Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:31:19.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Carbon market governance beyond the public–private divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Johannes Stripple
Affiliation:
Lund University
Eva Lövbrand
Affiliation:
Linköping University
Frank Biermann
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Philipp Pattberg
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Fariborz Zelli
Affiliation:
Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Despite current disagreements over the future climate policy architecture, carbon markets represent a central feature in most proposals to move society towards a low carbon economy. The worldwide creation of carbon markets is emblematic of the marketization trend in climate governance that accelerated after Russia’s ratification of the Kyoto Protocol in November 2004 – the crucial moment making the treaty legally binding. With the entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol, the inception of the EU emissions trading scheme in 2005 and the more recent emergence of regional carbon markets in North America, Australia and New Zealand, global transactions in emission reductions have become more than mere social imagining. As estimated by the World Bank (Capoor and Ambrosi 2008: 1), as much as 2983 million tonnes of carbon dioxide were traded by public and private actors in 2007 to a total value of USD 64 035 million.

In this chapter, we illustrate the agency beyond the state in contemporary carbon markets. However, in contrast to global governance studies (Rosenau 1999; Biersteker and Hall 2002), we do not conceptualize carbon market governance along the public–private continuum. Instead of asking which entities (for example public or private authorities) govern the carbon economy, we draw attention to the procedures by which carbon markets are made thinkable and operational as administrative domains in the first place. Hence, we analyse the complex body of knowledge, techniques and practices that have turned tradable carbon offsets into a governable reality. In particular, this chapter focuses on the multilateral verification, validation and certification practices of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) that have enabled the making of the ‘certified emission reduction’, and the private rules and standard-setting underpinning ‘voluntary’ or ‘verified emission reductions’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012
Architecture, Agency and Adaptation
, pp. 165 - 182
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, A. and Narain, S. 1991. Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1986. ‘Introduction: commodities and the politics of value’, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselt, H. van and Gupta, J. 2009 (in press). ‘Stretching too far: developing countries and the role of flexibility mechanisms beyond Kyoto’, Stanford Environmental Law Journal 28.Google Scholar
Biersteker, T. and Hall, R. H. (eds.) 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in International Affairs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bumpus, A. and Liverman, D. 2008. ‘Accumulation by decarbonisation and the governance of carbon’, Economic Geography 84: 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.Google Scholar
Callon, M. 2009. ‘Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 20: 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F. 2007. Market Devices. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Capoor, K. and Ambrosi, P. 2008. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. 1930. ‘A theory of upper atmospheric ozone’, Memoirs of the Royal Meteorological Society 3: 103–125.Google Scholar
Clayton, H. H. 1927. World Weather Records, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections No. 79. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Coase, R. 1960. ‘The problem of social cost’, Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, J. H. 1968a. ‘Land, water and ownership’, Canadian Journal of Economics 1: 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, J. H. 1968b. Pollution Property and Prices. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dean, M. 2004. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Det Norske Veritas 2005. Validation Report: Indur 7.5 Non-Conventional Renewable Sources Biomass Power Project in India, Report No. 2005–9008. Available at .
Det Norske Veritas 2006. Verification/Certification Report: Indur 7.5 Non-Conventional Renewable Sources Biomass Power Project in India, Report No. 2006–9116. CDM Registration No. 0391. Availabel at .
Falaleeva, M. and Stripple, J. 2008. CDM Post-2012: Practices, Possibilities, Politics, workshop report, Lund University, Sweden. Available at .Google Scholar
Haurwitz, B. 1948. ‘Insolation in relation to cloud type’, Journal of Meteorology 5: 110–113.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawn, A. 2006. ‘Carbon credits on eBay: subsistence farmers sell ecosystem services in a virtual marketplace’, Conservation Magazine 7: 4.Google Scholar
Hulme, M. 2007. ‘Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33: 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indur Green Power Pvt Ltd 2006. Monitoring Report Indur 7.5 Non-Conventional Renewable Sources Biomass Power Project in India, Reference No. UNFCCC 0391. Available at:
Larner, W. and Heron, R. L. 2004. ‘Globalizing benchmarking: participating at a distance in the globalizing economy’, in Larner, W. and Walters, W. (eds.), Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces. New York: Routledge, pp. 212–232.Google Scholar
Lemke, T. 2002. ‘Foucault, governmentality and critique’, Rethinking Marxism 14: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lövbrand, E. and Stripple, J. 2006. ‘The climate as political space: on the territorialization of the global carbon cycle’, Review of International Studies 32: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lövbrand, E., Nordqvist, J. and Rindefjäll, T. 2009 (in press). ‘Closing the legitimacy gap in global environmental governance: examples from the emerging CDM market’, Global Environmental Politics 9: 74–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2009. ‘Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34: 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. and Millo, Y. 2003. ‘Constructing a market, performing theory: the historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange’, American Journal of Sociology 109: 107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, P. and Rose, N. 2008. Governing the Present. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Paulsson, E. 2009. ‘A review of the CDM literature: from fine-tuning to critical scrutiny?’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 9: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattberg, P. 2007. Private Institutions and Global Governance: The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Power, M. K. 2003. ‘Auditing and the production of legitimacy’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 28: 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. and Miller, P. 1992. ‘Political power beyond the state: problematics of government’, British Journal of Sociology 43: 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N., O’Malley, P. and Valverde, M. 2006. ‘Governmentality’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2: 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, J. N. 1999. ‘Toward an ontology for global governance’, in Hewson, M. and Sinclair, T. (eds.), Global Governance Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 287–302.Google Scholar
Samuel, S. 2008. ‘The fishy business of eco-economics’, presented at the workshop Nature’s Accountability: Aggregation and Governmentality in the History of Sustainability organized by German Historical Institute, Washington DC, 9–11 October 2008. Available at
Schneider, L. 2008. A Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) with Atmospheric Benefits for a Post-2012 Climate Regime’. Freiburg, Germany: Oeko Institut. Available at Google Scholar
Voss, J.-P. 2007. ‘Innovation processes in governance: the development of “emissions trading” as a new policy instrument’. Science and Public Policy 34: 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weart, Spencer R. 2003. The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×