Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:05:00.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Rights and the commons: navigating the boundary between public and private knowledge spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2018

Gavan McCarthy
Affiliation:
is Director of the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre in the University Library, founded in 2007.
Helen Morgan
Affiliation:
is a Melbourne writer and archivist. She is a research fellow in the area of cultural informatics at the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre, having significant experience of working in collaborative research teams using digital technologies, with particular emphasis on building resilient contextual information frameworks, exploring the challenges and requirements of mapping cultural heritage in digital/networked environments and the transfer of knowledge between researchers, memory institutions and the community.
Get access

Summary

Introduction

For the 21st-century archivist, access to all archival materials is going to be one of the most complicated and difficult tasks. In the pre-digital world the number of variables that the archivist had to deal with was significantly fewer than that which they are confronted with in the networked digital age. As a rule, records in the pre-digital world were only in material form and in the custody of an archival service or repository. Access was provided physically through a research or reading room – the researcher had to go in person to the records. This physical containment of the records, the archivist and the researcher (or information seeker) in the one space enabled the negotiation of rules, restrictions and obligations associated with access to archival material. This containment facilitated responsible access to material not intended for publication that could, for example, contain information relating to third parties – in particular, other people – or information pertaining to national security or information of commercial interest. The research room was a frontier where the public were able to interact with private knowledge, whether those materials were generated by governments (in Western democracies these are often known as ‘public records’), by businesses and organizations or by private individuals. In all cases these records have been kept by archives because they have been deemed to form a useful contribution to societal memory.

Differential access to records as determined, for example, by security or information privacy issues was managed through processes of restriction. This meant additional work for the archivist in preparing materials for release that might include redaction of third-party names or other information that might infringe the rights of others or compromise the role of government. In extreme cases highly secure research rooms were established purely to enable security-cleared individuals to access the most highly restricted materials. Similar conditions were set up for academic researchers wishing to consult medical or criminal records. With the passage of time the sensitivity of records diminishes. As a rule, for records over 100 years old, when the individuals concerned have died, commercial concerns are long passed and national security issues have become of historical interest only, access is less problematic. But, as we shall see, in a highly connected digital world even this rule of thumb is being challenged.

Type
Chapter
Information
Is Digital Different?
How information creation, capture, preservation and discovery are being transformed
, pp. 171 - 188
Publisher: Facet
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Rights and the commons: navigating the boundary between public and private knowledge spaces
    • By Gavan McCarthy, is Director of the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre in the University Library, founded in 2007., Helen Morgan, is a Melbourne writer and archivist. She is a research fellow in the area of cultural informatics at the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre, having significant experience of working in collaborative research teams using digital technologies, with particular emphasis on building resilient contextual information frameworks, exploring the challenges and requirements of mapping cultural heritage in digital/networked environments and the transfer of knowledge between researchers, memory institutions and the community.
  • Edited by Michael Moss, Barbara Endicott-Popovsky
  • Book: Is Digital Different?
  • Online publication: 08 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302376.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Rights and the commons: navigating the boundary between public and private knowledge spaces
    • By Gavan McCarthy, is Director of the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre in the University Library, founded in 2007., Helen Morgan, is a Melbourne writer and archivist. She is a research fellow in the area of cultural informatics at the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre, having significant experience of working in collaborative research teams using digital technologies, with particular emphasis on building resilient contextual information frameworks, exploring the challenges and requirements of mapping cultural heritage in digital/networked environments and the transfer of knowledge between researchers, memory institutions and the community.
  • Edited by Michael Moss, Barbara Endicott-Popovsky
  • Book: Is Digital Different?
  • Online publication: 08 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302376.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Rights and the commons: navigating the boundary between public and private knowledge spaces
    • By Gavan McCarthy, is Director of the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre in the University Library, founded in 2007., Helen Morgan, is a Melbourne writer and archivist. She is a research fellow in the area of cultural informatics at the University of Melbourne eScholarship Research Centre, having significant experience of working in collaborative research teams using digital technologies, with particular emphasis on building resilient contextual information frameworks, exploring the challenges and requirements of mapping cultural heritage in digital/networked environments and the transfer of knowledge between researchers, memory institutions and the community.
  • Edited by Michael Moss, Barbara Endicott-Popovsky
  • Book: Is Digital Different?
  • Online publication: 08 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783302376.009
Available formats
×