Allen, J. 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. W., Madison, D. L., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A. and Mayes, B. T. 1979. Organizational politics: tactics and characteristics of its actors. California Management Review, 22(1): 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almond, P. and Ferner, A. 2006. American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations across National Borders. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bacharach, S. B. and Lawler, E. J. 1980. Power and Politics in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bacharach, S. B. and Lawler, E. J. 1981. Bargaining: Power, Tactics and Outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bacharach, S. B. and Lawler, E. J. 1998. Political alignments in organizations: contextualization, mobilization, and coordination. In Kramer, R. M. and Neale, M. A. (eds.), Power and Influence in Organizations: 67–88. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1962. Two faces of power. American Political Review, 56(4): 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1963. Decisions and non-decisions: an analytical framework. American Political Review, 57(3): 641–651.Google Scholar

Banerjee, S. B. and Prasad, A. 2008. Special issue on ‘Critical reflections on management and organizations: a postcolonial perspective’. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3).Google Scholar

Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. 2001. Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3): 216–244.Google Scholar

Battilana, J. 2006. Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5): 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. M. and Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Björkman, I. and Lervik, J. E. 2007. Transferring HR practices within multinational corporations. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(4): 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2006. Transferring value-infused organizational practices in MNCs: a conflict perspective. In Geppert, M., and Mayer, M. (eds.), Global, Local and National Practices in Multinational Companies. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 63–104.Google Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2009. Actors’ interests and local contexts in intrafirm conflict: the 2004 GM and Opel crisis. Competition and Change, 13(3): 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2012. Beyond or betwixt the lines of conflict? Biculturalism as situated identity in multinational corporations. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 8(2): 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. and Becker-Ritterspach, F. 2011. Conflict in headquarters–subsidiary relations. In Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. (eds.), Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation. Cambridge University Press, 139–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. and Dorow, W. 2003. Managing organizational politics for radical change. Journal of World Business, 38(3): 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blickle, G., Meurs, J. A., Zettler, I., Solga, J., Noethen, D., Kramer, J. and Ferris, G. R. 2008. Personality, political skill, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3): 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulding, E. K. 1962. Conflict and Defense: a General Theory. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Bouquet, C. and Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Managing power in the multinational corporation: how low power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34, 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boussebaa, M. 2015. Control in the multinational enterprise: the polycentric case of global professional service firms. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 696–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boussebaa, M., Sturdy, A. and Morgan, G. 2014. Learning from the world? Horizontal knowledge flows and geopolitics in international consulting firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(9): 1227–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, D. and Badham, R. 1999. Politics and organizational change: the lived experience. Human Relations, 52(5): 609–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, D. and Badham, R. 2008. Power, Politics, and Organizational Change: Winning the Turf Game. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buraway, M. 1979. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Burns, T. 1961. Micropolitics: mechanisms of institutional change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(3): 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappellen, T. and Janssens, M. 2010. Characteristics of international work: narratives of the global manager. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(4): 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, E. and Geppert, M. 2011. Subsidiary integration as identity construction and institution building: a political sensemaking approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clegg, S. R. 1989. Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clegg, S. R. 1990. Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World: London: Sage.Google Scholar

Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D. and Phillips, N. 2006. Power and Organizations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clemens, E. S. and Cook, J. M. 1999. Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courpasson, D. and Dany, F. 2009. Cultures of resistance in the workplace. In Clegg, S. R. and Haugaard, M. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Power. London: Sage, 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. 1980. Actors and Systems. The Politics of Collective Action. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. 1993. Die Zwänge kollektiven Handelns. Über Macht und Organisation. Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. 1959. A behavioral theory of organizational objectives. In Haire, M. (ed.), Modern Organization Theory. New York: Wiley, 76–90.Google Scholar

Dahrendorf, R. 1988. The Modern Social Conflict: an Essay on the Politics of Liberty. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. 1992. The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: a self-determination theory perspective. In Renninger, A., Hidi, S. and Krapp, A. (eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 43–70.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. 2000. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11: 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diehl, P. F. 2006. Just a phase? Integrating conflict dynamics over time. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 23: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dlugos, G. 1993. Towards the business politics approach and the field of research. In Dlugos, G., Dorow, W. and Farrell, D. (eds.), Organizational Politics. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dlugos, G., Dorow, W. and Farrell, D. 1993. Organizational Politics. Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Gammelgaard, J. 2011. Subsidiary power in multinational corporations: the subtle role of micro-political bargaining power. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(1): 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2009. A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France. European Management Journal, 27(2): 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowding, K. 2009. Rational choice approaches. In Clegg, S. R. and Haugaard, M. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Power. London: Sage, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drory, A. and Romm, T. 1990. The definition of organizational politics: a review. Human Relations, 43: 1133–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4): 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, D. and Petersen, J. C. 1982. Patterns of political behavior in organization. Academy of Management Review, 7(3): 403–412.Google Scholar

