Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: May 2015

6 - Tests of the AdS/CFT correspondence

from Part II - Gauge/Gravity Duality

Summary

In the preceding chapter we introduced the conjectured duality of N = 4 Super Yang–Mills theory and IIB string theory on AdS5 × S5 as a map between the open and closed string pictures of D3-branes. As we explained, a proof of this duality would require a full non-perturbative understanding of quantised string theory in a curved space background. This is absent at present. This means that, to date, it is not possible to give a proof of the AdS/CFT correspondence.

Nevertheless, some very non-trivial tests of the conjectured duality are possible, for which observables are calculated on both sides and perfect agreement is found. Some of these tests are presented in this chapter. Generally, tests of the correspondence are possible for both the strong form and the weak form as defined in table 5.1, both of which require the N → ∞ limit on the field theory side to ensure a classical calculation on the gravity side. While tests for the strong form with the 't Hooft coupling λ fixed but arbitrary will be discussed in chapter 7, in this chapter we focus on tests for the weak form for which λ is taken to be large. This amounts to calculations in classical supergravity on the gravity side.

An important issue is that in the weak form, the AdS/CFT correspondence maps a quantum field theory in the strongly coupled regime to a gravity theory in the weakly coupled regime. In part III of this book, we will use this property to make non-trivial predictions for strongly coupled field theories which cannot be obtained by standard quantum field theory methods. However, for the tests considered here, our aim is to compare observables calculated perturbatively at weak coupling within quantum field theory to the same QFT observables calculated at strong coupling using the AdS/CFT correspondence. This implies that only calculations for observables independent of the coupling may be compared directly to each other.

[1] Lee, Sangmin, Minwalla, Shiraz, Rangamani, Mukund, and Seiberg, Nathan. 1998. Three-point functions of chiral operators in D = 4, N = 4 SYM at large N. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 697–718.
[2] Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Correlation functions in the CFTd/AdS correspondence. Nucl. Phys., B546, 96–118.
[3] D'Hoker, Eric, Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Extremal correlators in the AdS/CFT correspondence. ArXiv:hep-th/9908160.
[4] Penrose, R., and Rindler, W. 1986. Spinors and Space-Time.Vol. 2: Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry, Chapter 9. Cambridge University Press.
[5] Brown, J. David, and Henneaux, M. 1986. Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity. Commun. Math. Phys., 104, 207–226.
[6] Imbimbo, C., Schwimmer, A., Theisen, S., and Yankielowicz, S. 2000. Diffeomorphisms and holographic anomalies. Class. Quantum. Grav., 17, 1129–1138.
[7] D'Hoker, Eric, and Freedman, Daniel Z. 2002. Supersymmetric gauge theories and the AdS/CFT correspondence. TASI 2001 School Proceedings. ArXiv:hepth/0201253. 3–158.
[8] Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Comments on four-point functions in the CFT/AdS correspondence. Phys. Lett., B452, 61–68.
[9] Liu, Hong, and Tseytlin, Arkady A. 1999. On four-point functions in the CFT/AdS correspondence. Phys. Rev., D59, 086002.
[10] D'Hoker, Eric, and Freedman, Daniel Z. 1999. Gauge boson exchange in AdSd+1. Nucl. Phys., B544, 612–632.
[11] D'Hoker, Eric, and Freedman, Daniel Z. 1999. General scalar exchange in AdS(d+1). Nucl. Phys., B550, 261–288.
[12] D'Hoker, Eric, Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Graviton exchange and complete four-point functions in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Nucl. Phys., B562, 353–394.
[13] D'Hoker, Eric, Freedman, Daniel Z., and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. AdS/CFT four-point functions: how to succeed at z integrals without really trying. Nucl. Phys., B562, 395–411.
[14] Arutyunov, G., and Frolov, S. 2000. Four-point functions of lowest weight CPO's in N = 4 SYM in supergravity approximation. Phys. Rev., D62, 064016.
[15] Erdmenger, J., and Perez-Victoria, M. 2000. Nonrenormalization of next-to-extremal correlators in N = 4 SYM and the AdS/CFT correspondence. Phys. Rev., D62, 045008.
[16] Liu, Hong, and Tseytlin, Arkady A. 1998. D = 4 Super Yang-Mills, D = 5 gauged supergravity, and D = 4 conformal supergravity. Nucl. Phys., B533, 88–108.
[17] Arutyunov, G., and Frolov, S. 1999. Three-point Green function of the stress energy tensor in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Phys. Rev., D60, 026004.
[18] Capper, D. M., and Duff, M. J. 1974. Trace anomalies in dimensional regularization. Nuovo Cimento, A23, 173–183.
[19] Christensen, S. M., and Duff, M. J. 1978. Axial and conformal anomalies for arbitrary spin in gravity and supergravity. Phys. Lett., B76, 571.
[20] Henningson, M., and Skenderis, K. 1998. The holographic Weyl anomaly. J. High Energy Phys., 9807, 023.
[21] Henningson, M., and Skenderis, K. 2000. Holography and the Weyl anomaly. Fortschr. Phys., 48, 125–128.
[22] de Haro, Sebastian, Solodukhin, Sergey N., and Skenderis, Kostas. 2001. Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Commun. Math. Phys., 217, 595–622.
[23] Schwimmer, A., and Theisen, S. 2000. Diffeomorphisms, anomalies and the Fefferman-Graham ambiguity. J. High Energy Phys., 0008, 032.