Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:28:44.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Phronetic social science: an idea whose time has come

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bent Flyvbjerg
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Todd Landman
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Sanford Schram
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Some critics of mainstream social science argue that the very idea of a social science is an oxymoron, at least when it is done in ways that strictly mimic the most prominent versions of science: that is, the natural sciences. Part of this critique stems from the realization that, given their respective subject matters, the natural and social sciences are entirely different enterprises. The natural sciences are focused on prediction and control of the natural world, making them the wrong place to look for a model about how to produce scientific knowledge that can inform social relations. Rather than mimicking the natural sciences, social science is arguably practiced best when it produces knowledge that the people being studied can themselves use to address better the problems they are experiencing.

It turns out that there is good news on the social science front these days. Some critics who do not entirely dismiss the idea of a social science as a science have gone beyond their criticisms to not only offer viable alternatives but to actually implement them, demonstrating that an alternative science that is more consistent with and relevant to the social nature of its subject matter is in fact entirely possible. In recent years, a confluence of alternatives has been developing that to varying degrees embrace this ethic. Interpretive approaches in particular feature the study of social relations from the perspective of the people being studied and have gained more visibility in recent years (Yanow and Schwartz-Shea 2006), as has participatory action research that involves active collaboration of researchers and the researched (Naples 2003). ‘Phronetic social science’ is one prominent example of this renewal in social science. It, however, has so far existed mostly in theory, with only a few examples of application to practical issues in policy, planning and management. The aim of Real Social Science is to rectify this deficiency in the literature by bringing together case studies illustrating phronetic social science in practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Real Social Science
Applied Phronesis
, pp. 15 - 26
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G. 1988 Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science’PS: Political Science and Politics 21 828Google Scholar
Argyris, C. 1983 Action Science and Intervention’Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 19 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caterino, B.Schram, S. 2006 Introduction. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Research, Method and Knowledge’Schram, S.Caterino, B.Making Political Science MatterNew York University PressGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. 2001 Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it can Succeed AgainCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006 Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research’Qualitative Inquiry 12 219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B.Bruzelius, N.Rothengatter, W. 2003 Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of AmbitionCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. 2000 Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical TopicsPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1976 New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative SociologiesLondonHutchinsonGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, J. 2006 The Founding of the American Political Science Association: Discipline, Profession, Political Theory, and PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review 100 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naples, N. 2003 Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist ResearchNew YorkRoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Reason, P.Bradbury, H. 2001 The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and PracticeLondonSageGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, I. 2005 The Flight from Reality in the Human SciencesPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Von Wright, G. H. 1971 Explanation and UnderstandingLondonRoutledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W. 1991 Participatory Action ResearchThousand Oaks, CASageCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanow, D.Schwartz-Shea, P. 2006 Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive TurnArmonk, NYM. E. SharpeGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×