Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:25:57.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Are the different hypotheses on the emergence of life as different as they seem?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Mark A. Bedau
Affiliation:
Reed College, Oregon
Carol E. Cleland
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The scientific field devoted to the study of the origin of life is characterized by its high degree of controversy. Disagreement among the active participants in research seems to run very deep and relate to the most basic features of the various models proposed. This probably stems from the relative novelty of the field, from its interdisciplinary nature which brings together scientists who use different methodological and theoretical categories, and above all, from the inevitable speculative dimension of the subject. Despite this pronounced division, there is a most basic common denominator which binds together all researchers of the emergence of life. This common element, which I will coin “the continuity thesis,” is the assumption that there is no unbridgeable gap between inorganic matter and living systems, and that under suitable physical conditions the emergence of life is highly probable. It is the adoption of the “continuity thesis,” concerning the philosophical dimension of life-matter relationship, which has turned the origin of life into a legitimate scientific question, and which constitutes a necessary condition for any scientific research in this domain.

The “thesis” is reflected in the different researchers' attempts to base the emergence of the biological features of self-organized systems upon universal physical principles and the physico-chemical properties of these systems. I claim that the continuity thesis, which is a philosophical presupposition, though strengthened by research in the field, is not derived from it.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Nature of Life
Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science
, pp. 137 - 156
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartel, D. P. & Szostak, J. W. (1993). Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences. Science, 261, 1411–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, J. D. (1965). Discussion. In Fox, S. W. (Ed.), The origin of prebiological systems and of their molecular matrices (pp. 65–88). New York: Academic Press.
Bresch, C., Neisert, H., & Harnasch, D. (1980). Hypercycles, parasites and packages. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 85, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns-Smith, A. G. (1985). Seven clues to the origin of life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Crick, F. (1981). Life itself. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Crick, F. & Orgel, L. E. (1973). Directed panspermia. Icarus, 19, 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. London: Penguin.
Duve, C. (1991). Blueprint for a cell. Burlington, NC: Neil Patterson.
Depew, D. J. & Weber, B. H. (1988). Consequences of nonequilibrium thermodynamics for the Darwinian tradition. In Webber, B. H., Depew, D. J., and Smith, J. D. (Eds.), Entropy, information, and evolution (pp. 317–354). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dyson, F. (1985). Origins of life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Eigen, M. (1971). Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschafien, 58, 465–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigen, M. (1992). Steps towards life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eigen, M. (1993). Viral quasispecies. Scientific American, July, 42–49.CrossRef
Eigen, M. & Schuster, P. (1977). The hypercycle, part A: The emergence of the hypercycle. Naturwissenschafien, 64, 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigen, M. & Schuster, P. (1978). The hypercycle, part C: The realistic hypercycle. Naturwissenschafien, 65, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, J. (1974). The spontaneous generation controversy from Descartes to Oparin. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Fox, S. W. (1980). Life from an orderly cosmos. Naturwissenschaften, 67, 576–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, S. W. (1984). Proteinoid experiments and evolutionary theory. In Ho, M. W. and Saunders, P. T. (Eds.), Beyond neo-Darwinism (pp. 15–60). London: Academic Press.
Fox, S. W. & Dose, K. (1972). Molecular evolution and the origin of life. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Gesteland, R. F. & Atkins, J. F. (Eds.) (1993). The RNA world. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press.
Goldlanskii, V. L. & Kuzmin, V. V. (1989). Spontaneous breaking of mirror symmetry in nature and the origin of life. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 32, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful life. New York: W. W. Norton.
Gribbin, J. (1993). In the beginning. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
Haldane, J. S. (1921). Mechanism, life and personality. London: John Murray.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1967). The origins of life. In Bernal, J. D., The origin of life (pp. 242–249). London: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.
Hoyle, F. & Wickramasinghe, N. C. (1981). Evolution from space. London: Dent & Sons.
Hoyle, F. & Wickramasinghe, N. C. (1993). Our place in the cosmos. London: J. M. Dent.
Hull, D. L. (1988). Introduction. In Weber, B. H., Depew, D. J., and Smith, J. D. (Eds.), Entropy, information, and evolution (pp. 1–8). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Joyce, G. F. (1989). RNA evolution and the origins of life. Nature, 338, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamminga, H. (1982). Life from space—a history of panspermia. Vistas in Astronomy, 267, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamminga, H. (1986). The protoplasm and the gene. In Cairns-Smith, A. G. and Hartman, H. (Eds.), Clay minerals and the origin of life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment, trans. Pluhar, W. S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kauffman, S. A. (1991). Antichaos and adaptation. Scientific American, August, 78–84.CrossRef
Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keosian, J. (1974). Life's beginnings—origin or evolution. Origins of Life, 5, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, M. (1983). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Küppers, B.-O. (1990). Information and the origin of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lehninger, A. L. (1970). Biochemistry. New York: Worth.
Maynard Smith, J. (1986). The problems of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mayr, E. (1974). Teleological and teleonomic, a new analysis. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 14, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Monod, J. (1974). Chance and necessity. Glasgow: Collins Publishing; Fontana Books.
Mora, P. T. (1965). The folly of probability. In Fox, S. W. (Ed.), The origin of prebiological systems and of their molecular matrices (pp. 39–52). New York: Academic Press.
Morowitz, H. J. (1992). Beginnings of cellular life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Oparin, A. I. (1961). The origin of life, trans. Morgolis, S.. New York: Macmillan.
Oparin, A. I. (1967). Genesis and evolutionary development of life, trans. Maas, E.. New York: Academic Press.
Oparin, A. I. (1972). Forward. In Fox, S. W. and Dose, K., Molecular evolution. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Orgel, L. E. (1968). Evolution of the genetic apparatus. Journal of Molecular Biology, 38, 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1974). Reduction and the incompleteness of science. In Ayala, F. and Dobzhansky, T. (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of biology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Popper, K. (1982). The open universe: An argument for indeterminism. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rood, R. T. & Trefil, J. S. (1981). Are we alone?New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Shapiro, R. (1986). Origins. Toronto: Bantam Books.
Toulmin, S. & Goodfield, J. (1982). The architecture of matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Waldrop, M. M. (1990). Spontaneous order, evolution and life. Science, 247, 1543–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, B. H., Depew, D. J., & Smith, J. D. (Eds.) (1988). Entropy, information, and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Weber, B. H., Depew, D. J., Dyke, C., et al. (1989). Evolution in thermodynamic perspective: An ecological approach. Biology and Philosophy, 4, 373–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, A. M. & Maizels, N. (1991). The genomic tag model for the origin of protein synthesis. In Osawa, S. and Honjo, T. (Eds.), Evolution of life (pp. 51–65). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
Wicken, J. (1987). Evolution, thermodynamics and information. New York: Stanford University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×