Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:20:56.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Inhibition of translation initiation by a microRNA

from II - MicroRNA functions and RNAi-mediated pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

David T. Humphreys
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Program Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst Sidney, NSW 2010 Australia
Belinda J. Westman
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Program Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst Sidney, NSW 2010 Australia
David I. K. Martin
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Program Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst Sidney, NSW 2010 Australia
Thomas Preiss
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Program Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst Sidney, NSW 2010 Australia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (∼22 nt) regulatory RNAs that are processed from stem-loop-forming precursor transcripts (Bartel, 2004; He and Hannon, 2004; Meister and Tuschl, 2004). In recent years, they have become the subject of intensive research, which quickly amassed a wealth of information on their biogenesis, function and significance for gene regulation. It also became apparent that miRNAs are an abundant class of gene regulators. The miRBase database (Release 7.1) lists 3424 miRNA sequence entries from various metazoa, plants and some viruses. Entries for intensely studied organisms number in the hundreds of distinct miRNA sequences, many of which exhibit phylogenetic conservation (Griffiths-Jones, 2004). Bioinformatic analyses predict that each miRNA will target multiple mRNAs (Lewis et al., 2003; Bartel, 2004; Lai, 2004; Brennecke et al., 2005; Krek et al., 2005), suggesting that, collectively, these novel gene regulators affect the expression of large portions of the cellular transcriptome. The biological significance of miRNAs is further corroborated by studies of individual examples, reporting their roles in diverse cellular and developmental pathways (see Brennecke et al., 2003; Johnston and Hobert, 2003; Xu et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2005).

The miRNAs assemble into RNA–protein complexes, usually termed miRNP or RISC (for RNA-induced silencing complex). Different purification schemes have identified a number of resident proteins of miRNP/RISC complexes, with a member of the Argonaute (Ago) protein family consistently found in each preparation (Mourelatos et al., 2002; Dostie et al., 2003; Jin et al., 2004; Chendrimada et al., 2005; Meister et al., 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
MicroRNAs
From Basic Science to Disease Biology
, pp. 85 - 101
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambros, V. (2004). The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature, 431, 350–355.Google Scholar
Andrei, M. A., Ingelfinger, D., Heintzmann, R.et al. (2005). A role for eIF4E and eIF4E-transporter in targeting mRNPs to mammalian processing bodies. RNA, 11, 717–727.Google Scholar
Bagga, S., Bracht, J., Hunter, S.et al. (2005). Regulation by let-7 and lin-4 miRNAs results in target mRNA degradation. Cell, 122, 553–563.Google Scholar
Bartel, D. P. (2004). MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell, 116, 281–297.Google Scholar
Bergamini, G., Preiss, T. and Hentze, M. W. (2000). Picornavirus IRESes and the poly(A) tail jointly promote cap-independent translation in a mammalian cell-free system. RNA, 6, 1781–190.Google Scholar
Brengues, M., Teixeira, D. and Parker, R. (2005). Movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science, 310, 486–489.Google Scholar
Brennecke, J., Hipfner, D. R., Stark, A., Russell, R. B. and Cohen, S. M. (2003). Bantam encodes a developmentally regulated microRNA that controls cell proliferation and regulates the proapoptotic gene hid in Drosophila. Cell, 113, 25–36.Google Scholar
Brennecke, J., Stark, A., Russell, R. B. and Cohen, S. M. (2005). Principles of microRNA-target recognition. Public Library of Science Biology, 3, e85.Google Scholar
Chen, C. Z., Li, L., Lodish, H. F. and Bartel, D. P. (2004). MicroRNAs modulate hematopoietic lineage differentiation. Science, 303, 83–86.Google Scholar
Chendrimada, T. P., Gregory, R. I., Kumaraswamy, E.et al. (2005). TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature, 436, 740–774.Google Scholar
Chendrimada, T. P., Finn, K. J., Ji, X.et al. (2007). MicroRNA silencing through RISC recruitment of eIF6. Nature, 447, 823–829.Google Scholar
Cho, P. F., Poulin, F., Cho-Park, Y. A.et al. (2005). A new paradigm for translational control: inhibition via 5′-3′ mRNA tethering by Bicoid and the eIF4E cognate 4EHP. Cell, 121, 411–423.Google Scholar
Coller, J. and Parker, R. (2005). General translational repression by activators of mRNA decapping. Cell, 122, 875–886.Google Scholar
Cougot, N., Babajko, S. and Seraphin, B. (2004). Cytoplasmic foci are sites of mRNA decay in human cells. Journal of Cell Biology, 165, 31–40.Google Scholar
Cullen, B. R. (2004). Derivation and function of small interfering RNAs and microRNAs. Virus Res, 102, 3–9.Google Scholar
Doench, J. G. and Sharp, P. A. (2004). Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression. Genes & Development, 18, 504–511.Google Scholar
Doench, J. G., Petersen, C. P. and Sharp, P. A. (2003). siRNAs can function as miRNAs. Genes & Development, 17, 438–442.Google Scholar
Dostie, J., Mourelatos, Z., Yang, M., Sharma, A. and Dreyfuss, G. (2003). Numerous microRNPs in neuronal cells containing novel microRNAs. RNA, 9, 180–186.Google Scholar
Ferraiuolo, M. A., Basak, S., Dostie, J.et al. (2005). A role for the eIF4E-binding protein 4E-T in P-body formation and mRNA decay. Journal of Cell Biology, 170, 913–924.Google Scholar
Gallie, D. R. (1991). The cap and poly(A) tail function synergistically to regulate mRNA translational efficiency. Genes & Development, 5, 2108–2116.Google Scholar
Gebauer, F. and Hentze, M. W. (2004). Molecular mechanisms of translational control. Nature Review of Molecular and Cell Biology, 5, 827–835.Google Scholar
Griffiths-Jones, S. (2004). The microRNA Registry. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, D109–111.Google Scholar
He, L. and Hannon, G. J. (2004). MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nature Review Genetics, 5, 522–531.Google Scholar
Hellen, C. U. and Sarnow, P. (2001). Internal ribosome entry sites in eukaryotic mRNA molecules. Genes & Development, 15, 1593–1612.Google Scholar
Humphreys, D. T., Westman, B. J., Martin, D. I. and Preiss, T. (2005). MicroRNAs control translation initiation by inhibiting eukaryotic initiation factor 4E/cap and poly(A) tail function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 16 961–16 966.Google Scholar
Iizuka, N., Najita, L., Franzusoff, A. and Sarnow, P. (1994). Cap-dependent and cap-independent translation by internal initiation of mRNAs in cell extracts prepared from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Cell Biology, 14, 7322–7330.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. J. (2000). Comparative view of initiation site selection mechanisms. In Translational Control of Gene Expression, Sonenberg, N. and Mathews, M. B. (eds.). Cold Spring Harbor, pp. 127–184.
Jakymiw, A., Lian, S., Eystathioy, T.et al. (2005). Disruption of GW bodies impairs mammalian RNA interference. Nature Cell Biology, 7, 1167–1174.Google Scholar
Jin, P., Zarnescu, D. C., Ceman, S.et al. (2004). Biochemical and genetic interaction between the fragile X mental retardation protein and the microRNA pathway. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 113–117.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. J. and Hobert, O. (2003). A microRNA controlling left/right neuronal asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 426, 845–849.Google Scholar
Kahvejian, A., Svitkin, Y. V., Sukarieh, R., M'Boutchou, M. N. and Sonenberg, N. (2005). Mammalian poly(A)-binding protein is a eukaryotic translation initiation factor, which acts via multiple mechanisms. Genes & Development, 19, 104–113.Google Scholar
Kiriakidou, M., Tan, G. S., Lamprinaki, S.et al. (2007). An mRNA m7G Cap binding-like motif within human Ago2 represses translation. Cell, 129, 1141–1151.Google Scholar
Krek, A., Grun, D., Poy, M. N.et al. (2005). Combinatorial microRNA target predictions. Nature Genetics, 37, 495–500.Google Scholar
Ladomery, M., Wade, E. and Sommerville, J. (1997). Xp54, the Xenopus homologue of human RNA helicase p54, is an integral component of stored mRNP particles in oocytes. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 965–973.Google Scholar
Lai, E. C. (2004). Predicting and validating microRNA targets. Genome Biology, 5, 115.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. P., Shih, I. H., Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P. and Burge, C. B. (2003). Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell, 115, 787–798.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Valencia-Sanchez, M. A., Hannon, G. J. and Parker, R. (2005). MicroRNA-dependent localization of targeted mRNAs to mammalian P-bodies. Nature Cell Biology, 7, 719–723.Google Scholar
Marx, J. (2005). Molecular biology. P-bodies mark the spot for controlling protein production. Science, 310, 764–765.Google Scholar
Meister, G. and Tuschl, T. (2004). Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature, 431, 343–349.Google Scholar
Meister, G., Landthaler, M., Patkaniowska, A.et al. (2004). Human Argonaute2 mediates RNA cleavage targeted by miRNAs and siRNAs. Molecular Cell, 15, 185–197.Google Scholar
Meister, G., Landthaler, M., Peters, L.et al. (2005). Identification of novel argonaute-associated proteins. Current Biology, 15, 2149–2155.Google Scholar
Minshall, N. and Standart, N. (2004). The active form of Xp54 RNA helicase in translational repression is an RNA-mediated oligomer. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1325–1334.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, Z., Dostie, J., Paushkin, S.et al. (2002). miRNPs: a novel class of ribonucleoproteins containing numerous microRNAs. Genes & Development, 16, 720–728.Google Scholar
Nakamura, A., Amikura, R., Hanyu, K. and Kobayashi, S. (2001). Me31B silences translation of oocyte-localizing RNAs through the formation of cytoplasmic RNP complex during Drosophila oogenesis. Development, 128, 3233–3242.Google Scholar
Nakamura, A., Sato, K. and Hanyu-Nakamura, K. (2004). Drosophila cup is an eIF4E binding protein that associates with Bruno and regulates oskar mRNA translation in oogenesis. Developmental Cell, 6, 69–78.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. R., Leidal, A. M. and Smibert, C. A. (2004). Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein that functions in Smaug-mediated translational repression. European Molecular Biology Organization Journal, 23, 150–159.Google Scholar
Nottrott, S., Simard, M. J. and Richter, J. D. (2006). Human let-7a miRNA blocks protein on actively translating polyribosomes. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 13, 1108–1114.Google Scholar
Olsen, P. H. and Ambros, V. (1999). The lin-4 regulatory RNA controls developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans by blocking LIN-14 protein synthesis after the initiation of translation. Developmental Biology, 216, 671–680.Google Scholar
Ostareck, D. H., Ostareck-Lederer, A., Shatsky, I. N. and Hentze, M. W. (2001). Lipoxygenase mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: The 3′ UTR regulatory complex controls 60 S ribosomal subunit joining. Cell, 104, 281–290.Google Scholar
Pasquinelli, A. E. and Ruvkun, G. (2002). Control of developmental timing by microRNAs and their targets. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 18, 495–513.Google Scholar
Pestova, T. V. and Hellen, C. U. (2003). Translation elongation after assembly of ribosomes on the Cricket paralysis virus internal ribosomal entry site without initiation factors or initiator tRNA. Genes & Development, 17, 181–186.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. P., Bordeleau, M., Pelletier, J. and Sharp, P. A. (2006). Short RNAs Repress Translation after Initiation in Mammalian Cells. Molecular Cell, 21, 533–542.Google Scholar
Pillai, R. S., Artus, C. G. and Filipowicz, W. (2004). Tethering of human Ago proteins to mRNA mimics the miRNA-mediated repression of protein synthesis. RNA, 10, 1518–1525.Google Scholar
Pillai, R. S., Bhattacharyya, S. N., Artus, C. G.et al. (2005). Inhibition of translational initiation by Let-7 MicroRNA in human cells. Science, 309, 1573–1576.Google Scholar
Poyry, T. A., Kaminski, A. and Jackson, R. J. (2004). What determines whether mammalian ribosomes resume scanning after translation of a short upstream open reading frame? Genes & Development, 18, 62–75.Google Scholar
Preiss, T. and Hentze, M. W. (1998). Dual function of the messenger RNA cap structure in poly(A)-tail-promoted translation in yeast. Nature, 392, 516–520.Google Scholar
Preiss, T. and Hentze, M. W. (2003). Starting the protein synthesis machine: eukaryotic translation initiation. Bioessays, 25, 1201–1211.Google Scholar
Richter, J. D. and Sonenberg, N. (2005). Regulation of cap-dependent translation by eIF4E inhibitory proteins. Nature, 433, 477–480.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (2000). Physical and functional interactions between the mRNA cap structure and the poly(A) tail. In Translational Control of Gene Expression, Sonenberg, N. and Mathews, M. B. (eds.) Cold Spring Harbor, pp. 447–465.
Seggerson, K., Tang, L. and Moss, E. G. (2002). Two genetic circuits repress the Caenorhabditis elegans heterochronic gene lin-28 after translation initiation. Developmental Biology, 243, 215–225.Google Scholar
Sen, G. L. and Blau, H. M. (2005). Argonaute 2/RISC resides in sites of mammalian mRNA decay known as cytoplasmic bodies. Nature Cell Biology, 7, 633–636.Google Scholar
Sheth, U. and Parker, R. (2003). Decapping and decay of messenger RNA occur in cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science, 300, 805–808.Google Scholar
Sonenberg, N. and Dever, T. E. (2003). Eukaryotic translation initiation factors and regulators. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 13, 56–63.Google Scholar
Svitkin, Y. V., Imataka, H., Khaleghpour, K.et al. (2001). Poly(A)-binding protein interaction with elF4G stimulates picornavirus IRES-dependent translation. RNA, 7, 1743–1752.Google Scholar
Teixeira, D., Sheth, U., Valencia-Sanchez, M. A., Brengues, M. and Parker, R. (2005). Processing bodies require RNA for assembly and contain nontranslating mRNAs. RNA, 11, 371–382.Google Scholar
Thermann, R. and Hentzel, M. W. (2007). Drosophila miR2 induces pseudo-polysomes and inhibits translation initiation. Nature, 447, 875–979.Google Scholar
Wang, B., Love, T. M., Call, M. E., Doench, J. G. and Novina, C. D. (2006). Recapitulation of short RNA-directed translational gene silencing in vitro. Molecular Cell, 22, 553–560.Google Scholar
Wilczynska, A., Aigueperse, C., Kress, M., Dautry, F. and Weil, D. (2005). The translational regulator CPEB1 provides a link between dcp1 bodies and stress granules. Journal of Cell Science, 118, 981–992.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, J. E., Hilton, M., Amos, Q. and Henzel, W. J. (2003). Cup is an eIF4E binding protein required for both the translational repression of oskar and the recruitment of Barentsz. Journal of Cell Biology, 163, 1197–1204.Google Scholar
Xu, P., Vernooy, S. Y., Guo, M. and Hay, B. A. (2003). The Drosophila microRNA Mir-14 suppresses cell death and is required for normal fat metabolism. Current Biology, 13, 790–795.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, V., Piccioni, F., Villaescusa, J. C. and Verrotti, A. C. (2004). Cup is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein that interacts with the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E to modulate Drosophila ovary development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 14 800–14 805.Google Scholar
Zeng, Y. and Cullen, B. R. (2003). Sequence requirements for micro RNA processing and function in human cells. RNA, 9, 112–123.Google Scholar
Zeng, Y., Wagner, E. J. and Cullen, B. R. (2002). Both natural and designed microRNAs can inhibit the expression of cognate mRNAs when expressed in human cells. Molecular Cell, 9, 1327–1333.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Samal, E. and Srivastava, D. (2005). Serum response factor regulates a muscle-specific microRNA that targets Hand2 during cardiogenesis. Nature, 436, 214–220.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×