Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T04:07:43.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Argumentative Awareness as a Driver of Trust in Investor Relations and Financial Communication

from Part II - Language Awareness in Business and the Professions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

Erika Darics
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Trust is a fundamental constituent of financial market interactions. As well-known cases of corporate failures in past and recent history have illustrated, betraying the trust that investors and other stakeholders put in corporate leaders can bring drastic consequences for the organisation concerned as well as for markets and society at large. A low level of trust in the market makes it more difficult also for sound and ethical business projects to be funded and supported. Research in accounting has highlighted the link between poor/unethical business practices and unsound/deceitful corporate communications, which leads to two interesting implications for business communication researchers and practitioners: (1) discourse analysis and evaluation can become a source for detecting – and possibly avoiding – unreliable business endeavours; (2) improving financial communication skills can enhance the quality of strategic thinking and decision-making as well as help corporate managers to build long-term trust while persuading sceptical stakeholders to support a business initiative. This chapter takes a rhetorical argumentation perspective advocating the crucial role of argumentation skills.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpaslan, C. M., Green, S. E. and Mitroff, I. I. (2008). Using a rhetorical framework to predict corruption. EJBO-Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 13(2), 511.Google Scholar
Argenti, P. A., Robert, A., and Karen, A. B. (2005). The Strategic Communication Imperative. In MIT Sloan Management Review: Top 10 Lessons on Strategy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (pp. 6167).Google Scholar
Barone-Adesi, G. (2002). The Role of Inside Information: Financial Disclosure and Value Creation. In Russ-Mohl, S. and Fengler, S. (eds.). Business Journalism, Corporate Communications, and Newsroom Management (pp. 6368). USI.Google Scholar
Brennan, N. M., Daly, C. A. and Harrington, C. S. (2010). Rhetoric, argument and impression management in hostile takeover defence documents. The British Accounting Review 42(4), 253268.Google Scholar
Craig, R. and Amernic, J. (2011). Detecting linguistic traces of destructive narcissism at-a-distance in a CEO’s letter to shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 101(4), 563575.Google Scholar
Dulek, R. E. and Campbell, K. S. (2015). On the dark side of strategic communication. International Journal of Business Communication 52(1), 122142Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Garber, P. (2000). First Bubbles: The Fundamentals of Early Manias. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Green, S. E. Jr (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review 29(4), 653669.Google Scholar
Grunig, J. E. and Hunt, T. T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Methuen.Google Scholar
Hursti, K. (2011). Management earnings forecasts: Could an investor reliably detect an unduly positive bias on the basis of the strength of the argumentation? Journal of Business Communication 48(4), 393408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Investor Relations Society UK. (2020). Course Programme - Investor Relations Society. [online] Available at: https://irsociety.org.uk/professional-development/courses [Accessed 30 April 2020].Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. (2006). Nonfallacious rhetorical strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy ad. Argumentation 20(4), 421442.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. H. and Blair, J. A. (2006). Logical self-defense. Idea.Google Scholar
Krishnan, K. (2018). The skills required to be a successful investor relations officer. In Laskin, A. V. (ed.). The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations (pp. 97106). John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Laskin, A. V. (2014). Strategic financial communication: Introduction to a special issue. International Journal of Strategic Communication 8, 127129.Google Scholar
Laskin, A. V. (2018). Investor Relations and Financial communication: The Evolution of the Profession. In Laskin, A. V. (ed.). The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations (pp. 322). John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Lev, B. (2012). Winning Investors over: Surprising Truths about Honesty, Earnings Guidance, and Other Ways to Boost your Stock Price. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. and Klamer, A. (1995). One quarter of GDP is persuasion. The American Economic Review 85(2), 191195.Google Scholar
McLean, B. and Elkind, P. (2003). The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Merkl-Davies, D. M. and Brennan, N. M. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature 26, 116196.Google Scholar
Morrill, D. C. (1995). Origins of NIRI. National Investor Relations Institute. Accessed on October 17 2019. www.niri.org/about-niri/history-of-niri-(origins)Google Scholar
Palmieri, R. (2014). Corporate Argumentation in Takeover Bids. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Palmieri, R. (2018). The role of argumentation in financial communication and investor relations. In Laskin, A. V. (ed.). The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations (pp. 4560). John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Palmieri, R. and Bolla, N. (2018). Strategic IR: Mastering the art of argumentation. Informed 99, 2023.Google Scholar
Palmieri, R. and Palmieri, C. (2012). Text types, activity types and the genre system of financial communication. In Gautier, L. (ed.). Les discoures de la bourse et de la finance. Forum Für Fachsprachen-Forschung (pp. 85105). Frank und Timme.Google Scholar
Palmieri, R., Perrin, D. and Whitehouse, M. (eds.), (2018). The pragmatics of financial communication. Part 1: From sources to the public sphere. Special Issue of International Journal of Business Communication 55(2), 127264.Google Scholar
Palmieri, R., Rocci, A. and Kudrautsava, N. (2015). Argumentation in earnings conference calls: Corporate standpoints and analysts’ challenges. Studiesin Communication Sciences 15(1), 120132.Google Scholar
Rocci, A. (2017). Ragionevolezza dell’impegno persuasivo. In Nanni, P., Rigotti, E. and Wolfsgruber, C. (eds.). Argomentare per un rapporto ragionevole con la realtà (pp. 88115). Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà, Itaca Libri.Google Scholar
Rocci, A. and Raimondo, C. (2017). Conference Calls: A Communication Perspective. In Laskin, A. V. (ed.). The Handbook of Financial Communication and Investor Relations (pp. 293308). John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Ross, S. A. (2002). Forensic finance: ENRON and others. Rivista di Politica Economica 92(11/12), 928.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchanges Commission (2020). What We Do. [online] Available at www.sec.gov/Article/whatwedo.html [Accessed 30 April 2020].Google Scholar
Seeking Alpha. (2020). Facebook, Inc. (FB) CEO Mark Zuckerberg On Q3 2019 Results - Earnings Call Transcript. [online] Available at https://seekingalpha.com/article/4300704-facebook-inc-fb-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-on-q3–2019-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single [Accessed 30 April 2020].Google Scholar
Tindale, C. W. (2004). Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F. H. and Grootendorst, R. (2003). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Werven, R., Bouwmeester, O. and Cornelissen, J. P. (2019). Pitching a business idea to investors: How new venture founders use micro-level rhetoric to achieve narrative plausibility and resonance. International Small Business Journal 37(3), 193214.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×