Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:30:16.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2010

Peter Trudgill
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Agder, Norway
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics
Stories of Colonisation and Contact
, pp. 193 - 211
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlqvist, Anders. 2010. Early Celtic and English. Australian Celtic Journal 9: 41–71.
Aitken, Adam J. 1984. Scottish accents and dialects. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 94–114. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Algeo, J. 1995. Having a look at the expanded predicate. In Aarts, B. and Meyer, C. F. (eds.), The verb in contemporary English, 203–17. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. and Lightfoot, David. 2002. The language organ: linguistics as cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Lars-Gunnar. 2005. What makes a language hard? In Kiselman, C. (ed.), Symposium on communication across cultural boundaries, 40–8. Prague: Kava-Pech.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auwera, Johan and Genee, Inge. 2002. English do: on the convergence of languages and linguists. English Language and Linguistics 6: 283–307.Google Scholar
Ayres, H. M. 1933. Bermudian English. American Speech 8.1: 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Beryl. 1965. Toward a new perspective in Negro English dialectology. American Speech 40: 171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Charles J. and Maroldt, Karl. 1977. The French lineage of English. In Meisel, J. (ed.), Langues en contact – pidgins – creoles, 21–53. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie and Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 1989. Variation in subject-verb concord in Early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1: 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Richard W. 1982. The English language in Canada. In Bailey, R. W. and Görlach, M. (eds.), English as a world language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Richard W. 1996. Nineteenth century English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2003. Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology. In Plag, I. (ed.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 3–33. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter and Mous, Maarten (eds.). 1994. Mixed languages. 15 case studies in language intertwining. Amsterdam/Dordrecht: IFOTT/Foris.
Barber, C. 1997. Early modern English. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Christopher. 2003. The Southland variety of English. Ph.D thesis, Otago University.Google Scholar
Battistella, Edwin. 1990. Markedness: the evaluative superstructure of language. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Attempting to trace Scottish influence on New Zealand English. In Schneider, W. W. (ed.), Englishes around the world: studies in honour of Manfred Görlach, 257–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2000. The dialectal origins of New Zealand English. In Bell, A. and Kuiper, K. (eds.), New Zealand English, 40–52. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. and Cable, Thomas. 1993. A history of the English language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. 1999. English pronunciation in the eighteenth century: Thomas Spence's ‘Grand repository of the English language’. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1997. The phonetics of fish and chips in New Zealand: marking national and ethnic identities. English World-Wide 18: 243–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benham, Charles. 1960 [1895]. Essex ballads. Colchester: Benham Newspapers.Google Scholar
Bernieri, Frank and Rosenthal, Robert. 1991. Interpersonal coordination: behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In Feldman, R. and Rime, B. (eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior: studies in emotion and social interaction, 401–32. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berthele, Raphael. 2000. Sprache in der Klasse: eine dialektologisch–soziolinguistische Untersuchung von Primarschulkindern in multilingualem Umfeld. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhaldraithe, Tomas. 1945. The Irish of Cois Fhairrge, Co. Galway: a phonetic study. Dublin: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E.. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bradley, H. 1904. The making of English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Branford, William. 1994. English in South Africa. In Burchfield, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 5: English in Britain and overseas – origins and development, 182–429. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 1997. Communication strategies in the area of the Hanseatic league: the approach by semi-communication. Multilingua 16: 365–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Andrew. 2002. Seven types of Celtic loanword. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. and Pitkänen, H. (eds.), The Celtic roots of English, 175–81. Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel and Akimoto, Minoji (eds.). 1999. Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Britain, David. 1991. Dialect and space: a geolinguistic study of speech variables in the Fens. Ph.D thesis, University of Essex.
Brook, G. L. 1958. A history of the English language. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Burgoon, Judee, Stern, Lesa and Dillman, Leesa. 1995. Interpersonal adaptation: dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1973. English in black and white. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Burns, Sir A. 1954. History of the British West Indies. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1997. Amerindian personal pronouns: a second opinion. Language 73: 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, Joseph. 1981. Mutual influence in expressive behavior: adult–adult and infant–adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin 89: 101–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cappella, Joseph. 1996. Dynamic coordination of vocal and kinesic behavior in dyadic interaction: methods, problems, and interpersonal outcomes. In Watt, J. and VanLear, C. (eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes, 353–86. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Cappella, Joseph. 1997. The development of theory about automated patterns of face-to-face human interaction. In Philipsen, G. and Albrecht, T. (eds.), Developing communication theories, SUNY series in human communication processes, 57–83. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, David. 2004. The struggle for mastery: the Penguin history of Britain 1066–1284. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1991. Canada. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 89–107. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1992. Dialect acquisition. Language 68, 673–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christaller, Walter. 1950. Das Grundgerüst der räumlichen Ordnung in Europa: die Systeme der europäischen zentralen Orte. Frankfurt: Kramer.Google Scholar
Clackson, James and Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2007. The Blackwell history of the Latin language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald and Muysken, P.. 1996. How adult second language learning differs from child first language development. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 19: 721–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English: a corpus-based study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ross. 1976. Aspects of Polynesian syntax. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 2000. Phonology. In Heine, B. and Nurse, D. (eds.), African languages: an introduction, 123–60. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Richard. 2007. Invisible Britons: the view from linguistics. In Higham, N. (ed.), The Britons in Anglo-Saxon England, 172–91. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Coates, Richard and Coupland, Nikolas. 1991. Contexts of accommodation: developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Allan. 1991. Christianity in Aotearoa: a history of church and society in New Zealand. Wellington: Education for Ministry.Google Scholar
Davis, Norman, Beadle, Richard and Richmond, Colin (eds.). 2004–5. Paston letters and papers of the fifteenth century, 3 vols. (Early English Text Society, supplementary series 20–22). Oxford University Press.
Denison, D. 1993. English historical syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dietrich, G. 1949. Die Syntax der ‘Do’-Umschreibung bei ‘have’, ‘be’, ‘ought’ und ‘used (to)’, auf sprachgeschichtlicher Grundlage dargestellt. Brunswick: Georg Westermann Verlag.Google Scholar
Dillard, Joey. 1970. Principles in the history of American English: paradox, virginity and cafeteria. Florida Reporter 8.1–2: 32–3.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan. 2008. New-dialect formation in Canada: evidence from the English modal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, V. K. 1979. The West Indian language issue in British schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ehrhart-Kneher, Sabine. 1996. Palmerston English. In Wurm, S. A., Mühlhäusler, P. and Tryon, D. T. (eds.), Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, 523–31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Eilert. 1960. The concise Oxford dictionary of place-names, 4th edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elbert, Samuel H. and Pukui, Mary Kawena. 1979. Hawaiian Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press.Google Scholar
Ellegård, A. 1953. The auxiliary DO: the establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander. 1889. On Early English pronunciation, vol. V. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1975. The dialect of Lunenburg, Nova Scotia. In Chambers, J. K. (ed.), Canadian English: origins and structures, 34–9. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
Eubank, Lynn. 1996. Negation in early German–English interlanguage: more valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research 12: 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D. Simon. 1964. A Grammar of Middle Welsh. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. 1972. Tense marking in Black English: a linguistic and social analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15: 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: a study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk, and pidgins. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginisation and creolisation of languages, 141–50. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 2003. More on the English progressive and the Celtic connection. In Tristram, H. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes III, 150–68. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek. 1968. A short grammar of Middle English. Warsaw: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Flint, E. H. 1964. The language of Norfolk Island. In Ross, A. and Moverley, A. (eds.), The Pitcairnese Language. London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
Forby, Robert. 1830. The vocabulary of East Anglia. London: Nichols.Google Scholar
Fox, Cyril. 1932. The personality of Britain: its influence on inhabitant and invader in prehistoric and early historic times. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales.Google Scholar
Frick, Franz N. 1899. Die Araner Mundart: ein Beitrag zur Erforschung des Westirischen. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Garrett, A. 1998. On the origin of auxiliary do. English Language and Linguistics 2.2: 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelling, Margaret. 1993. Place-names in the landscape: the geographical roots of Britain's place-names. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: a model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15: 87–105.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland, and Coupland, Nikolas. 1991. Contexts of accommodation: developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A. C. 1962. An introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Glauser, Beat. 1994. Dialect maps: depicting, constructing or distorting linguistic reality. In Melchers, G. and Johannesson, N.-L. (eds.), Nonstandard varieties of language, 35–52. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth. 1983. New Zealand English pronunciation: an investigation into some early written records. Te Reo 26: 29–42.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth. 1998. The origins of New Zealand Speech: the limits of recovering historical information from written records. English World-Wide 19: 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Campbell, Lyle, Hay, Jennifer, Maclagan, Margaret, Sudbury, Andrea and Trudgill, Peter. 2004. The origins of New Zealand English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English – a creole? In Kastovsky, D. and Szwedek, A. (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, 329–44. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1987. Colonial lag? The alleged conservative character of American English and other ‘colonial’ varieties. English World-Wide 8: 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, William. 1913. The pronunciation of English in Scotland. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, William and Dixon, James M.. 1921. Manual of Modern Scots. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Barbara and Young, Rachel. 1964. Norwich: the growth of a city. Norwich: Museums Committee.Google Scholar
Hale, Mark. 2007. Historical linguistics: theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Härke, Heinrich. 2002. Kings and warriors: population and landscape from post-Roman to Norman Britain. In Slack, P. and Ward, R. (eds.), The peopling of Britain: the shaping of a human landscape, 145–75. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, J. 1988. History of Saba. Saba: O.K.S.N.A.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Semicommunication: the language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36: 280–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, Don. 2006. The origins of the Anglo-Saxons. Hockwold: Anglo-Saxon Books.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2003. How do dialects get the features they have? In Motives for language change, 213–39. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. 1999. Verbal phrases and phrasal verbs in Early Modern English. In Brinton, L. J. and Akimoto, M. (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 33–165. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1993. A grammar of Old English I: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard and Denison, David. 2006. A history of the English language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, John. 1980. African features in White Bahamian English. English World-Wide 1: 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, John and Shilling, Alison. 1982. Dictionary of Bahamian English. Cold Spring NY: Lexik House.Google Scholar
Holman, Katherine. 2007. The northern conquest: Vikings in Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Signal Books.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1997. Setting new standards: sound changes and gender in New Zealand English. English World-Wide 18.1: 107–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmqvist, Erik. 1922. On the history of English present inflections. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. 1997. The rise of auxiliary DO: verb-non-raising or category-strengthening?Transactions of the Philological Society 95: 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Arthur and Trudgill, Peter. 1995. English accents and dialects, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hughey, Ruth (ed.). 1941. The correspondence of Lady Katherine Paston, 1603–1627. Norwich: Norfolk Record Society.
Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 1992. Non-native features of near-native speakers: on the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris, R. J. (ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals, 351–68. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth H. 1953. Language and history in early Britain. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jacqueline and Newport, Elissa. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21: 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W. 1989. Saban lore: tales from my grandmother's pipe, 3rd edn. Saba: Lynne Johnson.Google Scholar
Johnston, Paul. 1997a. Old Scots phonology and its regional variation. In Jones, C. (ed.), The Edinburgh history of the Scots language, 46–111. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Paul. 1997b. Regional variation. In Jones, C. (ed.), The Edinburgh history of the Scots language, 433–513. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Källgård, Anders. 1993. Present-day Pitcairnese. English World-Wide 14: 71–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1999. Inflectional classes, morphological restructuring, and the dissolution of Old English grammatical gender. In Unterbeck, Barbara and Rissanen, Matti (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition. Vol. II, 709–27. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kazazis, Kostas. 1970. The relative importance of parents and peers in first-language acquisition: the case of some Constantinopolitan families in Athens. General Linguistics 10: 111–20.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: the invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1994. Babel in Buckinghamshire? Pre-school children acquiring accent features in the new town of Milton Keynes. In Melchers, G. and Johannesson, N.-L. (eds.), Nonstandard varieties of language, 64–83. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kett, John. no date. Tha's a rum'un, bor!Woodbridge: Baron.
Ketton-Cremer, R. W. 1957. Norfolk Assembly. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Kirwin, William. 2001. Newfoundland English. In Algeo, J. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 6: English in North America, 441–5. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani. 2000. The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: a case of early contact? In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), Celtic Englishes II, 329–46. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Kohlman, Aarona Booker. no date. Wotcha say: an introduction to colloquial Caymanian. Grand Cayman: Cayman ARTventures.
Kökeritz, Helge. 1953. Shakespeare's pronunciation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, A., Taylor, A. and Ringe, D.. 2000. The Middle English verb-second constraint: a case study in language contact and language change. In Herring, Susan, Reenen, Pieter and Schoesler, Lene (eds.), Textual parameters in older language, 353–91. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1928. American pronunciation. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans and Lowman, Guy. 1970. The dialect structure of southern England: phonological evidence. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans and McDavid, Raven I.. 1961. The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans, Hansen, Marcus L., Bloch, Julia and Bloch, Bernard. 1939–43. Handbook of the linguistic geography of New England. Providence: Brown University.Google Scholar
Kusters, Wouter. 2003. Linguistic complexity: the influence of social change on verbal inflection. Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1993. Third-person singular inflection in early British and American English. Language Variation and Change 5: 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 81, 344–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1968. A phonetic study of West African languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laing, Lloyd and Laing, Jennifer. 1979. Anglo-Saxon England. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2002. An explanation for the changes kw-, hw-, xw- in the English dialects. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. and Pitkänen, H. (eds.), The Celtic roots of English, 183–98. Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2008. Changing views about Anglo-Saxons and Britons. In Aertsen, H. and Veldhoen, B. (eds.), Six papers from the 28th Symposium on Medieval Studies, 1–38. Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Laker, Stephen. 2009. Motivations for early phonological change in English: the Brittonic contribution. Ph.D thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy. 2005. Typology and complexity. In Minett, J. W. and Wang, W. S.-Y. (eds.), Language acquisition, change and emergence: essays in evolutionary linguistics, 465–93. Hong Kong: City University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Blake, N. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. II: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Danny. 2009. Pronominal borrowing among the Maya. Diachronica, 26.2: 214–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Page, Robert B. and Tabouret-Keller, Andree. 1985. Acts of identity: creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, Daniel (ed.). 1998. The linguistic culture of the Ogasawara Islands (Japanese Language Centre Research Reports 6). Osaka: Shoin Women's College.
Long, Daniel (ed.). 1999. Evidence of an English contact language in the 19th century Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. English World-Wide 20.2: 251–86.CrossRef
Long, Daniel (ed.). 2000. Examining the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands within the contexts of Pacific language contact. In Fischer, S. and Sperlich, W. B. (eds.), Leo Pasifika: proceedings of the fourth international conference on Oceanic Linguistics, 200–17. Auckland: Institute of Polynesian Languages and Literatures.
Long, Daniel (ed.). 2001. Insights into the vanishing language and culture of the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands: Mr. Charles Washington's 1971 interviews. In Sanada, S. (ed.), Endangered languages of Japan, 4685. Kyoto: Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim Publications Series A4–001.
Long, Daniel (ed.). 2002. The disappearing English language and culture of the “Westerners” of the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Kyoto: Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim Publications Series A4–015.
Long, Daniel (ed.). 2007. English on the Bonin Islands. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Lutz, Angelika. 2009. Why is West-Saxon English different from Old Saxon? In Sauer, H. and Story, J. (eds.), Anglo-Saxon and the Continent. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. 2002. I'm off to Philadelphia in the morning. American Speech 77: 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclagan, David. 1998. /h/-dropping in early New Zealand English. New Zealand English Journal 12: 34–42.Google Scholar
Maclagan, Margaret A. and Gordon, Elizabeth. 1996. Out of the air and into the ear: another view of the New Zealand diphthong merger. Language Variation and Change 8: 125–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclagan, Margaret A., Elizabeth Gordon and Lewis, Gillian. 1999. Women and sound change: conservative and innovative behaviour by the same speakers. Language Variation and Change 11: 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMahon, Michael. 1983. Thomas Hallam and the study of dialect and educated speech. Transactions of the Yorkshire Dialect Society 83: 119–31.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Michael. 1994. Phonology. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 4: 1776–1997, 373–535. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marckwardt, Albert. 1958. American English. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mather, J. Y. and Speitel, H. H. (eds.). 1975. The linguistic atlas of Scotland. London: Croom Helm.
Matsumoto, M. 1999. Composite predicates in Middie English. In Brinton, L. J. and Akimoto, M. (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 59–96. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matthews, W. 1972. Cockney past and present. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McClure, J. Derrick. 1994. English in Scotland. In Burchfield, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English Language vol. 5: English in Britain and overseas: origins and development, 23–93. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I. and McDavid, Virginia. 1951. The relationship of the speech of American Negroes to the speech of whites. American Speech 26: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElhinny, Bonnie. 1993. Copula and auxiliary contraction in the speech of White Americans. American Speech 68: 371–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Malcolm (ed.). 1997. New Zealand historical atlas. Auckland: Bateman.
