Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:31:03.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Economic impacts of IPM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

By
Scott M. Swinton  and
George W. Norton
Edited by
Edward B. Radcliffe ,
William D. Hutchison  and
Rafael E. Cancelado
Edward B. Radcliffe
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
William D. Hutchison
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

Economic impact analyses of IPM programs measure the economic effects on producers and consumers that can be attributed to IPM programs and practices. Good impact assessments are tailored to the objectives of the programs they are evaluating. Because IPM program objectives and approaches can vary widely, there is no one-size-fits-all method for IPM impact assessment. Some IPM activities are narrowly focused, such as a new methodology for measuring pest density. Others are broad, such as a national training program in pest recognition. Small programs may have narrow impacts, while large programs may have repercussions great enough to change prices at the regional or even national level.

Despite the diversity of approaches and objectives, virtually all IPM programs aim to influence economic and health or environmental outcomes. Economic outcomes may be measured at the level of the individual management unit (e.g. a farm) or at the aggregate level of all producers and consumers in a given market. Environmental and health outcomes may be measured using indicative, average approaches or using site-specific data about environmental vulnerability. Decision makers often wish to explore the trade-offs between economic and environmental/health outcomes and methods exist for that purpose. This chapter offers an overview of economic impact analysis methods, including ways to incorporate environmental and health effects; in part this chapter also draws upon previous summaries of impact assessment methods by Norton & Mullen, 1994; Norton et al., 2001; Cuyno et al., 2005; and Norton et al., 2005.

Type
Chapter
Information
Integrated Pest Management
Concepts, Tactics, Strategies and Case Studies
 , pp. 14 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, C. W., Roach, B. A. & Epp, D. J. (1992). Valuing environmental quality changes using averting expenditures: an application to groundwater contamination. Land Economics, 68(2), 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, J. M., Norton, G. W. & Pardey, P. G. (1995). Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Antle, J. M. & Pingali, P. L. (1994). Pesticides, productivity and farmer health: a Philippine case study. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 418–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antle, J., Stoorvogel, J., Bowen, W., Crissman, C. & Yanggen, D. (2003). The tradeoff analysis approach: lessons from Ecuador and Peru. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 42, 189–206.Google Scholar
Beach, D. & Carlson, G. A. (1993). Hedonic analysis of herbicides: do user safety and water quality matter? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 612–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbrook, C. M., Sexson, D. L., Wyman, J. A.et al. (2002). Developing a pesticide risk assessment tool to monitor progress in reducing reliance on high-risk pesticides. American Journal of Potato Research, 79, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookshire, D. S. & Coursey, D. L. (1987). Measuring the value of a public good: an empirical comparison of elicitation procedures. American Economic Review, 77, 554–566.Google Scholar
Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J. & Brown, T. C. (eds.) (2003). A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual, completely revised edn. Mexico City, Mexico: Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT).Google Scholar
Cousens, R. (1987). Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. Plant Protection Quarterly, 2, 13–20.Google Scholar
Crissman, C. C., Antle, J. M. & Capalbo, S. M. (1998). Economic, Environmental and Health Tradeoffs in Agriculture: Pesticides and the Sustainability of Andean Potato Production. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cuyno, L. C. M., Norton, G. W. & Rola, A. (2001). Economic analysis of environmental benefits of integrated pest management: a Philippines case study. Agricultural Economics, 25, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuyno, L., Norton, G. W., Crissman, C. C. & Rola, A. (2005). Evaluating the health and environmental impacts of IPM. In Globalizing Integrated Pest Management, eds. Norton, G. W., Heinrichs, E. A., Luther, G. C. & Irwin, M. E., pp. 245–262. Ames, IA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., Murgai, R. & Quizon, J. B. (2004). Sending farmers back to school: the impact of farmer field schools in Indonesia. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. (1998). Environmental and economic consequences of technology adoption: IPM in viticulture. Agricultural Economics, 18, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A. M., III (2003). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Greene, C. R., Kramer, R. A., Norton, G. W., Rajotte, E. G. & McPherson, R. M. (1985). An economic analysis of soybean integrated pest management. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67, 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Regev, U. & Shalit, H. (1979). An economic optimization model of pesticide resistance: alfalfa and Egyptian alfalfa weevil. Environmental Entomology, 8, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higley, L. G. & Wintersteen, W. K. (1992). A novel approach to environmental risk assessment of pesticides as a basis for incorporating environmental costs into economic injury levels. American Entomologist, 38, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoag, D. L. & Hornsby, A. G. (1992). Coupling groundwater contamination with economic returns when applying farm pesticides. Journal of Environmental Quality, 21, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J. & Tette, J. (1992). A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides, New York Food and Life Sciences Bulletin No. 139. Geneva, NY: Cornell University. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station. Available at http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/5203/.Google Scholar
Martin, M. A., Schreiber, M. M., Riepe, J. R. & Bahr, J. R. (1991). The economics of alternative tillage systems, crop rotations, and herbicide use on three representative east central Corn Belt farms. Weed Science, 39, 299–397.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. T., Wetzstein, M. E. & Douce, G. K. (1991). Factors affecting peanut producer adoption of integrated pest management. Review of Agricultural Economics, 13, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, L. J., Tanagosh, L. K. & Baritelle, J. L. (1983). Incorporating risk in comparisons of alternative pest management methods. Environmental Entomology, 12, 1003–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, J. D., Norton, G. W. & Reaves, D. W. (1997). Economic analysis of environmental benefits of integrated pest management. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musser, W. N., Tew, B. V. & Epperson, J. E. (1981). An economic examination of an integrated pest management production system with a contrast between E-V and stochastic dominance analysis. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 13, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napit, K. B., Norton, G. W., Kazmierczak, R. F. & Rajotte, E. G. (1988). Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in several states. Journal of Economic Entomology, 81, 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, G. & Mullen, J. (1994). Economic Evaluation of Integrated Pest Management Programs: A Literature Review, Virginia Cooperative Extension PublicationNo. 448–120. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
Norton, G. W., Swinton, S. M, Riha, S.et al. (2001). Impact Assessment of Integrated Pest Management Programs. Blacksburg, VA: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
Norton, G. W., Moore, K., Quishpe, D.et al. (2005). Evaluating socio-economic impacts of IPM. In Globalizing Integrated Pest Management, eds. Norton, G. W., Heinrichs, E. A., Luther, G. C. & Irwin, M. E., pp. 225–244. Ames, IA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedigo, L. P., Hutchins, S. H. & Higley, L. G. (1986). Economic injury levels in theory and practice. Annual Review of Entomology, 31, 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, L. J., Thwaite, W. G. & Bower, C. C. (1994). Rating index as a basis for decision making on pesticide use reduction for accreditation of fruit produced under integrated pest management. Crop Protection, 13, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pingali, P. L., Marquez, C. B. & Palis, F. G. (1994). Pesticides and Philippine rice farmer health: a medical and economic analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinton, S. M. & Day, E. (2003). Economics in the design, assessment, adoption, and policy analysis of IPM. In Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies, R-140, ed. Barker, K. R., pp. 196–206. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Swinton, S. M., Owens, N. N. & Ravenswaay, E. O. (1999). Health risk information to reduce water pollution. In Flexible Incentives for the Adoption of Environmental Technologies in Agriculture, eds. Casey, F., Schmitz, A., Swinton, S. & Zilberman, D., pp. 263–271. Boston, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinton, S. M., Renner, K. A. & Kells, J. J. (2002). On-farm comparison of three postemergence weed management decision aids in Michigan. Weed Technology, 16, 691–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szmedra, P. I., Wetzstein, M. E. & McClendon, R. (1990). Economic threshold under risk: a case study of soybean production. Journal of Economic Entomology, 83, 641–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teague, M. L., Mapp, H. P. & Bernardo, D. J. (1995). Risk indices for economic and water quality tradeoffs: an application to Great Plains agriculture. Journal of Production Agriculture, 8, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, T. P. & Grube, A. H. (1986). Integrated pest management strategies for approximately optimal control of corn rootworm and soybean cyst nematode. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68, 704–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×