Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register
  • Cited by 3
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: July 2014

10 - The role and relevance of networked climate governance

Export citation

Summary

Introduction

Next to governing through markets, networks have emerged as a central steering mechanism in modern governance. Climate governance is no exception. Uncounted numbers of initiatives, projects, programmes, institutions and organizations fill the realm of global climate governance, at times targeting public actors and intergovernmental decision-making processes, while on many other occasions targeting private actors such as corporations or individuals. While it is generally acknowledged that these forms of networked governance have become more widespread and pervasive, there is rather little scholarship on their performance and broader implications (exceptions are Bäckstrand 2008; Okereke et al. 2009).

This chapter appraises different types of networked climate governance, including public non-state networks such as the C40 global cities partnership; hybrid networks emanating from public–private sources of authority such as the more than 340 partnerships that have emerged out of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg; and networks whose authority derives from purely private sources, such as corporate social responsibility and standard-setting initiatives. I appraise these different types of networked governance in the climate realm according to three sets of criteria. First, their potential contribution to effective climate change mitigation and adaptation; second, their contribution to broader political goals such as increased participation and inclusiveness in global environmental governance; and third, their linkages and fit with the existing institutional architecture of international climate change governance. The chapter concludes with a number of policy options for strengthening the contribution of networked governance mechanisms to effective climate policies.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Bäckstrand, K. 2008. ‘Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships’, Global Environmental Politics 8: 74–102.
Benner, T., Reinicke, W. H. and Witte, J. M. 2004. ‘Multisectoral networks in global governance: towards a pluralistic system of accountability’, Government and Opposition 39: 191–210.
Betsill, M. M. 2001. ‘Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles’, Local Environment 6: 393–406.
Betsill, M. M. and Bulkeley, H. 2004. ‘Transnational networks and global environmental governance: the cities for climate protection program’, International Studies Quarterly 48: 471–493.
Biermann, F. 2000. ‘The case for a world environment organization’, Environment 42: 22–31.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Chan, S. and Mert, A. 2007. ‘Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainability: des the promise hold?’, in Glasbergen, P., Biermann, F. and Mol, A. P. J. (eds.), Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 239–260.
Börzel, T. A. 1998. ‘Organizing Babylon: on the different conceptions of policy networks’, Public Administration 76: 253–273.
Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. 2005. ‘Public–private partnerships: effective and legitimate tools of international governance’, in Grande, E. and Pauly, L. W. (eds.), Reconstituting Political Authority: Complex Sovereignty and the Foundations of Global Governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 195–216.
Bulkeley, H. and Betsill, M. M. 2003. Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.
C40 2008a. C40 large cities climate summit. C40, London. Available at .
C40 2008b. History of the C40. Available at , 20 October 20 2008).
Commission of the European Communities 2001. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Enechi, O. and Pattberg, P. 2009. ‘The business of transnational climate governance: legitimate, accountable and transparent?’, St Antony’s International Review 5: 76–98.
Gupta, A. 2008. ‘Transparency under scrutiny: information disclosure in global environmental governance’, Global Environmental Politics 8: 1–7.
Haas, P. M. 2004. ‘Addressing the global governance deficit’, Global Environmental Politics 4: 1–15.
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, A. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
ICLEI 1997. Local Government Implementation of Climate Protection, report to the United Nations. Toronto: ICLEI.
ICLEI 2006. Combating Climate Change: A Comprehensive Look at Local Climate Protection Programs. Toronto: ICLEI. Available at .
Kara, J. and Quarless, D. 2002. ‘Guiding principles for partnerships for sustainable development (“type 2 outcomes”) to be elaborated by interested parties in the context of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD)’, presented at the Fourth Summit Preparatory Committee (PREPCOM 4), Bali, Indonesia.
Mayntz, R. 2004. Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? Köln: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H. and Schroeder, H. 2009. ‘Conceptualizing climate change governance beyond the international regime’, Global Environmental Politics 9: 58–78.
Pattberg, P. 2006. ‘The influence of global business regulation: beyond good corporate conduct’, Business and Society Review 111: 241–268.
Rieth, L., Zimmer, M., Hamann, R. and Hanks, J. 2007. ‘The UN Global Compact in Sub-Sahara Africa: decentralization and effectiveness’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 7: 83–99.
Rosenau, J. N. 1997. Along the Domestic–Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggie, J. G. 1993. ‘Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in International Relations’, International Organization 47: 139–174.
Schroeder, H. and Bulkeley, H. 2008. Governing Climate Change Post-2012: The Role of Global Cities – Los Angeles, Tyndall Briefing Note No. 33. Oxford, UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
Zacher, M. W. 1992. ‘The decaying pillars of the Westphalian temple: implications for international order and governance’, in Rosenau, J. N. and Czempiel, E. O. (eds.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–101.
Zürn, M. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.