Book contents
- Micropolitics in the Multinational Corporation
- Micropolitics in the Multinational Corporation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figure
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations of politics, power and conflict in MNCs
- Part II Seminal contributions
- 4 Seminal contributions of the rationalistic-managerialistschool
- 5 Seminal contributions of the institutionalistand micropoliticsschools
- 6 Seminal contributions of the critical managementschool
- Part III Analytical tools and applications
- Part IV Reflections and new directions for research
- Index
- References
4 - Seminal contributions of the rationalistic-managerialistschool
from Part II - Seminal contributions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Book contents
- Micropolitics in the Multinational Corporation
- Micropolitics in the Multinational Corporation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figure
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Foundations of politics, power and conflict in MNCs
- Part II Seminal contributions
- 4 Seminal contributions of the rationalistic-managerialistschool
- 5 Seminal contributions of the institutionalistand micropoliticsschools
- 6 Seminal contributions of the critical managementschool
- Part III Analytical tools and applications
- Part IV Reflections and new directions for research
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Micropolitics in the Multinational CorporationFoundations, Applications and New Directions, pp. 123 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 802–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacharach, S. B. and Lawler, E. J. 1980. Power and Politics in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bouquet, C. and Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Managing power in the multinational corporation: how low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34(3): 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. M. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E. and Pennings, J. M. 1971. Strategic contingencies theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2): 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2): 342–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1987. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (2nd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar