Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 18
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

3 - Phronesis and narrative analysis

Summary

Introduction

The phronetic approach includes an attention to method; the ways in which evidence is collected, coded and analysed; and the ways in which the inferences that are drawn from that analysis of evidence inform larger questions of appropriateness and the challenge to existing power relations with respect to the research topic area at hand. I think it is incorrect to cast the phronetic approach as somehow antithetical to strong method, or some form of ‘method-light’ that can be adopted by those who are more interested in the substance of social science research (see Landman 2008: 307–11; and Schram, Chapter 2, above). Indeed, Flyvbjerg (2006: 68–74) argues that he has been set up as a straw man for those who opposed the so-called ‘perestroika’ movement in the American Political Science Association, and argues forcefully (and with examples) why method sits squarely within the phronetic approach. His argument is that we as social scientists have spent perhaps too much time focusing on epistemé and techné to the neglect of phronesis.

I endorse this view, while at the same time wanting to make sure that we do not lose sight of the importance of the whole triumvirate of concepts that form the phronetic approach. As a comparative methodologist and scholar of human rights, I have argued over the years for the use of systematic methods that address otherwise normatively informed and value-based questions (see, e.g., Landman 2002, 2005). I see no contradiction in this perspective, especially if the careful and systematic analysis of human rights evidence can bring about their greater protection; a position that is consistent with a larger Weberian ‘value-rational’ tradition in the social sciences (see Landman 2005: 553–4; and Olsen, Payne and Reiter, Chapter 10, below). Quality systematic value-oriented research can and should contribute to incremental gains in knowledge. Contextually informed knowledge based on a phronetic approach can move beyond the cases under investigation and provide generalizations that are helpful for solving political problems in other contexts. In my own field, and as will be demonstrated in this chapter, learning about the struggle for and against human rights in particular political contexts is valuable for advocates in other contexts.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Ball, P.Asher, J.Sulmont, D.Manrique, D. 2003
Ball, P.Spirer, H.Spirer, L. 2000 Investigating Large Scale Human Rights Violations Using Information Systems and Data AnalysisWashington, DCAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science
Beer, Francis A.Balleck, Barry J. 1994 Realist/Idealist Texts: Psychometry and Semantics’Peace Psychology Review 1 38
Bellah, R. N.Madsen, R.Sullivan, W. M.Swidler, A.Tipton, S. M. 1985 Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American LifeNew YorkHarper & Row
Bishop, Y. M.Feinberg, S. E.Holland, P. H. 1975 Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and PracticeCambridge, MAMIT Press
Budge, I.Klingemann, H. D.Volkens, A.Bara, J.Tanenbaum, E. 2001 Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998Oxford University Press
Chapman, Audrey R.Ball, Patrick 2001 The Truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative Lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and GuatemalaHuman Rights Quarterly 23 1
Chase, S. E. 2005 Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, VoicesDenzin, N. K.Lincoln, Y. S.The Sage Handbook of Qualitative ResearchThousand Oaks, CASage651
Clandinin, D. JeanConnelly, F. Michael 2000 Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative ResearchSan Francisco, CAJossey-Bass
Eulau, H. 1996 Micro–Macro Dilemmas in Political Science: Personal Pathways through ComplexityNorman, OKUniversity of Oklahoma Press
Fenno, R. F. 1978 Home Style: House Members in Their DistrictsNew YorkLongman
Flyvbjerg, B. 2001 Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it can Succeed AgainCambridge University Press
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006 56
Frank, A. 2002 ‘Why Study People's Stories? The Dialogical Ethics of Narrative AnalysisInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods 1
Franzosi, R. 2004 From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data and Social ScienceCambridge University Press
Gallie, W. B. 1956
Glynos, J.Howarth, D. 2008 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political TheoryLondonRoutledge
Hayner, P. B. 1994 Human Rights Quarterly 16 597
Hayner, P. B. 2002 Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenge of Truth CommissionsLondonRoutledge
Howarth, D. 2000 DiscourseBuckinghamOpen University Press
Howarth, D.Norval, A.Stavrakakis, Y. 2000 Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social ChangeManchester University Press
Landman, T. 2000 Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An IntroductionLondonRoutledge
Landman, T. 2002 Comparative Politics and Human RightsHuman Rights Quarterly 24 890
Landman, T. 2003 Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An IntroductionLondonRoutledge
Landman, T. 2005 Review Article: The Political Science of Human RightsBritish Journal of Political Science 35 549
Landman, T. 2006 Studying Human RightsLondonRoutledge
Landman, T. 2008 Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An IntroductionLondonRoutledge
Landman, T.Carvalho, E. 2009 Measuring Human RightsLondonRoutledge
Landman, T.Gohdes, A. 2010
Reissmann, C. K. 2008 Narrative Methods for the Human SciencesThousand Oaks, CASage
Riley, T.Hawe, P. 2005 Researching Practice: The Methodological Case for Narrative InquiryHealth Education Research 20 226
Schram, S.Caterino, B. 2006 Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and MethodNew York University Press
Silva, R.Klingner, J.Weikart, S. 2010 www.hrdag.org/about/downloads/State-Violence-in-Chad.pdf
Skaar, E. 1999 ‘Truth Commissions, Trials – or Nothing? Policy Options in Democratic TransitionsKolstad, I.Stokke, H.Writing Rights: Human Rights Research at the Chr. Michelsen Institute 1984–2004BergenFagbokforlaget,149
Skaar, E.Gloppen, S.Suhrke, A. 2005 Roads to ReconciliationLanham, MDLexington Books
Williamson, A.Feyer, A-M.Stout, N.Driscoll, T.Usher, H. 2001 Use of Narrative Analysis for Comparisons of the Causes of Fatal Accidents in Three Countries: New Zealand, Australia, and the United States’Injury Prevention 7 15
Zwane, E.van der Heijden, P. 2005 Population Estimation using the Multiple System Estimator in the Presence of Continuous CovariatesStatistical Modelling 5 39