Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 27
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
May 2016
Print publication year:
2016
Online ISBN:
9781316416983

Book description

This book presents a comprehensive account of features of Latin that emerge from dialogue: commands and requests, command softeners and strengtheners, statement hedges, interruptions, attention-getters, greetings and closings. In analyzing these features, Peter Barrios-Lech employs a quantitative method and draws on all the data from Roman comedy and the fragments of Latin drama. In the first three parts, on commands and requests, particles, attention-getters and interruptions, the driving questions are firstly - what leads the speaker to choose one form over another? And secondly - how do the playwrights use these features to characterize on the linguistic level? Part IV analyzes dialogues among equals and slave speech, and employs data-driven analyses to show how speakers enact roles and construct relationships with each other through conversation. The book will be important to all scholars of Latin, and especially to scholars of Roman drama.

Reviews

'This excellent work offers new insights into the ways Plautus and Terence use language. … In short, this book makes a valuable contribution in a number of different areas and will be welcomed by a wide range of scholars.'

Eleanor Dickey Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents


Page 1 of 2



Page 1 of 2


Bibliography

Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London.
Adams, J. N. 1984. “Female Speech in Latin Comedy.” Antichthon 18: 4377.
Adams, J. N. 1995. “The Language of the Vindolanda Writing Tablets: An Interim Report.” JRS 85: 86134.
Adams, J. N. 1995. “Neglected Evidence for Female Speech in Latin.” CQ 55.2: 582596.
Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.
Adams, J. N. 2007. The Regional Diversification of Latin 200 BC–AD 600. Cambridge.
Adams, J. N. 2013. Social Variation in the Latin Language. Cambridge.
Adams, J. N., Reinhardt, T. and Lapidge, M.. 2005. “Introduction.” In Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose (Proceedings of the British Academy 129). Oxford, 136.
Arnott, G. W. 1964. “The Confrontation of Sostratos and Gorgias.” Phoenix 18: 110123.
Arnott, G. W. 1965. “Review of Otto Rieth: Die Kunst Menanders in den ‘Adelphen’ des Terenz”. Gnomon 37: 255263.
Arnott, G. W. 1970. “Phormio Parasitvs: A Study in Dramatic Methods of Characterization.” Greece and Rome 17: 3257.
Arnott, G. W. 1972. “Targets, Techniques and Traditions in Plautus’ Stichus.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 19: 5479.
Arnott, G. W. 1995. “Menander’s Manipulation of Character for the Individualisation of Character.” In de Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. H (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci. Bari, 147164.
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA.
Bagordo, A. 2001. Beobachtungen zur Sprache des Terenz. Göttingen.
Bagordo, A. 2007. “Langverstil und Senarstil bei Terenz.” In Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W.-W. and Felgentreu, F (eds.), Terentius Poeta (Zetemata Monographien zur klassischen Altertumswissenschaft 127). Munich, 127141.
Bain, D. 1984. “Female Speech in Menander.” Antichthon 18: 2442.
Barrios-Lech, P. 2014a. “Quid ais and Female Speech in Roman Comedy.” Hermes 142.4: 480486.
Barrios-Lech, P. 2014b. “The 1st Person Plural ‘Hortatory’ Subjunctive in Plautus and Terence.” RhM 157.3–4: 272277.
Barrios-Lech, P. 2016. “Noli + Infinitive in Roman Comedy.” Glotta 92: 18–23.
Barrios-Lech, P. forthcoming. “The volo Command in Roman Comedy.” Mnemosyne, doi: 10.1163/1568525X-12341827.
Barsby, J. (ed.) 1999. Eunuchus: Terence. Cambridge.
Barsby, J. (trans.) 2001. Terence. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.
Barsby, J. 2004. “Some Aspects of the Language of Cistellaria.” In Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.), Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen, 335346.
Barwick, K. 1964 [1925]. Flavii Sosipatri Charisii Artis grammaticae libri 5, corrected by F. Kühnert. Leipzig.
Becker, E. 1873. “De Syntaxi Interrogationum Obliquarum.” In Studemund, W. (ed.), Studien auf dem Gebiet des Archaischen Lateins. Berlin, 115314.
Bennett, C. E. 1966 (repr.) Syntax of Early Latin, vol. 1: Syntax of the Early Latin Verb. Hildesheim.
Bettini, M. 1981. “Vel Vibe di Veio e il re Amulio: A proposito di Nevio praet. 5 sg. Ribb.² e di bell. poen. 12 Mor.” MD 6: 163168.
Blase, H. 1896. “Amabo.” In Wölfflin, E. (ed.), Archiv für Lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik, vol. 9. Leipzig, 485491.
Blase, H., Landgraf, G., and Golling, J. (eds.) 1903. Historische Grammatik der Lateinischen Sprache, vol. 3.1: Syntax des Einfachen Satzes. Leipzig.
Bloomer, M. 1997. “Schooling in Persona: Imagination and Subordination in Roman Education.” ClAnt 16.1: 5778.
