Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language, Literacy, and Technology , pp. 261 - 277Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Allen, H. W., & Paesani, K. (2010). Exploring the possibility of a pedagogy of multiliteracies in introductory foreign language courses. L2 Journal, 2, 119–142.Google Scholar
Amselle, J.-L. (2001). Branchements: Anthropologie de l'universalité des cultures. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2000). Λατινο-ελληνική ορθογραφία στο ηλεκτρονικό ταχυδροµείο: Χρήση και στάσεις [Latin-Greek orthography in electronic mails: Use and stances]. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 20, 75–86.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2009). ‘Greeklish’: Transliteration practice and discourse in the context of computer-mediated digraphia. In Georgakopoulou, A. & Silk, M. (eds.), Standard Languages and Language Standards – Greek, Past and Present (pp. 221–249). Aldershot, Hampshire (UK): Ashgate.Google Scholar
Anis, J. (ed.). (2001). Vous parlez texto? Guide des nouveaux langages du réseau. Paris: Le cherche midi éditeur.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (2001). On Interpretation (Hedghill, E. M., trans.). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
Armstrong-Coben, A. (2009). The computer will see you now. New York Times, March 6, p. A23.Google Scholar
Arola, K. L. (2010). The çesign of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (McGee, V. W., trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baron, D. (2009). A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where it's Heading. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D., & Lee, C. K. M. (2012). Redefining vernacular literacies in the age of Web 2.0. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 282–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauerlein, M. (2009). The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young AMERICANS and Jeopardizes our Future (or, Don't Trust Anyone Under 30). New York: Tarcher/Penguin.Google Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthopology, 19, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. (2006). The age of the thumb: A cultural reading of mobile technologies from Asia. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 19(2), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G., Blythe, M., & Sengers, P. (2005). Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2), 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, M. (2002). Signs of Cherokee Culture: Sequoyah's Syllabary in Eastern Cherokee Life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. Boston: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguisitcs of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, J. M. (2001). Paper Before Print: The History and Impact of Paper in the Islamic World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordwell, D. (2006). The Way Hollywood Tells it: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
boyd, d. (2006). Friends, friendsters, and top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1418/1336.Google Scholar
boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brassac, C. (1997). Processus cognitifs en situation d'interaction: De la communication à la communication. Actes de la Sixième Ecole d’été de l'Association pour la Recherche Cognitive (pp. 229–236). Bonas.Google Scholar
Bühler, C. (1960). The Fifteenth-Century Book: The Scribes, the Printers, the Decorators. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, C. (1998). Paul Renner: The Art of Typography. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Burke, M., Csabi, S., Week, L., & Zerkowitz, J. (eds.). (2012). Pedagogical Stylistics: Current Trends in Language, Literature and ELT. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Butler, S. (1962). Thought and language. In Black, M. (ed.), The Importance of Language (pp. 13–35). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2005). Literacy as a framework for advanced language acquisition. ADFL Bulletin, 37(1), 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., & Norris, J. M. (2011). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94(Supplement).Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technical Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 83–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, H., & Tolkien, C. (eds.). (1981). Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Carr, N. G. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to our Brains. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Chu, M., Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Sarrazin, H., Westergren, M. (2012). The Social Economy: Unlocking Value and Productivity through Social Technologies. McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 60–81.Google Scholar
Clanchy, M. T. (1979). From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1999). How do real people communicate with virtual partners? Proceedings of 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium, Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems (pp. 43–47). Falmouth, MA: AAAI.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. (1988). The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. (2009). Twitter on the barricades: Six lessons learned. New York Times, June 20. www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/weekinreview/21cohenweb.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. (2011). When knowledge isn't written, does it still count? New York Times, August 7.Google Scholar
Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences. (2013). The Heart of the Matter: The Humanities and Social Sciences for a Vibrant, Competitive, and Secure Nation. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Conrad, D. C. (2001). Recontructing oral tradition: Souleymane Kanté's approach to writing Mande history. Mande Studies, 3, 147–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies, 4(3), 164–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damerow, P. (2006). The origins of writing as a problem of historical epistemology. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal, 1. http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2006/cdlj2006_001.html.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (1996). The study of writing systems. In Daniels, P. T. & Bright, W. (eds.), The World's Writing Systems (pp. 3–17). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.Google Scholar
Davis, N. Z. (1975). Printing and the People. In Davis, N. Z. (ed.), Society and Culture in Early Modern France (pp. 189–226). Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibert, M. (2012). The problem with invisible children's “Kony 2012.” African Arguments. http://africanarguments.org/2012/03/08/the-problem-with-invisible-childrens-kony-2012-by-michael-deibert/.Google Scholar
Deibert, R. J. (1997). Parchment, Printing, and Hypermedia: Communication in World Order Transformation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deibert, R. J., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. (eds.). (2008). Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demange, F. (2002). Le sceau-cylindre et ses modes d'utilisation au Proche-Orient antique. In Mercier, A. (ed.), Les trois révolutions du livre (pp. 21–25). Paris: Musée des Arts et Metiers/Imprimerie Nationale Éditions.Google Scholar
Demick, B. (2010). China worries about losing its character(s). Los Angeles Times, July 12.Google Scholar
Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology (Spivak, G. C., trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Develotte, C., & Mangenot, F. (2007). Discontinuités didactiques et langagiers au sein d'un dispositif pédagogique en ligne. Glottopol, 10. www.univ-rouen.fr/dyalang/glottopol.Google Scholar
Develotte, C., Guichon, N., & Kern, R. (2008). “Allo Berkeley? Ici Lyon…Vous nous voyez bien?” Etude d'un dispositif de formation en ligne synchrone francoaméricain à travers les discours de ses usagers. Alsic (Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d'Information et de Communication), 11(2), 129–156.Google Scholar
Develotte, C., Guichon, N., & Vincent, C. (2010). The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment. ReCALL, 23(3), 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Develotte, C., Kern, R., & Lamy, M.-N. (eds.). (2011). Décrire la conversation en ligne: le face à face distanciel. Lyon: ENS Éditions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond Sutra Recitation Group. (2007). King Sejong the Great: The Everlasting Light of Korea. Pohang, Korea: Yong Hwa Publications.Google Scholar
Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, E. L. (2005). The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englund, R. K. (1998). Texts from the late Uruk period. In Bauer, J., Englund, R. K., & Krebernik, M. (eds.), Mesopotamien: Späturuk-Zeit und Frühdynastische Zeit (pp. 15–233). Freiburg, Schweiz: Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
Erstad, O., & Wertsch, J. V. (2008). Tales of mediation: Narrative and digital media as cultural tools. In Lundby, K. (ed.), Digital Storytelling, Mediatized Stories: Self-Representations in New Media (pp. 21–39). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fabe, M. (2004). Closely Watched Films: An Introduction to the Art of Narrative Film Technique. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, C. E. (1910). The telephone in opera and church service transmission. Telephony, (September 10), 293.Google Scholar
Febvre, L., & Martin, H.-J. (1976). The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450–1800 (Gerard, D., trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. (1989). Communication and technology. Language & Communication, 9(2/3), 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C. S. (1992). America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, M. (2003). pisan dub-ba and the Direction of Cuneiform Script. Cuneiform Digital Library Bulletin, 2, 1–2. http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlb/2003/002.html.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977a). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Sheridan, A., trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977b). What is an author? (Bouchard, D. F. & Simons, S., trans.). In Bouchard, D. F. (ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 113–138). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frissen, V. (1995). Gender is calling: Some reflections on the past, present, and future use of the telephone. In Grint, K. & Gill, R. (eds.), The Gender-Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research (pp. 79–94). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Gaur, A. (2006). Writing materials. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistic, 2nd edn (pp. 682–684). Boston: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giussani, B. (2006). A first blog of the first draft of history. New York Times, January 30.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, A. E. (2009). The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, N. (2000). Word-Processing Technology in Japan: Kanji and the Keyboard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, J. P. (2005). A new gloss on Hildegard of Bingen's Lingua Ignota. Viator, 36, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323(2 January), 69–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, F. L. (1898). A Collection of Hieroglyphs: A Contribution to the History of Egyptian Writing. London: Egypt Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Grossman, L. (2009). Iran protests: Twitter, the medium of the movement. Time Magazine, June 17. http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1905125,00.html.Google Scholar
Gruppioni, E. (2011). La cyberécriture des adolescents: hétérogénéités et permanences de la “langue jeune”. In Liénard, F. & Zlitni, S. (eds.), La communication électronique: enjeux de langues (pp. 277–291). Limoges, France: Éditions Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
Guichon, N., & McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttenplan, D. D. (2010). Western nations react to poor education results. New York Times, December 8.Google Scholar
Haas, C. (1996). Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., Her, E. J., & Rainie, L. (2009). Social Isolation and New Technology: How the Internet and Mobile Phones Impact Americans’ Social Networks. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
Hansen, D., Bernstorf, E., & Stuber, G. M. (eds.). (2004). The Music and Literacy Connection. Reston, VA: MENC.Google Scholar
Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2010). Mediatization – empirical perspectives: An introduction to a special issue. Communications: The European Journal of Communications Research, 35(3), 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612–634). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. (2013). Grammar and electronic communication. In Chapelle, C. A. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 2338–2346). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higley, S. L. (2007). Hildegard of Bingen's Unknown Language: An Edition, Translation, and Discussion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R. B., & Smith, B. S. (1977). Beginning Cherokee, 2nd edn. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, M. (ed.), The New Psychology of Language (pp. 155–175). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jasmin, K., & Casasanto, D. (2012). The QWERTY Effect: How typing shapes the meanings of words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 499–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannet, A., & Schenk, C. (2010). La fabulueuse histoire d'un média en banlieue. L'Hebdo, (October 10).Google Scholar
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. (1997). Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate. San Francisco: HarperEdge.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. (2000). Toward a sociology of reading in classical antiquity. American Journal of Philology, 121(4), 593–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B. (1996). The Linguistic Individual: Self-Expression in Language and Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2001). Individual. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Key Terms in Language and Culture (pp. 122–125). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2004). The problem of context in computer-mediated communication. In LeVine, P & Scollon, R. (eds.), Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 20–33). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Káldy-Nagy, G. (1974). Beginnings of the Arabic-letter printing in the Muslim world. In Káldy-Nagy, G. (ed.), The Muslim East: Studies in Honour of Julius Germanus (pp. 201–211). Budapest: Loránd Eötvös University.Google Scholar
Kataoka, K. (2003). Form and function of emotive pictorial signs in casual letter writing. Written Language & Literacy, 6(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R. (2008). Literacy and technology in French language teaching: Issues and prospects. In Ayoun, D. (ed.), Studies in French Applied Linguistics (pp. 255–294). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 330–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R., & Schultz, J. M. (2005). Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and the literary in second and foreign language instruction. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. D. (1998). Nehru and the Language Politics of India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolata, G. (2001). Veiled messages of terror may lurk in cyberspace. New York Times, p. F4.Google Scholar
Koutsogiannis, D., & Mitsikopoulou, B. (2003). Greeklish and greekness: Trends and discourses of “glocalness.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1).Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2009). The Multilingual Subject: What Foreign Language Learners Say about their Experience and Why it Matters. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (ed.). (2002). Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Anderson, R. W. (1999). Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 31–42.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2000a). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 153–161). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2000b). Multimodality. In Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (pp. 182–202). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1986). Revolution in poetic language. In Moi, T. (ed.), The Kristeva Reader (pp. 89–136). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
LaFraniere, S. (2009). Your name's not on our list? Change it, Beijing officials say. New York Times, April 21, pp. A1, A8.Google Scholar
Lam, W. S. E. (2009). Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: A case of an adolescent immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 377–397. doi: 10.1598/rrq.44.4.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanham, R. A. (1993). The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanham, R. A. (2006). The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, S. (2013). US mobile data growing while SMS falls, CTIA reports. PC World. www.pcworld.com/article/2037138/us-mobile-data-growing-while-sms-falls-ctia-reports.html.Google Scholar
