Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:21:57.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Partners in crime: the use of forensic DNA technologies in Austria

from Section 2 - National contexts of forensic DNA technologies and key issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

By
Barbara Prainsack
Edited by
Richard Hindmarsh  and
Barbara Prainsack
Richard Hindmarsh
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Barbara Prainsack
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION: AUSTRIA'S ‘FIRST SERIAL KILLER’ AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FORENSIC DNA DATABASE

In spring 2008, the small Alpine republic of Austria made it into world headlines in the reporting on a bizarre and disconcerting criminal activity. On 27 April, police had discovered a cellar dungeon in which 42-year-old Elisabeth F. had been abused and held captive by her father for 24 years. During that period she bore seven children, of whom six survived. Upon being rescued by the police, some of Elisabeth's children saw sunlight for the first time in their lives. The entire world was in shock.

Many Austrians remembered that this was not the first time they had made headlines with a horror story. Johann (‘Jack’) Unterweger, the illegitimate son of a Viennese prostitute and a member of the US Armed Forces, ‘gave Austria its first serial killer’, as an Austrian weblog put it. At age 24, Unterweger was sentenced to life in prison after murdering an 18-year-old German woman who, as he later stated, reminded him of his mother (Gepp 2007). He spent his life in prison writing short stories and he also authored a book, an autobiography titled Purgatory: A Journey to Jail (1983), which in a twist had also rendered him the darling of the local celebrity scene. Released from prison in 1990 – after having served only 16 years of his life sentence as a result of devoted lobbying efforts on the part of celebrity friends – Unterweger was celebrated as a model case of rehabilitation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genetic Suspects
Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing
 , pp. 153 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cole, S. A. (2000). Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, S. A. and Dioso, R. (2005). Law and the Lab. Wall Street Journal, 13 May, W13.Google Scholar
Dahl, J. (2008). Another side of the story: defence lawyers' views on DNA evidence. In Technologies of Insecurities: The Surveillance of Everyday Life, eds. Aas, K., Gundhus, H. and Lomell, H.. London: Routledge-Cavendish, pp. 219–237.Google Scholar
Duster, T. (2006). Explaining differential trust of DNA forensic technology: grounded assessment or inexplicable paranoia?Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 34, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (2009). ENFSI Survey on DNA Databases in Europe. The Hague: European Network of Forensic Science Instituteswww.enfsi.eu/page.php?uid=98 (accessed June 2009).Google Scholar
Gepp, J. (2007). Der geliebte Psychopath. [The Beloved Psychopath.] Falter 48, 28 November. www.falter.at/web/print/detail.php?id=598 (accessed June 2009).
Hewson, L. and Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2008). Using multimedia to support jury understanding of DNA profiling evidence. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 40, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houck, M. (2006). CSI: reality. Scientific American, 295, 84–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, T. and Magers, M. (2007). The perceived impacts of crime scene investigation shows on the administration of justice. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 14, 259–276.Google Scholar
Leake, J. (2007). The Vienna Woods Killer: A Writer's Double Life. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (2003). God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science. Endeavour, 27, 93–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, E. (2007). The new forensics: criminal justice, false certainty, and the second generation of scientific evidence. California Law Review, 95, 721–797Google Scholar
,Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007). The Forensic Use of Bioinformation: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethicswww.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/bioinformationuse/publication_441.html (accessed January 2009).Google Scholar
Prainsack, B. (2008a). Forum on the Nuffield report The Forensic Use of Bioinformation: Ethical Issues: An Austrian perspective. BioSocieties, 3, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prainsack, B. 2008b. Über Bio(a)soziale und uns, die wir über sie schreiben. [On bio(a)social people and us, who write about them.] In Gefährliche Menschenbilder. Biowissenschaften, Gesellschaft und Kriminalität [Dangerous human images. Biosciences, Society, and Criminality], eds. Böllinger, L., Krasmann, S. and Pilgram, A.Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 82–96.Google Scholar
Prainsack, B. and Kitzberger, M. (2009). DNA behind bars: other ways of knowing forensic DNA technologies. Social Studies of Science, 39, 51–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, J. (2000). Forensic Casebook of Crime. London: True Crime Library/Forum Press.Google Scholar
Schweizer, N. and Saks, M. (2007). The CSI effect: popular fiction about forensic science affects public expectations about real forensic science. Jurimetrics, 47, 357–364.Google Scholar
Unterweger, J. (1983). Fegefeuer oder Die Reise ins Zuchthaus, auflage 2 [Purgatory, or The Journey to Jail, 2nd edn]. Augsburg: Maro Verlag.Google Scholar
Kamp, N. and Dierickx, K. (2007). European Ethical-Legal Papers, No. 9: National Forensic DNA Databases in the EU. Leuven: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law.:.Google Scholar
Walker, C and Cram, I. (1990). DNA profiling and police powers. Criminal Law Review, 479–493.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×