Bloomer, M. 2001. “Cross-Speaking in Plautus: The Economies of Slave and Master in the Captivi.” In Tylawsky, E. I. (ed.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-five Years at Yale. New Haven, CT, 3357.
Blum-Kulka, S. 1989. “Playing It Safe: The Role of Conventionality in Indirectness.” In Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ, 3770.
Boedeker, D. 1991. “Euripides’ Medea and the Vanity of ΛΟΓΟΙ.” CPh 86.2: 95112.
Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D.. 1994. The Vindolanda Writing Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II). London.
Bradley, K. 1994. Slavery and Society at Rome. Cambridge.
Brooke-Rich, L. 2009. “Language and Power in Roman Comedy.” MA thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
Brown, P. and Fraser, C.. 1979. “Speech as a Marker of Situation.” In Scherer, K. and Giles, H. (eds.), Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge, 3362.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A.. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, 253276.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A.. 1989. “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies.” Language in Society 18: 159212.
Brunt, P. A. 1988. The Fall of the Roman Republic and Related Essays. Oxford.
Bucholtz, M. (ed.) 2004. Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries. New York.
Burton, P. J. 2004. “Amicitia in Plautus: A Study of Roman Friendship Processes.” AJPh 125.2: 209243.
Butler, C. 1985. Statistics in Linguistics. Oxford.
Cabrillana, C. 2004. “Forma lingüística y tipo de personaje en la comedia terenciana.” In Eire, A. López and Guerreira, A. Ramos (eds.), Registros lingüísticos en las lenguas clásicas. Salamanca, 1131.
Caffi, C. 2007. Mitigation. Amsterdam.
Cameron, D. 1998. “‘Is there any ketchup, Vera?’ Gender, Power, and Pragmatics.” Discourse and Society 9: 437455.
Cameron, D. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford.
Carney, T. F. 1964. “The Words sodes and quaeso in Terentian Usage.” Acta Classica 7: 5763.
Chahoud, A. 2010. “Colloquial Language in Literary Studies.” In Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds.), Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge, 4264.
Christenson, D. 2013. “Eunuch.” In Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), Companion to Terence. Malden, MA, 262280.
Clackson, J. 2010. “Colloquial Language in Linguistic Studies.” In Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds.), Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge, 711.
Clackson, J. (ed.) 2011. Companion to the Latin Language. Hoboken, NJ.
Coates, J. 1997. “One-at-a-time: The Organisation of Men’s Talk.” In Johnson, S. and Meinhof, U. (eds.), Language and Masculinity. Oxford, 107129.
Coates, J. 2003. Men Talk: Stories in the Making of Masculinities. Malden, MA.
Coates, J. 2004. Women, Men and Language, 3rd edn. New York.
Courtney, E. 1995. Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. Atlanta, GA.
Cugusi, M. 1982. M. Porci Catonis Orationum Reliquiae. Turin.
Cutting, J. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York.
Davidson, R. 1992. “Prolegomenon to the Structure of Emotion: Gleanings from Neuropsychology.”Cognition and Emotion 6: 245268.
de Melo, W. D. C. 2006. “Review of Terence and the Language of Roman Comedy by E. Karakasis.Mnemosyne 59.2: 268274.
de Melo, W. D. C. 2007. The Early Latin Verb System. Oxford.
de Melo, W. D. C. (trans.) 2011–2013. Plautus. 5 vols. Cambridge, MA.
Denizot, C. 2011. Donner des ordres en grec ancien: étude linguistique des formes de l’injonction. Cahiers de l’ERIAC, n°3 – Fonctionnements linguistiques. Mont-Saint-Aignan.
Dessen, C. 1995. “The Figure of the Eunuch in Terence’s Eunuchus.” Helios 22.2: 123139.
Dickey, E. 1995. “Forms of Address and Conversational Language in Aristophanes and Menander.” Mnemosyne 48.3: 257271.
Dickey, E. 1996. Greek Forms of Address. Oxford.
Dickey, E. 2002. Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford.
Dickey, E. 2006. “The Use of sis as a Focus-marking Clitic Particle.” In Kölligan, D. and Sen, R. (eds.), Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology, and Phonetics, vol. 11. Oxford, 2125.
Dickey, E. 2012a. “How to Say ‘Please’ in Classical Latin.” CQ 62.2: 731748.
Dickey, E. 2012b. “The Rules of Politeness and Latin Request Formulae.” In Probert, P. and Willi, A. (eds.), Laws and Rules in Indo-European. Oxford, 313328.
Dickey, E. (ed.) 2012c. The Colloquia of the Hermeneumata Pseudodositheana, vol 1. Cambridge.
Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds.) 2010. Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge.
Dionisotti, A. C. 1982. “From Ausonius’ Schooldays? A Schoolbook and Its Relatives.” JRS 72: 83125.
Duckworth, G. (ed.) 1940. T. Macci Plauti Epidicus. Princeton.
Duckworth, G. 1952. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton.
Dumont, J. C. 1974. “Guerre, paix et servitude dans les Captifs.” Latomus 33: 505522.
Dunsch, B. 2014. “Religion in Roman Comedy.” In Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford, 634652.
Durkheim, É. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Trans. Swain, Joseph Ward. London.
Dutsch, D. 2008. Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford.
Echols, E. C. 1950. “The Quid-Greeting in Plautus and Terence.” CJ 45.4: 188190.
Eckert, P. 1988. “Adolescent Social Structure and the Spread of Linguistic Change.” Language in Society, 17.2: 183207.
Eckert, P. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York.
Eckert, P. 2012. “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Linguistic Variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology, 41: 87100.
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet., S. 2003 Language and Gender. Cambridge.
Eelen, G. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester.
Enk, P. J. (ed.) 1979 (repr.) Plauti Truculentus cum prolegomenis, notis criticis, commentario exegetico. New York.
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A.. 1994. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots. Paris.
Ernout, A. and Thomas, F.. 1964 (repr.) Syntaxe Latine. Paris.
Ervin-Tripp, S. 1976. “‘Is Sybil there?’ The Structure of Some American English Directives.” Language in Society 5: 2566.
Evans, J. 1991. War, Women, and Children in Ancient Rome. London and New York.
Fantham, E. 1971. “Hautontimoroumenos and Adelphoe: A Study of Fatherhood in Terence and Menander.” Latomus 30.4: 970998.
Fantham, E. 1972. Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto.
Fantham, E. 1975. “Sex, Status, and Survival in Hellenistic Athens: A Study of Women in New Comedy.Phoenix 29.1: 4474.
Feneron, J. S. 1974. “Some Elements of Menander’s Style.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 21: 8195.
Ferguson, C. A. 1994. “Dialect, Register, and Genre: Working Assumptions about Conventionalization.” In Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford, 1530.
Ferri, R. 2008. “Politeness in Latin Comedy: Some Preliminary Thoughts.” MD 61: 1528.
Ferri, R. 2010. “Note on Afran. 95–6R 3.” Philologus 154.1: 143144.
Ferri, R. 2012. “How to Say No in Latin.” In Leiwo, M., Halla-aho, H., and Vierros, M. (eds.), Variation and Change in Greek and Latin. Papers and monographs of the Finnish Institute at Athens, 17. Helsinki. 105–127.
Ferri, R. forthcoming. “An Ancient Grammarian’s View of How the Spoken Language Works: Pragmalinguistic Observations in Donatus’ Commentum Terenti.” In Ferri, R and Zago, A (eds.), The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about Language in the Roman World (Corpus Christianorum: Lingua Patrum 8).
Ferri, R. and Probert, P.. 2010. “Roman Authors on Colloquial Language.” In Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A (eds.), Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge, 1241.
Fögen, T. 2004. “Gender Specific Communication in Graeco-Roman Antiquity, with a Research Bibliography.” Historiographia Linguistica 31.2/3: 199276.
Fontaine, M. 2010. Funny Words in Plautine Comedy. Oxford.
Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford.
Forberg, M. 1913. “De Salutandi Formulis Plautinis et Terentianis.” Dissertation, Leipzig.
Fraenkel, E. 2007. Plautine Elements in Plautus. Trans. Drevikosky, Tomas and Muecke, Francis. Oxford.
Frangoulidis, S.Phormio.” In Augoustakis, A., Traill, A. and Thorburn, J. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA, 281294.
Fraser, B. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6.2: 167190.
Gaide, F. 2001. “À propos des interactions verbales dans le théâtre de Plaute.” In Moussy, C. and Dangel, J. (eds.), De Lingua Latina Novae Quaestiones: Actes du Xème Colloque International de Linguistique Latine, Paris-Sèvres, 19–23 (Avril 1999). Louvain, 959969.
Galinksy, G. K. 1969. “Plautus Poenulus and the Cult of Venus Erycina.” In Bibauw, J. (ed.), Hommages à Marcel Renard, vol. 1. Brussels, 358364.
Gee, J. P. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York.
Ghezzi, C. and Molinelli, P.. 2014. “Deverbal Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Italian.” In Ghezzi, C. and Molinelli, P. (eds.), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages. Oxford, 6185.
Gibson, R. 1997. “Didactic Poetry as ‘Popular’ Form: A Study of Imperatival Expressions in Latin Didactic Verse and Prose.” In Atherton, C. (ed.), Form and Content in Didactic Poetry. Bari, 6798.
Gilleland, M. 1979. “The Linguistic Differentiation of Character Type and Sex in the Comedies of Plautus and Terence.” Dissertation, University of Virginia.
Gilleland, M. 1980. “Female Speech in Greek and Latin.” AJPh 101: 180183.
Gilula, D. 1980. “The Concept of the Bona Meretrix: A Study of Terence’s Courtesans.” RFIC 108: 142165.
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York.
Goldberg, S. 1986. Understanding Terence. Princeton.
Goldberg, S. (ed.) 2013. Hecyra. Cambridge.
Gottesman, A. 2008. “The Pragmatics of Homeric Kertomia.” CQ 58.1: 112.
Grant, J. 1975. “The Ending of Terence’s Adelphoe and the Menandrian Original.” AJPh 96.1: 4260.
Gratwick, A. S. 1982. “Drama.” In Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Vol. 2, Part I. The Early Republic. Cambridge, 77137.
Gratwick, A. S. (ed.) 1993. Menaechmi: Plautus. Cambridge.
Gray, P. 2007. Psychology. New York.
Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, New York, 4158.
Grimal, P. 1969. “Le modèle et la date des Captivi de Plaute.” In Bibauw, J. (ed.), Hommages à Marcel Renard, vol. 1. Brussels, 394414.
Haffter, H. 1934. Untersuchungen zur Altlateinischen Dichtersprache. Berlin.
Hall, J. 1996. “Cicero Fam. 5.8 and Fam. 15.5 in the Light of Modern Politeness Theory.” Antichthon 30: 1933.
Hall, J. 2005. “Politeness and Formality in Cicero’s Letter to Matius (Fam. 11.27).” MH 62: 193213.
Hall, J. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford.
Hall, K. 1995. “Lip Service on the Fantasy Lines.” In Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York, 183216.
Hand, F. 1829–1845. Tursellinus seu de particulis Latinis commentarii. Leipzig. 4 vols.
Handford, S. A. 1946. The Latin Subjunctive. Its Usage and Development from Plautus to Tacitus. London.
Happ, H. 1967. “Die Lateinische Umgangssprache und die Kunstsprache des Plautus.” Glotta 45.1/2: 60104.
Heap, A. M. 1992. “Word Order in Menander.” Liverpool Classical Monthly 17: 5658.
Hibbard, G. R. (ed.) 1987. Hamlet. Oxford.
Hine, H. 2011. “‘Discite … Agricolae’: Modes of Instruction in Latin Prose Agricultural Writing from Cato to Pliny the Elder.” CQ 61.2: 624654.
Hoffmann, M. E. 1983. “Conversation Openings in the Comedies of Plautus.” In Pinkster, H. (ed.), Latin Linguistics and Linguistic Theory: Proceedings of the 1st International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Amsterdam, April 1981. Amsterdam, 217228.
Hofmann, J. B. 1951. Lateinische Umgangssprache. 3rd edn. Heidelberg.
Holmes, J. 1984. “Modifying Illocutionary Force.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345365.
Holmes, J. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London.
Holmes, J. 2011. “Complimenting: A Positive Politeness Strategy.” In Coates, J. (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford, 7188.
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E.. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge.
Hough, J. N. 1945. “The numquid vis Formula in Roman Comedy.” AJPh 66: 282302.
Hunter, R. L. 1985. The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Cambridge.
Jakobi, R. 1996. Die Kunst der Exegese im Terenzkommentar des Donat. Berlin.
James, S. 2013. “Gender and Sexuality in Terence.” In Augoustakis, A., Traill, A. and Thorburn, J. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA, 175194.
James, S. 2015. “Mater, Oratio, Filia.” In Dutsch, D., James, S. L., and Konstan, D. (eds.), Women in Roman Republican Drama. Madison, WI, 108127.
Jocelyn, H. D. 1993. “Sprache, Schriftlichkeit, und Charakterisierung in der römischen Komödie (Plautus, Pseudolus 41–73, 998–1014).” In Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.), Beiträge zur Mündlichen Kultur der Römer. Tübingen, 125139.
Karakasis, E. 2003. “Language and Plot in Plautus’ Bacchides.” RCCM 45.1: 4767
Karakasis, E. 2005. Terence and the Language of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.
Karakasis, E. 2014. “Tragic and Epic Interactions in Terentian Comedy.” In Papaioannou, S. (ed.), Terence and Interpretation. Newcastle upon Tyne, 7593.
Kaster, R. A. 2005. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Cary, NC.
Katsouris, A. 1975. Linguistic and Stylistic Characterization: Tragedy and Menander. Ioannina.
Kauer, R. and Lindsay, W. M (eds.) 1958. P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford.
Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. (eds.) 1982. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 2, part I: The Early Republic. Cambridge.
Kenny, A. 1982. The Computation of Style: An Introduction to Statistics for Students of Literature and Humanities. Oxford.
Kirk, W. H. 1897. “Etiam in Plautus and Terence.” AJPh 18.1: 2642.
Kissine, M. 2012. “Sentences, Utterances, and Speech Acts.” In Jaszczolt, K. and Allan, K. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, Cambridge, 169190.
Knorr, O. 2007. “Metatheatrical Humor in Terence.” In Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W. and Felgentreu, F. (eds.), Terentius Poeta (Zetemata Monographien zur klassischen Altertumswissenschaft 127). Munich, 167174.
Konstan, D. 1983. Roman Comedy. Ithaca.
Konstan, D. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge.
Konstan, D. 2010. “Are Fellow Citizens Friends? Aristotle versus Cicero on Philia, Amicitia, and Social Solidarity.” In Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Valuing Others in Classical Antiquity, Leiden, 233248.
Krieter-Spiro, M. 1997. Sklaven, Köche und Hetären: Das Dienstpersonal bei Menander. Stellung, Rolle, Komik und Sprache. Stuttgart.
Kroon, C. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin: A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero, and at. Amsterdam.
Kruschwitz, P. 2012. “Language, Sex, and (Lack of) Power: Reassessing the Linguistic Discourse about Female Speech in Latin Sources.” Athenaeum 100.1–2: 197229.
Kruschwitz, P. 2013. “Memento Mori: The Use(s) of the Future Imperative in the Carmina Latina Epigraphica.” In Martínez, C. Fernández, Belén, M. Limón, Pallarès, J. Gómez and Calleja, J. del Hoyo (eds.), Ex officina: Literatura epigráfica en verso. Seville, 193216.
Kuiper, K. 1998. “New Zealand Sporting Formulae: Two Models of Male Socialisation.” In Coates, J. (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford, 285293.
Labov, W. 1963. “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change.” Word 19: 273309.
Labov, W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC.
Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia.
Lakoff, G. 1972. “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” In Peranteau, P. M, Levi, J. L and Phares, G. C (eds.), Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society April 14–16, 1972. Chicago, 183228.
Lakoff, R. 1973a. “Language and Women’s Place.” Language in Society 2.1: 4579.
Lakoff, R. 1973b. “The Logic of Politeness; or, Minding your P’s and Q’s.” In Corum, C., Smith-Stark, T. C. and Weiser, A. (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society April 13–15 1973. Chicago, 292305.
Lakoff, R. and Bucholtz, M. 2004. Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries. New York.
Langen, P. 1880. Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Plautus. Leipzig.
Leach, E. W. 1969. “Ergasilus and the Ironies of the Captivi.” C&M 30: 263296.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London.
Lefèvre, E. 1983. “La structure des Adelphes de Térence comme critère d’analyse.” In Zehnacker, H (ed.), Théâtre et spectacles dans l’antiquité. Actes du colloque de Strasbourg, 5–7 novembre 1981. Leiden, 169179.
Lefèvre, E. 1998. “Plautus’ Captivi oder Die Palliata als Prätexta.” In Benz, L. and Lefèvre, E. (eds.), Maccus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität der Captivi des Plautus. Tübingen, 950.
Leigh, M. 2004. Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford.
Leo, F. 1883. “Lectiones Plautinae.” Hermes 18: 558587 = Fraenkel, E (ed.), 1960. Ausgewählte Kleine Schriften, vol. 1. Rome, 3–33.
Leo, F. (ed.) 1895–1896. Plauti Comoediae. 2 vols. Berlin.
Leo, F. 1912. Plautinische Forschungen: Zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie. Berlin.
Leo, F. 1913. Geschichte der Römischen Literatur. Berlin.
Letessier, P. 2000. “La ‘salutatio’ chez Plaute: adaptation ludique d’un rituel social.” Lalies 20: 151163.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge.
Lilja, S. 1965. Terms of Abuse in Roman Comedy. Helsinki.
Lindsay, W. M. (ed.) 1900. The Captivi of Plautus. London.
Lindsay, W. M. 1910. T. Macci Plauti Comoediae. 2 vols. Oxford.
Lindsay, W. M. 1922. Early Latin Verse. Oxford.
Lindsay, W. M. (ed.) 2003. Nonius Marcellus De compendiosa doctrina: libros XX. Munich.
Lloyd, M. 2004. “The Politeness of Achilles: Off-record Conversation Strategies in Homer and the Meaning of kertomia.” JHS 124: 7589.
Lloyd, M. 2006. “Sophocles in the Light of Face-Threat Politeness Theory.” In de Jong, I. J. F. and Rijksbaron, A. (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Language: Aspects of Diction, Syntax, and Pragmatics. Leiden, 225239.
Lloyd, M. 2009. “The Language of the Gods: Politeness in the Prologue of the Troades.” In Cousland, J. R. C. and Hume, J. R (eds.), The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp. Leiden, 183192.
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1973. “Terentian Technique in the Adelphi and the Eunuchus.” CQ 23.2: 279284.
Loch, E. 1871. Zum Gebrauch des Imperativus bei Plautus. Memel.
Lodge, G. 1924–1933. Lexicon Plautinum. 2 vols. Leipzig.
Löfstedt, L. 1966. Les expressions du commandement et de la défense en latin et leur survie dans les langues romanes. Helsinki.
Lord, C. 1977. “Menander and the Adelphoe of Terence.” TAPhA 107: 183202.
Lowe, J. C. B. 1997. “Terence’s Four-Speaker Scenes.” Phoenix 51.2: 152169.
MacCary, W. T. and Willcock, M. M. (eds.) 1976. Plautus: Casina. Cambridge.
Mack, A. M. 1967. “Mulieres comicae: Female Characters in Plautus and his Predecessors.” Dissertation, Harvard University.
Malinowski, B. 1946. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A., The Meaning of Meaning, 8th edn. New York, 296336.
Maltby, R. 1979. “Linguistic Characterization of Old Men in Terence.” CPh 74.2: 136147.
Maltby, R. 1995. “The Distribution of Greek Loan-Words in Plautus.” In Brock, R. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, vol. 8. Leeds, 3169.
Maltby, R. 2014. “Donatus on ‘Appropriate Style’ in the Plays of Terence.” In Papaioannou, S. (ed.), Terence and Interpretation. Newcastle upon Tyne, 201221.
Manuwald, G. 2011. Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge.
Marmorale, E. 1950. Naevius Poeta. Florence.
Marouzeau, J. 1910. La phrase à verbe ‘être’ en Latin. Paris.
Marouzeau, J. 1922. L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine. I: Les groupes nominaux. Paris.
Marshall, C. W. 2009 (repr. with corrections). The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.
Martin, J. 1974. Antike Rhetorik: Technik und Methode. Munich.
Martin, R. H. 2002 (repr. with additions). Adelphoe: Terence. Cambridge.
Martin, R. H. 1995. “A Not-So-Minor Character in Terence’s Eunuchus.” CPh 90.2: 139151.
Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes. Ithaca, NY.
Mastronarde, D. 2002. Euripides: Medea. Cambridge.
Maurach, G. (ed.) 1988. Der Poenulus des Plautus. Heidelberg.
McCarthy, K. 2000. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton.
McConnell-Ginet, S. 1978. “Intonation in a Man’s World.” Signs 3.3: 541559.
McGlynn, P. 1963–1967. Lexicon Terentianum. 2 vols. London.
Mey, J. L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd edn. Malden, MA.
Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge.
Milroy, L. 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford.
Minchin, E. 2007. Homeric Voices: Discourse, Memory, Gender. Oxford.
Monaco, G. (ed.) 1969. Plauto: Curculio. Palermo.
Moore, T. 1998. The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin, TX.
Moore, T. 2012. Music in Roman Comedy. Cambridge.
Morgan, J. L. 1978. “Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts.” In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York, 261280.
Mowat, B. and Werstine, P. (eds.) Coriolanus. 2009.
Müller, R. 1997. Sprechen und Sprache. Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg.
Müller, W. 1981. Topik des Stilbegriffs. Darmstadt.
Núñez, S. 1995. “Materiales para una sociología de la lengua latina: Terencio y los modificadores de imperativo.” Florentia Iliberritana 6: 347366.
O’Barr, W. and Atkins, B. K.. 1980. “Women’s Language or ‘Powerless Language’?” In McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R. and Furman, N. (eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York, 93110.
Osmun, G. F. 1952. “Dialogue Technique in Menander.” Dissertation, University of Michigan.
Owens, W. M. 2000. “Plautus’ Stichus and the Political Crisis of 200 BC.” AJPh 121.3: 385407.
Packman, Z. M. 1999. “Feminine Role Designations in the Comedies of Plautus.” AJPh 120.2: 245258.
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge.
Palmer, L. R. 1961. The Latin Language. London.
Paltridge, B. 2006. Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. New York.
Paoli, U. E. 1943. “L’ἐπίκληρος Attica nella palliata romana.” Atene e Roma 11: 19–29 = Paoli, U. E., 1976. Altri studi di diritto Greco e Romano. Milan, 103112.
Parker, H. 1989. “Crucially Funny or Tranio on the Couch: The Servus Callidus and Jokes about Torture.” TAPhA 119: 233246.
Petersmann, H 1995. “Zur Mündlichen Charakterisierung des Fremden in der Komödie des Plautus.” In Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.), Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels: Festgabe für Eckard Lefèvre zum 60. Geburtstag. Tübingen, 123136.
Petersmann, H 1996–1997. “Die Nachahmung des sermo rusticus auf der Bühne des Plautus und Terenz.” AAntHung 37: 199211.
Pinkster, H. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics. London.
Poccetti, P. 2010. “Greeting and Farewell Expressions as Evidence for Colloquial Language: Between Literary and Epigraphical Texts.” In Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds.), Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge, 100126.
Pomeroy, S. 1975. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity. New York.
Probert, P. and Willi, A. (eds.) Laws and Rules in Indo-European. Oxford.
Raccanelli, R. 1998. L’amicitia nelle commedie di Plauto: un’indagine antropologica. Bari.
Reay, B. 2005. “Agriculture, Writing, and Cato’s Aristocratic Self-Fashioning.” CA 24.2: 331361.
Rei, A. 1998. “Villains, Wives, and Slaves in the Comedies of Plautus.” In Joshel, S. R. and Murnaghan, S. (eds.), Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations. London and New York, 92108.
Reich, V. 1933. “Sprachliche Charakteristik bei Terenz.” WS 51: 7294.
Ribbeck, O. 1875. Die Römische Tragödie im Zeitalter der Republik. Leipzig.
Riccotilli, L. 2003. “Lettura pragmatica del finale degli Adelphoe.” Dioniso 2: 6083.
Richlin, A. 2014. “Talking to Slaves in the Plautine Audience.” CA 33.1: 174226.
Richter, P. 1873. “Heus.” In Studemund, W. (ed.), Studien auf dem Gebiet des Archaischen Lateins, vol. 1. Berlin, 566579.
Rieth, O. 1964. Die Kunst Menanders in den “Adelphen” des Terenz. Hildesheim.
Risselada, R. 1989. “Latin Illocutionary Parentheticals.” Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 15.1–4: 367378.
Risselada, R. 1993. The Imperative and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam.
Risselada, R. 1994. “Modo and sane, or What to Do with Particles in Latin Directives.” In Herman, J. (ed.), Linguistic Studies on Latin: Selected Papers from the 6th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics. Amsterdam, 319342.
Roesch, S. 2005. “L’échec des clôtures du dialogue dans les comédies de Plaute.” In Calboli, G. (ed.), Papers on Grammar IX.2. Rome, 921932.
Roesch, S. 2008. “Les débuts des dialogues dans la comédie et la tragédie latines.” In Bureau, B. and Nicolas, C. (eds.), Commencer et finir: débuts et fins dans les littératures grecque, latin et néolatin. Lyon, 207222.
Roesch, S. 2010. “Interpellation et enjeux de pouvoir dans les comédies et tragédies latines,” CORELA (Numéros thématiques | L’interpellation). Online at: http://corela.revues.org/1632 (accessed December 29, 2015).
Rosén, H. 1999. Latine loqui: Trends and Directions in the Crystallization of Classical Latin. Munich.
Rothwell, K. 1995. “Aristophanes’ Wasps and the Socio-politics of Aesop’s Fables.” CJ 93: 233254.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G.. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50.4: 696735.
Saller, R. 1982. Personal Patronage under the Early Empire. Cambridge.
Sandbach, F. H. 1970. “Menander’s Manipulation of Language for Dramatic Purposes.” Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 26: 113136.
Sandbach, F. H. 1978. “Donatus’ Use of the Name Terentius and the End of Terence’s Adelphoe.BICS 25: 123145.
Scafuro, A. C. 2003–2004. “The Rigmarole of the Parasite’s Contract for a Prostitute in Asinaria: Legal Documents in Plautus and His Predecessors.” LICS 3.4. Online at: www.leeds.ac.uk/classics/lics/ (accessed December 29, 2015).
Schauwecker, Y. 2002. “Zum Sprechverhalten der Frauentypen bei Plautus.” Gymnasium 109: 191211.
Schuhmann, E. 1977. “Der Typ der ‘uxor dotata’ in den Komödien des Plautus.” Philologus 121: 4565.
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge.
Searle, J. R. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York, 5982.
Searle, J. R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5: 124.
Segal, E. 1968. Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus. Cambridge, MA.
Seyfarth, R. M., and Cheney, D. L.. 2012. “The Evolutionary Origins of Friendship.” Annual Review of Psychology 63: 153177.
Seyffert, O. 1874. Studia Plautina. Berlin.
Sharrock, A. 1997. “Haud Mollia Iussa” [response to Gibson 1997]. In Atherton, C. (ed.), Form and Content in Didactic Poetry. Bari, 99115.
Shipp, G. P. 1953. “Greek in Plautus.” WS 66: 105112.
Siess, H. 1906. “Über die Characterzeichnung in den Komödien des Terenz.” WS 28: 229262.
Siess, H. 1908a. “Über die Characterzeichnung in den Komödien des Terenz: II.” WS 29: 81109.
Siess, H. 1908b. “Über die Characterzeichnung in den Komödien des Terenz: III.” WS 29: 289320.
Slater, N. W. 1985. Plautus in Performance: The Theater of the Mind. Princeton.
Slater, N. W. 1988. “The Fictions of Patriarchy in Terence’s Hecyra.” CW 81.4: 249260.
Sommerstein, A. 1995. “The Language of Athenian Women.” In de Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. H (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci. Bari, 6185.
Spranger, P. 1984. Historische Untersuchungen zu den Sklavenfiguren des Plautus und Terenz. Stuttgart.
Stewart, R. 2012. Plautus and Roman Slavery. Malden, MA.
Stockert, W. 1982. “Zur sprachlichen Charakterisierung der Personen in Plautus Aulularia.” Gymnasium 89: 414.
Stockert, W. 2004. “Schwören auch Frauen bei Herkules? – Bemerkungen zu Cist. 52 und anderen Plautus-Stellen.” In Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.), Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen, 363370.
Stubbs, M. 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago.
Studemund, W. 1873. Studien auf dem Gebiet des Archaischen Lateins. Berlin.
Tannen, D. 1987. “Repetition in Conversation as Spontaneous Formulaicity.” Text 7: 215243.
Tannen, D. 1994. Gender and Discourse. Oxford.
Taylor, L. R. 1949. Party Politics in the Age of Caesar. Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Terkourafi, M. 2003. “Generalised and Particularised Implicatures of Linguistic Politeness.” In Kühnlein, P., Rieser, H. and Zeevat, H. (eds.), Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millenium. Amsterdam, 149164.
Terkourafi, M. 2007. “Toward a Universal Notion of Face for a Universal Notion of Co-operation.” In Kecskes, I. and Horn, L. (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Berlin, 313344.
Terkourafi, M. 2008. “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness.” In Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. (eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin, 4574.
Terkourafi, M. 2012. “Politeness and Pragmatics.” In Jaszczolt, K. and Allan, K (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge, 617637.
Thalmann, W. 1996. “Versions of Slavery in the Captivi of Plautus.” Ramus: 112145.
Thamm, G. 1972. “Beobachtungen zur Form des plautinischen Dialogs.” Hermes 100: 558567.
Tobias, A. J. 1979. “Bacchiac Women and Iambic Slaves in Plautus.” CW 73.1: 918.
Touratier, C. 1977. “Valeurs et functionnement de subjonctif Latin.” REL 55: 370406.
Traill, A. 2013. “Adelphoe.” In Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), Companion to Terence. Malden, MA, 318339.
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: iusti coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.
Trosborg, A. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. Berlin.
Trudgill, P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge.
Tschernjaew, P. 1900. Terentiana: De Sermone Terentii Plebeio aut Quotidiano. Kasan.
Tuchhaendler, N. J. 1876. De Vocabulis Graecis in Linguam Latinam Translatis. Berlin.
Unceta-Gómez, L. 2009. La petición verbal en Latín: estudio léxico, semántico y pragmatico. Madrid.
Ussing, J. L. 1875. T. Macci Plauti Comoediae, vol. 1. Copenhagen.
Vahlen, J. 1967. Ennianae poesis reliquiae. 2nd edn. Amsterdam.
Vairel-Carron, H. 1975. Exclamation, ordre, et défense: analyse de deux systèmes syntaxiques en Latin. Paris.
Valentini, A. 2012. Matronae tra novitas e mos maiorum: spazi e modalità dell’azione pubblica femminile nella Roma medio repubblicana. Venice.
Van Dyke, J. 1977. “Making a Scene: Language and Gesture in Coriolanus.” In Alexander, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Shakespeare Library, vol. 2: Shakespeare Criticism. Cambridge, 276286.
Verboven, K. 2011. “Friendship.” In Peachin, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World. New York, 404421.
Victor, B. 2012Terentius orator an poeta: The Endings of Eunuchus and Adelphoe.” CQ 62: 671691.
Victor, B. 2013. “History of the Text and Scholia.” In Augoustakis, A., Traill, A. and J. Thorburn (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA, 343363.
Viljoen, G. van N. 1963. “The Plot of the Captivi of Plautus.” AClass 6: 3863.
Wackernagel, J. 1926. Vorlesungen über Syntax. 2 vols. Basel.
Wagenvoort, H. 1931. “De Sticho Plautina.” Mnemosyne 59.3: 309312.
Wardhaugh, R. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA.
Warmington, E. H. Remains of Old Latin, vols. 1–4. Cambridge, MA.
Watt, W. S. 1963. “Heus.” Glotta 41: 138143.
Watts, R. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge.
Webster, T. B. L. 1974. An Introduction to Menander. Manchester.
Welsh, J. 2015. “Roman Women in the fabula togata.” In Dutsch, D., James, S. L. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Women in Roman Republican Drama. Madison, WI, 155170.
Wessner, P. 1902–1908. Commentum Terenti, accedunt Eugraphi commentum et scholia Bembina. Leipzig.
Westermann, W. 1955. The Slave Systems of Greek and Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia.
Wiedemann, T. E. J. 1987. Slavery. Oxford.
Willcock, M. 1995. “Plautus and the Epidicus.” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, vol. 8. Leeds, 1929.
Wiles, D. 1991. The Masks of Menander. Cambridge.
Wilkins, A. 1895. De Oratore: Libri Tres, vol. 1. Oxford.
Willi, A. 2003. The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford.
Willi, A. 2002. “The Language of Greek Comedy: Introduction and Bibliographical Sketch.” In Willi, A. (ed.), The Language of Greek Comedy. Oxford, 132.
Williams, C. 2012. Reading Roman Friendship. Cambridge.
Woods, A., Fletcher, P. and Hughes, A.. 1986. Statistics in Language Studies. Cambridge.
Wright, J. 1974. Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the comoedia palliata. Rome.
Zhang, Q. 2005. “A Chinese Yuppie in Beijing: Phonological Variation and the Construction of a New Professional Identity.” Language in Society 34: 431–66.
Zucker, F. 1950. Freundschaftsbewährung in der neuen attischen Komödie: ein Kapitel hellenistischer Ethik und Humanität. Berlin.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.