Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Toom, Victor
2010.
Producing Suspects. The Politics of the National DNA Database of England and Wales.
Science as Culture,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
387.
Brettell, T. A.
Butler, J. M.
and
Almirall, J. R.
2011.
Forensic Science.
Analytical Chemistry,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 12,
p.
4539.
Toom, Victor
2012.
Forensic DNA databases in England and the Netherlands: governance, structure and performance compared.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
311.
Machado, Helena
and
Costa, Susana
2012.
Biolegalidade, imaginário forense e investigação criminal*.
Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais,
p.
61.
Kruger, Erin
2012.
Visualizing Uncertainty: Anomalous Images in Science and Law.
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
19.
Heinemann, Torsten
Lemke, Thomas
and
Prainsack, Barbara
2012.
Risky profiles: societal dimensions of forensic uses of DNA profiling technologies.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
249.
Wilson-Kovacs, Dana
Wyatt, David
and
Hauskeller, Christine
2012.
“A Faustian bargain?” Public voices on forensic DNA technologies and the National DNA Database.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
285.
Kruse, Corinna
2012.
Legal storytelling in pre-trial investigations: arguing for a wider perspective on forensic evidence.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
299.
Amorim, Antonio
2012.
Opening the DNA black box: demythologizing forensic genetics.
New Genetics and Society,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
259.
2012.
Law and the Technologies of the Twenty-First Century.
p.
72.
M’charek, Amade
Hagendijk, Rob
and
Vries, Wiebe de
2013.
Equal before the Law.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
542.
Lawless, Christopher J
2013.
The low template DNA profiling controversy: Biolegality and boundary work among forensic scientists.
Social Studies of Science,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
191.
Kruse, Corinna
2013.
The Bayesian approach to forensic evidence: Evaluating, communicating, and distributing responsibility.
Social Studies of Science,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 5,
p.
657.
Sager, Morten
Bragesjö, Fredrik
and
Elzinga, Aant
2013.
Emerging Health Technology.
p.
101.
Skinner, David
2013.
‘The NDNAD Has No Ability in Itself to be Discriminatory’: Ethnicity and the Governance of the UK National DNA Database.
Sociology,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 5,
p.
976.
Fonseca, Claudia
2013.
Mediações, tipos e figurações: reflexões em torno do uso da tecnologia DNA para identificação criminal.
Anuário Antropológico,
p.
09.
Machado, Helena
and
Costa, Susana
2013.
Biolegality, the Forensic Imaginary and Criminal Investigation*.
RCCS Annual Review,
M’charek, Amade
Schramm, Katharina
and
Skinner, David
2014.
Topologies of Race.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 4,
p.
468.
Williams, Robin
and
Wienroth, Matthias
2014.
The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know.
p.
70.
Williams, Robin
2014.
Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.