Ferner, A., Almond, P., Clark, I., Colling, T., Edwards, T., Holden, L. and Müller-Carmen, M. 2004. The dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources: case-study evidence from US MNCs in the UK. Organization Studies, 25(3): 363–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Galang, M. C., Zhou, J., Kacmar, M. and Howard, J. L. 1996. Perceptions of organizational politics: prediction, stress-related implications, and outcomes. Human Relations, 49(2): 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., Douglas, C., Blass, F. R., Kolodinsky, R. and Treadway, D. C. 2002. Social influence processes in organizations and human resource systems. In Ferris, G., and Marmocchio, J. J. (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 21. Stanford, CA: Elsevier, 65–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferris, G. R., Russ, G. S. and Fandt, P. M. 1989. Politics in organizations. In Giacalone, R. A. and Rosenfield, P. (eds.), Impression Management in the Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 143–170.Google Scholar

Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Brouer, R., Perrewe, P. L., Douglas, C. and Lux, S. 2007. Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 290–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, P. and Spicer, A. 2014. Power in management and organization science. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 237–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Toronto: Random House.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4): 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1988. Technologies of the Self: a Seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. and Gordon, C. (eds.). 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. 1960. The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. and Zander, A. (eds.), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd edn. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company, 607–623.Google Scholar

Frenkel, M. 2008. The multinational corporation as a third space: rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 924–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedberg, E. 1992. Zur Politologie von Organisationen. In Küpper, W. and Ortmann, G. (eds.), Mikropolitik, 2nd edn. Opladen: VS VerlagfürSozialwissenschaften, 39–52.Google Scholar

Friedberg, E. 1995. Ordnung und Macht. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Gagnon, S. and Collinson, D. 2014. Rethinking global leadership development programmes: the interrelated significance of power, context and identity. Organization Studies, 35(5): 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garud, R., Hardy, C. and Maguire, S. 2007. Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 28(7): 957–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geppert, M., Williams, K. and Wortmann, M. 2014. Micro-political game-playing in Lidl: a comparison of store-level employment relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 20(3): 1–17.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Glasl, F. 2010. Konfliktmanagement, 9th edn. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1959/1990. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Göhler, G. 2009. ‘Power to’ and ‘power over’. In Clegg, S. R. and Haugaard, M. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Power. London: Sage, 25–39.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J. and Baron, R. A. 1997. Behavior in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. and Clegg, S. 1996. Some dare call it power. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C. J. and Nords, W. R. (eds.), The Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, 622–641.Google Scholar

Haugaard, M. and Clegg, S. R. 2009. Introduction: why power is the central concept of the social science. In Clegg, S. R. and Haugaard, M. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Power. London: Sage, 1–24.Google Scholar

Hitlin, S. and Elder, G. H. 2007. Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2): 170–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutton, P. H., Gutman, H., Martin, L. H. and Foucault, M. 1988. Technologies of the Self: a Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Jones, O., Conway, S. and Steward, F. (eds.). 2001. Social Interaction and Organisational Change: Aston Perspectives on Innovation Networks. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kehr, H. M. 2004. Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: the compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of Management Review, 29(3): 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A. and Willmott, H. 2007. A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28(7): 1055–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolb, D. M. and Bartunek, J. M. (eds.). 1992. Hidden Conflict in Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar

Kostova, T. and Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostova, T., Roth, K. and Dacin, M. T. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 994–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local Players in Global Games. The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Küpper, W. and Felsch, A. 2000. Organisation, Macht und Ökonomie. Mikropolitik und die Konstitution organisationaler Handlungssysteme. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Küpper, W. and Ortmann, G. 1986. Mikropolitik in Organisationen. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 46(5): 590–602.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1996. On actor-network theory: a few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47: 369–381.Google Scholar

Lindenberg, S. 2001. Social rationality versus rational egoism. In Turner, J. (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer, 635–668.Google Scholar

Lindenberg, S., Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A. and Buunk, B. 2006. Solidarity and prosocial behavior: a framing approach. In Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, B. and Lindenberg, S. (eds.), Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. Springer, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Logemann, M. and Piekkari, R. 2015. Localise or local lies? The power of language and translation in the multinational corporation. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 11(1): 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lukes, S. 2005. Power: a Radical View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machiavelli, N. 1998. The Prince (edited by Mansfield, Harvey C.). University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G. 1962. The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24(4): 662–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

March, J. G. 1988. Decisions and Organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

March, J. G. and Olson, J. (eds.). 1994. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar

March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Marti, I. and Mair, J. 2010. Bringing change into the lives of the poor: entrepreneurship outside traditional boundaries. In Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. and Leca, B. (eds.), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge University Press, 92–119.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. 1983. Power In and Around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. 1985. The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22(2): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrill, C., Zald, M. N. and Rao, H. 2003. Covert political conflict in organizations: challenges from below. Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumby, D. K. 1998. Organizing men: power, discourse, and the social construction of masculinity (s) in the workplace. Communication Theory, 8(2): 164–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mumby, D. K. 2001. Power and politics. In Putnam, L. L. and Jablin, F. M. (eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 585–623.Google Scholar

Mumby, D. K. and Stohl, C. 1991. Power and discourse in organization studies: absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse and Society, 2(3): 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munro, R. 2009. Actor-network theory. In Clegg, S. R. and Haugaard, M. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Power. London: Sage, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narayanan, V. K. and Fahey, L. 1982. The micro-politics of strategy formulation. Academy of Management Review, 7(1): 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuberger, O. 2006. Mikropolitik und Moral in Organisationen, 2nd edn. Stuttgart: Lucius and Lucius.Google Scholar

Osterloh, M. 1983. Handlungsspielräume und Informationsverarbeitung. Bern/Stuttgart/Wien: Hans Huber Verlag.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. 1963. On the concept of influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27(1): 37–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson d'Estrée, T. 2003. Dynamics. In Cheldelin, S., Druckman, D. and Fast, L. (eds.), Conflict. London: Continuum, 68–87.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. 1972. Complex Organizations: a Critical Essay. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar

Pettigrew, A. M. 1973/2001. The Politics of Organizational Decision-making. London: Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar

Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W. and Cameron, K. S. 2001. Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 697–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeffer, J. 1981. Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with Power. Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Pondy, L. R. 1967. Organizational conflict: concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2): 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prahalad, C. K. and Doz, Y. L. 1987. The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Salancik, G. R. and Pfeffer, J. 1974. The bases and use of power in organizational decision making. The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4): 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schotter, A. and Beamish, P. W. 2011. Intra-organizational turbulences in multinational corporations. In Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. (eds.), Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation. The Role of Interests, Identities and Institutions. Cambridge University Press, 191–230.Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. 2001. Interest and interests: the psychology of constructive capriciousness. Review of General Psychology, 5: 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. 1979. Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4): 493–513.Google Scholar

Thomas, K. 1976. Conflict and conflict management. In Dunnette, M. D. (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 889–935.Google Scholar

Vaara, E., Tienari, J., Piekkari, R. and Säntti, R. 2005. Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3): 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vigoda, E. 2003. Developments in Organizational Politics: How Political Dynamics Affect Employee Performance in Modern Work Sites. Cheltenham/UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vigoda-Gadot, E. and Drory, A. (eds.). 2006. Handbook of Organizational Politics, 1st edn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and Motivation. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar

WallJr, J. A. and Callister, R. R. 1995. Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21(3): 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. 1976. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Mit textkritischen Erläuterungen hrsg. von Johannes Winckelmann, 5th edn. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Welch, D., Welch, L. and Piekkari, R. 2005. Speaking in tongues: the importance of language in international management processes. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35(1): 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whyte, W. H. 1957/2013. The Organization Man. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Wildavsky, A. 1987. Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: a cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review, 81(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackroyd, S. and Thompson, P. 1999. Organizational Misbehavior. Sage: London.Google Scholar

Almond, P. and Ferner, A. (eds.) 2006. American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations Across National Borders. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambos, B. and Schlegelmilch, B. 2007. Innovation and control in the multinational firm: political and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5): 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambos, T. C. and Birkinshaw, J. 2010. Headquarters’ attention and its effect on subsidiary performance. Management International Review, 50(4): 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambos, T. C., Andersson, U. and Birkinshaw, J. 2010. What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1099–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, U., and Forsgren, M. 2000. In search of centre of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40(4): 329–350.Google Scholar

Andersson, U. and Holm, U. 2010. Managing the Contemporary Multinational: the role of headquarters. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. 2001. Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs: a multilevel analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6): 1013–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. 2007. Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 802–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astley, W. G. and Sachdeva, P. S. 1984. Structural sources of interorganizational power: a theoretical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 9(1): 104–113.Google Scholar

Astley, W. G. and Zajac, E. J. 1990. Beyond dyadic exchange: functional interdependence and sub-unit power. Organisation Studies, 11(4): 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astley, W. G. and Zajac, E. J. 1991. Intraorganizational power and organizational design: reconciling rational and coalitional models of organization. Organization Science, 2(4): 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogun, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Vaara, E. 2011. Selling, resistance and reconciliation: a critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(6): 765–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: the Transnational Solution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Managing Across Borders: the Transnational Solution, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Becker-Ritterspach, F. 2006. The social constitution of knowledge integration in MNEs: a theoretical framework. Journal of International Management, 12(3): 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker-Ritterspach, F. 2009. Hybridization of MNE Subsidiaries: the Automotive Sector in India. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker-Ritterspach, F. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2011. An organizational politics perspective on intra-firm competition in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 51(4): 533–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker-Ritterspach, F., Saka-Helmhout, A. and Hotho, J. 2010. Learning in multinational enterprises as the socially embedded translation of practices. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 6(1): 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bélanger, J. and Edwards, P. 2006. Towards a political economy framework: TNCs as national and international players. In Ferner, A., Quintanilla, J. and Sànchez-Runde, C. (eds.), Multinationals, Institutions and the Construction of Transnational Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhabha, H. K. 1990. Nation and Narration. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. 2000. Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. and Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. and Lingblad, M. 2005. Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm. Organization Science, 16(6): 674–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. and Ridderstrale, J. 1999. Fighting the corporate immune system: a process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review, 8(2): 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkinshaw, J., Holm, U., Thilenius, P. and Arvidsson, N. 2000. Consequences of perception gaps in the headquarters–subsidiary relationship. International Business Review, 9(3): 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. and Jonsson, S. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221–241.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. and Young, S. 2005. Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14(2): 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2008. Normative control in MNC. In Feldman, M. P. and Santangelo, G. D. (eds.), New Perspectives in International Business Research, Vol. 3. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. 2009. Actors’ interests and local contexts in intrafirm conflict: the 2004 GM and Opel crisis. Competition and Change, 13(3): 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blazejewski, S. and Becker-Ritterspach, F. 2011. Conflict in headquarter–subsidiary relations: a critical literature review and new directions. In Geppert, M. and Dörrenbächer, C. (eds.), Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation: the Role of Interests, Identities, and Institutions. Cambridge University Press, 139–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhm, S., Spicer, A. and Fleming, P. 2008. Infra-political dimensions of resistance to international business: a neo-Gramscian approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(3): 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boje, D. M. 1991. The storytelling organization: a study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 106–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouquet, C. and Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Managing power in the multinational corporation: how low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34(3): 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M. 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M. 2009. The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise – a review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1563–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, T. 1961. Micropolitics: mechanisms of institutional change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(3): 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, J. L. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casson, M. 1979. Alternatives to the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. 1989. Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. (ed.)1994. Transnational Corporations and Innovatory Activities. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. 2009. Innovation and information technology in the MNE. In Rugman, A. M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 417–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. 2013. Blurred boundaries between firms, and new boundaries within (large multinational) firms: the impact of decentralized networks for innovation. Seoul Journal of Economics, 26(1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. and Iammarino, S. 1998. MNCs, technological innovation and regional systems in the EU: some evidence in the Italian case. International Journal of Economics and Business, 5(3): 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. and Iammarino, S. 2000. Multinational corporations and the location of technological innovation in the UK regions. Regional Studies, 34(4): 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. and Mudambi, R. 2005. MNE competence creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12): 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. and Piscitello, L. 1999. The emergence of corporate international networks for the accumulation of dispersed technological capabilities. Management International Review, 39(1): 123–147.Google Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. and Santangelo, G. D. 2000. Capitalism, profits and innovation in the new techno economic paradigm. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1): 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cantwell, J. A. and Zhang, Y. 2009. The co-evolution of international business connections and domestic technological capabilities: lessons from the Japanese catch-up experience. Transnational Corporations, 18(2): 37–68.Google Scholar

Cantwell, J. A., Dunning, J. H. and Lundan, S. M. 2010. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: the co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ciabuschi, F., Dellestand, H. and Holm, U. 2012. The role of headquarters in the contemporary MNC. Journal of International Management, 18(3): 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, E. and Geppert, M. 2006. Socio-political processes in international management in post-socialist contexts: knowledge, learning and transnational institution building. Journal of International Management, 12(3): 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clegg, S., Courpasson, R. D. and Phillips, N. 2007. Power and Organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 1 (Nov): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collinson, S. and Morgan, G. 2009. Images of the Multinational Firm. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Cowley, P. R. 1988. Market structure and business performance: an evaluation of buyer/seller power in the PIMS database. Strategic Management Journal, 9(3): 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crouch, C. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. 1980. Actors and Systems: the Politics of Collective Action. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. 1963/1992. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (2nd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 1963. Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Delios, A. and Beamish, P. W. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 915–933.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delios, A. and Henisz, W. J. 2003a. Policy uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3): 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delios, A. and Henisz, W. J. 2003b. Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: the international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11): 1153–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. 1978. Writing and Difference. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1982. Positions. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M. 1973. The Resolution of Conflict. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Gammelgaard, J. 2011. Subsidiary power in multinational corporations: the subtle role of micro-political bargaining power. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(1): 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2006. Micro-politics and conflicts in multinational corporations: current debates, re-framing, and contributions of this special issue. Journal of International Management, 12(3): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2009a. A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France. European Management Journal, 27(2): 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2009b. Micro-political games in the multinational corporation: the case of mandate change. Management Revue, 20(4): 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doz, Y. and Prahalad, C. K. 1984. Patterns of strategic control within multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2): 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doz, Y. and Prahalad, C. K. 1991. Managing DMNCs: a search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doz, Y. L., Bartlett, C. A. and Prahalad, C. K. 1981. Global competitive pressures and host country demands: managing tensions in MNCs. California Management Review, 23(3): 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extension. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunning, J. H. and Lundan, S. M. 2008. Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4): 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, P. K. and Bélanger, J. 2009. The MNC as a contested terrain. In Collinson, S. and Morgan, G. (eds.), Images of the Multinational. Oxford: Wiley, 193–216.Google Scholar

Edwards, T. and Kuruvilla, S. 2005. International HRM: national business systems, organizational politics and the international division of labour in MNCs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, T., Coller, X., Ortiz, L., Rees, C. and Wortmann, M. 2006. National industrial relations systems and cross-border restructuring: evidence from a merger in the pharmaceuticals sector. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(1): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, T., Colling, T. and Ferner, A. 2007. Conceptual approaches to the transfer of employment practices in multinational companies: an integrated approach. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(3): 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzioni, A. 1964. Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenton-O'Creevy, M., Gooderham, P., Cerdin, J-L. and Ronning, R. 2011. Bridging roles, social skill and embedded knowing in multinational organizations. In Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. (eds.), Politics and Power in the International Corporation: the Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities. Cambridge University Press, 101–136.Google Scholar

Ferner, A. 1997. Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resource Management Journal, 7(1): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferner, A. and Quintanilla, J. 1998. Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: the enduring influence of national identity of a process of ‘Anglo-Saxonization’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4): 710–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferner, A., Almond, P., Clark, I., Colling, T., Edwards, T. and Holden, L. 2004. The dynamics of central control and subsidiary autonomy in the management of human resources: case-study evidence from US MNCs in the UK. Organization Studies, 25(3): 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferner, A., Almond, P. and Colling, T. 2005a. Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: the case of ‘workforce diversity’ in US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferner, A., Almond, P., Colling, T. and Edwards, T. 2005b. Policies on union representation in US multinationals in the UK: Between micro-politics and macro-institutions. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(4): 703–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferner, A., Edwards, T. and Tempel, A. 2012. Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals. Human Relations, 65(2): 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferner, A., Quintanilla, J. and Varul, M. Z. 2001. Country-of-origin effects, host-country effects, and the management of HR in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain. Journal of World Business, 36(2): 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forsgren, M. 2008. Theories of the Multinational: a Multidimensional Creature in the Global Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. 2010. MNC headquarters' role in subsidiaries' value-creating activities: a problem of rationality or radical uncertainty. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4): 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forsgren, M., Holm, U. and Johanson, J. 2005. Managing the Embedded Multinational: a Business Network View. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foss, N. J. and Pedersen, T. 2004. Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: an introduction. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 340–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1973. The Order of Things: an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1980 Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–7. Edited by Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

French, J. P. R. and Raven, B. 1960. The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. and Zander, A. (eds.), Group Dynamics. New York: Harper and Row, 607–623.Google Scholar

Frenkel, M. 2008. The multinational corporation as a third space: rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 924–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gandemo, B. and Mattsson, J. 1984. Internationalisation of firms – patterns and strategies. Bedriftsykonomen, 6: 314–317.Google Scholar

Geppert, M. 2003. Sensemaking and politics in MNCs: a comparative analysis of vocabularies within the global manufacturing discourse in one industrial sector. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4): 312–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geppert, M. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2011. Politics and power in the multinational corporation: an introduction. In Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. (eds.), Politics and Power in the International Corporation: the Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities. Cambridge University Press, 1–38.Google Scholar

Geppert, M. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2014. Politics and power within multinational corporations: mainstream studies, emerging critical approaches and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(2): 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geppert, M. and Williams, K. 2006. Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: towards a socio-political framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1): 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geppert, M., Matten, D. and Walgenbach, P. 2006. Transnational institution building and the multinational corporation: an emerging field of research. Human Relations, 59(11): 1451–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geppert, M., Williams, K. and Matten, D. 2003. The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: an Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3): 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gramsci, A. 1971. Selection from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar

Håkansson, H. (ed.) 1982. International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Håkansson, H. and Snehota, I. 1995. Developing Relationships in Business Networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. 2001. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, P. A. and Thelen, K. 2009. Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harzing, A-W. 1999. Managing the Multinationals. An International Study of Control Mechanisms. Cheltenham: Northampton, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Harzing, A.-W. and Sorge, A. 2003. The relative impact of country-of-origin and universal contingencies on internationalization strategies and corporated control in multinational enterprises: world-wide and European perspectives. Organization Studies, 24(2): 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNC: a heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1): 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedlund, G. 1993. Assumptions of hierarchy and heterarchy, with applications to the management of the multinational corporation. In Westney, D. E. and Ghoshal, S. (eds.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. New York: St Martin's Press, 221–236.Google Scholar

Henisz, W. J. 2000a. The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 16(2): 334–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henisz, W. J. 2000b. The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henisz, W. J. and Zelner, B. A. 2004. Explicating political hazards and safeguards: a transaction cost politics approach. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(6): 901–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennart, J. F. 1982. A Theory of Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Hennart, J. F. 2001. Theories of the multinational enterprise. In Rugman, A. M. and Brewer, T. L. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Business. Oxford University Press, 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennart, J. F. 2009. Theories of the multinational enterprise. In Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2nd edn). Oxford University Press, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E. and Pennings, J. M. 1971. Strategic contingencies’ theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2): 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinings, C. R., Hickson, D. J., Pennings, J. M., Schneck, R. E. 1974. Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(1): 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstede, G. 1984. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. 1994. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar

Hollingsworth, J. R. and Boyer, R. 1997. Coordination of economic actors and social systems of production. In Hollingsworth, J. R. and Boyer, R. (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge University Press, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hotho, J. and Pedersen, T. 2012. Beyond the ‘rules of the game’: three institutional approaches and how they matter for international business. In Wood, G. and Demirbag, M. (eds.), Handbook of Institutional Approaches to International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 236–273.Google Scholar

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. and Gupta, V. 2004. Leadership, Culture, and Organizations: the GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Hymer, S. H. 1960. The international operations of national firms: a study of direct foreign investment. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar

Ietto-Gillies, G. 2012. Transnational Corporations and International Production. Trends, Theories, Effects (2nd edn). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Jackson, G. and Deeg, R. 2008. Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 540–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. 1990. The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4): 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johanson, J. and Wiedersheim, P. F. 1975. The internationalization of the firm – the four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juul, M. and Walters, P. G. P. 1987. The internationalization of Norwegian firms – a study of the UK experience. Management International Review, 27(1): 58–66.Google Scholar

Kogut, B. and Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3(3): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. 1993/2003. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organisational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostova, T. and Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostova, T., Roth, K. and Dacin, M. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of MNCs: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 994–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2001. The making of a global firm: local pathways to multinational enterprise. In Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford University Press, 172–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local Players in Global Games. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democracy. Verso: London.Google Scholar

Lam, A. 2003. Organizational learning in multinationals: R&D networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3): 673–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, C. 1994. Industrial order and the transformation of industrial relations: Britain, Germany and France. In Hyman, R. and Ferner, A. (eds.), New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell, 167–195.Google Scholar

Lane, C. 2000. Understanding the globalization strategies of German and British multinational companies: is a ‘societal effects’ approach still useful? In Maurice, M. and Sorge, A. (eds.), Embedding Organizations. Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations and Socio-economic Context. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, C. 2001. The emergence of German transnational companies: a theoretical analysis and empirical study of the globalization process. In Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford University Press, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larimo, J. 1985. The foreign direct manufacturing investment behaviour of Finnish companies. Paper presented at the European International Business Association Conference, Glasgow, December.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J. 1967. Differentiation and Integration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, D. L. 2008. Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ling, Y., Floyd, S. W. and Baldridge, D. C. 2005. Toward a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lukes, S. 2005. Power: a Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luostarinen, R. 1980. Internationalisation of the firm. Acta Academica Series A: 30. Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F. 1979. The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge (trans. Bennington, G. and Massumi, B.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Maclean, M. and Hollinshead, G. 2011. Contesting social space in the Balkan region: the social dimensions of a ‘red’ joint venture. In Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. (eds.), Politics and Power in the International Corporation: the Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities. Cambridge University Press, 380–411.Google Scholar

Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, D. and Welch, L. 1999a. Adopting a common corporate language: IHRM implications. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3): 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marschan-Piekkari, R., Welch, D. and Welch, L. 1999b. In the shadow: the impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational. International Business Review, 8(4): 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matten, D. and Geppert, M. 2004. Work systems in heavy engineering: the role of national culture and national institutions in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management, 10(2): 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurice, M., Sorge, A. and Warner, M. 1980. Societal differences in organizing manufacturing units: a comparison of France, West Germany, and Great Britain. Organization Studies, 1(1): 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. 1977/1991. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. In Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University Chicago Press, 41–62.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. 1983. Power in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Morgan, G. 2001. The multinational firm: organizing across institutional and national divides. In Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. and Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford University Press, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, G. and Kristensen, P. H. 2006. The contested space of multinationals: varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations, 59(11): 1467–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, G. and Quack, S. 2005. Institutional legacies and firm dynamics: the internationalization of British and German law firms. Organization Studies, 26(12): 1765–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, G. and Whitley, R. 2003. Introduction. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3): 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mudambi, R. and Pedersen, T. 2007. Agency theory and resource dependency theory: complementary explanations for subsidiary power in multinational corporations. SMG Working Paper No. 5.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S. 1997. The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Pahl, J. M. and Roth, K. 1993. Managing the headquarters–foreign subsidiary relationship: the roles of strategy, conflict, and integration. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 4(2): 139–165.Google Scholar

Penrose, E. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. 1981. Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1974. Organizational decision making as a political process: the case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2): 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Phillips, N. and Hardy, C. 2002. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, N., Sewell, G. and Jaynes, S. 2008. Applying critical discourse analysis in strategic management research. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4): 770–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pondy, L. R. 1967. Organizational conflict: concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2): 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prahalad, C. K. and Doz, Y. L. 1987. The Multinational Mission. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Quintanilla, J. and Varul, M. Z. 2001. Country-of-origin effects, host-country effects, and the management of HR in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain. Journal of World Business, 36(2): 107–127.Google Scholar

Riad, S. 2005. The power of ‘organizational culture’ as a discursive formation in merger integration. Organization Studies, 26(10): 1529–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rojo, L. and van Dijk, T. 1997. ‘There was a problem, and it was solved!’: legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse and Society, 8(4): 523–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenzweig, P. M. and Nohria, N. 1994. Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenzweig, P. M. and Singh, J. V. (1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 340–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, K. and Nigh, D. 1992. The effectiveness of headquarters–subsidiary relationships: the role of coordination, control, and conflict. Journal of Business Research, 25(4): 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothman, J. and Friedman, V. J. 2001. Identity, conflict and organizational learning. In Dierkes, M., Antal, A. Berthoin, Child, J. and Nonaka, I. (eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford University Press, 582–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the Multinationals: the Economics of Internal Markets. New York: Columbia Press. Reissued in 2006 as Inside the Multinationals, (25th Anniversary Edition). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A. and Nguyen, Q. T. K. 2011. Fifty years of international business theory and beyond. Management International Review, 51(6): 755–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Said, E. W. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books. First published in 1978 by Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Saka, A. 2003. Cross-national Appropriation of Work Systems, Japanese Firms in the UK. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salancik, G. R. and Pfeffer, J. 1977. Who gets power and how they hold on to it: a strategic contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5(3): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, F. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, Cumnor Hill: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zana, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25. New York: Academic Press, 1–65.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. 1994. Cultural dimensions of values: towards an understanding of national differences. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S. C. and Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 85–119.Google Scholar

Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Scott, W. R. 1998. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open System. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Sharpe, D. R. 1997. Compromise solutions: a Japanese multinational comes to the UK. In Whitley, R. and Kristensen, P. H. (eds.), Governance at Work: the Social Regulation of Economic Relations. Oxford University Press, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorge, A. 1985. Informationstechnik und Arbeit im sozialen Prozeß. Arbeitsorganisation, Qualifikation u. Produktivkraftentwicklung. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.Google Scholar

Sorge, A. 1991. Strategic fit and the societal effect: interpreting cross-national comparisons of technology, organization and human resources. Organization Studies, 12(2): 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorge, A. 1995. Cross-national differences in personnel and organization. In Harzing, A. W. and Ruysseveldt, J. V. (eds.), International Human Resource Management. London: Sage, 99–123.Google Scholar

Stopford, J. M. and Wells, L. T. 1972. Managing the Multinational Enterprise: Organization of the Firm and Ownership of the Subsidiaries. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. 2005. Beyond Continuity – Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Teece, D. J. 1977. Technology transfer by multinational corporations: the resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Economic Journal, 87(346): 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tienari, J. and Vaara, E. 2012. Power and politics in mergers and acquistions. In Faulkner, D., Teerikangas, S. and Joseph, R. J. (eds.), The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, K. W. 1992. Conflict and conflict management: reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3): 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trompenaars, F. and Hampden-Turner, C. 1997. Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business (2nd edn). London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar

Trompenaars, F. and Hampden-Turner, C. 1998. Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Global Business. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Turnbull, P. W. and Valla, J.-P. 1986. Strategies for International Industrial Marketing: the Management of Customer Relationships in European Industrial Markets. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Uhlenbruck, K., Rodriguez, P., Doh, J. and Eden, L. 2006. The impact of corruption on entry strategy: evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(3): 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E. and Monin, P. 2010. A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions. Organization Science, 21(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. 2002. Justification, legitimization and naturalization of mergers and acquisitions: a critical discourse analysis of media texts. Organization, 9(2): 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. 2004. Critical discourse analysis as methodology for critical international business studies. In Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch, C. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. 2008. A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in MNCs. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 985–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. 2011. On the narrative construction of MNCs: an antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organization Science, 22(2): 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E., Tienari, J. and Laurila, J. 2006. Pulp and paper fiction: on the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6): 789–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaara, E., Tienari, J., Piekkari, R. and Säntti, R. 2005. Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3): 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Dijk, T. 1998. Ideology: a Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: a discourse-historical perspective. Discourse Studies, 1(1): 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product life cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, translated by Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott. Edited with an introduction by Parsons, Talcott. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Werner, S. 2002. Recent developments in international management research: a review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3): 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westney, D. E. 1993. Institutionalization theory and the multinational corporation. In Ghoshal, S. and Westney, D. E. (eds.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. New York: St. Martins Press, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westney, D. E. and Zaheer, S. 2009. The multinational enterprise as an organization. In Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business. Oxford University Press, 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitley, R. (ed.) 1992. European Business Systems. Firms and Markets in their National Contexts. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Whitley, R. 1998. Internationalization and varieties of capitalism: the limited effects of cross-national coordination of economic activities on the nature of business systems. Review of International Political Economy, 5(3): 445–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent Capitalism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitley, R. 2001. How and why are international firms different? The consequences of cross-border managerial coordination for firm characteristics and behavior. In Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H., Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford University Press, 27–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitley, R. 2009. The multinational company as a distinct organisational form. In Collinson, D. and Morgan, G. (eds.), Images of the Multinational Firm. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 145–166.Google Scholar

Williams, C. and Lee, S. H. 2011. Political heterarchy and dispersed entrepreneurship in the MNC. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6): 1243–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, K. and Geppert, M. 2011. Bargained globalization: employment relations providing robust ‘tool kits’ for socio-political strategizing in MNCs in Germany. In Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. (eds.), Politics and Power in the International Corporation: the Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities. Cambridge University Press, 72–100.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. 2002. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Xu, D. and Shenkar, O. 2002. Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. The Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yamin, M. and Andersson, U. 2011. Subsidiary importance in the MNC: what role does internal embeddedness play? International Business Review, 20(2): 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar