Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.Google Scholar

Arlin, P. K. (1975). Cognitive development in adulthood: A fifth stage? Developmental Psychology, 11, 602–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arreola, N. J., and Reiter-Palmon, R. (2016). The effect of problem construction creativity on solution creativity across multiple everyday problems. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 183–193.Google Scholar

Bagozzi, R. P., and Dholakia, U. M. (2005). Three roles of past experience in goal setting and goal striving. In The routines of decision making, edited by Betsch, T. and Haberstroh, S., 21–38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 63–75.Google Scholar

Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., and Vega, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benedek, M., Nordtvedt, N., Jauk, E., Koschmieder, C., Pretsch, J., Krammer, G., and Neubauer, A. C. (2016). Assessment of creativity evaluation skills: A psychometric investigation in prospective teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 75–84.Google Scholar

Berg, J. M. (2016). Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, C. S., and Mumford, M. D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 197–222.Google Scholar

Botella, M., Zenasni, F., and Lubart, T. (2011). A dynamic and ecological approach to the artistic creative process of arts students: An empirical contribution. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 29(1), 7–38.Google Scholar

Crockett, L. W. (2016). The critical 21st century skills every student needs and why. http://globaldigitalcitizen.org/21st-century-skills-every-student-needs.Google Scholar

Cronin, M. A., and Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 761–773.Google Scholar

Cropley, A. J. (1990). Creativity and mental health in everyday life. Creativity Research Journal, 3(3), 167–178.Google Scholar

Diedrich, J., Benedek, M., Jauk, E., and Neubauer, A. C. (2015). Are creative ideas novel and useful? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 35–40.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(2), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faure, C. (2004). Beyond brainstorming: Effects of different group procedures on selection of ideas and satisfaction with the process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 13–34.Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In The handbook of creativity, edited by Sternberg, R. J., 273–292. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., and Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., and Lubart, T. (2012). The creative process in visual art: A longitudinal multivariate study. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 283–295.Google Scholar

Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., and Lubart, T. (2017). An experimental study of the creative process in writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 202–215.Google Scholar

Getzels, J. W., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). From problem-solving to problem finding. In Perspectives in creativity, edited by Taylor, I. A. and Getzels, J. W., 90–116. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Getzels, J. W., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 36(1), 96–98.Google Scholar

Gick, M. L., and Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1–38.Google Scholar

Girotra, K., Terwiesch, C., and Ulrich, K. T. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science, 56(4), 591–605.Google Scholar

Gish, L., and Clausen, C. (2013). The framing of product ideas in the making: A case study of the development of an energy saving pump. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(9), 1085–1101.Google Scholar

Goh, K. T., Goodman, P. S., and Weingart, L. R. (2013). Team innovation processes: An examination of activity cycles in creative project teams. Small Group Research, 44(2), 159–194.Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Harris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., and Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelligence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 237–244.Google Scholar

Harris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., and Ligon, G. S. (2014). Construction or demolition: Does problem construction influence the ethicality of creativity? In The ethics of creativity, edited by Moran, S., Cropley, D., and Kaufman, J. C., 170–186. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Harvey, S., and Kou, C. Y. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386.Google Scholar

Hennessey, B. A., and Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598.Google Scholar

Herman, A., and Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 13.Google Scholar

Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Mental models in problem solving. In Tutorials in learning and memory: Essays in honor of Gordon Bower, edited by Anderson, J. R. and Kosslyn, S. M., 193–218. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Hornberg, J., and Reiter-Palmon, R. (2017). Personality and the Big Five personality traits: Is the relationship dependent on the creativity measure? In The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research, edited by Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., and Kaufman, J. C., 275–294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Johnson, P., Daniels, K., and Huff, A. (2001). Sense making, leadership, and mental models. In The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today's leaders, edited by Zaccaro, S. J., and Klimoski, R. J., 79–103. USA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., and Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83–91.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., and Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 332–340.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., and Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., and Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R A., and Watson, C. (2016). Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 394–399.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Niu, W., Sexton, J. D., and Cole, J. C. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Differences across ethnicity and gender in evaluating creative work. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(2), 496–511.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., and Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Kennel, V., and Reiter-Palmon, R. (2012). Teams and creativity: Accuracy in idea evaluation and selection. Paper presented at the 120th American Psychological Association Conference, Orlando, FL, August.Google Scholar

Larey, T. S., and Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 175–184.Google Scholar

Leonardi, P. M. (2011). Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organization Science, 22(2), 347–369.Google Scholar

Licuanan, B. F., Dailey, L. R., and Mumford, M. D. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., and Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 231–246.Google Scholar

Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308.Google Scholar

Lubart, T. I. (2009). In search of the writer's creative process. In The psychology of creative writing, edited by Kaufman, S. B. and Kaufman, J. C., 149–165. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ma, H. H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 30–42.Google Scholar

McFeely, S. M., Reiter-Palmon, R., Ligon, G., and Schoenbeck, M. (2016). Differential effects of creativity rater training on quality and originality. Poster presented at the 31st annual Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology Meeting, Anaheim, CA, April.Google Scholar

Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., and Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76(10), 1–21.Google Scholar

Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., and Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullen, B., Johnson, C., and Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1), 3–23.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., and Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: Problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 63–76.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Feldman, J. M., Hein, M. B., and Nagao, D. J. (2001). Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: Individual versus group performance in creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., and Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Lonergan, D. C., and Scott, G. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 22(1), 21–30.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., and Johnson, J. F. (1998). Domain-based scoring in divergent-thinking tests: Validation evidence in an occupational sample. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., and Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., and Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity, edited by Runco, M. A.. New York: Ablex.Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Baughman, W. A., Costanza, D. P., and Threlfall, K. V. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: V. overall prediction. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., and Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9(1), 45–53.Google Scholar

Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination, principles and procedures of creative thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Paletz, S. B., and Peng, K. (2009). Problem finding and contradiction: Examining the relationship between naive dialectical thinking, ethnicity, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 139–151.Google Scholar

Putman, V. L., and Paulus, P. B. (2009). Brainstorming, brainstorming rules and decision making. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), 29–40.Google Scholar

Ray, D. K., and Romano, N. C. (2013). Creative problem solving in GSS groups: Do creative styles matter? Group Decision and Negotiation, 1(29).Google Scholar

Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., and Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120–151.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R. (2017). The effect of problem construction on team process and creativity. Paper presented at the 12th annual conference for INGroup, St. Louis, MO, July.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Beghetto, R., and Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Looking at creativity through the business-psychology-education (BPE) lens: The challenge and benefits of listening to each other. In Creativity research: An interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research handbook, edited by Shiu, E., 9–30. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Herman, A. E., and Yammarino, F. (2008). Creativity and cognitive processes: A multi-level linkage between individual and team cognition. In Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation, edited by Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., and Bedell-Avers, K. E., 7:203–267. Copenhagen: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., and Hullsiek, B. (2010). The role of creativity in JDM. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3(1), 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Kennel, V., de Vreede, T., and de Vreede, G. J. (forthcoming). Structuring team idea evaluation and selection of solution: Does it influence creativity? In Palgrave handbook of social creativity research, edited by Lebuda, I. and Glăvenou, V.. New York: Palgrave Press.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., and McFeely, S. (2017). The effect of paradoxical and convergent thinking during problem construction on creative problem solving. Paper presented at the 125th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., O'Connor Boes, J., and Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 9–23.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., and Threlfall, V. K. (1998). Solving everyday problems creatively: The role of problem construction and personality type. Creativity Research Journal, 11(3), 187–197.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., and Robinson, E. J. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., Morral-Robinson, E., Hullsiek, B., Arreola, N., and Crough, D. (2011). Team cognition and creativity: The case of problem construction. Poster presented at the 1st Israel Organizational Behavior Conference, Tel-Aviv, Israel, December.Google Scholar

Richards, R. (Ed.). (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., and Stroebe, W. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 244–251.Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., and Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 47–68.Google Scholar

Rostan, S. M. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 97–110.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1999). Tests of creativity. In Encyclopedia of creativity, edited by Runco, M. A. and Pritzker, S., appendix, pp. 755–760. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Basadur, M. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2(3), 166–173.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(1), 213–221.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., and Lim, W. (2000). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 391–398.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 295–302.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., and Vega, L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children's ideas. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(5), 439–452.Google Scholar

Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., and Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem-solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 523–538.Google Scholar

Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., and Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388.Google Scholar

Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41(3), 146–164.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., and Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 79–85.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., and Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 1–16.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 50–67.Google Scholar

Sullivan, D. M., and Ford, C. M. (2005). The relationship between novelty and value in the assessment of organizational creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 117–131.Google Scholar

Tomasco, S. (2010). IBM 2010 global CEO study: Creativity selected as most crucial factor for future success. May. www.03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/31670.wss.Google Scholar

Vernon, D., and Hocking, I. (2016). Beyond belief: Structured techniques prove more effective than a placebo intervention in a problem construction task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 153–159.Google Scholar

Voss, J. F., Wolfe, C. R., Lawrence, J. A., and Engle, R. A. (1991). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms, edited by Sternberg, R. J. and Frensch, P. A., 119–158. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Weingart, L. R., Cronin, M. A., Houser, C. J. S., Cagan, J., and Vogel, C. M. (2005). Functional diversity and conflict in cross-functional product development teams: Considering representational gaps and task characteristics. In Understanding teams, edited by Neider, L. L. and Schriesheim, C. A., 89–110. Greenwich, CT: IAP.Google Scholar

Weingart, L. R., Todorova, G., and Cronin, M. A. (2008). Representational gaps, team integration and team creativity: The mediating roles of conflict and coordination. Paper presented at the meeting of Carnegie Melon University Research Showcase, Pittsburg, PA, March.Google Scholar

Wigert, B. G. (2013). The influence of divergent and convergent problem construction processes on creative problem solving. Doctoral dissertation retrieved from Proquest (3604561).Google Scholar

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., and Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.Google Scholar

Yang, C. C., Wan, C. S., and Chiou, W. B. (2010). Dialectical thinking and creativity among young adults: A postformal operations perspective. Psychological Reports, 106(1), 79–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Song, L. J., and Wu, J. (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 180–202.Google Scholar