinto, J, Karki, S, Hammond, PW. (2007) A molecular immunology approach to antibody humanization and functional optimization. Mol. Immunol. 44, 1986–1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Léger, OJ, Yednock, TA, Tanner, L, Horner, HC, Hines, DK, Keen, S, Saldanha, J, Jones, ST, Fritz, LC, Bendig, MM. (1997) Humanization of a mouse antibody against human alpha-4 integrin: a potential therapeutic for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Hum. Antibodies 8, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Sai, T, Berger, M, Chao, Q, Davidson, D, et al. (2006) Human antibodies for immunotherapy development generated via a human B cell hybridoma technology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 3557–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lv, M, Li, Y, Yu, M, Sun, Y, Lin, Z, Qiao, C, Luo, Q, Gu, X, Huang, Y, Feng, J, Shen, B. (2007) Structured to reduce the mitogenicity of anti-CD3 antibody based on computer-guided molecular design. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39, 1142–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeda, H, Matsushita, S, Eda, Y, Kimachi, K, Tokiyoshi, S, Bendig, MM. (1991) Construction of reshaped human antibodies with HIV-neutralizing activity. Hum. Antibodies Hybridomas. 2, 124–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCafferty, J, Griffiths, AD, Winter, G, Chiswell, DJ. (1990) Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains. Nature 348, 552–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morelock, MM, Rothlein, R, Bright, SM, Robinson, MK, Graham, ET, Sabo, JP, Owens, R, King, DJ, Norris, SH, Scher, DS, et al. (1994) Isotype choice for chimeric antibodies affects binding properties. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13048–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Morrison, SL, Johnson, MJ, Herzenberg, , Oi, VT. (1984) Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 6851–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, K, Tanaka, Y, Fujino, I, Hirayama, N, Shitara, K, Hanai, N. (2000) Dissection and optimization of immune effector functions of humanized anti-ganglioside GM2 monoclonal antibody. Mol. Immunol. 37, 1035–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neuberger, MS, Williams, GT, Mitchell, EB, Jouhal, SS, Flanagan, JG, Rabbitts, TH. (1985) A hapten-specific chimaeric IgE antibody with human physiological effector function. Nature 314, 268–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisihara, T, Ushio, Y, Higuchi, H, Kayagaki, N, Yamaguchi, N, Soejima, K, Matsuo, S, Maeda, H, Eda, Y, Okumura, K, Yagita, H. (2001) Humanization and epitope mapping of neutralizing anti-human Fas ligand monoclonal antibodies: structural insights into Fas/Fas ligand interaction. J. Immunol. 167, 3266–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohlin, M, Owman, H, Mach, M, Borrebaeck, CA. (1996) Light chain shuffling of a high affinity antibody results in a drift in epitope recognition. Mol. Immunol. 33, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padlan, EA, Abergel, C, Tipper, JP. (1995) Identification of specificity-determining residues in antibodies. FASEB J. 9, 133–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padlan, EA. (1991) A possible procedure for reducing the immunogenicity of antibody variable domains while preserving their ligand-binding properties. Mol. Immunol. 28, 489–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padlan, EA. (1994) Anatomy of the antibody molecule. Mol. Immunol. 31, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, JT, Henry, AH, Searle, SJ, Guild, BC, Roguska, M, Rees, AR. (1994) Comparison of surface accessible residues in human and murine immunoglobulin Fv domains. Implication for humanization of murine antibodies. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 959–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poul, MA, Ticchioni, M, Bernard, A, Lefranc, MP. (1995) Inhibition of T cell activation with a humanized anti-beta 1 integrin chain mAb. Mol. Immunol. 32, 101–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Queen, C, Schneider, WP, Selick, HE, Payne, PW, Landolfi, NF, Duncan, JF, Avdalovic, NM, Levitt, M, Junghans, RP, Waldmann, TA. (1989) A humanized antibody that binds to the interleukin 2 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 10029–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rader, C, Cheresh, DA, Barbas, CF. (1998) A phage display approach for rapid antibody humanization: designed combinatorial V gene libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 8910–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riechmann, L, Clark, M, Waldmann, H, Winter, G. (1988) Reshaping human antibodies for therapy. Nature 332, 323–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, ML, Shalaby, MR, Werther, W, Presta, L, Carter, P. (1992) Engineering a humanized bispecific F(ab′)2 fragment for improved binding to T cells. Int J Cancer Suppl. 7, 45–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosok, MJ, Yelton, , Harris, LJ, Bajorath, J, Hellstrom, KE, Hellstrom, I, Cruz, GA, Kristensson, K, Lin, H, Huse, WD, Glaser, SM. (1996) A combinatorial library strategy for the rapid humanization of anticarcinoma BR96 Fab. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22611–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saldanha, JW, Martin, AC, Léger, OJ. (1999) A single backmutation in the human kIV framework of a previously unsuccessfully humanized antibody restores the binding activity and increases the secretion in cos cells. Mol. Immunol. 36, 709–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, K, Ohtomo, T, Hirata, Y, Saito, H, Matsuura, T, Akimoto, T, Akamatsu, K, Koishihara, Y, Ohsugi, Y, Tsuchiya, M. (1996) Humanization of an anti-human IL-6 mouse monoclonal antibody glycosylated in its heavy chain variable region. Hum. Antibodies. Hybridomas 7, 175–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, K, Tsuchiya, M, Saldanha, J, Koishihara, Y, Ohsugi, Y, Kishimoto, T, Bendig, MM. (1993) Reshaping a human antibody to inhibit the interleukin 6-dependent tumor cell growth. Cancer Res. 53, 851–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Sato, K, Tsuchiya, M, Saldanha, J, Koishihara, Y, Ohsugi, Y, Kishimoto, T, Bendig, MM. (1994) Humanization of a mouse anti-human interleukin-6 receptor antibody comparing two methods for selecting human framework regions. Mol. Immunol. 31, 371–81.Google ScholarPubMed
Schneider, WP, Glaser, SM, Kondas, JA, Hakimi, J. (1993) The anti-idiotypic response by cynomolgus monkeys to humanized anti-Tac is primarily directed to complementarity-determining regions H1, H2, and L3. J. Immunol. 150, 3086–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Schroff, RW, Foon, KA, Beatty, SM, Oldham, RK, Morgan, AC. (1985) Human anti-murine immunoglobulin responses in patients receiving monoclonal antibody therapy. Cancer Res. 45, 879–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Shearman, CW, Pollock, D, White, G, Hehir, K, Moore, GP, Kanzy, EJ, Kurrle, R. (1991) Construction, expression and characterization of humanized antibodies directed against the human alpha/beta T cell receptor. J. Immunol. 147, 4366–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Shirai, H, Kidera, A, Nakamura, H. (1996) Structural classification of CDR-H3 in antibodies. FEBS Lett. 399, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirai, H, Kidera, A, Nakamura, H. (1999) H3-rules: identification of CDR-H3 structures in antibodies. FEBS Lett. 455, 188–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staelens, S, Desmet, J, Ngo, TH, Vauterin, S, Pareyn, I, Barbeaux, P, Rompaey, I, Stassen, JM, Deckmyn, H, Vanhoorelbeke, K. (2006) Humanization by variable domain resurfacing and grafting on a human IgG4, using a new approach for determination of non-human like surface accessible framework residues based on homology modeling of variable domains. Mol. Immunol. 43, 1243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P, Mitchell, DA, Buss, TN, Holmes, MA, Anasetti, C, Foote, J. (2002) “Superhumanized” antibodies: reduction of immunogenic potential by complementarity-determining region grafting with human germline sequences: application to an anti-CD28. J. Immunol. 169, 1119–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tempest, PR, White, P, Buttle, M, Carr, FJ, Harris, WJ. (1995) Identification of framework residues required to restore antigen binding during reshaping of a monoclonal antibody against the glycoprotein gB of human cytomegalovirus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 17, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, TC, Rollins, SA, Rother, RP, Giannoni, MA, Hartman, SL, Elliott, EA, Nye, SH, Matis, , Squinto, SP, Evans, MJ. (1996) Inhibition of complement activity by humanized anti-C5 antibody and single-chain Fv. Mol. Immunol. 33, 1389–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas-Madrazo, E, Paz-García, E. (2003) An improved model of association for VH-VL immunoglobulin domains: asymmetries between VH and VL in the packing of some interface residues. J. Mol. Recognit. 16, 113–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhoeyen, M, Milstein, C, Winter, G. (1988) Reshaping human antibodies: grafting an antilysozyme activity. Science 239, 1534–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, H, Nie, Y, Huse, WD, Watkins, JD. (1999) Humanization of a murine monoclonal antibody by simultaneous optimization of framework and CDR residues. J. Mol. Biol. 294, 151–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, TT, Kabat, EA. (1970) An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity. J. Exp. Med. 132, 211–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, SO, Lee, TS, Kim, SJ, Jang, MH, Kang, YJ, Park, JH, Kim, KS, Lee, HS, Ryu, CJ, Gonzales, NR, Kasmiri, SV, Lim, SM, Choi, CW, Hong, HJ. (2006) Construction, affinity maturation and biological characterization of an anti-tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 humanized antibody. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 6985–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, Feng, J, Li, Y, Guo, N, Shen, B. (2005) Humanization of an anti-human TNF-alpha antibody by variable region resurfacing with the aid of molecular modeling. Mol. Immunol. 42, 1445–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×