McWhorter, John. 2007. Language interrupted. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mees, Inger. 1977. Language and social class in Cardiff. Ph.D thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen. 1997. The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research 13: 227–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Middle English dialectology. In Blake, N. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge University Press, 156–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21: 339–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 2000. Social network analysis and the history of English. European Journal of English Studies 4.3: 211–16.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2007. Grammar, contact and time. Journal of Language Contact – Thema 1: 133–55. www.jlc-journal.org.Google Scholar
Mittendorf, Ingo and Poppe, Erich. 2000. Celtic contacts of the English progressive? In Tristram, Hildegard (ed.), Celtic Englishes II, 117–45. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Moens, William. 1888. The Walloons and their church at Norwich 1565–1832. London: Huguenot Society.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael, Fuller, Janet and DeMarse, Sharon. 1993. ‘The black men has wives and Sweet harts [and third-person plural -s] Jest like the white men’: evidence for verbal -s from written documents on 19th-century African American speech. Language Variation and Change 5: 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Bruce. 1999. Australian English: Australian identity. Lingua Franca. www.abc.net.au/rn/arts/ling/stories/s68786.htm.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kenneth O. 2001. The Oxford history of Britain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1991. Pidgins, creoles, typology, and markedness. In Byrne, F. and Huebner, T. (eds.), Development and structures of creole languages: essays in honour of Derek Bickerton, 123–43. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1977. Pidginisation and simplification of language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Murray, R. W. 1996. Historical linguistics. In O'Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M. and Katamba, F. (eds.), Contemporary linguistics: an introduction, chapter 8. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Newbrook, Mark. 1982. Scot or Scouser? An anomalous informant in outer Merseyside. English World-Wide 3: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Review of Ö. Dahl (2004)The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Diachronica 24, 171–8.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna and Peterson, David A.. 1996. The Amerind personal pronouns. Language 72.2: 336–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, Gerhard. 1966. Die Expanded Form in Altenglischen. Neumünster: Wachholtz.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1998. The continental backgrounds of English and its insular development until 1154. Odense University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, A. 1999. A social history of periphrastic DO. (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 56.) Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
O Dochartaigh, Cathair. 1984. Irish. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 289–305. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogura, M. 1994. The development of periphrastic DO in English. Diachronica 10.1: 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paddock, Harold. 1982. Newfoundland dialects of English. In Paddock, H. (ed.), Languages in Newfoundland and Labrador, 71–89. St John's: Memorial University.Google Scholar
Parsons, James. 1954. English-speaking settlement of the Western Caribbean. Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers 16: 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Arvilla. 1980. Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pelech, William. 2002. Charting the interpersonal underworld: the application of cluster analysis to the study of interpersonal coordination in small groups. Currents: New Scholarship in the Human Services 1.1: 1–12.Google Scholar
Pelteret, David. 1995. Slavery in Early Mediaeval England. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Pettersson, Sofia. 1994. A study of Dutch and Low German elements in the East Midland and East Anglian dialects. Unpublished paper, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The language instinct. London: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana (ed.). 2000. The English history of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Poplack, Shana and Tagliamonte, Sali. 1989. There's no tense like the present: verbal -s inflection in early Black English. Language Variation and Change 1: 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of Early Standard English: the creolisation hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14: 69–85.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rickwood, Douglas. 1984. The Norwich Strangers, 1565–1643: a problem of control. Proceedings of the Huguenot Society 24: 119–28.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter. 1983. English phonetics and phonology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1978. Postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English: sound change in progress? In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 2001. Contact with other languages. In Algeo, John (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 6: English in North America, 154–83. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C. and Moverley, A.. 1964. The Pitcairnese language. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 1983. The origin of verbal – s in Black English. American Speech 58: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: from identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79.2: 233–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2003. Isolation and language change: contemporary and sociohistorical evidence from Tristan da Cunha English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2008. St Helenian English: origins, evolution and variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel, Sudbury, Andrea and Wilson, Sheila. 2006. English in the South Atlantic. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik, 2131–7. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel, Trudgill, Peter, Schneider, Edgar and Williams, Jeffrey P. (eds.). 2010. Lesser-known Englishes. Cambridge University Press.
Schrijver, Peter. 1999. The Celtic contribution to the development of the early North Sea Germanic vowel system, with special reference to coastal Dutch. NOWELE 35: 3–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2002. The rise and fall of British Latin: evidence from English and Brittonic. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. and Pitkänen, H. (eds.), The Celtic roots of English, 87–110. Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2006. What Britons spoke around 400 AD. In Higham, N. J. (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England, 165–71. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2009. Celtic influence on Old English: phonological and phonetic evidence. In Klemola, J. and Filppula, M. (eds.), English Language and Linguistics 13.2: 193–211.
Shilling, Alison. 1980. Bahamian English – a non-continuum? In Day, R. (ed.), Issues in English creoles, 133–46. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Singler, J. 1997. The configuration of Liberia's Englishes. World Englishes 16: 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Gabriella and Quirk, Randolph. 1991. On having a look in a corpus. In Aijmer, K. and Altenberg, B. (eds.), English corpus linguistics, 197–203. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strevens, Peter. 1972. British and American English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sudbury, Andrea. 2000. Dialect contact and koinéisation in the Falkland Islands: development of a new southern hemisphere English? Ph.D thesis, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Swan, Michael. 2007. History is not what happened: the case of contrastive analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17.3: 414–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Alan. 1994. English in Wales. In Burchfield, R. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language vol. 5: English in Britain and overseas – origins and development, 94–147. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Mark G., Stumpf, Michael P. H. and Härke, Heinrich. 2008. Integration versus apartheid in post-Roman Britain. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 275: 2419–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact: an introduction. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Everett, Daniel L.. 2005. Pronoun borrowing. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 27: 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact: creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Townend, Matthew. 2002. Language and history in Viking Age England: linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1994. Language change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1999. Key concepts in language and linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tristram, Hildegard (ed.). 2000. The Celtic Englishes II. Heidelberg: Winter.
Tristram, Hildegard (ed.). 2002. Attrition of inflections in English and Welsh. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. and Pitkänen, H. (eds.), The Celtic roots of English, 111–49. Joensuu University Press.
Tristram, Hildegard (ed.). 2004. Diglossia in Anglo-Saxon England, or what was spoken Old English like?Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 40: 87–110.
Tristram, Hildegard (ed.). 2006. Why don't the English speak Welsh? In Higham, N. J. (ed.), Britons in Anglo-Saxon England, 192–214. Woodbridge: Boydell.
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1978. Creolisation in reverse: reduction and simplification in the Albanian dialects of Greece. Transactions of the Philological Society 1976– 77: 32–50.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1983. Language contact and language change: on the rise of the creoloid. In Trudgill, P., On dialect: social and geographical perspectives, 102–7. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1988. Norwich revisited: recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. English World-Wide 9: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1990. The dialects of England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1996a. Dual-source pidgins and reverse creoloids: northern perspectives on language contact. In Jahr, E. H. and Broch, I. (eds.), Language contact in the Arctic: northern pidgins and contact languages, 5–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1996b. Language contact and inherent variability: the absence of hypercorrection in East Anglian present-tense verb forms. In Klemola, J., Kytö, M. and Rissanen, M. (eds.), Speech past and present: studies in English dialectology in memory of Ossi Ihalainen, 412–25. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Third-person singular zero: African American vernacular English, East Anglian dialects and Spanish persecution in the Low Countries. Folia Linguistica Historica 18.1–2: 139–48.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. New-dialect formation and dedialectalisation: embryonic and vestigial variants. Journal of English Linguistics 27.4: 319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2000. Sociolinguistics: an introduction to language and society. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2001. Modern East Anglia as a dialect area. In Fisiak, J. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), East Anglian English, 1–12. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2003. A glossary of sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-dialect formation: the inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: on the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society 37.2: 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2009. Sociolinguistic typology and complexification. In Sampson, G., Gil, D. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 97–108. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. in preparation. Language in contact and isolation: on the social determinants of linguistic structure.
Trudgill, Peter and Foxcroft, Tina. 1978. On the sociolinguistics of vocalic mergers: transfer and approximation in East Anglia. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 69–79. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Gordon, Elizabeth and Lewis, Gillian. 1998. New-dialect formation and southern hemisphere English: the New Zealand short front vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Gordon, Elizabeth, Lewis, Gillian and Maclagan, Margaret A.. 2000. Determinism in new-dialect formation and the genesis of New Zealand English. Journal of Linguistics 36: 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter and Hannah, Jean. 2008. International English: a guide to varieties of Standard English, 5th edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter and Schreier, Daniel. 2006. The segmental phonology of 19th century Tristan da Cunha English: convergence and local innovation. English Language and Linguistics 10.1: 119–41.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Daniel Schreier, Long, Daniel and Williams, Jeffrey P.. 2003. On the reversibility of mergers: /w/, /v/ and evidence from Lesser-Known Englishes. Folia Linguistica Historica 24/2: 23–46.Google Scholar
Tryon, D. T. 1970. Conversational Tahitian: an introduction to the Tahitian language of French Polynesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Lorenzo. 1949. Africanisms in the Gullah dialect. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tuten, Donald. 2003. Koineization in medieval Spanish. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vane, Christine. 1984. The Walloon community in Norwich; the first hundred years. Proceedings of the Huguenot Society 24: 129–40.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 2000. English as a ‘Celtic’ language: Atlantic influences from above and below. In Tristram, H. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, 399–406. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 2002. On the rise of ‘Celtic’ syntax in Middle English. In Lucas, P. J. and Lucas, A. M. (eds.), Middle English from tongue to text. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn. 1972. English dialects: an introduction. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Wakelin, Martyn. 1984. Rural dialects in England. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Language in the British Isles, 70–93. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wall, Arnold. 1938. New Zealand English: how it should be spoken. Auckland: Whitcombe and Tombs.Google Scholar
Wang, William. 1969. Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45: 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warantz, Elissa. 1983. The Bay Islands English of Honduras. In Holm, J. (ed.), Central American English, 71–94. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Washabaugh, William. 1983. Creoles of the off-shore islands. In Holm, J. (ed.), Central American English, 157–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English, 3 vols. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whinnom, Keith. 1971. Linguistic hybridisation and the ‘special’ case of pidgins and creoles. In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginisation and creolisation of languages. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, David. 2002. Explaining the innovations of Middle English: what, where, and why? In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. and Pitkänen, H. (eds.), The Celtic roots of English, 153–74. Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
White, David. 2003. Brittonic influence in the reductions of Middle English nominal morphology. In Tristram, H. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, 29–45. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Whitelock, Dorothy. 1952. The beginnings of English society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1982. Why can you have a drink when you can't *have an eat?Language 58: 753–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey P. 1985. Preliminaries to the study of the dialects of white West Indian English. Nieuwe West-Indische Gids (New West Indian Guide) 59: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey P. 1987. Anglo-Caribbean English: a study of its sociolinguistic history and the development of its aspectual markers. Ph.D thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey P. forthcoming. White Saban English: a social history. In Aceto, M. and Williams, J. (eds.), Eastern Caribbean Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Windross, Michael. 1994. Loss of postvocalic “r”: were the orthoepists really tone-deaf? In Kastovsky, D. (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 429–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1992. Back to the past: the BEV/creole connection revisited. Language Variation and Change 4: 311–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Christian, Donna. 1976. Appalachian speech. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Thomas, Erik. 2002. The development of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Alex. 2007. Apartheid and economics in Anglo-Saxon England. In Higham, N. (ed.), The Britons in Anglo-Saxon England, 113–29. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison and Grace, George. 2006. The consequences of talking to strangers: evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua 117: 543–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English dialect grammar. Oxford: Froude.Google Scholar
Wright, Laura. 2001. Some morphological features of the Norfolk guild certificates of 1388/9: an exercise in variation. In Fisiak, J. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), East Anglian English, 79–162. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. 1956. A History of Modern Colloquial English, 3rd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yasuda, A. 1968. The structure of the Penrhyn phrase. MA thesis, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Zettersten, Arne. 1969. The English of Tristan da Cunha. (Lund Studies in English 37.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Trudgill, Universitetet i Agder, Norway
  • Book: Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics
  • Online publication: 02 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760501.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Trudgill, Universitetet i Agder, Norway
  • Book: Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics
  • Online publication: 02 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760501.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Trudgill, Universitetet i Agder, Norway
  • Book: Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics
  • Online publication: 02 December 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760501.011
Available formats
×