Leather, J., & van Dam, J. (eds.). (2003). Ecology of Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, G. (1997). The international linguistic background of the correct sounds for the instruction of the people. In Kim-Renaud, Y.-K. (ed.), The Korean Alphabet: Its History and Structure (pp. 31–87). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. (2001). In China, computer use erodes traditional handwriting, stirring a cultural debate. New York Times, February 1. www.nytimes.com/2001/02/01/technology/01LOST.html?pagewanted=all.Google Scholar
Lee, W. (1999). The Artist, formerly known as Prince. Entertainment Weekly, (488). EW.com website: www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,273604,00.html.Google Scholar
Leland, J. (2013). Online battle over sacred scrolls, real-world consequences. New York Times, February 16.Google Scholar
Lenhart, A. (2010). Teens, Cell Phones and Texting. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social Media and Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
Lentfer, J. (2012). Bad guys, good guys, and the people in between. www.how-matters.org/2012/03/06/good-guys-bad-guys/.Google Scholar
Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Volume III (pp. 743–770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B. C., Liu, Y., & O'Neil, M. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In Rush, L. S., Eakle, A. J., & Berger, A. (eds.), Secondary School Literacy: What Research Reveals for Classroom Practice (pp. 37–68). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Levine, A., & Dean, D. R. (2012). Generation on a Tightrope: A Portrait of Today's College Student. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lewin, T. (2012). Digital natives and their customs. New York Times, November 4, p. ED6.Google Scholar
Lieberman, S. J. (1980). Of clay pebbles, hollow clay balls, and writing: A Sumerian view. American Journal of Archaeology, 84(3), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1990). The fable of the keys. Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, H. (2002). Oral and scribal texts in early modern England. Barnard, In J. & McKenzie, D. F. (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. IV 1557–1695 (pp. 97–121). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Low, P., & Hawking, S. W. (2012). Towards establishing neural correlates of intended movements and speech. Paper presented at the Francis Crick Memorial Conference, Cambridge, UK. http://fcmconference.org/–talks.Google Scholar
Lundby, K. (ed.). (2008). Digital Storytelling, Mediatized Stories: Self-Representations in New Media. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lunenfeld, P. (2011). The Secret War Between Downloading and Uploading: Tales of the Computer as Culture Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, D. (2014). Drawing bodies and spaces in telecollaboration: a view of research potential in synaesthesia and multimodality, from the outside. Pedagogies, 9(1), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, D., & Kramsch, C. (2014). The ambiguous world of heteroglossic computer-mediated language learning. In Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. (eds.), Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy (pp. 155–178). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvin, C. (1988). When Old Technologies were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, M. L. (2011). Syntactic Borrowing in Contemporary French: A Linguistic Analysis of News Translation. London: Legenda.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Melton, J. V. H. (2001). Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, A. (2014). Write to speak revisited: An ecological investigation of transfer between chatting and speaking in foreign languages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, J. (1998). Multiple media literacies. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyrowitz, J. (2009). Medium theory: An alternative to the dominant paradigm of media effects. In Nabi, R. L. & Oliver, M. B. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Media Processes and Effects (pp. 517–530). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. (1990). Early Mesopotamian communicative systems: Art, literature, and writing. In Gunter, A. C. (ed.), Investigating Artistic Environments in the Ancient Near East (pp. 53–69). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Miller, C. C. (2014). With medium, Evan Williams is tackling the future of writing online. New York Times, March 8. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/08/with-medium-evan-williams-is-tackling-the-future-of-writing-online/?php=true&_type=blogs&emc=edit_th_20140309&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=2071511&_r=0.Google Scholar
Miller, R. (2004). Wikimedia founder Jimmy Wales responds. Slashdot. http://slashdot.org/story/04/07/28/1351230/wikipedia-founder-jimmy-wales-responds.Google Scholar
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession, 12, 234–245.Google Scholar
Moirand, S. (1979). Situations d’écrit: Compréhension, production en langue étrangère. Paris: CLE International.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. (1995). Safe harbours or open seas: English classrooms in an age of electronic text. English in Australia, 111, 9–16.Google Scholar
Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Social Communication in the Twitter Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, J. (2010). Scrolling and attention. www.nngroup.com/articles/scrolling-and-attention/.Google Scholar
Nissen, H. J. (1986). The archaic texts from Uruk. World Archaeology, 17(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H. J., Damerow, P., & Englund, R. K. (1993). Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing and Techniques of Economic Administration. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Norris, S., & Jones, R. H. (eds.). (2005). Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyiri, J. C. (1994). Thinking with a word processor. In Casati, R. (ed.), Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences (pp. 63–74). Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, J. J. (1998). Avatars of the Word: From Papyrus to Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Malley, A. S., Cohen, G. R., & Grossman, J. M. (2010). Electronic medical records and communication with patients and other clinicians: Are we talking less? Center for Studying Health System Change: Issue Brief, 131(April). www.hschange.com/CONTENT/1125/–ib1.Google Scholar
Okrent, A. (2010). In the Land of Invented Languages: A Celebration of Linguistic Creativity, Madness, and Genius. New York: Spiegel and Gral.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. (2006). Cracking the code of teens’ IM slang. CNET News. http://news.cnet.com/Cracking-the-code-of-teens-IM-slang/2009–1025_3–6135457.html – ixzz1Vgegi3RZ.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1994). The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onishi, N. (2008). Thumbs race as Japan's best sellers go cellular. New York Times, January 20, p. 1.Google Scholar
Palfreyman, D., & al Khalil, M. (2003). “A funky language for teenzz to use”: Representing Gulf Arabic in instant messaging. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1).Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011a). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding From You. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pariser, E. (2011b). When the Internet thinks it knows you. New York Times, May 23, p. A23.Google Scholar
Park, J. (2009). Reading TV: Graphic overtitles in Korean TV shows. Berkeley Language Center Newsletter, 25(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
Parkinson, B., & Lea, M. (2011). Video-linking emotions. In Kappas, A. & Krämer, N. C. (eds.), Face-to-face Communication over the Internet: Emotions in a Web of Culture, Language and Technology (pp. 100–126). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattison, R. (1982). On Literacy: The Politics of the Word from Homer to the Age of Rock. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrinelli, L. (2009). The fat alien sings: A Klingon language opera. NPR Music. www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103903810.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
People's Daily Online. (2010). In information era, handwriting growing obsolete in China. People's Daily Online. http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90782/6954221.html.Google Scholar
Perkel, D. (2007). Everyday creativity: Appropriation before, during, and after dissemination. Paper presented at Supporting Creative Acts Beyond Dissemination. Creativity & Cognition 2007, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Perkel, D. (2008). Copy and paste literacy? Literacy practices in the production of a MySpace profile. In Drotner, K., Jensen, H. S., & Schroeder, K. C. (eds.), Informal Learning and Digital Media (pp. 203–224). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. (2009). And lead us not into thinking the new is new: A bibliographic case for new media history. New Media & Society, 11(1&2), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picchioni, S. A. (1984–5). The direction of cuneiform writing: theory and evidence. Studi Orientali e linguistici, 2, 11–26.Google Scholar
Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between children's knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 145–161. doi: 10.1348/026151008×320507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, J. (2009). Filmmaking and foreign language instruction. Berkeley Language Center Newsletter, 24(2), 10–11.Google Scholar
Pottinger, D. T. (1958). The French Book Trade in the Ancien Régime, 1500–1791. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabkin, E. S. (2006). Audience, purpose, and medium: How digital media extend humanities education. In Hanrahan, M. & Madsen, D. L. (eds.), Teaching Technology, Textuality: Approaches to New Media (pp. 135–147). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, N. (2002). Lingo online: A report on the language of the keyboard generation. http://arts.uwaterloo.ca/~nrandall/LingoOnline-finalreport.pdf.Google Scholar
Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Learning 2.0: The Impact of Social Media on Learning in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission Joint Research Centre.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1983). Manuscripts copied from printed books. In Trapp, J. B. (ed.), Manuscripts in the Fifty Years after the Invention of Printing: Some Papers Read at a Colloquium at the Warburg Institute on 12–13 March 1982 (pp. 12–20). London: Warburg Institute, University of London.Google Scholar
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rex, L. A., & Schiller, L. (2009). Using Discourse Analysis to Improve Classroom Interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richtel, M. (2010a). Growing up digital, wired for distraction. New York Times, November 21, pp. A1, A20–21.Google Scholar
Richtel, M. (2010b). Your brain on computers: Hooked on gadgets, and paying a mental price. New York Times, June 6. www.nytimes.com/2010/06/07/technology/07brain.html.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1971). The model of text: meaningful action considered as a text. Social Research, 38, 529–562.Google Scholar
Rieger, M. (2004). Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 555–565.Google ScholarPubMed
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (eds.), Global Modernities (pp. 25–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochlin, G. I. (1997). Trapped in the Net: The Unanticipated Consequences of Computerization. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romance, J. (2009). La arroba no es de Sevilla (ni de Italia). www.purnas.com/2009/06/30/la-arroba-no-es-de-sevilla-ni-de-italia/.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. J. (2011). How much can you say in 140 characters? A lot, if you speak Japanese. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/09/how-much-can-you-say-in-140-characters-a-lot-if-you-speak-japanese/245199/–.TndNGgYj-uo.facebook.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, T. (2011). Everyone speaks text message. New York Times Magazine, December 11, MM20.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1983). Literature as Exploration, 4th edn. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Ross, N. (2006). Writing in the Information Age. English Today, 22(03), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudoren, J. (2014). A language of conflict, and peace. New York Times, March 18. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/19/world/middleeast/a-language-of-conflict-and-peace.html?emc=edit_tnt_20140319&nlid=2071511&tntemail0=y&_r=0.Google Scholar
Santana, A. D., Livingstone, R., & Cho, Y. (2011). Medium matters: Newsreaders’ recall and engagement with online and print newspapers. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Sarno, D. (2009). Twitter creator Jack Dorsey illuminates the site's founding document. Part I. Los Angeles Times, February 18. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/02/twitter-creator.html – sthash.yNUuRQ2s.dpuf.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1996). How Writing Came About. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging INTERNET. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, R. W., & Dixon, C. S. (2003). The German Reformation, 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. H. R. (2002). The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Séror, J. (2005). Computers and qualitative data analysis: Paper, pens, and highlighters vs. screen, mouse, and keyboard. TESOL Quarterly, 39(2), 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, D. W., & Clinton, K. A. (2006). Toolforthoughts: Reexamining thinking in the digital age. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(4), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, S. (2011). Spotlight again falls on web tools and change. New York Times, January 30.Google Scholar
Silva, D. J. (2008). Missionary contributions toward the revaluation of Hangeul in late nineteenth-century Korea. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 192, 57–74.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In Greenberger, M. (ed.), Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest (pp. 37–72). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, P. (1997). Language Through Literature: An Introduction. Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. (2014). Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students, 2nd edn. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slackman, M. (2011). When a punch line is no longer a lifeline for Egyptians. New York Times, p. A11.Google Scholar
Small, G. W., Moody, T. D., Siddarth, P., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2009). Your brain on Google: Patterns of cerebral activation during internet searching. American Journal of Geriatric Psych, 17(2), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. (2013). Using interconnected texts to highlight culture in the foreign language classroom. L2 Journal, 5(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, L. (2011). Voicing “sexy text”: Heteroglossia and erasure in TV news representations of Detroit's text message scandal. In Thurlow, C. & Mroczek, K. (eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media (pp. 3–25). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Standage, T. (2013). Writing on the Wall: Social Media – The First 2000 Years. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stanley, A. (2013). At ceremony for civil rights milestone, an image that spoke volumes. New York Times, August 29, p. A16.Google Scholar
Stephens, M. (1998). The Rise of the Image, the Fall of the Word. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, D. (2005). Old Portuguese in Hebrew Script: Convention, contact, and convivência. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University. www.jmrg.org/strolovitch/disspage/.Google Scholar
Su, H.-Y. (2004). Mock Taiwanese-accented Mandarin in the internet community in Taiwan: The interaction between technology, linguistic practice, and language ideologies. In LeVine, P. & Scollon, R. (eds.), Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 59–70). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Swaffar, J., & Arens, K. (2005). Remapping the Foreign Language Curriculum: An Approach Through Multiple Literacies. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (2013). The medium is the metamessage: Conversation style in new media interaction. In Tannen, D. & Trester, A. M. (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media (pp. 99–117). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tatlow, D. K. (2012). Writing Chinese in a digital world. International Herald Tribune, August 23.Google Scholar
Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1995). Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The London School of Economics and Political Science. (2008). Mobile life report 2008: The connected world. www.mobilelife2007.co.uk/Mobile_Life_2008.pdf (accessed February 8, 2011).Google Scholar
Themistocleous, C. (2011). Writing in a non-standard Greek variety: Romanized Cypriot Greek in online chat. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. (2013). Googling yourself takes on a whole new meaning. New York Times Magazine, September 1, MM32.Google Scholar
Thornton, T. P. (1996). Handwriting in America: A Cultural History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people's text-messaging. Discourse analysis online, 1(1). http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/thurlow.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. (1997). The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. J. (1998). Language in Literature: An Introduction to Stylistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Trithemius, J. (1974). In Praise of Scribes. De laude scriptorum (Behrendt, R., trans.). Lawrence, KS: Coronado Press.Google Scholar
Tseliga, T. (2007). “It's all Greeklish to me!” Linguistic and sociocultural perspectives on Roman-alphabeted Greek in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. In Danet, B. & Herring, S. C. (eds.), The Multilingual INTERNET (pp. 116–141). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuchscherer, K., & Hair, P. E. H. (2002). Cherokee and West Africa: Examining the Origins of the Vai Script. History in Africa, 29, 427–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, B. L. (1980). Ancient Writing and its Influence. Medieval Academy of America, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, E. (1997). 21st: Elegance and entropy (intervew with Scott Rosenberg). Salon.com (October 9). www.salon.com/1997/10/09/interview_9/.Google Scholar
Umble, D. Z. (2003). Sinful network or divine service: Competing meanings of the telephone in Amish country. In Gitelman, L. & Pingree, G. B. (eds.), New Media, 1740–1915 (pp. 139–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Underwood, H. G. (1890). An Introduction to the Korean Spoken Language. Yokohama: Kelly & Walsh.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2005b). Typographic meaning. Visual Communication, 4(2), 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (eds.). (2001). Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, L., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Equal representation by search engines? A comparison of websites across countries and domains. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(3). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue3/pan.html.Google Scholar
Vega, T. (2011). Industry tries to streamline privacy policies for mobile users. New York Times, August 15, p. B7.Google Scholar
Veldhuis, N. (2012). Cuneiform: Changes and developments. In Houston, S. D. (ed.), The Shape of Script: How and Why Writing Systems Change (pp. 3–23). Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Vinall, K. (2012). ¿Un legado histórico?: Symbolic competence and the construction of multiple histories. L2 Journal, 4(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vydrine, V. (2001). Lettres de Souleymane Kantè et Maurice Houis. Mande Studies, 3, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajnryb, R. (1992). Classroom Observation Tasks: A Resource Book for Language Teachers and Trainers. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, C. B. F. (1987). Cuneiform. Berkeley: University of California Press/British Museum.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(3), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J. B., & D'Addario, K. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warde, B. (1956). The Crystal Goblet: Sixteen Essays on Typography. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Warner, C. N. (2004). It's just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69–87.Google Scholar
Waugh, L. R. (1980). The poetic function in the theory of Roman Jakobson. Poetics Today, 2(1a), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, W., & Shannon, C. E. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Webley, K. (2011). Typing beats scribbling: Indiana schools can stop teaching cursive. Time Magazine NewsFeed. http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/07/06/typing-beats-scribbling-indiana-schools-can-stop-teaching-cursive/–ixzz1RifcrbEp.Google Scholar
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Computer mediation, PBL, and dialogicality. Distance Education, 23(1), 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, K. (2013). Les spoet cobra le dico: La poétique mixte du verlan. B.A. senior honors thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Willan, P. (2000). merchant@florence wrote it first 500 years ago. The Guardian, July 31. www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2000/jul/31/internetnews.internationalnews.Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous Technology: Technics-Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wong, S. (2012). Joseph Kony captures Congress’ attention. Politico. www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74355.html.Google Scholar
Wood, C., Meachem, S., Bowyer, S., Jackson, E., Tarczynski-Bowles, M. L., & Plester, B. (2011). A longitudinal study of children's text messaging and literacy development. British Journal of Psychology, no-no. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8295.2010.02002.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, X., & Lu, X. (2010). The calligraphy and printing cultural heritage of Gansu – the development of the engraved printing process and papermaking: An archeological approach. In Allen, S. M., Zuzao, L., Xiaolan, C., & Bos, J. (eds.), The History and Cultural Heritage of Chinese Calligraphy, Printing and Library Work (pp. 45–70). Munich: De Gruyter Saur.Google Scholar
Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., & Masuda, T. (2007). Are the windows to the soul the same in the East and West? Cultural differences in using the eyes and mouth as cues to recognize emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimansky, P. (1993). Review of D. Schmandt-Besserat, Before Writing. Journal of Field Archaeology, 20(4), 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, H. (2005). A People's History of the United States. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar