Hafner, H. (2015) “Descriptive psychopathology, phenomenology, and the legacy of Karl Jaspers.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17, 19–29.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (2010) “Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, M. E., Yee, C. M., Heller, W., Miller, G. A., & Spielberg, J. M. (2019) “Reconfiguration of brain networks supporting inhibition of emotional challenge.” NeuroImage, 186, 350–357.Google Scholar

Bates, T. C., Lewis, G. J., & Weiss, A. (2013) “Childhood socioeconomic status amplifies genetic effects of adult intelligence.” Psychological Science, 24, 2111–2116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beauchaine, T. P., & Klein, D. N. (2017) “Developmental psychopathology and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.” In Beauchaine, T. P. & Hinshaw, S. P. (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 33–67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. (2007) “Reducing psychology while maintaining its autonomy via mechanistic explanations.” In Schouton, M. & de Jong, H. L. (Eds.), The matter of mind: Philosophical essays of psychology, neuroscience, and reduction (pp. 172–198). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. (2017). “Explicating top-down causation using networks and dynamics.” Philosophy of Science, 84(2), 253–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2008) “From reduction back to higher levels.” Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 559–564). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Berenbaum, H. (2013) “Classification and psychopathology research.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 894–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolton, D. (2013). “Should mental disorders be regarded as brain disorders? 21st century mental health sciences and implications for research and training.” World Psychiatry, 12(1), 24.Google Scholar

Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. (2013) “Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121.Google Scholar

Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., & Kalis, A. (2019) “Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42(e2), 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Schmittmann, V. D., Epskamp, S., & Waldorp, L. J. (2011) “The small world of psychopathology.” PLoS ONE 6, e27407.Google Scholar

Borsboom, D., Rhemtulla, M., Cramer, A. O. J., Van der Maas, H. L. J., Scheffer, M., & Dolan, C. V. (2016) “Kinds versus continua: A review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs.” Psychological Medicine, 46, 1567–1579.Google Scholar

Brennand, K. J., Simone, A., Jou, J., Gelboin-Burkhart, C., Tran, N., Sangar, S., … McCarthy, S. (2011) “Modelling schizophrenia using human induced pluripotent stem cells.” Nature, 473(7346), 221–225.Google Scholar

BBRF/Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. (2018, April) “What’s new with TMS for depression and other brain diseases.” https://us3.campaign-archive.com/?u=c6e89b4de3dfd70e795490632&id=7b7ae091ba&e=1a018af71d, accessed 04/05/18.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. T. Jr, & Davis, J. M. (2012) “Another view of the history of antipsychotic drug discovery and development.” Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 1168.Google Scholar

Casey, B. J., Oliveri, M. E., & Insel, T. (2014) “A neurodevelopmental perspective on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework.” Biological Psychiatry, 76, 350–353.Google Scholar

Clayson, P. E., & Miller, G. A. (2017) “Psychometric considerations in the measurement of event-related brain potentials: Guidelines for measurement and reporting.” International Journal of Psychophysiology, 111, 57–67.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Craver, C. F. (2007) Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craver, C. F., & Bechtel, W. (2007) “Top-down causation without top-down causes.” Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–563.Google Scholar

Cuthbert, B. N. (2015). “Research Domain Criteria: Toward future psychiatric nosologies.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17(1), 89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2010) “Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria project.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 1061–1062.Google Scholar

Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013) “Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC.” BMC Medicine, 11, 126.Google Scholar

Cuthbert, B. N., & Kozak, M. J. (2013) “Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 928–937.Google Scholar

Davis, J. M. (1976) “Recent developments in the drug treatment of schizophrenia.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 208–214.Google Scholar

Engstrom, E. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2015) “Emil Kraepelin: Icon and reality.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 1190–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrante, M., Redish, A. D., Oquendo, M. A., Averbeck, B. B., Kinnane, M. E., & Gordon, J. A. (2018) “Computational psychiatry: A report from the 2017 NIMH workshop on opportunities and challenges.” Molecular Psychiatry, 24(4):479–483.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1968) Psychological explanation. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Frances, A. (2014) “RDoC is necessary, but very oversold.” World Psychiatry, 13, 47–49.Google Scholar

Franklin, J. C., Jamieson, J. P., Glenn, C. R., & Nock, M. K. (2015) “How developmental psychopathology theory and research can inform the research domain criteria (RDoC) project.” Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 280–290.Google Scholar

Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., Montague, R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) “Computational psychiatry: The brain as a phantastic organ.” The Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

George, M. S., Lisanby, S. H., Avery, D., McDonald, W. M., Durkalski, V., Pavlicova, M., … Holtzheimer, P. E. (2010) “Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: A sham-controlled randomized trial.” Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 507–516.Google Scholar

Golden, R. R., & Meehl, P. E. (1979) “Detection of the schizoid taxon with MMPI indicators.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 217–233.Google Scholar

Goldfried, M. R. (2016). “On possible consequences of National Institute of Mental Health funding for psychotherapy research and training.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(1), 77.Google Scholar

Gordon, J. A. (2018) “Towards a genomic psychiatry: Recommendations of the Genomics Workgroup of the NAMHC.” Director’s Messages published online March 29, 2018. www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/messages/2018/towards-a-genomic-psychiatry-recommendations-of-the-genomics-workgroup-of-the-namhc.shtml, accessed 01/06/18.Google Scholar

Gordon, J. A. (2019) “From neurobiology to novel medications: A principled approach to translation.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 425–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Griesinger, W. (1854) Die Pathologie und Therapie der psychischen Krankheiten. Stuttgart: Krabbe.Google Scholar

Hardcastle, V. G. (1996) How to build a theory in cognitive science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, S. E. (1998). “NIMH during the tenure of Director Steven E. Hyman, MD: The now and future of NIMH.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(Suppl.), 36–40.Google Scholar

Hyman, S. E. (2005). “Addiction: A disease of learning and memory.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1414–1422.Google Scholar

Hyman, S. E. (2010) “The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.Google Scholar

Hyman, S. E. (2012) “Revolution stalled.” Science Translational Medicine, 4, 155cm11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Insel, T. R. (2010, April) “Faulty circuits.” Scientific American, 302(4), 44–51.Google Scholar

Insel, T. R., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2009) “Endophenotypes: Bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity.” Biological Psychiatry, 66, 988–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Insel, T. R., Cuthbert, B. N., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., … Wang, P. S. (2010) “Research domain criteria: Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kandel, E., & Squire, L. (1992) “Cognitive neuroscience: Editorial overview.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2, 143–145.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S. (2005) “‘A gene for…’: The nature of gene action in psychiatric disorders.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1243–1252.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S. (2008) “Explanatory models for psychiatric illness.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 695–702.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S. (2012a) “The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: Replacing the organic functional/hardware-software dichotomy with empirically based pluralism.” Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 377–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kendler, K. S. (2012b) “Levels of explanation in psychiatric and substance use disorders: Implications for the development of an etiologically based nosology.” Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 11–21.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S., & Campbell, J. (2009) “Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: Repositioning the mind–body problem.” Psychological Medicine, 39, 881–887.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S., Zachar, P., & Craver, C. (2011) “What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders?” Psychological Medicine, 41, 1143–1150.Google Scholar

Kozak, M. J., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2016) “The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics.” Psychophysiology, 53, 286–297.Google Scholar

Kozak, M. J., & Miller, G. A. (1982). “Hypothetical constructs versus intervening variables: A re-appraisal of the three-systems model of anxiety assessment.” Behavioral Assessment, 14, 347–358.Google Scholar

Lake, J. I., Yee, C. M., & Miller, G. A. (2017) “Misunderstanding RDoC. Mechanisms of mental disorders special issue,” Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 170–174.Google Scholar

Laruelle, M. (2013) “The second revision of the dopamine theory of schizophrenia: Implications for treatment and drug development.” Biological Psychiatry, 74, 80–81.Google Scholar

Leshner, A. I. (1997). “Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters.” Science, 278, 45–47.Google Scholar

Leshner, A. I. (2007) “Behavioral science comes of age.” Science, 316, 953.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007) “Cognitive neuroscience and depression: Legitimate versus illegitimate reductionism and five challenges.” Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31, 263–272.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014) “The research domain criteria (RDoC): An analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 129–139.Google Scholar

Lilienfeld, S. O., & Treadway, M. T. (2016) “Clashing diagnostic approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 435–463.Google Scholar

MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). “On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.” Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.Google Scholar

Marr, D. (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Maj, M. (2013) “Mental disorders as ‘brain disorders’ and Jaspers’ legacy.” World Psychiatry, 12, 1–3.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1996). “Presidential address: How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology.” Psychophysiology, 33, 615–628.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (2010) “Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Clayson, P. E., & Yee, C. M. (2014) “Hunting genes, hunting endophenotypes.” Psychophysiology, 51, 1329–1330.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000) “Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212–215.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., & Kozak, M. J. (1993) “A philosophy for the study of emotion: Three-systems theory.” In Birbaumer, N. & Öhman, A. (Eds.), The structure of emotion: Physiological, cognitive and clinical aspects (pp. 31–47). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Rockstroh, B. S., Hamilton, H. K., & Yee, C. M. (2016) “Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC.” Psychophysiology, 53, 410–414.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., & Yee, C. M. (2015) “Moving psychopathology forward.” Psychological Inquiry, 26, 263–267.Google Scholar

Montague, P. R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Dayan, P. (2012) “Computational psychiatry.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 72–80.Google Scholar

Morris, S. E., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2012) “Research domain criteria: Cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior.” Dialogues Clinical Neuroscience, 14, 29–37.Google Scholar

National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Genomics. (2018) “Report of the National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Genomics: Opportunities and Challenges of Psychiatric Genetics Research Recommendations Summary.” [Internet]. National Institute of Mental Health. Available from: www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/namhc-genomics-workgroup-research-recommendations-summary.shtml, accessed 29/06/19.Google Scholar

Perera, T., George, M. S., Grammer, G., Janicak, P. G., Pascual-Leone, A., & Wirecki, T S. (2016) “The Clinical TMS Society consensus review and treatment recommendations for TMS therapy for major depressive disorder.” Brain Stimulation, 9, 336–346.Google Scholar

Phillips, M. R. (2014) “Will RDoC hasten the decline of America’s global leadership role in mental health?” World Psychiatry, 13, 40–41.Google Scholar

Piccinini, G., & Craver, C. (2011) “Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches.” Synthese, 183, 283–311.Google Scholar

Robins, E., & Guze, S. B. (1970) “Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 983–987.Google Scholar

Sanislow, C. A., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., Kozak, M. J., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., … Cuthbert, B. N. (2010) “Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research domain criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631–639.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Meca, A., & Sauvigné, K. C. (2016) “The role of neuroscience within psychology: A call for inclusiveness over exclusiveness.” American Psychologist, 71, 52–70.Google Scholar

Sharp, P. B., & Miller, G. A. (2019) “Reduction and autonomy in psychology and neuroscience: A call for pragmatism.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(1), 18–31.Google Scholar

Sporns, O. (2013) “The human connectome: Origins and challenges.” NeuroImage, 80, 53–61.Google Scholar

Stephan, K. E., & Mathys, C. (2014) “Computational approaches to psychiatry.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 85–92.Google Scholar

Tabb, K. (2018, May) “Can psychiatry be precise?” Invited lecture at the “Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry V: The Problems of Multiple Levels, Explanatory Pluralism, Reduction and Emergence” conference, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Thomas, J. G., & Sharp, P. B. (2019) “Mechanistic science: A new approach to comprehensive psychopathology research that relates psychological and biological phenomena.” Clinical Psychological Science, 7(2), 196–215.Google Scholar

Wright, C., & Bechtel, W. (2007) “Mechanisms and psychological explanation.” In Thagard, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: Volume 4. Philosophy of psychology and cognitive science (pp. 31–79). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Yang, A. C., & Tsai, S. J. (2017) “New targets for schizophrenia treatment beyond the dopamine hypothesis.” International Journal of Molecular Science, 18, e1689.Google Scholar

Yee, C. M., Javitt, D. C., & Miller, G. A. (2015) “Replacing DSM categorical analyses with dimensional analyses in psychiatry research: The research domain criteria initiative.” JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 1159–1160.Google Scholar

Bilder, R. M., Howe, A. G., & Sabb, F. W. (2013) “Multilevel models from biology to psychology: Mission impossible?” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 917–927.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1936) “Testability and meaning.” Philosophy of Science, 3, 419–471.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1937) “Testability and meaning—continued.” Philosophy of Science, 4, 104.Google Scholar

Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) “Response to Lilienfield.” Behaviour Research and Therapy, 62, 140–142.Google Scholar

Cuthbert, B. N., & Kozak, M. J. (2013) “Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(3), 928–937.Google Scholar

Donald, M. (2001) A mind so rare. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Kuppens, P. (2012) “Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research.” Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 903–920.Google Scholar

Hyman, S. E. (2010) “The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.Google Scholar

Insel, T. (2013) “Director’s blog: Transforming diagnosis.” Retrieved from www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Kendler, K. S. (2005) “‘A gene for’: The nature of gene action in psychiatric disorders.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(7), 1243–1252.Google Scholar

Luhrmann, T. M. (2000) Of two minds: An anthropologist looks at American psychiatry. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Meehl, P. E. (1978) “Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 806–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. A. (2010) “Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 716–743.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., & Keller, J. (2000) “Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(6), 212–215.Google Scholar

Poldrack, R. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2016) “From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: Informatics and the search for mental structure.” Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 587–612.Google Scholar

Sullivan, J. A. (2017) “Coordinated pluralism as a means to facilitate integrative taxonomies of cognition.” Philosophical Explorations, 20(2), 129–145.Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E., Horn, E. E., & Pettersson, E. (2014) “A phenotypic null hypothesis for the genetics of personality.” Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 515–540.Google Scholar

Zachar, P. (2000) Psychological concepts and biological psychiatry: A philosophical analysis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zachar, P. (2015) “Psychiatric disorders: Natural kinds made by the world or practical kinds made by us?” World Psychiatry, 14, 288–290.Google Scholar

Zachar, P. (2018) “Quantitative classification as (re-)descriptive psychopathology.” World Psychiatry, 17(3), 294–295.Google Scholar

Zachar, P., Turkheimer, E., & Schaffner, K. F. (forthcoming) “Defining and redefining phenotypes: Operational definitions as open concepts”. In Wright, A. G. C. & Hallquist, M. N. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of research methods in clinical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar