Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 12
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
May 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781107110618

Book description

Plato often rejects hedonism, but in the Protagoras, Plato's Socrates seems to endorse hedonism. In this book, J. Clerk Shaw removes this apparent tension by arguing that the Protagoras as a whole actually reflects Plato's anti-hedonism. He shows that Plato places hedonism at the core of a complex of popular mistakes about value and especially about virtue: that injustice can be prudent, that wisdom is weak, that courage is the capacity to persevere through fear, and that virtue cannot be taught. The masses reproduce this system of values through shame and fear of punishment. The Protagoras and other dialogues depict sophists and orators who have internalized popular morality through shame, but who are also ashamed to state their views openly. Shaw's reading not only reconciles the Protagoras with Plato's other dialogues, but harmonizes it with them and even illuminates Plato's wider anti-hedonism.

Reviews

'Shaw’s book is clearly structured and regularly informs readers about the intended aims and the results achieved.'

Bernd Manuwald Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

'… this book deserves careful attention. It offers a combination of close readings of some important passages with an eye to both argumentative structure and dramatic presentation. It also steps back from the minutiae of line-by-line analysis to consider more general questions about how Plato uses these presentations of dialectical encounters to score points against both his sophistic rivals and also the Athenian people more generally.'

James Warren Source: Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought

'Shaw offers an incisive diagnosis of popular double-think, as he calls it, which balances the incoherent complex of commitments to hedonism, to the possibility of akrasia and to the belief that injustice is prudent, i.e. in one's own self-interest to do.'

Vanessa de Harven Source: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography

Adam, J. and Adam, A. M. 1893. Platonis Protagoras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Adkins, A. W. H. 1960. Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Adkins, A. W. H. 1973. “’Αρετή, Τέχνη, Democracy, and Sophists: Protagoras 316b–328d,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 93, 312
Annas, J. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Annas, J. 1993. “Virtue as the Use of Other Goods,” Apeiron 26, 5366
Annas, J. 1999. Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Austin, E. 2010. “Prudence and the Fear of Death in Plato’s Apology,” Ancient Philosophy 30, 3955
Barney, R. 2004. “Callicles and Thrasymachus,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, plato.stanford.edu/entries/callicles-thrasymachus
Benson, H. 2000. Socratic Wisdom. New York: Oxford University Press
Berman, S. 1991a. “How Polus was Refuted: Reconsidering Plato’s Gorgias 474c–475c,” Ancient Philosophy 11, 265–84
Berman, S. 1991b. “Socrates and Callicles on Pleasure,” Phronesis 36, 117–40
Blundell, M. W. 1989. Helping Friends and Harming Enemies: A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bobonich, C. 2002. Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. 1994. Plato’s Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. 2010. Socratic Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Brown, E. A. 2000. “Justice and Compulsion for Plato’s Philosopher-Rulers,” Ancient Philosophy 20, 117
Brown, E. A. 2003. “Plato: Ethics and Politics in the Republic,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-ethics-politics
Brown, L. 1986. “Being in the Sophist: A Syntactical Enquiry,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4, 4970
Burnet, J. 1924. Plato: Euthyphro, Apology of Socrates, Crito. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Burnyeat, M. 1971. “Virtues in Action,” in Vlastos, G. (ed.), The Philosophy of Socrates, 209–34. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books
Burnyeat, M. 1999. “Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic,” in Oeterson, G. B. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 215324. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press
Butler, J. 1999. “The Arguments for the Most Pleasant Life in Republic IX: A Note Against the Common Interpretation,” Apeiron 32, 3748
Butler, J. 2003. “A Case for an Intellectual Hedonism in the Philebus,” in Reshotko, N. (ed.), Desire, Identity, and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner, 109–25. Edmonton, AB: Academic Printing and Publishing
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company
Cooper, J. M. 1999. “Socrates and Plato in Plato’s Gorgias,” in Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory, 2975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Crombie, I. M. 1962. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
Cronquist, J. 1980. “The Point of the Hedonism in Plato’s Protagoras,” Prudentia 12, 6381
Davidson, J. N. 1997. Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens. London: Harper Collins
Denyer, N. 2008. Plato: Protagoras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
DeStrycker, E. 1994. Plato’s Apology of Socrates. Leiden: E. J. Brill
Devereux, D. 1975. “Protagoras on Courage and Knowledge: Protagoras 351A–B,” Apeiron 9, 3739
Dodds, E. R. 1959. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Duncan, R. 1978. “Courage in Plato’s Protagoras,” Phronesis 23, 216–28
Franklin, L. 2005. “Technê and Teleology in Plato’s Gorgias,” Apeiron 38, 229–55
Frede, D. 1985. “Rumpelstiltskin’s Pleasures: True and False Pleasure in Plato’s Philebus,” Phronesis 30, 151–79
Frede, D. 1993. Plato: Philebus. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company
Frede, M. 1992. “Introduction,” in Plato: Protagoras, Lombardo, S. and Bell, K. (trans.), viixxxiv. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company
Gagarin, M. 2001. “Did the Sophists Aim to Persuade?Rhetorica 19, 275–91
Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N., and Seaford, R. (eds.) 1998. Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Goldberg, L. 1983. A Commentary on Plato’s Protagoras. New York: Peter Lang Publishing
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Grote, G. 1865. Plato and the Other Companions of Sokrates. London: John Murray
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1962. A History of Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hackforth, R. 1928. “Hedonism in Plato’s Protagoras,” Classical Quarterly 22, 3942
Harte, V. 1999. “Conflicting Values in Plato’s Crito,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81, 117–47
Hemmenway, S. R. 1996. “Sophistry Exposed: Socrates on the Unity of Virtue in the Protagoras,” Ancient Philosophy 16, 123
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Irwin, T. 1979. Plato: Gorgias. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Irwin, T. 1992. “Socrates the Epicurean?” in Benson, H. (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates, 198219. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Irwin, T. 1993. “Say What You Believe,” Apeiron 26, 116
Irwin, T. 1995a. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Irwin, T. 1995b. “Plato’s Objections to the Sophists,” in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World, 568–90. London and New York: Routledge
Kahn, C. 1981. “Some Philosophical Uses of ‘To Be’ in Plato,” Phronesis 26, 105–34
Kahn, C. 1983. “Drama and Dialectic in Plato’s Gorgias,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1, 75121
Kahn, C. 1988. “On the Relative Date of the Gorgias and the Protagoras,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6, 69102
Kamtekar, R. 2005. “The Profession of Friendship: Callicles, Democratic Politics, and the Rhetorical Education in Plato’s Gorgias,” Ancient Philosophy 25, 319–39
Kerferd, G. B. 1953. “Protagoras’ Doctrine of Justice and Virtue in the ‘Protagoras’ of Plato,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 73, 4245
Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Klosko, G. 1979. “Towards a Consistent Interpretation of the Protagoras,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61, 125–42
Korsgaard, C. 1983. “Two Distinctions in Goodness,” Philosophical Review 92, 169–95
Kraut, R. 1992. “The Defense of Justice in Plato’s Republic,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, 311–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Makin, S. 1990–91. “An Ancient Principle about Causation,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91, 135–52
McCoy, M. B. 1998. “Protagoras on Human Nature, Wisdom, and the Good: The Great Speech and the Hedonism of Plato’s Protagoras,” Ancient Philosophy 18, 2139
McKim, R. 1988. “Shame and Truth in Plato’s Gorgias,” in Griswold, C. L. (ed.), Platonic Writings, Platonic Readings, 3448. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall
McKirahan, R. D. 1984. “Socrates and Protagoras on ΣΩΦΡΟΣΥΝΗ and Justice,” Apeiron 18, 1925
Moss, J. 2005. “Shame, Pleasure, and the Divided Soul,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, 137–70
Murphy, N. R. 1951. The Interpretation of Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Nill, M. 1985. Morality and Self-Interest in Protagoras, Antiphon, and Democritus. Leiden: E. J. Brill
North, H. 1966. Sophrosyne. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Nussbaum, M. C. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
O’Brien, M. 1961. “The ‘Fallacy’ in Protagoras 349d–350c,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 92, 408–17
Okin, S. M. 1977. “Philosopher Queens and Private Wives: Plato on Women and the Family,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, 345–69
Penner, T. 1973. “The Unity of Virtue,” Philosophical Review 82, 3568
Penner, T. 1988. “Socrates on the Impossibility of Belief-Relative Sciences,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 3, 263325
Penner, T. 1991. “Desire and Power in Socrates: The Argument of Gorgias 466a–468e that Orators and Tyrants have No Power in the City,” Apeiron 24, 147202
Penner, T. 1992. “Socrates and the Early Dialogues,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, 121–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Reeve, C. D. C. 2004. Plato: Republic. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company
Reshotko, N. 2006. Socratic Virtue: Making the Best of the Neither-Good-Nor-Bad. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
Robinson, T. M. 2003. “Protagoras, the Protagoras, and the Dissoi Logoi,” in Havliček, A. and Karfic, F. (eds.), Plato’s Protagoras: Proceedings of the Third Symposium Platonicum Pragense, 233–45. Prague: OIKYMENH Publishers
Rudebusch, G. 1999. Socrates, Pleasure, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Russell, D. C. 2000. “Protagoras and Socrates on Courage and Pleasure: Protagoras 349d ad finem,” Ancient Philosophy 20, 311–38
Russell, D. C. 2005. Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Sauppe, H. 1892. Plato: Protagoras. Boston, MA: Ginn and Company
Shaw, J. C. 2011. “Socrates and the True Political Craft,” Classical Philology 106, 187207
Singpurwalla, R. G. K. 2013. “Why Spirit is the Natural Ally of Reason: Spirit, Reason, and the Fine in Plato’s Republic,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 44, 4165
Smyth, H. W. 1984. Greek Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Sprague, R. K. 1976. Plato’s Philosopher-King: A Study of the Philosophical Background. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
Stokes, M. C. 1990. “Some Pleasures of Plato, Republic IX,” Polis 9, 251
Sullivan, J. P. 1961. “The Hedonism of Plato’s Protagoras,” Phronesis 6, 1028
Taylor, C. C. W. 1991. Plato: Protagoras. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Taylor, C. C. W. 2003. “The Hedonism of the Protagoras Reconsidered,” in Havliček, A. and Karfic, F. (eds.), Plato’s Protagoras: Proceedings of the Third Symposium Platonicum Pragense, 148–64. Prague: OIKYMENH Publishers
Vlastos, G. 1956. “Introduction,” in Plato’s Protagoras, Ostwald, M. (trans.), viilvi. New York: Bobbs-Merrill
Vlastos, G. 1969. “Socrates on Acrasia,” Phoenix 23, 7188
Vlastos, G. 1981. Platonic Studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Vlastos, G. 1991. Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Vlastos, G. 1994. Socratic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Weiss, R. 1985. “Courage, Confidence, and Wisdom in the Protagoras,” Ancient Philosophy 5, 1124
Weiss, R. 1989. “The Hedonic Calculus in the Protagoras and the Phaedo,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27, 511–29
Weiss, R. 1998. Socrates Dissatisfied. Oxford: Oxford University Press
White, N. P. 1979. A Companion to Plato’s Republic. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company
White, N. P. 1985. “Rational Prudence in Plato’s Gorgias,” in O’Meara, D. (ed.), Platonic Investigations, 139–62. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press
Wilberding, J. 2004. “Prisoners and Puppeteers in the Cave,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27, 117–39
Wolfsdorf, D. 2006. “Courage and Knowledge at Protagoras 349e1–351b2,” Classical Quarterly 56, 436–44
Woolf, R. 2000. “Callicles and Socrates: Psychic Disharmony in the Gorgias,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18, 140
Zeyl, D. J. 1980. “Socrates and Hedonism: Protagoras 351b–358d,” Phronesis 25, 250–69
Zeyl, D. J. 1987. Plato: Gorgias. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.