Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T09:47:47.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

On the Mathematical Representation of Spacetime: A Case Study in Historical–Phenomenological Desedimentation

from Discussion

Joseph Cosgrove
Affiliation:
Providence College
Burt Hopkins
Affiliation:
Seattle University
John Drummond
Affiliation:
Fordham University
Get access

Summary

Abstract: This essay is a contribution to the historical phenomenology of science, taking as its point of departure Husserl's later philosophy of science and Jacob Klein's seminal work on the emergence of the symbolic conception of number in European mathematics during the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Since neither Husserl nor Klein applied their ideas to actual theories of modern mathematical physics, this essay attempts to do so through a case study of the concept of “spacetime.” In §1, I sketch Klein's account of the emergence of the symbolic conception of number, beginning with Vieta in the late sixteenth century. In §2, through a series of historical illustrations, I show how the principal impediment to assimilating the new symbolic algebra to mathematical physics, namely, the dimensionless character of symbolic number, is overcome via the translation of the traditional language of ratio and proportion into the symbolic language of equations. In §§3–4, I critically examine the concept of “Minkowski spacetime,” specifically, the purported analogy between the Pythagorean distance formula and the Minkowski “spacetime interval.” Finally, in §5, I address the question of whether the concept of Minkowski spacetime is, as generally assumed, indispensable to Einstein's general theory of relativity.

Keywords: spacetime; Edmund Husserl; Albert Einstein; Jacob Klein; Minkowski; symbolic mathematics; relativity.

“The only reason he [the relativist] can do his calculations is because he first stripped his datum of any qualitative character and considered it as an abstract number.”

Émile Meyerson, The Relativistic Deduction

Einstein's popular exposition of the theory of relativity includes a humorous characterization of the process of setting up a Cartesian coordinate grid.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Acumen Publishing
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×