Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:02:00.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Creativity across the Seven Cs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2018

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbot, B., Besançon, M., and Lubart, T. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education 3–13, 43(4), 371381.Google Scholar
Barbot, B., Besançon, M., and Lubart, T. (2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besançon, M., and Lubart, T. I. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 381389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besançon, M., and Lubart, T. I. (2015). La créativité de l'enfant (Children's creativity). Bruxelles: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Besançon, M., Lubart, T., and Barbot, B. (2013). Creative giftedness and educational opportunities. Educational and Child Psychology, 30(2), 7988.Google Scholar
Botella, M., Glăveanu, V., Zenasni, F., Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Wolff, M., and Lubart, T. (2013). How artists create: Creative process and multivariate factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 161170.Google Scholar
Botella, M., and Lubart, T. (2016). Creative processes: Art, design and science. In Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking, edited by Corazza, G. and Agnoli, S., 5365. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Botella, M., Zenasni, F., and Lubart, T. (2011). A dynamic and ecological approach to the artistic creative process of arts students: An empirical contribution. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 29(1), 1738.Google Scholar
Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Glăveanu, V., Botella, M., Guillou, K., De Biasi, P. M., and Lubart, T. (2014). The creativity maze: Exploring creativity in screenplay writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 384399.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J.-M., and Lubart, T. (2010). Creativity in the age of emerging technology: Some issues and perspectives in 2010. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 160166.Google Scholar
Caroff, X., and Lubart, T. I. (2012). Multidimensional approach to detecting creative potential in managers. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 1320.Google Scholar
Decotter, D., Burkhardt, J.-M., Lubart, T., and Gonguet, A. (2017). The technology probe approach to support latent need analysis and creativity in design. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., and Lubart, T. (2014). Decentering the creative self: How others make creativity possible in creative professional fields. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 2943.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., de Biaisi, P.-M., Desainte-Catherine, M., Georgsdottir, A., Guillou, K., Kurtag, G., Mouchiroud, C., Storme, M., Wojtczuk, A., and Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: Findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 176.Google Scholar
Guegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N., and Segonds, F. (2016). Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 165175.Google Scholar
Guegan, J., Nelson, J., and Lubart, T. (2017). The relationship between contextual cues in virtual environments and creative processes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 202206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubart, T. I. (1990). Creativity and cross-cultural variation. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 3959.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Componential models of creativity. In Encyclopedia of creativity, edited by Runco, M. A. and Pritzer, S., 295300. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2000). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295308.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2005). How can computers be partners in the creative process? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 365369.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2009) Creative writing process. In Psychology of creative writing, edited by Kaufman, J. and Kaufman, S., 149165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives on creativity. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity, edited by Kaufman, J. C. and Sternberg, R. J., 265278. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2017). The 7 C's of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior. 51(4), 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (Ed.). (forthcoming). The creative process across five domains. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., Besançon, M., and Barbot, B. (2011). EPoC: Evaluation of potential creativity. Paris: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Lubart, T., Botella, M., Caroff, X., Mouchiroud, C., Nelson, J., and Zenasni, F. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Homo creativus. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., and Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 285301.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., Glaveanu, V., Storme, M., Camargo, A. and de Vries, H. (forthcoming). Creativity from a cultural perspective. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity, 2nd ed., edited by Sternberg, R. J. and Kaufman, J. C.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., and Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité [Psychology of creativity]. 2nd ed. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., Pacteau, C., Jaquet, A. Y., and Caroff, X. (2010). Children's creative potential: An empirical study of measurement issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 388392.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., and Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In The creative cognition approach, edited by Smith, S., Ward, T., and Finke, R., 271302. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., Zenasni, F., and Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal of Talent Development and Creativity, 1(2), 4151.Google Scholar
Mouchiroud, C., and Lubart, T. I. (2001). Children's original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162(4), 382401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puccio, G., Firestien, R. L., Coyle, C., and Masucci, C. (2006). A review of the effectiveness of CPS training: A focus on workplace issues. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 1933.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305310.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., and Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 131.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., and Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Storme, M., and Lubart, T. (2012). Conceptions of creativity and relations with judges’ intelligence and personality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2), 138149.Google Scholar
Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Celik, P., and Lubart, T. (2014). Learning to judge creativity: The underlying mechanisms in creativity training for non-expert judges. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 1925.Google Scholar
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., and Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture's consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405439.Google Scholar
Tavani, J.-L., Caroff, X., Storme, M., and Collange, J. (2016). Familiarity and liking for music: The moderating effect of creative potential and what predict the market value. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 197203.Google Scholar
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×